The posterior tibial slope angle (PTS) in posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty influences the knee kinematics, knee stability, flexion gap, knee range of motion (ROM) and the tension of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). The current technique of using an arbitrary (often 3–5 degrees) PTS in all cases seldom will restore native slope in cruciate retaining TKA. Questions/Purposes: The primary objective was to determine if we could surgically reproduce the native PTS in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. The second objective was to determine if reproduction of native slope was significant – ie influenced clinical outcome.

We evaluated the radiographic and clinical outcomes of a series of consecutive total knee arthroplasties using the PFC sigma cruciate-retaining total knee system in 215 knees. The tibial bone cut was planned to be parallel to the patient's native anatomical slope in the sagittal plane. An “Angel Wing” instrument was placed on the lateral tibial plateau and the slope of the cutting guide adjusted to make the cutting block parallel to the patient's native tibial slope. All true lateral radiographs of the knee were measured for PTS using a picture achieving and communication system (PACS). PTSs were measured with reference to the proximal tibial medullary canal (PTS-M) and the proximal tibial anterior cortex (PTS-C). The knee ROM, Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and SF-12 at the last follow-up were evaluated as clinical outcomes.

The mean preoperative PTS-M was 6.9±3.3 degrees and the mean postoperative PTS-M was 7±2.4 degrees. The mean preoperative PTS-C was 12.2±4.2 degrees and the mean postoperative PTS-M was 12.6±3.4 degrees. There was no significant difference form the preoperative and postoperative PTS measurement in both techniques (p>0.05). We used an arbitrary 3 degrees as an acceptable range for PTS-M reproduction. The PTS-M was reproduced within 3 degrees in 144 knees (67%); designated as Group A. The 71 knees with a difference more than 3 degrees in (33%) were designated as Group B. Group A showed significantly larger gain in ROM compared with group B (p=0.04). Group A also had significantly better improvement in Knee society score and WOMAC score and SF-12 physical score when compare with group B (p<0.01).

Our modification of standard surgical technique reliably reproduced the native tibial slope in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. More importantly, reproduction of the patient's native PTS within 3 degrees resulted in better clinical outcomes manifested by gain in ROM and knee functional outcome scores.