Membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) plays a role in the progression of several common solid cancers. Given that osteosarcoma features extensive local invasion and haematogenous metastases, we hypothesised that osteosarcoma cells utilise MT1-MMP to drive these processes. Moreover, since hypoxia regulates MT1-MMP expression in breast cancer we investigated the effects of hypoxia on MT1-MMP expression in osteosarcoma cells.
Examination of MT1-MMP expression in osteosarcoma biopsy tissue in relation to clinical outcome Assessment of MT1-MMP, together with hypoxia inducible factors HIF-1α and HIF-2α expression in a panel of osteosarcoma cell lines under normoxia and hypoxiaBackground
Aims
The soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a diverse collection of malignant tumours of the connective tissues arising from the primitive mesoderm and ectoderm. While the primary treatment of most is surgery, chemotherapy can be offered to patients presenting with locally advanced or metastatic disease although sarcomas are resistant to the majority of anticancer drugs. The reasons for this are not fully understood but it is thought that p53 abnormalities and mdm2 overexpression may be involved. Samples from twenty eight adult patients with soft tissue sarcomas have been analysed for p53 mutations in exons 4 to 9 both by denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (dHPLC) and by direct automated sequencing. By sequencing we found mutations in 7/28 patients, giving a mutation rate of 25%. 4/6 were point mutations in exons 5, 7 and 8 and the remaining three were deletions in exons 4, 7 and 8. Six of these samples gave abnormalities in dHPLC analysis with a concordance rate of 97.5% between the sequencing and dHPLC data. Thirty nine and forty samples have been assessed by immunohistochemistry for p53 and mdm2 expression respectively. Do7 antibody which recognises the N terminus of p53 and F4-14 which recognises the carboxy-terminus of mdm2 were used. Immunohistochemistry was scored semiquantitatively by two independent observers and the results scored accordingly: low (<
20%), intermediate (20–80%) and high (>
80%). The initial results showed that 23/40 (58%) of patients were high staining for mdm2 in contrast to only 15/39 (38%) of patients for p53. All patients with deletions in p53 had intermediate staining for mdm2. 2/3 of these had intermediate staining for p53 and 1/3 had high staining for p53. One patient with a point mutation had high staining for both p53 and mdm2 but the other two have yet to be analysed by immunohistochemistry. These results confirm the overexpression of mdm2 in STS. Future experiments are planned using fluorescent in situ hydridisation (FISH) to determine whether MDM2 amplification is one of the mechanisms involved in mdm2 overexpression.