The study aimed to determine how well recorded pain levels and range of motion relate to patients' reported levels of functional ability/disability pre- and post- total hip arthroplasty. Range of motion (ROM), Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Self-Report Harris Hip Score (HHS) were recorded pre-operatively and 3 months post-total hip arthroplasty. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the strength of the relationships both pre- and post-operatively between ROM (calculated using the HHS scoring system) and scores on OHS and HHS and response relating to pain from the questionnaires (question 1 HHS and questions 1, 6, 8, 10, 11 and 12 of OHS) and overall scores. Only weak relationships were found between ROM and HHS pre- (r = 0.061, n = 99, p = 0.548) and post-operatively (r = 0.373, n = 66, p = 0.002). Similar results were found for OHS, and when ROM was substituted for flexion range. In contrast, strong correlations were found between OHS pain component and HHS pre- (r = -0.753, n = 107, p<0.001) and post-operatively (r = -0.836, n = 87, p<0.001). Strong correlations were also found between the OHS pain component correlated with the HHS functional component only (HHS with score for questions relating to pain deducted) pre- (r = -0.665, n = 107, p<0.001) and post-operatively (r = -0.688, n = 87, p<0.001). Similar results were found when the HHS pain component was correlated with OHS. In orthopaedic clinical practice ROM is routinely used to assess the success or failure of arthroplasty surgery. These results suggest that this should not be done. Instead, asking the patient the level of pain that they are experiencing may be a good determinant of level of function. The results of this study may aid the development of arthroplasty scoring systems which better assess patients' functional ability.
The use of prolonged courses of parenteral or oral antibiotic therapy in the management of two stage revision of infected total knee arthroplasty is reported by all major series. We present a series of 59 consecutive patients, all with microbiologically proven deep infection managed at our unit where a prolonged course of antibiotic therapy has not been routinely used. The mean follow-up is 56.4 months (range 24–114 months). Of the 38 patients undergoing a staged exchange, infection was successfully eradicated in 34 patients (89%) with recurrent or persistent infection in 4 (11%). The infection cure rate in our series is similar that reported elsewhere. A prolonged course of antibiotic therapy does not seem to alter the incidence of recurrent or persistent infection. The costs of antibiotic administration are high, both to the patient and care facility. It may be unnecessary.
The incidence of infection after primary arthroplasty is low. However, with the increasing number of arthroplasties being performed the prevalence of infection is increasing. The pattern of infecting organisms following total joint arthroplasty has changed and gentamicin resistant organisms are becoming increasingly common. Vancomycin added to bone a cement carrier can, with adequate surgical debridement be very effective in the eradication of established resistant infection. We report the results of its use in 33 patients with 26 infected hip and 7 infected knee arthroplasies. 32 patients remain clinically and radiologically free of infection after a mean follow-up of 67 months. There was one recurrence of infection and there were three positive second stage cultures of uncertain significance. Vancomycin is potentially a very useful tool in the management of deep infection following arthroplasty surgery.