Purpose

The management of moderate to large engaging Hill-Sachs lesions is controversial and surgical options include remplissage, allograft reconstruction, and partial resurfacing arthroplasty. Few in-vitro studies have quantified their biomechanical characteristics and none have made direct comparisons. The purpose of this study was to compare joint stability and range of motion (ROM) among these procedures using an in-vitro shoulder simulator. It was hypothesized that all procedures would prevent defect engagement, but allograft and partial resurfacing would most accurately restore intact biomechanics; while remplissage would provide the greatest stabilization, possibly at the expense of motion.

Purpose: This prospective, randomized double-blinded clinical trial compared cemented fixation of the humeral component to uncemented/tissue-in-growth fixation in total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder.

Method: All patients presenting with primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder requiring replacement were screened for eligibility. Patients were randomized in the operating room after glenoid preparation to the cemented or uncemented group by a computer-generated, stratified randomization procedure. Outcome measures included disease specific QOL assessment (WOOS), SF-12, ASES, MACTAR, radiographic evaluation of component fixation, operative time, complications and revision surgery. Patients were assessed by a blinded evaluator in post-operative intervals of 2 and 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary endpoint was the WOOS score at 2 years.

Results: One hundred and sixty-one patients were consented and randomized for the study. There were 80 patients in the cemented and 81 patients in the uncemented group. At baseline, the groups were alike with regards to demographics and baseline evaluations. The WOOS scores at post-operative intervals of 12, 18 and 24 months showed a significant difference (p=0.009, 0.001, 0.028 respectively) in favour of the cemented group. The cemented group also had better strength (3 m p=0.038, 12 m p= 0.036, 18 m p=0.051, 24 m p=0.053) and forward flexion (6m p=0.031, 12 m p=0.04). As expected, the operative time was significantly less for the uncemented group (C = 2.26h +/−.63; U = 1.69h +/− 1.9, p= 0.03).

Conclusion: These findings provide the first evidence that cemented fixation of the humeral head provides better quality of life, strength and ROM than uncemented fixation. This was a Tier 1 Project of the JOINTs Canada group.

Summary Results of this two-group parallel design randomised controlled trial indicated one and two year outcomes following ACL reconstruction were not different in one hundred and fifty patients using either an ACL functional knee brace or neoprene knee sleeve. Introduction: The primary objective of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes in patients using an ACL functional knee brace and patients using a neoprene knee sleeve

One hundred and fifty patients were randomised to receive an ACL functional knee brace (n=76) or a neoprene sleeve (n=74) at their six week postoperative visit following primary ACL reconstruction. Patients were instructed to wear the knee orthosis during participation in all physical activities. Patients were assessed preoperatively, six weeks, six, twelve, eighteen and twenty-four months postoperatively. Outcome measures included disease-specific quality of life (ACL QOL), KT 1000 and single limb forward hop test administered by a blinded research assistant. One and two-year outcomes were compared after adjusting for baseline scores. A priori directional subgroup hypotheses based on time from injury to surgery, pre-operative KT 1000 scores, and one and two-year compliance scores were evaluated using tests for interactions. Analysis was completed on an intention-to-treat basis.

There were no significant between-group differences for any of the outcomes at one and two-year follow-ups. Mean between-group differences at two years were: 2.87% (95% CI: −3.85 – 9.60) for the ACL QOL, 0.07mm (95% CI: −0.80 – 0.93) for KT 1000 side-to-side difference, and 2.64% (95% CI: −4.57 – 9.85) for hop limb symmetry index. There were no significant subgroup findings and adverse events were similar between groups.

Confidence intervals for between-group differences are narrow and exclude clinically important differences. These findings suggest a functional knee brace does not result in superior outcomes over a neoprene sleeve following ACL reconstruction.

Thirty-six patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency and varus malalignment were treated with combined ACL reconstruction and medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Average follow-up was twenty-five months. All patients had improved ligamentous stability and twenty-five patients returned to full activities. Osteotomy union rate was 100%, mechanical axis angle was corrected from six degrees varus to neutral and the mechanical axis deviation was corrected from 2cm medial to 1cm lateral. We experienced four complications, including one deep infection. Combining ACL reconstruction and HTO simultaneously accomplishes a ligamentously stable knee with corrected alignment, allowing patients to return to activity.

To determine clinical outcome after combined ACL reconstruction and medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO).

ACL reconstruction with medial opening HTO can be a beneficial procedure in properly selected patients presenting with complaints of both pain and instability. Correction of varus mal-alignment may provide protection for articular cartilage and improve joint stability.

Concomitant medial opening HTO performed at time of ACL reconstruction allows patients to return to activities after one procedure with a ligamentously stable knee, corrected alignment, and potential protection of articular cartilage.

Thirty-six patients who underwent ACL reconstruction along with medial opening HTO were retrospectively evaluated postoperatively at an average of twenty-five months.

Average age was thirty-seven years at time of surgery. All patients were recreationally active. Pre-operatively all patients had knee pain and instability, varus angulation, and twenty-two patients had previous knee surgery. Semitendinosus/gracilis grafts were used in all patients, and osteotomies were fixed with Puddu plates. Postoperatively patients had improved ligmentous stability with radiographic and clinical evidence of osteotomy healing, and all but nine patients have returned to full activities. We experienced four complications: one ACL failure, one case of anterior laxity with tibial tunnel widening, and two infections. On average, MAD was corrected from 22mm medial to 10mm lateral; mechanical axis angle was corrected from 6.4 degrees of varus to 0.2 degrees of valgus; tibial slope was increased from 9.1 degrees to 10.3 degrees, and patellar height ratio was decreased from 0.9 to 0.8.