Purpose: To evaluate fellowship trainee and supervisor perceptions on the relative importance of core cognitive and procedural competencies in spine subspecialty fellowship training.

Method: A questionnaire was designed through synthesis and amalgamation of two previous surveys designed by other authors. This questionnaire was reviewed for content by spine surgery experts (Canadian Spine Society Education Committee). The questionnaire was administered (online and paper) to fellow trainees and supervisors across Canada and data was collected over a 3-month period. It consisted of 40 MCQ items grouped into 13 broad cognitive skills categories, as well as 29 technical/procedural items. Data was analyzed using qualitative and descriptive statistics (e.g. average mean scores, standard deviations, t-tests).

Results: The response rate was 91%, with 15 of 17 fellow trainees and 47 of 51 supervisors completing the survey. Twelve of the 13 core cognitive skill categories were rated as being important to acquire by the end of fellowship. Trainees were not comfortable performing, and requested additional training in 8 of 29 spine surgery technical skill items. Specifically, additional training was believed to be required for intradural procedures (e.g. syringomyelia, intradural neoplasms) and other less common, technically demanding, procedures (e.g. transoral odontoidectomy, anterior thoracic discectomy). Significant differences (p< 0.05) existed in perceptions of importance for specific cognitive and technical skills based on previous residency training (orthopaedic or neurosurgical). No such differences were found when comparing responses of the fellow trainees and their supervisors.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that fellowship trainees and supervisors have similar perceptions on the relative importance of specific core cognitive and procedural competencies required in achieving successful spine fellowship training. Furthermore, background specialty training (orthopaedic or neurosurgical) influences the perceptions of both fellow trainees and supervisors regarding the importance of specific cognitive and technical skills deemed necessary for successful training.

Purpose: Single anesthetic bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SABTKA) is a controversial procedure with a questionable safety profile. The purpose of this study was to determine if specific, individual preoperative medical co-morbidities can predict perioperative complications in patients undergoing SABTKA.

Method: The records of all SABTKA performed between 1997 and 2007 at 1 large community hospital and 1 academic, university hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Complete demographic data, preoperative co-morbidities (cardiovascular disease, COPD, diabetes, and hypertension), and perioperative complications for 156 patients were collected and analyzed using logistic multivariate regression analysis. Comparison was made to an age, gender, and co-morbidity matched cohort of patients treated with unilateral TKA.

Results: In the SABTKA group only 11% of patients had a preoperative history of cardiovascular disease yet 89% of all post operative myocardial infarctions (MI) occurred in this population (p< 0.001, Odds Ratio 57.8). Cardiovascular disease also predicted need for admission to ICU (p< 0.001, Odds Ratio 50.8), and number of days spent in the ICU (p< 0.001). In those patients without preoperative cardiovascular disease or COPD the rate of MI was only 0.64%. All differences were significant when compared to the matched unilateral TKA cohort. Age, gender, diabetes, and hypertension did not predict perioperative complications in the SABTKA cohort.

Conclusion: The literature indicates there are certain populations of patients at higher risk for perioperative complications after SABTKA. This study clearly identifies a subpopulation of patients that have cardiovascular disease and are at an unacceptably high risk of perioperative MI. Cardiovascular disease should likely be considered an absolute contraindication to SABTKA.