There are significant differences in the methods and styles of orthopaedic surgical training between continents, all with the aim to produce competent consultant surgeons, but the differences in training content and pathway are vast. We review and contrast the key differences between three continents.

Objective

To identify risk factors for surgical site infections and to quantify the contribution of independent risk factors to the probability of developing infection after definitive fixation of tibial plateau fractures.

Introduction: Spinous process osteotomy (SPO) and multiple laminotomy can be used for multi-level lumbar decompression. We conducted an experimental study to compare the effects of these two methods on spinal kinetics.

Method: Ten fresh calf spines (L2- sacrum) were mounted in dental stone and segmental motion of L3 relative to L5 was assessed using an electromagnetic 3-D motion detection system (FASTRAK, Polhemus, Colchester, VT, USA). Pure moments of 0, 2.5, 5, 7, and 10 Nm were used in flexion/extension, right/left lateral bending, and right/left axial rotation. The moments were generated by applying two equal and opposite forces (weights) to the perimeter of a plastic circular disc, which was fixed to the superior end plate of L3 by three screws. In five spines decompression was performed at L3/4 and 4/5 using standard laminotomy technique. Decompression using SPO was done at L3–5 through a unilateral approach in the rest. Segmental mobility between the two methods was compared using the Mann-Whitney test.

Results: Mean range of motion in the specimens before intervention was-lateral bending (32.70 ± 7.6 SD), rotation (13.10 ± 4.8 SD), flexion/extension (19.30 ± 7.1 SD). There was statistically significant difference between mean increase in lateral bending after SPO to that following laminotomy (4.00 ± 1.5 SD vs 0.60 ± 1.6 SD; p=0.008). Mean increase in flexion- extension after SPO was not significantly different from that after laminotomy (4.50 ± 1.1 SD vs 3.90 ± 3.8 SD; p= 0.75). There was no difference in the mean increase in axial rotation after SPO compared to that following laminotomy (7.90 ± 3.6 SD vs 6.80 ± 5.0 SD; p= 0.75).

Conclusions: Both laminotomy and SPO produced increased range of motion in a calf spine model. SPO produced significant increase in lateral bending although its clinical significance is unknown.

Ethics approval: none

Interest Statement: Local grant (Research Fund, Centre for Spinal Studies, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Hospital, UK

Background: The best treatment for displaced distal radius fracture is still debated. The aim of our study is to use the PRWE and Euroqol questionnaires to look at patients function at a minimum of 1 year following distal radius fracture.

Method: 32 consecutive patients with a Colles-type fracture were treated surgically. 16 were treated with K wires and 16 underwent an open reduction and internal fixation. At a minimum of one year the PRWE and Euroqol questionnaires were filled in.

Results: Intra articular and extra articular fractures were equally distributed between the 2 groups. The Euroqol the EQVAS and PRWE scores showed no statistical difference between the 2 groups (respectively p=0.7 CI 95% -0.23 to 0.17; p=0.05 CI -30 to 0.6 and p=0.5 CI 95% -18 to 9.4).

Conclusion: Using PRWE and Euroqol, there is no short term functional difference between patients treated with closed reduction and percutaneous wire fixation or open reduction and internal fixation following a distal radius fracture.

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of a modified version of the pivot shift test in detecting ruptures of the anterior cruciate (ACL) ligament.

Methods: Two groups of patients aged 18 to 50 years were recruited from operating theatre lists examined at a check and consent clinic. One of the groups had ACL deficient knees and the control group had intact ACL, later proven at arthroscopy. A total of 48 independent examinations, 26 with ACL rupture and 22 without, were undertaken by a consultant or registrar proficient in the modified version of the pivot shift test. At the start of the consultation the examiner, who was blinded to the operation that the patient was listed for and to the patient’s history, performed the modified pivot shift test only. The result of the test was reported as positive or negative for ACL rupture to the study co-ordinator before the examiner continued with the consultation.

Results: Of the 26 examinations of ACL deficient knees, 22 were reported as positive and four negative for ACL rupture using the pivot shift test only. Of the 22 examinations of ACL intact knees one was reported as positive for ACL rupture and 21 as negative. This gives a specificity and sensitivity of the modified version of the pivot shift test as 95.5% (95% CI 75.1–99.8%) and 84.6% (95%CI 64.3–95.0%) respectively.

Conclusion: The modified pivot shift test is an accurate test for the detection of ACL rupture. Our modified pivot shift test compares favourably with data from previous accuracy studies of previously described versions of the pivot shift test. We now plan to assess the accuracy of the modified pivot shift test when carried out by medical students and junior doctors.