Sacroiliac joint dysfunction is a degenerative condition that can result in low back pain and is likely underdiagnosed. Diagnosis is made clinically with the patient experiencing pain in the sacroiliac joint region. Initial management is non-operative with pain management, physiotherapy, injections, and rhizolysis. If these fail then surgical management, by sacroiliac joint fusion, can be considered. The aim of this study was to review the outcomes of all patients who underwent sacroiliac joint fusion by a single surgeon in a large district general hospital between April 2018 and April 2023. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent sacroiliac joint fusion between April 2018 and April 2023 was conducted. Data was collected from clinical letters, operative notes, and the British Spinal Registry. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain were recorded as well as any post-operative complications.Objectives
Design and Methods
To Determine Whether Maximal Rib Prominence Measured On Lateral Radiographs Can Be Used As A Surrogate To Rib Rotation Determined By Surface Tomography (Quantecscanning) In Assessment Of Spinal Rotation. Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Underwent Plain Lateral Radiographs And Quantec Scans. Maximal Rib Prominence On The Lateral Radiograph Was Defined Pre- And Post-Operatively By Distance From Most Posterior Aspect Of The Rib To The Facet Joint And Instrumented Rod, Respectively. Rib Rotation Was Measured By Surface Tomography Quantec Scan Using The Suzuki Method. This Was Then Repeated At A Later Time And By An Additional Investigator To Assess Intra- Observer And Inter-Observer Variability. The Correlation Between Maximal Rib Prominence And The Suzuki Ratio Was Determined.Aim:
Method:
To review the results of patients who underwent fixation of complex proximal femur fractures using the Proximal Femur Locking Plates (PFP) and analyse causes of failure of PFP. Retrospective review of radiographs and case notes of PFP fixations in two hospitals between February 2008 and June 2011. Primary outcome was union at six months. Secondary outcome included post-operative complications, and need for further surgical intervention.Aim
Methods
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) refers to having persistent back and/or leg pain after one or more surgical procedures aimed at correcting lumbosacral disease. Different modalities including Epidural injections, Spinal cord stimulation, Anterior/Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF, PLIF) have been described in the literature with varying outcome. Our aim was to review the functional outcome of patients treated with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for FBSS since June 2000 to December 2006. This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 25 patients diagnosed with FBSS and treated with PLIF at University Hospital of North Tees. All patients were requested to fill in the Oswestry Disability Index(ODI), Numerical Rating Scale for Back Pain (NRSBP), Numerical Rating Scale for Leg Pain (NRSLP), SF36 pre and post operatively. The scores were analysed using SPSS software for statistical significance. There were 12 men and 13 women. Mean age was 47.8 years (range 31–76 years). Mean follow up was 24.8 months (range 4 – 63 months). Four of the 25 patients had Post discectomy syndrome while the rest had post laminectomy syndrome. Most common level of surgery was L5/S1 either as a single level or in combination with other levels above. ODI decreased from a pre-op mean of 55.6(range 20–74.1) to 20.6(range 2–54) while VASBP decreased from 6.9 (range 1–9) to 2.2(range 0–6) (p<
0.05) and VASLP decreased from 6.4 (range 3–10) to 2.2 (range 0–7) (p<
0.05). SF36BP scores improved from a mean 26.7 (range 12–37.1) before the surgery to 45 (range 31–62) (p<
0.05) after surgery. 84% of the patients felt that the outcome of the surgery met their expectation and were satisfied with result. Our results show that PLIF can be offered as a safe and effective for treatment of FBSS.
There is limited literature available looking into circumstances surrounding the development of stress fracture of the medial and lateral malleoli after ankle replacement. We present the preliminary results of a prospective study examining the effect of ankle replacement upon local bone mineral density and the phenomenon of stress shielding. We aimed to assess the effect of ankle replacement loading of the medial and lateral malleoli, by analysing the Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the medial and lateral malleoli before and after Mobility total ankle replacement. Ten consecutive patients undergoing Mobility total ankle replacement for osteoarthritis had pre-operative bone densitometry scans of the ankle, repeated at 6 months after surgery. The bone mineral density of a 2 cm square area within the medial malleolus and lateral malleolus was measured. The pre-operative and postoperative bone densitometry scans were compared. The relation between the alignment of the tibial component and the bone mineral density of the malleoli was also analysed. The mean preoperative BMD within the medial malleolus improved from 0.57g/cm2 to mean 6 months postoperative BMD of 0.62g/cm2. The mean preoperative BMD within the lateral malleolus decreased from 0.39g/cm2 to a mean 6 months postoperative of 0.33g/cm2. The mean alignment of the tibial component was 88.50 varus (range 850 varus to 940 valgus). However, there was no correlation between the alignment of the tibial component and the bone mineral density on the medial malleolus (r = 0.09, p = 0.865). The absence of stress shielding around the medial malleolus indicates that ankle replacements implanted within the accepted limits for implant alignment, load the medial malleolus. However, there was stress shielding over the lateral malleolus resulting in decreased BMD in the lateral malleolus.
110 had MRSA infection in their surgical wound. 83 of 110 (75.5%) patients were non-elective admissions, of which 49 (60%) were proximal femur fractures. 20% of proximal femur fractures admitted from nursing home and 7.8% from their own homes developed SSI with MRSA. This cohort of SSI with MRSA had an average of 5.7(1–18) previous admissions. 25 (23%) had been previously colonised with MRSA. Majority of them (76%) were between 70–90 years old and were ASA grade 3–4.