An intra-articular steroid injection can be a useful diagnostic tool in patients presenting with debilitating hip pain and radiographically mild osteoarthritis. The clinical and patient reported outcomes associated with patients who have radiographically mild osteoarthritis and undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain poorly studied. Patients undergoing primary, elective THA at a single academic medical center by a fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeon between 2017–2023 were identified. Only those patients who underwent an intra-articular corticosteroid injection into the operative hip within one year of surgery were included. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the severity of their osteoarthritis as determined by preoperative radiographs; those with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade I-II arthritis were classified as “mild” whereas those with KL grade III-IV arthritis were classified as “severe”. Clinical and patient reported outcomes at final follow-up were compared between cohorts. The final cohorts included 25 and 224 patients with radiographically mild and severe osteoarthritis, respectively. There were no baseline differences in age, gender or time between intra-articular corticosteroid injection and THA between cohorts. There were no significant differences in the preoperative or postoperative HOOS JR values between patients with mild or severe arthritis (all Patients with radiographically mild osteoarthritis who feel relief of their hip pain following an intra-articular corticosteroid injection report similar preoperative debility and demonstrate similar improvements in patient reported outcome scores following THA compared to patients with radiographically severe osteoarthritis.
Advances in surgical technique and implant design may influence the incidence and mechanism of failure resulting in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). The purpose of the current study was to characterize aetiologies requiring rTHA, and to determine whether temporal changes existed in these aetiologies over a ten-year period. All rTHAs performed at a single institution from 2009 to 2019 were identified. Demographic information and mode of implant failure was obtained for all patients. Data for rTHA were stratified into two time periods to assess for temporal changes: 2009 to 2013, and 2014 to 2019. Operative reports, radiological imaging, and current procedural terminology (CPT) codes were cross-checked to ensure the accurate classification of revision aetiology for each patient.Aims
Methods
Total hip replacement failure due to fretting-corrosion remains a clinical concern. We recently described that damage within CoCrMo femoral heads can occur either by mechanically-dominated fretting processes leading to imprinting (via rough trunnions) and surface fretting (via smooth trunnions), or by a chemically-dominated etching process along preferential corrosion sites, termed “column damage”. These corrosion sites occur due to banding of the alloy microstructure. Banding is likely caused during thermo-mechanical processing of the alloy and is characterized by local molybdenum depletion. It was the objective of this study to quantify material loss from femoral heads with severe corrosion, identify the underlying damage modes, and to correlate the damage to the alloy's microstructure. 105 femoral heads with a Goldberg score 4 were evaluated. Coordinate measuring machine data was used to compute material loss and visualize damage features. Time Introduction
Methods
Wound complications following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) are associated with an increased risk of superficial and deep infections. Closed incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been reported to decrease this risk. This study's purpose was to assess if ciNPT decreases the rate of wound complications following revision THA versus a conventional, silver-impregnated dressing. This was a single center, randomized controlled trial of patients undergoing both septic and aseptic revision THA. Patients received either ciNPT or a silver-impregnated dressing (control) for 7 days. Wound complications within 90 days of the procedure were recorded, including: surgical site infection (SSI), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), prolonged drainage greater than 5 days, erythema requiring antibiotics, and hematoma formation. An Introduction
Methods
Improper seating during head/stem assembly can lead to unintended micromotion between the femoral head and stem taper—resulting in fretting corrosion and implant failure.1 There is no consensus—either by manufacturers or by the surgical community—on what head/stem taper assembly method maximizes modular junction stability in total hip arthroplasty (THA). A 2018 clinical survey2 found that orthopedic surgeons prefer applying one strike or three, subsequent strikes when assembling head/stem taper. However, it has been suggested that additional strikes may lead to decreased interference strength. Additionally, the taper surface finish—micro-grooves—has been shown to affect taper interference strength and may be influenced by assembly method. The objective of this study was to employ a novel, micro-grooved finite element (FEA) model of the hip taper interface and assess the role of head/stem assembly method—one vs three strikes—on modular taper junction stability. A two-dimensional, axisymmetric FEA model representative of a CoCrMo femoral head taper and Ti6Al4V stem taper was created using median geometrical measurements taken from over 100 retrieved implants.3 Surface finish—micro-grooves—of the head/stem taper were modeled using a sinusoidal function with amplitude and period corresponding to retrieval measurements of micro-groove height and spacing, respectively. Two stem taper micro-groove geometries— “rough” and “smooth”—were modeled corresponding to the median and 5th percentile height and spacing measurements from retrievals. All models had a 3' (0.05°), proximal-locked angular mismatch between the tapers. To simulate implant assembly during surgery, multiple dynamic loads (4kN, 8kN, and 12kN) were applied to the femoral head taper in a sequence of one or three strikes. The input load profile (Figure 1) used for both cases was collected from surgeons assembling an experimental setup with a three-dimensional load sensor. Models were assembled and meshed in ABAQUS Standard (v 6.17) using four-node linear hexahedral, reduced integration elements. Friction was modeled between the stem and head taper using surface-to-surface formulation with penalty contact (µ=0.2). A total of 12 implicit, dynamic simulations (3 loads × 2 assembly sequences × 2 stem taper surface finishes) were run, with 2 static simulations at 4kN for evaluating inertial effects. Outcome variables included contact area, contact pressure, equivalent plastic strain, and pull-off force.Introduction
Methods
