The aim of this study was to determine whether the absence of periosteal reaction on plain radiographs was predictive of exchange nail failure in lower limb diaphyseal fracture non-unions. A consecutive cohort of 20 femora and 35 tibiae undergoing exchange nailing for diaphyseal aseptic (n=39) and septic (n=16) fracture non-union at a single centre from 2003 to 2010. Multiple causes of non-union were found in 29 patients (53%) with infection present in 16 cases (29.1%). Of this cohort 49 fracture non-unions had complete radiographic records (19 femora and 30 tibiae) allowing evaluation of the periosteal callus. The primary outcome was the number of number of revision procedures required to achieve union. Failure was defined was as the requirement of >two revision procedures to achieve union.Aim
Methods
A successful outcome following treatment of nonunion requires the correct identification of all of the underlying cause(s) and addressing them appropriately. The aim of this study was to assess the distribution and frequency of causative factors in a consecutive cohort of nonunion patients in order to optimise the management strategy for individual patients presenting with nonunion. Causes of the nonunion were divided into four categories: mechanical; infection; dead bone with a gap; and host. Prospective and retrospective data of 100 consecutive patients who had undergone surgery for long bone fracture nonunion were analysed.Objectives
Methods
The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for failure of exchange nailing for femoral diaphyseal fracture non-unions. The study cohort comprised 40 patients with femoral diaphyseal non-unions treated by exchange nailing. The main outcome measures were union, number of secondary fixation procedures required to achieve union and time to union. Univariate analysis and multiple regression were used to identify risk factors for failure to achieve union. The mean age of the patients at exchange nail surgery was 37 years. The median time to exchange nailing from primary fixation was 8.4 months. Multiple causes for non-union were found in 14 (35.0%) cases, with infection present in 12 (30.0%) patients. Further exchange procedures were required in nine (22.5%) cases, one patient (2.5%) required the use of another fixation modality, to achieve union. Union was ultimately achieved in 35 (94.5%) patients. The median time to union was 9.4 months after the exchange nail procedure. Univariate analysis confirmed that cigarette smoking and infection were predictive of failure (p<0.05). Multi-regression analysis found that Gustilo-Anderson grade, presence of dead bone or a gap and infection were predictive of exchange nail failure (p <0.05). Exchange nailing is an effective treatment for aseptic femoral diaphyseal fracture non-union. Patients with infection required more than one procedure. Smoking, infection and the presence of dead-bone or a gap at the fracture site were associated with an increased risk of further fixation surgery.
The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for failure of exchange nailing in tibial diaphyseal fracture non-unions. The cohort comprised 99 tibial diaphyseal fracture non-unions treated by exchange nailing. The mean age of the patients at exchange nail surgery was 36 years. The median time from primary fixation to exchange nailing was 6.4 months. The main outcome measures were union, number of secondary fixation procedures required to achieve union and time to union. Univariate analysis and multiple regression were used to identify risk factors for failure to achieve union. Multiple causes for non-union were found in 31.3% cases, with infection present in 32.3%. Further exchange procedures were required in 35.4%, 7.1% required the use of other fixation modalities. Union was ultimately achieved in 97.8%. The median time to union was 8.7 months. Univariate analysis revealed that cigarette smoking, an atrophic pattern of non-union and infection were predictive for failure of exchange nailing (p<0.05). Multi-regression analysis found that only infection was statistically significantly predictive (p<0.05) of exchange nail failure. Exchange nailing is an effective treatment for tibial diaphyseal non-unions even in the presence of infection. Smoking, atrophic pattern of non-union and infection are associated with an increased risk of further fixation surgery.
Although non-union is a devastating and costly consequence of trauma for the child, family and society it is felt to be a rare complication in children. Currently there is no data available in the literature regarding its incidence either per fracture or per head of population. Should we be taking paediatric fracture non-union more seriously regarding research, resource allocation and informed consent? Our aim was to determine the incidence of non-union per child and per fracture. In Scotland Information Services Division (NHS Scotland) records every inpatient admission by ICD-10 diagnosis. As almost all fracture non-unions require intervention ISD provides accurate non-union figures by site and age. However, many fractures are treated as outpatients. Using local data of overall fracture numbers we were able to calculate a ratio of inpatient to total fracture numbers and apply this nationally.Aim
Method
Fracture non-union is a devastating cause of patient morbidity. The cost of NU treatment ranges from £7,000 to £79,000. With an estimated 11,700 cases in the UK pa the financial implications are huge, potentially costing several hundreds of million of pounds annually. Successful outcome in the management of non-union is based upon correctly identifying the underlying cause(s) and addressing them appropriately. The aim of this study was to assess the causative factors in non-union in order to optimize the management of non-union. The causes of NU were categorized into 4 groups (infection, dead bone/gap, host factors, mechanical).Introduction
Aim
The SAP searches for infection only using three ICD-10 codes. Six ICD-10 codes had been used to classify these 12 patients.