There is no clear definition of a critical sized defect of the tibia. We defined it as a fracture gap at least one centimeter in length and involving over 50% of the cortical diameter. We explored if the presence of a critical-sized defect predicted reoperation, and which other factors predict reoperation in patients with the critical defect. The patient based outcomes of these patients were compared to patients without a critical defect. Patients enrolled in the SPRINT trial with a critical sized defect were evaluated for secondary interventions to gain union. Other factors predicting the need for reoperation were studied. We also compared the patients with critical sized defects to the larger cohort of patients without a defect with respect to demographics, injury mechanism, fracture characteristics, and patient-based outcome.Purpose
Method
Our hypothesis was that closed tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nails are impacted by surgeon and center volumes. Data from 813 patients with closed tibia fractures were obtained from the SPRINT study. Using multiple regression, we examined the effect of center and surgeon volume (categorized as high, moderate, or low), and geographic differences by country (Canada, USA, and the Netherlands) on health-related quality-of-life and revision surgeries to gain union at one year. Our measures of quality-of-life were the Short-Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36 PCS) and the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA).Purpose
Method
We explored the role of patients beliefs and attitudes towards their likelihood of recovery from severe physical trauma. We developed and validated an instrument designed to capture the impact of patients beliefs and attitudes towards functional recovery from injury; the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping (SPOC) questionnaire. At six weeks post-surgical fixation, we administered the SPOC questionnaire to 359 consecutive patients with operatively managed tibial shaft fractures. We constructed multi-variable regression models to explore the association between SPOC scores and functional outcome at one year, as measured by return to work and Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores.Purpose
Method
Using utilities and other outcome data collected prospectively on all SPRINT patients and cost data collected from a sample of SPRINT patients, we compared reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing using a cost-utility analysis. Participants completed the Health Utility Index 3 (HUI) questionnaire at two weeks after hospital discharge, and three, six, and 12 months post-surgery. We calculated quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for each patient for the first 12 months following intramedullary nailing. A convenience sample of 235 SPRINT patients with similar baseline characteristics provided data on healthcare resource utilization. Costs associated with the healthcare resource utilization were obtained from the 2008 Physicians Schedule of Benefits and a Case Costing System.Purpose
Method
The SPRINT trial randomized 1226 patients with tibial shaft fractures treated by intramedullary (IM) nailing to reamed versus unreamed groups. Using data from this trial, we completed a subgroup analysis of those patients who required two or more reoperations following the initial IM fracture stabilization. We identified 44 patients with tibial shaft fractures who required two or more reoperations following IM nailing. We considered those that were reamed vs unreamed, open vs closed, those that were planned for reoperation after the 12 month follow up, and the indications for reoperation.Purpose
Method
