The function of the upper extremity is highly dependent on correlated motion of the shoulder. The shoulder can be affected by several diseases. The most common are: rotator cuff tear (RCT), shoulder instability, shoulder osteoarthritis and fractures. Rotator cuff disease is a common disorder. It has a high prevalence rate, causing high direct and indirect costs. The appropriate treatment for RCT is debated. The American Academy Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines state that surgical repair is an option for patients with chronic, symptomatic full-thickness RCT, but the quality of evidence is unconvincing. Thus, the AAOS recommendations are inconclusive. We are performing a randomized controlled trial to compare surgical and conservative treatment of RCT, in term of functional outcomes, rotator cuff integrity, muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration. Shoulder instability occurs when the head of the upper arm bone is forced out of the shoulder socket. Shoulder instabilities have been classified according to the etiology, the direction of instability, or on combinations thereof. The Thomas and Matsen classification, which is currently the most commonly utilized classification, divides shoulder instability events into the traumatic, unidirectional, Bankart lesion, and surgery (TUBS) and the atraumatic, multidirectional, bilateral, rehabilitation, and capsular shift (AMBRI) categories. The acquired instability overstress surgery (AIOS) category was then added. Surgical procedures for shoulder instability includes arthroscopic capsuloplasty, remplissage, bone block procedure or Latarjet procedure. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) represents a good solution for the management of patients with osteoarthritis or fracture of the proximal humerus, with associated severe osteoporosis and RC dysfunction.

Evidence-based orthopaedic surgery emphasizes the need to properly design and perform high-quality randomized controlled trials to minimize bias and to truly ensure the effectiveness of orthopaedic interventions. The currently available best evidence suggests to load and move the Achilles tendon after an open or percutaneous repair for an acute rupture.

Following repair of the torn AT, patients are immobilized with their ankle in gravity equines. They are encouraged to bear weight on the operated limb as soon as possible to full weightbearing, and discharged home on the day of the procedure. All patients are given an appointment for review 2 weeks postoperatively, when they receive a single cast change, with the ankle accommodated in a removable anterior splint in a plantigrade position, secured to the lower leg and foot with Velcro straps. Removal of the foot straps under supervision of a physiotherapist allowes the ankle to be plantar flexed fully but not dorsiflexed. These exercises are performed against manual resistance. At 6 weeks postoperatively, the anterior splint is removed, and the patient referred to physiotherapy for active mobilization.

At 12 weeks postoperatively, patients are assessed as to whether they are able to undertake more vigorous physiotherapy, and encouraged to gradually return to their normal activities. Progressive activities are incorporated as strength allowed, with the aim to return to unrestricted activities 6 months following surgery.

Achilles tendinopathy is a common cause of disability. Despite the economic and social relevance of the problem, the causes and mechanisms of Achilles tendinopathy remain unclear. Tendon vascularity, gastrocnemius-soleus dysfunction, age, gender, body weight and height, pes cavus, and lateral ankle instability are considered common intrinsic factors. The essence of Achilles tendinopathy is a failed healing response, with haphazard proliferation of tenocytes, some evidence of degeneration in tendon cells and disruption of collagen fibres, and subsequent increase in non-collagenous matrix. Tendinopathic tendons have an increased rate of matrix remodelling, leading to a mechanically less stable tendon which is more susceptible to damage. The diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy is mainly based on a careful history and detailed clinical examination. The latter remains the best diagnostic tool. Over the past few years, various new therapeutic options have been proposed for the management of Achilles tendinopathy. Despite the morbidity associated with Achilles tendinopathy, many of the therapeutic options described and in common use are far from scientifically based. New minimally invasive techniques of stripping of neovessels from the Kager's triangle of the tendo Achillis have been described, and seem to allow faster recovery and accelerated return to sports, rather than open surgery. A genetic component has been implicated in tendinopathies of the Achilles tendon, but these studies are still at their infancy.

Postoperative stiffness (POS) of the shoulder may occur after an apparently successful reconstruction of a rotator cuff tear.

The role of the peripheral nervous system in tissue healing has only recently been recognized.

We determined the plasma levels of SP in patients with postoperative stiffness after arthroscopic repair of a rotator cuff tear, and compared them with those in patients with a good outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Plasma samples were obtained at 15 months from surgery from 2 groups of patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of a rotator cuff tear. In Group 1, 30 subjects (14 men and 16 women, mean age: 64.6 years, range 47 to 78) with shoulder stiffness 15 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were recruited. In Group 2, 30 patients (11 men and 19 women, mean age: 57.8 years, range 45 to 77) were evaluated 15 months after successful arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Immunoassays were performed with commercially available assay kits to detect the plasma levels of SP.

Statistical analysis were performed with Wilcoxon Sign Rank test. Significance was set at P< 0.05

The concentrations of the neuropeptide SP in sera were measurable in all patients. Patients with postoperative stiffness had statistically significant greater plasma levels of SP than patients in whom arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears had resulted in a good outcome (P < 0.05)

Postoperative stiffness (POS) of the shoulder may occur after an apparently successful reconstruction of a rotator cuff tear.

An increased amount of SP in the subacromial bursa has been correlated with the pain caused by rotator cuff disease.

SP stimulates DNA synthesis in fibroblasts, which are the cellular components of the adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Also, SP is a pain transmitter peptide, and pain may cause a secondary muscular and/or capsular contracture.

Our results show that the plasma concentrations of substance P in patients with shoulder stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are higher compared to plasma levels of SP in patients with a good postoperative outcome.

We cannot determine the cause of POS in our patients, but the findings of this study suggest a possible neuronal role in the pathophysiology of POS after arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears. The knowledge of the pathophysiological role of sensory nerve peptides in tissue repair in these patients could open new therapeutic options to manage conditions of the musculo-skeletal system with impaired tissue-nervous system interaction.

Restoring of anatomic footprint may improve the healing and mechanical strength of repaired tendons. A double row of suture anchors increases the tendon-bone contact area, reconstituting a more anatomic configuration of the rotator cuff footprint.

We aimed to investigate if there were differences in clinical and imaging outcome between single row and double row suture anchor technique repairs of rotator cuff tears.

We recruited 60 patients affected by a rotator cuff tear diagnosed on clinical grounds, magnetic resonance imaging evidence of cuff tear and inadequate response to nonoperative management, an unretracted and sufficiently mobile full-thickness rotator cuff lesion to allow a double row repair found at the time of surgery.

In 30 patients, rotator cuff repair was performed with single row suture anchor technique (Group 1). In the other 30 patients, rotator cuff repair was performed with double row suture anchor technique (Group 2). 8 patients (4 in the single row anchor repair group and 4 in the double row anchor repair group) were lost at follow up.

A modified UCLA shoulder rating scale was used to evaluate preoperative and postoperative shoulder pain, function and range of motion, strength and patient satisfaction. All patients received a post-operative MR arthrography at the final follow up appointment.

At the 2 year follow-up, no statistically significant differences were seen with respect to the UCLA score and ROM values. Post-operative MR arthrography at 2 years of follow up in group 1 showed intact tendons in 14 patients, partial thickness defects in 10 patients and full thickness defects in 2 patients. In group 2, MR arthrography showed an intact rotator cuff in 18 patients, partial thickness defects in 7 patients, and full thickness defects in 1 patient.

Biomechanical studies comparing single versus double row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair show that a double row of suture anchors increases the tendonbone contact area and restores the anatomic rotator cuff footprint, providing a better environment for tendon healing.

Our study shows that there are no advantages in using a double row suture anchor technique to restore the anatomical footprint. The mechanical advantages evidenced in cadaveric studies do not translate into superior clinical performance when compared with the more traditionally, technically less demanding, and economically more advantageous technique of single row suture anchor repair.

Several studies showed the efficacy of arthroscopic repair for Type II SLAP lesions without other associated lesions, but the only data reported on the association of arthroscopic repair of Type II SLAP lesion and rotator cuff tears involve young and active patient. To our knowledge, no studies have focused on patients over 50.

We evaluated the results of a randomized controlled trial of arthroscopic repair in patients over 50 with rotator cuff tears and Type II SLAP lesion in whom the repair was effected repairing the two lesions, or repairing the rotator cuff tears and performing a tenotomy of the long head of the biceps.

We recruited 63 patients. In 31 patients, we repaired the rotator cuff and the Type II SLAP lesion (Group 1). In the other 32 patients, we repaired the rotator cuff and tenotomized the long head of the biceps (Group 2). 7 patients (2 in the group 1 and 5 in the group 2) were lost to final follow up.

A modified UCLA shoulder rating scale was used to evaluate pre-operative and post-operative shoulder pain, function, active forward flexion, strength and patient satisfaction.

Of 63 patients randomized to one of the two treatments, 5.2 year results were available for 56. 7 patients (2 in the group 1 and 5 in the group 2) did not return at the final follow up.

Statistically significant differences were seen with respect to the UCLA score and ROM values at final follow-up In Group 1 (SLAP repair and rotator cuff repair), the UCLA showed a statistically significant improvement from a pre-operative average rating of 10.4 (range 6 to 14) to an average of 27.9 (24–35) postoperatively (P< 0.001). In Group 2 (biceps tenotomy and rotator cuff repair), the UCLA showed a statistically significant improvement from a pre-operative average rating of 10.1 (range 5 to 14) to an average of 32.1 (range 30 to 35) post-operatively (P< 0.001) There was statistically significant difference in total post-operative UCLA scores and ROM when comparing the two groups post-operatively (P< 0.05).

Arthroscopic management has been recommended for some SLAP lesions, but no studies have focused on patients over 50 with rotator cuff tear and Type II SLAP lesion.

We compared the clinical outcome of patients over 50 affected with rotator cuff tears and Type II SLAP lesion in whom both the defects were repaired, or the rotator cuff tear was repaired and the long head of the biceps tendon was tenotomized. In our hands, the association of rotator cuff repair and biceps tenotomy provides better clinical outcome compared with repair of Type II SLAP lesion and of the rotator cuff.

The repair of the two defects, in fact, can lead to worst clinical results compared with association Rotator cuff repair alone is sufficient to determine a good post-operative outcome, allowing to avoid post-operative stiffness of the shoulder.