This study aimed to determine if the adoption of collagenase treatment is economically viable.

Xiapex collagenase was trialled at Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust in 50 patients suitable for fasciectomy, with a palpable cord and up to two affected joints. Retrospective data for contracture angle pre-injection, immediately post-manipulation and at an average 6 weeks (range 2–17) clinic follow up was collected from medical notes. At follow up the post-procedure number of days required for return to activities of daily living (ADLs) and/or work were recorded, along with overall patient satisfaction rating.

Complete data was obtained for 43 patients of average age 67 (range 45–82). At follow up 88% had ≤ 20° residual contracture. Average days return to full ADLs was 9 and work was 11. Overall satisfaction was 8.6 out of 10. Xiapex patients required an average 1 hand physiotherapy appointment post-manipulation compared to 6 for fasciectomy, saving £172.20. Total cost for one treatment course, excluding physiotherapy, was £1166 for Xiapex compared to £2801 for palmar fasciectomy and £5352 for digital fasciectomy.

The level of contracture after one Xiapex treatment course permitted return of hand function in the majority of patients whose overall treatment course required less financial and hospital resources.

The cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement has been demonstrated to have superior fixation on radiographs and a similar early complication rate compared with the cemented version. However, a small number of cases have come to our attention where, after an apparently successful procedure, the tibial component subsides into a valgus position with an increased posterior slope, before becoming well-fixed. We present the clinical and radiological findings of these six patients and describe their natural history and the likely causes. Two underwent revision in the early post-operative period, and in four the implant stabilised and became well-fixed radiologically with a good functional outcome.

This situation appears to be avoidable by minor modifications to the operative technique, and it appears that it can be treated conservatively in most patients.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:345–9.

Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) is associated with fewer complications, faster recovery and better function than Total Knee Replacement (TKR). However, joint registries demonstrate a higher revision rate in UKR, limiting its use. Currently most UKRs are cemented and performed using a minimally invasive technique. In joint registries, common reasons for revision include aseptic loosening and pain. These problems could potentially be addressed by using cementless implants, which may provide more reliable fixation.

The objectives of this study were to compare the quality of fixation (determined by the incidence and appearance of radiolucencies), and clinical outcomes of cemented and cementless UKR at five years.

A randomised controlled trial was established with 63 knees (62 patients) randomised to either cemented (32 patients) or cementless UKR (30 patients). Fixation was assessed with fluoroscopic radiographs aligned to the bone-implant interface at one and five years. Outcome scores were collected pre-operatively and at one, two and five years, including Oxford Knee Score (OKS), American Knee Society Score, objective and functional (AKSS-O/F) and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), expressed as absolute scores and 0–5 year change (δ) scores.

Four patients died during the study period. There were no revisions. Mean operative time was 11 minutes shorter in the cementless group (p=0.029). At five years, there was no significant difference in any outcome measure except AKSS-F and δAKSS-F which were significantly better in the cementless group (both p=0.003). There were no femoral radiolucencies in either group. There were significantly more tibial radiolucencies in the cemented group (20/30 vs 2/27, p< 0.001). There were nine complete radiolucencies in the cemented group and none in the cementless group (p< 0.001).

Cementless fixation provides improved fixation at five years compared to cemented fixation in UKR, maintaining equivalent or superior clinical outcomes with a shorter operative time and no increase in complications.

Indications for Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) vary between units. Some authors have suggested, and many surgeons believe, that medial UKA should only be performed in patients who localise their pain to the medial joint line. This is despite research showing a poor correlation between patient-reported location of pain and radiological or operative findings in osteoarthritis. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of patient-reported pre-operative pain location and functional outcome of UKA at one and five years.

Pre-operative pain location data were collected for 406 knees (380 patients) undergoing Oxford medial UKA. Oxford Knee Score, American Knee Society Scores and Tegner activity scale were recorded preoperatively and at follow-up. 272/406 (67%) had pure medial pain, 25/406 (6%) had pure anterior knee pain and 109/406 (27%) had mixed or generalised pain. None had pure lateral pain. The primary outcome interval is one year; 132/406 patients had attained five years by the time of analysis and their five year data is presented.

At one and five years, each group had improved significantly by each measure (mean δOKS 15.6 (SD 8.9) at year one, 16.3 (9.3) at year five). There was no difference between the groups, nor between patients with and without anterior knee pain or isolated medial pain.

We have found no correlation between preoperative pain location and outcome. We conclude that localised medial pain should not be a prerequisite to UKA and that it may be performed in patients with generalised or anterior knee pain.

Introduction

The results of the mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing with a five year survival of 82%. Therefore, it is recommended that mobile bearings should not be used for lateral UKR. This low survivorship is primarily due to high dislocation rate, all occurring in the first year. A detailed analysis of the causes of bearing dislocation confirmed the elevated lateral tibial joint line to be a contributory factor. A new surgical technique was therefore introduced in which care was taken neither to remove too much bone from distal femur nor to over tighten the knee and thus ensure that the tibial joint line was not elevated. Other modifications to the technique were also introduced including use of a domed tibial component.

Introduction

Kozinn and Scott have made recommendations about contra-indications for unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). They suggest that patients younger than 60, weight > 82 kilograms, patients with exposed bone in patella-femoral compartment or patients who are physically active/perform heavy labour should not be offered a UKR. In addition, chondrocalcinosis is a contra-indication. These strict selection criteria are based on the experience with fixed bearing UKAs and are more intuitive than evidence based. The Oxford UKR has a fully congruous mobile bearing and has been shown to have minimal wear. Over the past 25 years, the Oxford Group has followed a standardised protocol for patient selection for UKR. We ignore patella-femoral joint pathology, chondrocalcinosis, patient's age, weight and activity level when deciding the suitability for UKR.

Purpose of Study

To assess the incidence of radiolucency in cemented and cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement at two years.

The results of mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing (five-year survival: 82%). Therefore, it is recommended that mobile bearings should not be used for lateral UKR. This low survivorship is primarily due to a high dislocation rate. A detailed analysis confirmed the elevated lateral tibial joint line to be a contributory factor to bearing dislocation. A new surgical technique was therefore introduced in which care was taken neither to remove too much bone from the distal femur nor to over tighten the knee and therefore ensure that the tibial joint line was not elevated. Other modifications included use of a domed tibial component.

The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of these iterations: the original series (series I), those with improved surgical technique (series II) and the domed tibial component (series III). The primary outcome measure was bearing dislocation at one year. One year was chosen as all the dislocations in the first series occurred within a year. In the original series (n=53), implanted using a standard open approach, there were six dislocations in the first year, the average flexion 110°, and 95% had no/mild pain on activity. In the second series (n=65), there were 3 dislocations, the average flexion was 117°, and 80% had no/mild pain on activity.

In the third series with the modified technique and a convex domed tibial plateau, there was one dislocation, average flexion was 125° and 94% had no/mild pain on activity. At four years the cumulative primary dislocation rates were 10%, 5% and 0% respectively, and were significantly different (p=0.04).

The improved surgical technique and implant design has reduced dislocation rate to an acceptable level so a mobile bearing can now be recommended for lateral UKR.

About ten years ago we introduced sophisticated instrumentation and an increased range of component sizes for the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) to facilitate a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach. The device is now routinely implanted through an incision from the medial pole of the patella to the tibial tuberosity. This has resulted in a more rapid recovery and an improved functional result. As the access to the knee is limited there is a concern that the long term results may be compromised. The aim of this study was to determine the 10 year survival.

A prospective follow up of all Phase 3 minimally invasive Oxford UKR implanted by two senior authors (DWM & CAFD) has been undertaken. So far 1015 UKRs have been implanted for anteromedial osteoarthritis. All patients received a cemented implant through a MIS approach and were followed up prospectively by an independent observer. The data was collected prospectively regarding pre-operative status, complications and clinical as well as functional outcome at predetermined intervals.

The average age of patients was 66.4 years (range: 33 – 88) with mean Oxford Knee Score 41 (SD: 7.9) at the time of last follow up, Knee Society Score (objective) of 84 (SD: 13) and Knee Society Score (functional) of 83 (SD: 21). At ten years the survival of this cohort is 96%. There were 22 revisions including 7 for progression of arthritis, 5 for infection, 5 for bearing dislocation, 4 for unexplained pain and one for rupture of ACL secondary to trauma.

We conclude that the Oxford Knee can be implanted reliably through a minimally invasive approach, giving excellent long term results.

Introduction: Most unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs) employ cement for fixation of the prosthetic components to the bone. The information in the literature about the relative merits of cemented and cementless UKR is contradictory, with some favouring cementless fixation while others favouring cemented fixation. There is concern about the radiolucency which frequently develops around the tibial component with cemented fixations. The exact cause of the occurrence of radiolucency is unknown but according to some, it may suggest suboptimal fixation.

Method: Following ethical approval, 62 patients with medial OA were randomised to receive either cemented (n=31) or cementless components (n=31). All patients underwent identical surgical procedure with either a cemented or cementless Oxford UKR. Patients were assessed clinically and radiologically. The x-rays were taken with an image intensifier (I.I.). The position of the I.I. was adjusted until it was perfectly aligned with the tibial bone-implant interface thereby allowing accurate assessment of presence and extent of the radiolucency.

Results: The patients in the two groups were well matched. There was no significant difference in the clinical scores between the two groups. The mean OKS for the cemented group was 40 (± 8.3) and 42 (± 4.6) for cementless group. Narrow radiolucent lines were seen at the bone-implant interfaces of 75% of the cemented tibial components; partial in 43% and complete in 32%. In the cementless implants, partial radiolucencies were seen in 7% and complete radiolucencies in none. The differences are statistically highly significant (p< 0.0001) and imply satisfactory bone ingrowth into the cementless implants.

Conclusions: The method of fixation influences the incidence of radiolucency. With identical designs, no patient with cementless components developed any complete radiolucency. The observation raises the question as to whether cementless rather than cemented components should be routinely used for UKR.

Introduction: The results of the mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing with a five year survival of 82%. Therefore, it is recommended that mobile bearings should not be used for lateral UKR. This low survivorship is primarily due to high dislocation rate, all occurring in the first year. A detailed analysis of the causes of bearing dislocation confirmed the elevated lateral tibial joint line to be a contributory factor. A new surgical technique was therefore introduced in which care was taken neither to remove too much bone from the distal femur nor to over tighten the knee and therefore ensure that the tibial joint line was not elevated. Other modifications to the technique were also introduced including use of a domed tibial component.

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of these iterations: the original series [series I], Series II with improved surgical technique and the domed tibial component [Series III].

Method: The primary assessment of outcome was bearing dislocation at one year. One year was chosen as all the dislocations in the first series occurred within a year. In series I, there were 53 knees, in series II 65 knees and in series III 60 knees, all with a minimum of one year follow up.

Results: In series I, there were 6 bearing dislocations (11%) and the average range of movement (ROM) was 110°. In the second series, there were 2 dislocations (3%) and the average ROM was 118°. In the third series, there were no primary dislocations and the average ROM was 125°.

Conclusions: The improved surgical technique and implant design has reduced the dislocation rate to an acceptable level so a mobile bearing can now be recommended for lateral UKR.

The purpose of this study was to determine if a single physiotherapy intervention would enable patients to kneel following Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

Kneeling is an important functional activity that is frequently not performed after knee arthroplasty, thus affecting a patient’s ability to carry out basic tasks of everyday life. There is however no clinical reason why patients should not kneel and many with proposed knee surgery ask about the possibility of kneeling after their operation.

Sixty adults participated in a prospective randomised controlled trial with blinded assessments. At 6 weeks post-operatively UKA patients were randomised to either the Routine care group where no advice on kneeling was given or to the Kneeling intervention group where participants were taught and given advice on how to kneel and were encouraged to do so. They were re-assessed at 1 year. The primary outcome measure was Question 7 of the Oxford Knee Score which asks the question “Could you kneel down and get up again afterwards?”

Pre-operatively there was no difference in the kneeling ability of the two groups. At 1 year the difference in kneeling ability between the two groups was highly significant (p< 0.05). Spearman’s correlation coefficient showed no significant association between a change in score of Question 7 at 1 year and the following factors; scar position, numbness, range of flexion, arthritic involvement of other joints and pain. Linear regression analysis also confirmed that these factors were not successful in predicting a change in kneeling ability.

This study showed that the single factor predictive of kneeling ability was the physiotherapy intervention provided at 6 weeks post-operatively and it is suggested that kneeling should be incorporated into patient’s post-operative rehabilitation programmes.

Introduction: Treatment options for the young active patient with isolated symptomatic medial compartment OA and pre-existing ACL deficiency are limited. Implant longevity and activity levels may preclude TKA, whilst HTO and unicompartmentasl knee arythroplasty (UKA) are unreliable due to ligamentous instability. UKAs tend to fail because of wear or tibial loosening resulting from eccentric loading. Combined UKA and ACL reconstruction may therefore be a solution.

Method: Fifteen patients with combined ACL reconstruction and Oxford UKA (ACLR group), were matched (age, gender and follow-up period) with 15 patients with Oxford UKA with intact ACL (ACLI group). Prospectively collected clinical and x-ray data from the last follow-up (minimum 3 years, range: 3 – 5) were compared. Ten patients from each group also underwent in-vivo kinematic assessment using a standardised protocol.

Results: At the last follow-up, the clinical outcome for the two groups were similar. One ACLR patient needed revision due to infection. Radiological assessment did not show any significant difference between relative component positions and none of the patients had pathological radiolucencies suggestive of component loosening. Kinematic assessment showed posterior placement of the femur on tibia in extension for the ACLR group, which corrected with further flexion.

Conclusions: The short-term clinical results of combined ACL reconstruction and UKA are excellent. Lack of pathological radiolucencies and near normal knee kinematics suggest that early tibial loosening due to eccentric loading is unlikely.

Purpose: Varus deformity after total knee replacement (TKR) is associated with poor outcome. This aim of this study was to determine whether the same is true for medial unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA).

Methods: 158 patients implanted with the Oxford UKA, using a minimally invasive approach, were studied prospectively for five years. Leg alignment was measured with a long-arm goniometer referenced from Anterior Superior Iliac Spine, centre of patella and centre of ankle. Patients were grouped according to the American Knee Society Score (AKSS). Group A: > 0° varus (n=13, 8.2%); Group B: 0 to 4° valgus (n=39, 24.7%); Group C: 5–10° valgus (normal alignment, n=106, 67.12%). Comparisons were made between the three groups in terms of the absolute and the change in Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and AKSS over the five year period, and the presence of radiolucency.

Results: There was no significant difference in any outcome measure except for Objective-AKSS (p< 0.001). The means and standard deviations of the ΔOKS for the groups were:

24 ± 5,

The frequency of five year radiolucency for the groups A, B, and C were 42%, 35%, and 45% respectively.

Conclusion: The aim of the Oxford UKA is to restore knee kinematics and thus knee alignment to the pre-disease state. Therefore, as demonstrated by this study, about 30% of patients have varus alignment. This study also demonstrates that post-operative varus alignment does not compromise the outcome. The only score which did show worse outcome was the Objective-AKSS. This is because 10 or 20 points are deducted for varus alignment, which is not appropriate following UKA. Therefore, AKSS in its present form is not a reliable tool for assessment of UKA.

Introduction: The information in the literature about the relative merits of cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is contradictory, with some favouring cementless fixation while others favouring cemented fixation. Cemented fixations give good survivorship but there is concern about the radiolucency which frequently develops around the tibial component. The exact cause of the occurrence of radiolucency is unknown but according to some, it may suggest suboptimal fixation.

Method: Sixty-two knees (31 in each group) were randomised to receive either cemented or cementless UKR components. The components were similar except that the cementless had a porous titanium and hydroxyappatite (HA) coating. Patients were prospectively assessed by an independent observer pre-operatively and annually thereafter. The clinical assessment included Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Scores and Tegner activity score. Fluoroscopically aligned radiographs were assessed for thickness and extent of radiolucency under the tibial implant.

Results: At one year there were no differences in the clinical outcome between the groups and there were no loose components. No radiolucencies thicker than 1mm were seen. At one year none of the cementless tibias and 30% of the cemented tibias had complete radiolucencies. One out of 31 cementless (3%) and 12 out of 31 cemented (39%) had partial radiolucencies. This difference between these two groups was high significant (p< 0 0001).

Conclusions: This study clearly demonstrates that the incidence of radiolucency beneath the tibial component is influenced by component design and method of fixation. With identical designs of tibial component none of the cementless components developed complete radiolucences whereas 30% of the cemented components did. We conclude that HA achieves better bone integration than cement.

Oxford Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is now performed using a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technique. Although early results are encouraging, the studies assessing outcome could be criticised for the restricted number of patients and limited follow-up. Aim of this study was to assess clinical outcome and prosthetic survival rate inpatients with minimally invasive Oxford medial UKA.

This prospective study assessed 500 consecutive patients, who underwent cemented Oxford UKA for medial OA using MIS technique. Patients were assessed using objective and functional Knee Society Score (KSS).

This study has confirmed preliminary findings that Oxford UKA using a minimally invasive approach is safe, reliable and effective.

Introduction: The indications for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remain controversial; in particular, those relating to the state of the patello-femoral joint (PFJ). Some authorities consider the presence of anterior knee pain (AKP) and/or full thickness cartilage loss (FTCL) to be a contraindication. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of patello-femoral problems on the outcome of medial UKA.

Materials and Methods: This prospective study involved one hundred knees with cemented medial Oxford UKA (phase 3), via a minimally invasive approach. Pre-operatively presence or absence of AKP was noted. The cartilage status of medial and lateral patello-femoral joint was grade and recorded intra-operatively. Outcome was evaluated at one-year with the Knee Society Score and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS).

Results: 54% of patients had pre-operative AKP. The clinical outcome at one year was not dependent on the presence or absence of pre-operative AKP [OKS: 40.2 (± 8.2) for patients without pre-op. AKP and OKS: 40.8 ((± 6.8) for patients with pre-operative AKP]. 35% of patients had FTCL seen at operation in the PFJ. The outcome at one year was independent of the state of the medial and/or lateral PFJ [OKS = 40.7 (± 7) with normal or partial thickness cartilage loss and OKS = 39.8 (± 7) with full thickness cartilage loss in PFJ]

Conclusions: These short-term results suggest that for the Oxford UKA the presence of anterior knee pain or full thickness cartilage damage in patello-femoral joint should not be considered to be a contraindication.

Introduction: The indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remain controversial; in particular, the threshold of disease in the patellofemoral compartment is debated. Whilst some authorities ignore the condition of the patellofemoral joint, others consider pre-existing patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) a contraindication to UKA. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of PFOA on the outcome of medial UKA.

Methodology: This prospective study involved one hundred consecutive patients who had undergone cemented medial Oxford UKA (phase 3), via a minimally invasive approach, at least one year previously. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of full thickness cartilage loss (FTCL) on the patella or trochlea at operation. Outcome was evaluated with the Knee Society Score (AKSS) and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS, maximum 48). Groups were compared for differences in knee score and intra-operative cartilage status of PFJ using a one way ANOVA. Repeat analysis was performed using the presence of anterior knee pain (AKP) as the group defining variable.

Results: There were 35 patients with FTCL and 65 without. Both groups were well matched for age, gender and activity levels. No significant difference in post operative knee scores existed between groups for the pre-operative presence of FTCL (OKS = 40 in both groups). Similar, non significant, results were found when the pre-operative presence of AKP was used as a group defining factor (OKS 40 Vs 39). The study was sufficiently powered to avoid type II error.

Conclusion: Intra-operative evidence of PFOA in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis does not prejudice the outcome of UKA at one year. Moreover, the inclusion of patients with symptomatic AKP (with or without concurrent PFOA) also appears not to influence the outcome after UKA.

Introduction: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an increasingly popular procedure for young osteoarthritic patients whose age and activity levels preclude the use of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, successful reconstruction using an unconstrained mobile bearing implant requires an intact and functioning ACL. Patients with isolated medial compartment OA and an absent ACL therefore provide a management dilemma for the treating surgeon. One option is to perform a combined ACL reconstruction and mobile bearing UKA. This paper presents early results of this new procedure using an Oxford UKA and ACL reconstruction using an autograft.

Materials and Methods: Eleven patients who underwent one or two-staged ACL reconstruction and Oxford UKA for treatment of symptomatic medial compartment OA were reviewed at one year after surgery. The combined procedure required specific precautions and considerations; care had to be taken to place the tibial tunnel as far laterally as possible to avoid impingement of the graft by the tibial implant. Also, the presence of a posteromedial, rather than an anteromedial cartilage defect has the potential to reduce accuracy for placement of the initial tibial cut.

Results: All patients were male with an average age of 49 years (range: 36 – 52) and mean follow up of 1.3 years. One patient needed revision to TKA due to infection. The objective and functional knee society scores improved pre to post operatively from 55 to 98, and 85 to 100, respectively.

Conclusions: ACL reconstruction and simultaneous or staged UKA is a viable treatment option for patients with symptomatic medial compartment arthritis in whom the ACL is absent. Early results of this technically demanding procedure are encouraging but longer follow-up is required.

Introduction: Oxford Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is now performed using a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technique. Although early results are encouraging, the studies assessing outcome could be criticised for the restricted number of patients and centres involved. A multi-centre follow-up of patients is required to confirm the preliminary findings.

Aim: To examine early clinical outcome in patients with minimally invasive Oxford medial UKA using a multi-centre, multi-surgeon design.

Materials and Methods: This prospective study was carried out in three centres with involvement of six surgeons. All patients undergoing cemented Oxford UKA for medial OA using MIS were included. 231 consecutive UKAs with a minimum follow up of 2 years (mean: 2.84) were assessed using objective and functional Knee Society Score (KSS).

Results: There were 108 females and 102 males (21-bilateral) with average age of 66.8 years (42 – 86). No significant difference was noted between various age groups or between different surgeons. Three knees were revised: one for infection, one for unexplained pain and one for bearing dislocation. Cumulative survival rate at 2 years was 98.6% with 93% patients having good or excellent KSS rating.

Conclusions: This multi-centre study has confirmed preliminary findings that Oxford UKA using a minimally invasive approach is safe and effective.