Cementless distally locked stems were introduced in revision hip arthroplasty (RTHA) in the late 1980s to deal with severe femoral bone loss. These implants have not been assessed over the long-term, particularly the influence of the design and porous coating. Therefore we performed a retrospective case-control study at a minimum 10-years' follow-up comparing the straight Ultime™ stem with 1/3 porous coating versus the anatomical Linea™ stem with 2/3 proximal coating with hydroxyapatite.

We performed a single-center case-control study measuring survival, function based the Harris and Oxford-12 scores, and rate of thigh pain. X-rays were done at regular intervals and at follow-up. No femoral bone graft was used at insertion.

The two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex and follow-up (mean 12.2 years in Ultime and 10.8 years in Linea cohorts); however they differed in the severity of bone loss therefore the results were adjusted according to this variable. Ten-year survival considering revision for any reason was 63.5% ± 5.4 for Ultime and 91.6% ± 2.7 for Linea (p < 0.001). Merle d'Aubigné scores and Oxford-12 were higher in the Linea group 82.9 ± 12.4 and 26.3/48, respectively, versus 69.5 ± 16 and 21/48 in the Ultime group (p < 0.001). Thigh pain was observed in 30% of Ultime cases versus 3% of Linea cases. Bone reconstruction measured via cortical thickness was better in the Linea group and correlated to metaphyseal filling at insertion.

This study confirms the benefits of using of locked stems in RTHA with severe bone loss. Better metaphyseal filling and optimized porous coating help to minimize thigh pain and the revision rate.

Introduction

In valgus knees, ligament balance remain difficult when implanting a total knee arthroplasty (TKA), this leads some authors to systematically propose the use of constrained devices. Others prefer reserving higher constraints to cases where it is not possible to obtain final satisfactory balance: less than 5 of residual frontal laxity in extension in each compartment, and a tibiofemoral gap difference not in excess to 3mm between flexion and extension. The goal of the study was to assess if is possible to establish preoperative criteria that can predict a constrained design prosthetic implantation at surgery.

Purpose of the study: The objectives of this work were to assess the stability of outcome achieved after Duquennoy procedure to tighten the lateral capsule-ligament structures of the ankle joint. To do this, we reviewed the same series of patients at 3 and 25 years follow-up to analyse the very long-term stability, laxity, and stiffness of the ankle joint and any osteoarthritic degradation.

Material and methods: From 1975 to 1986, we performed 75 Duquennoy procedures on the lateral capsule and ligament structures of the ankle joint. At mean 25 years follow-up (2007) we were able to review 28 ankles (27 patients) with the same method as applied in 1980 (3 years follow-up). The function outcome was assessed with the Good, Karlsson, Duquennoy and Tegner scores. Clinically, other than joint range of motion, were noted varus laxity or anterior drawer. Static x-rays were obtained to search for signs of osteoarthritis and stress images to measure talocrural laxity, in comparison with the preoperative figures and the 1980 data.

Results: There were two early technique failures (one persistent talocrural instability, one subtalar instability). Good and Karlsson scores were good or excellent in 92% of cases. Patients were very satisfied with the operation and the VAS was 8.9/10. Pain and occasional instability were reported by 27% of patients. There was no talocrural no subtalar stiffness at last follow-up. Radiographic laxity declined significantly between the preoperative value and the last review. Only one patient presented a narrow talocrural space (less than 50% narrowing). Eight patients had osteophytes whose presence was not correlated with poor functional outcome. These osteophytes were also present on the controlateral side. Importantly, there was no significant difference in the mean function scores between 3 and 25 years follow-up (Duquennoy score). Similarly joint range of motion and radiographic laxity remained stable over time.

Discussion: The Duquennoy procedure to tighten the lateral capsule and ligament structures is a simple technique with rare complications which provides excellent results both in terms of ligament stability and in terms of preservation from degenerative osteoarthritis. These results remain stable over time. Conversely, the technique has no action on the subtalar joint and should not be proposed as treatment for associated subtalar laxity, if diagnosed.

Purpose of the study: Locked implants have yielded favourable results for femoral bone reconstruction for revision total hip arthroplasty, but defective integration has also been reported due to insufficient bioactive coating. The purpose of this work was to evaluate a locked pivot with a two-third proximal hydroxyapatite coating.

Material and methods: From 1996 to 2007, 158 femoral implants (Linea™) were implanted for hip arthroplasty revision. The 143 cases with more than one year follow-up were reviewed (14 deaths, 1 lost to follow-up); 83 revisions for aseptic loosening, 41 periprosthetic fractures, 19 revisions in an infected context. Patients were reviewed retrospectively by a non-operator observer. These were older patients (mean age 68 years, range 31–93) and 36 patients had complex situations requiring at least two prior prostheses; 25% had severe grade 3 or 4 (SOFCOT) bone lesions and 59% diaphyseal damage.

Results: Clinical improvement was significant, the Postel Merle d’Aubigné score improved from 7.7 + 4.3 (0–17) to 15.6 + 2.2 (8–18) at mean 50 months (14–131) (p< 0.001). At last follow-up, 14 patients (10%) reported thigh pain and only seven pivots (5%) had not achieved Engh osteointegration (five with thigh pain two without). There were no fractures. There was on non-union of the femorotomy. According to the Hoffman index, femoral bone regeneration was significant at the metaphyseal and diaphyseal levels. Eighteen of the 19 infections cured, all periprosthetic fractures healed. The implant survival was 88.9% at 91 months (65–96.7%). There were five pivot replacements for non integration and/or thigh pain which resolved in all cases; there were no other pivot replacements. The quality of the metaphyseal and diaphyseal filling was predictive of the quality of the bone fixation of the pivot (p< 0.01).

Discussion: Compared with older models of locked pivots, this implant reduced the rate of thigh pain while allowing constantly satisfactory bone reconstruction. The metaphyseal and diaphyseal filling index is the main factor predictive of clinical and radiological success by favouring osteointegration. Maximal filling, obtained with a full range of implant diameters and lengths, contributes to this good result.