For dorsal stabilization, rigid implant systems are be coming increasingly complemented by numerous dynamic systems based on pedicle screws. Numerous posterior non-fusion systems have been developed within the past decade to resolve the disadvantages of rigid instrumentations and preserve spinal motion. For dorsal stabilization, rigid implant systems are becoming increasingly complemented by numerous dynamic systems based on pedicle screws and varying direction. However, it is still unclear which direction is most suitable to accomplish a physiologically related dynamic stabilization, and which loadings conditions are induced to the implants. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a new telescopic dynamic stabilization device. Evaluation of the effects on the dynamic stabilization of the spine in terms of segmental range of motion (RoM), and implant loadings.Background
Purpose
While the biomechanical properties of trans-pedicular screws have proven to be superior in the lumbar spine, little is known concerning pullout strength of trans-pedicle screws in comparison to different distal terminal constructs like sublaminar hooks alone, trans pedicular screws with sublaminar hooks and clow hooks alone in the thoracolumbar spine surgery. In vitro biomechanical pullout testing was performed to evaluate the axial pullout strength of four different distal terminal constructs in thoracolumbar spine surgery. 32 fresh-frozen lamb spines were used. The lamb spines were divided into four groups, each group is composed of eight lamb spine cadavers with a different distal fixation pattern was used to terminate the construct at L1. (Group 1) trans-pedicular screws alone, (Group 2) sublaminar hooks alone, (Group 3) trans-pedicular screws augmented with a sublaminar hooks via a domino connector and (Group 4) clow hooks alone.Background
Methods
