The aim is to investigate if there is a relation between patellar height and knee flexion angle. For this purpose we retrospectively evaluated the radiographs of 500 knees presented for a variety of reasons. We measure knee flexion angle using a computer-generated goniometer. Patellar height was determined using computer generated measurement for the selected ratios, namely, the Insall–Salvati (I/S), Caton–Deschamps (C/D) and Blackburne–Peel (B/P) indices and Modified I/S Ratio. A search of an NHS hospital database was made to identify the knee x rays for patients who were below the age of forty. A senior knee surgeon (DC) supervised three trainee trauma and orthopaedics doctors (HA, JM, ES) working on this research. Measurements were made on the Insall–Salvati (I/S), Caton–Deschamps (C/D) and Blackburne–Peel (B/P) indices and Modified I/S Ratio. The team leader then categorised the experimental measurement of patients’ knee flexion angle into three groups. This categorisation was according to the extent of knee flexion. The angles were specifically, 10.1 to 20, 20.1 to 30, and 30.1 to 40 degrees of knee flexion. Out of the five-hundred at the start of the investigation, four hundred and eighteen patients were excluded because they had had either an operation on the knee or traumatic fracture that was treated conservatively.
To use Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to determine the effectiveness of lumbar spinal surgery at a single UK institution. Consecutive patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery (discectomies or decompressions) from 1 January 2011 to 13 March 2013 at a UK District General Hospital were assessed. The procedures were performed or supervised by a senior Consultant Orthopaedic spinal surgeon. All patients completed PROM questionnaires before and three months following surgery. These included Visual Analogue Scores (VAS), SF-12, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Roland Morris Low Back Pain Questionnaire (RMQ).Aim
Methods
