Aims

The evidence base within trauma and orthopaedics has traditionally favoured quantitative research methodologies. Qualitative research can provide unique insights which illuminate patient experiences and perceptions of care. Qualitative methods reveal the subjective narratives of patients that are not captured by quantitative data, providing a more comprehensive understanding of patient-centred care. The aim of this study is to quantify the level of qualitative research within the orthopaedic literature.

Introduction

Fusion represents an effective treatment option in patients affected by end-stage arthritis. To minimise the risk of non-union following fusion, biological preparations such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) are commonly used intra-operatively. Mechanotransduction represents an emerging field of research whereby physical stimuli can be used to modulate the behaviour and differentiation of cells. Blast waves (a subtype of shock waves) are one such physical stimulus. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the osteogenic potential of BMAC can be enhanced using a blast wave, and thus improve its efficacy in fusion surgery.

Autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) is an effective treatment for large Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus (OLT), however little is reported on an athletic population, who are likely to place higher demands on the reconstruction. The aim is to report the outcomes of large OLT (>150mm²) within an athletic population. The study population was limited to professional or amateur athletes (Tegner score >6) with an OLT of size 150mm² or greater. The surgical intervention was AOT with a donor site from the lateral femoral condyle. Clinical outcomes at a minimum of 24 months included Return to Sport, VAS and FAOS Scores. In addition, graft incorporation was evaluated by MRI using MOCART scores at 12 months post-surgery. 38 athletes including 11 professional athletes were assessed. Mean follow-up was 46 months. Mean lesion size was 249mm². 33 patients returned to sport at their previous level and one did not return to sport (mean return to play 8.2 months). Visual analogue scores improved from 4.53 pre-operatively to 0.63 post-operatively (p=0.002). FAOS Scores improved significantly in all domains (p< 0.001). Two patients developed knee donor site pain, and both had three osteochondral plugs harvested. Univariant analysis demonstrated no association between pre-operative patient or lesion characteristics and ability to return to sport. However, there was a strong correlation between MOCART scores and ability to return to sport (AUC=0.89). Our study suggests that AOT is a viable option in the management of large osteochondral talar defects in an athletic population, with favourable return to sport levels, patient satisfaction, and FAOS/VAS scores. The ability to return to sport is predicated upon good graft incorporation and further research is required to optimise this technique. Our data also suggests that patients should be aware of the increased risk of developing knee donor site pain when three osteochondral plugs are harvested.

Bone is one of the most highly adaptive tissues in the body, possessing the capability to alter its morphology and function in response to stimuli in its surrounding environment. The ability of bone to sense and convert external mechanical stimuli into a biochemical response, which ultimately alters the phenotype and function of the cell, is described as mechanotransduction. This review aims to describe the fundamental physiology and biomechanisms that occur to induce osteogenic adaptation of a cell following application of a physical stimulus. Considerable developments have been made in recent years in our understanding of how cells orchestrate this complex interplay of processes, and have become the focus of research in osteogenesis. We will discuss current areas of preclinical and clinical research exploring the harnessing of mechanotransductive properties of cells and applying them therapeutically, both in the context of fracture healing and de novo bone formation in situations such as nonunion.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2019;9(1):1–14.

The lower limbs of vehicle occupants are vulnerable to severe injuries during under vehicle explosions. Understanding the injury mechanism and causality of injury severity could aid in developing better protection. Therefore, we tested three different knee positions in standing occupants (standing, knee in hyper-extension, knee flexed at 20˚) of a simulated under‐vehicle explosion using cadaveric limbs in a traumatic blast injury simulator; the hypothesis was that occupant posture would affect injury severity.

Skeletal injuries were minimal in the cadaveric limbs with the knees flexed at 20˚. Severe, impairing injuries were observed in the foot of standing and hyper‐extended specimens. Strain gauge measurements taken from the lateral calcaneus in the standing and hyper-extended positions were more than double the strain found in specimens with the knee flexed position. The results in this study demonstrate that a vehicle occupant whose posture incorporates knee flexion at the time of an under‐vehicle explosion is likely to reduce the severity of lower limb injuries, when compared to a knee extended position.

Introduction

Fixation of posterior malleolar fragments associated with ankle fractures aims to stabilise the syndesmosis and prevent posterior subluxation. Haraguchi described 3 types of posterior malleolar fractures, with type 2 being a medial extension injury, these fractures often involve medial and posterior fragments. We describe the techniques and outcomes for a double window posteromedial approach allowing optimal reduction and stabilisation.

Introduction

Bone tumours of the foot are rare, representing 3–6% of all bone tumours. Of these 15–25% are thought to be malignant. Obtaining clear surgical margins remains an important factor in improving outcome from tumours. However, the anatomical complexity of the foot can lead to an inadequate resection, particularly if the operating surgeon is attempting to preserve function. The aim of this paper is to identify the clinical course of patients suffering from malignant bone tumours of the foot.

Background

The conflict in Afghanistan has been epitomised by the emergence of the Improvised Explosive Device (IEDs). Improvements in protection and medical treatments have resulted in increasing numbers of casualties surviving with complex lower extremity injuries. To date, there has been no analysis of foot and ankle blast injuries as a result of IEDs. Therefore the aims of this study are to report the pattern of injury and determine which factors were associated with a poor clinical outcome.

Aim/Purpose

Review our unique experience in the management of 29 consecutive casualties who survived open pelvic fractures following a blast mechanism.

Current military conflicts are characterised by the use of the Improvised Explosive Device (IED). Improvements in personal protection, medical care and evacuation logistics have resulted in increasing numbers of casualties surviving with complex musculoskeletal injuries, often leading to life-long disability. Thus, there exists an urgent requirement to investigate the mechanism of extremity injury caused by these devices in order to develop mitigation strategies. In addition, the wounds of war are no longer restricted to the battlefield; similar injuries can be witnessed in civilian centres following a terrorist attack.

Key to mitigating such injuries is the ability to deconstruct the complexities of an explosive event into a controlled, laboratory-based environment. In this study, an anti-vehicle underbelly injury simulator, capable of recreating in the laboratory the impulse from an anti-vehicle (AV) explosion, is presented and characterised. Tests were then conducted to assess the simulator's ability to interact with human cadaveric legs. Two mounting conditions were assessed, simulating a typical seated and standing vehicle passenger using instrumented cadaveric lower limbs.

This experimental device, will now allow us (a) to gain comprehensive understanding of the load-transfer mechanisms through the lower limb, (b) to characterise the dissipating capacity of mitigation technologies, and (c) to assess the biofidelity of surrogates.

The defining weapon of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan has been the Improvised Explosive Device (IEDs). When detonated under a vehicle, they result in significant axial loading to the lower limbs, resulting in devastating injuries. Due to the absence of clinical blast data, automotive injury data using the Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) has been extrapolated to define current NATO injury thresholds for Anti-vehicle (AV) mine tests. We hypothesized that AIS, being a marker of fatality rather than disability would be a worse predictor of poor clinical outcome compared to the lower limb specific Foot and Ankle Severity Score (FASS).

Using a prospectively collected trauma database, we identified UK Service Personnel sustaining lower leg injuries from under-vehicle explosions from Jan 2006–Dec 2008. A full review of all medical documentation was performed to determine patient demographics and the severity of lower leg injury, as assessed by AIS and FASS. Clinical endpoints were defined as (i) need for amputation or (ii) poor clinical outcome. Statistical models were developed in order to explore the relationship between the scoring systems and clinical endpoints.

63 UK casualties (89 limbs) were identified with a lower limb injury following under-vehicle explosion. The mean age of the casualty was 26.0 yrs. At 33.6 months follow-up, 29.1% (26/89) required an amputation and a further 74.6% (41/89) having a poor clinical outcome (amputation or ongoing clinical problems). Only 9(14%) casualties were deemed medically fit to return to full military duty. ROC analysis revealed that both AIS=2 and FASS=4 could predict the risk of amputation, with FASS = 4 demonstrating greater specificity (43% vs 20%) and greater positive predictive value (72% vs 32%). In predicting poor clinical outcome, FASS was significantly superior to AIS (p<0.01). Probit analysis revealed that a relationship could not be developed between AIS and the probability of a poor clinical outcome (p=0.25).

Foot and ankle injuries following AV mine blast are associated with significant morbidity. Our study clearly demonstrates that AIS is not a predictor of long-term clinical outcome and that FASS would be a better quantitative measure of lower limb injury severity. There is a requirement to reassess the current injury criteria used to evaluate the potential of mitigation technologies to help reduce long-term disability in military personnel. Our study highlights the critical importance of utilising contemporary battlefield injury data in order to ensure that the evaluation of mitigation measures is appropriate to the injury profile and their long-term effects.

The aim of this study is to review our unique experience in the management of 29 consecutive casualties who survived open pelvic fractures following a blast mechanism, in order to determine the injury pattern, clinical management and outcome of these devastating injuries.

All patients were serving soldiers who were injured whilst on operations in Afghanistan. The median New Injury Severity Score (NISS) was 41. Mean blood requirement in the 1^st 24 hours was 60.3 units. In addition to their orthopaedic injury, 6 (21%) had an associated vascular injury, 7(24%) had a bowel injury, 11 (38%) had a genital injury and 7(24%) had a bladder injury. 8 (28%) fractures were managed definitively with external fixation, and 7 (24%) fractures required ORIF. Of those patients who underwent ORIF, 4 (57%) required removal of metalwork for infection. Faecal diversion was performed on 9 (31%) casualties. Median length of stay was 70.2 days, and mean total operative time was 29.6 hours. At a mean 20.3 months follow-up, 24 (83%) were able to ambulate, and 26 (90%) had clinical and radiological evidence of pelvic ring stability.

The “Global War on Terror” has resulted in incidents that were previously confined exclusively to conflict areas can now occur anywhere, and surgeons who are involved in trauma care may be required to manage similar injuries from terrorist attacks. Our study clearly demonstrates that the management of this injury pattern is extremely resource intensive with the need for significant multi-disciplinary input. Given the nature of the soft tissue injury, we would advocate an approach of minimal internal fixation in the management of these fractures. With the advent of emerging wound and faecal management techniques, we do not believe that faecal diversion is mandated in all cases.

The conflict in Afghanistan has been epitomised by the emergence of the Improvised Explosive Device(IEDs). Improvements in medical treatments have resulted in increasing numbers of casualties surviving with complex lower extremity injuries. To date, there has been no analysis of foot and ankle blast injuries as a result of IEDs. Therefore the aims of this study are to firstly report the pattern of injury and secondly determine which factors were associated with a poor clinical outcome in order to focus future research.

Using a prospective trauma registry, UK Service Personnel who sustained lower leg injuries following an under-vehicle explosion between Jan 2006 and Dec 2008 were identified. Patient demographics, injury severity, the nature of lower limb injury and clinical management was recorded. Clinical endpoints were determined by (i)need for amputation and (ii)need for ongoing clinical output at mean 33.0 months follow-up.

63 UK Service Personnel (89 injured limbs) were identified with lower leg injuries from explosion. 50% of casualties sustained multi-segmental injuries to the foot and ankle complex. 26(29%) limbs required amputation, with six amputated for chronic pain 18 months following injury. Regression analysis revealed that hindfoot injuries, open fractures and vascular injuries were independent predictors of amputation.

Of the 69 limbs initially salvaged, the overall infection rate was 42%, osteomyelitis 11.6% and non-union rates was 21.7%. Symptomatic traumatic osteoarthritis was noted in 33.3% salvaged limbs. At final follow-up, 66(74%) of injured limbs had persisting symptoms related to their injury, with only 9(14%) fit to return to their pre-injury duties.

This study demonstrates that foot and ankle injuries from IEDs are frequently associated with a high amputation rate and poor clinical outcome. Although, not life-threatening, they remain a source of long-term morbidity in an active population. Primary prevention of these injuries remain key in reducing the injury burden.

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) occur in 10% of combat casualties. In the immediate field-hospital setting, an insensate limb can affect the surgeon's assessment of limb viability and in the long-term PNI remain a source of considerable morbidity. Therefore the aims of this study are to document the recovery of combat PNI, as well as report on the effect of current medical management in improving functional outcome. In this study, we present the largest series of combat related PNI in Coalition troops since World War II.

From May 2007 – May 2010, 100 consecutive patients (261 nerve injuries) were prospectively reviewed in a specialist PNI clinic. The functional recovery of each PNI was determined using the MRC grading classification (good, fair and poor). In addition, the incidence of neuropathic pain, the results of nerve grafting procedures, the return of plantar sensation, and the patients' current military occupational grading was recorded.

At mean follow up 26.7 months, 175(65%) of nerve injuries had a good recovery, 57(21%) had a fair recovery and 39(14%) had a poor functional recovery. Neuropathic pain was noted in 33 patients, with Causalgia present in 5 cases. In 27(83%) patients, pain was resolved by medication, neurolysis or nerve grafting. In 35 cases, nerve repair was attempted at median 6 days from injury. Of these 62%(22) gained a good or fair recovery with 37%(13) having a poor functional result. Forty-two patients (47 limbs) initially presented with an insensate foot. At final follow up (mean 25.4 months), 89%(42 limbs) had a return of protective plantar sensation. Overall, 9 patients were able to return to full military duty (P2), with 45 deemed unfit for military service (P0 or P8).

This study demonstrates that the majority of combat PNI will show some functional recovery. Adherence to the principles of war surgery to ensure that the wound is clear of infection and associated vascular and skeletal injuries are promptly treated will provide the optimal environment for nerve recovery. Although neuropathic pain affects a significant proportion of casualties, pharmacological and surgical intervention can alleviate the majority of symptoms. Finally, the presence of an insensate limb at initial surgery, should not be used as a marker of limb viability. The key to recovery of the PNI patient lies in a multi-disciplinary approach. Essential to this is regular surgical review to assess progress and to initiate prompt surgical intervention when needed. This approach allows early determination of prognosis, which is of huge value to the rehabilitating patient psychologically, and to the whole rehabilitation team.

Anti-vehicle mines (AV) and Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) remain the most prevalent threat to Coalition troops operating in Iraq and Afghanistan. Detonation of these devices results in rapid deflection of the vehicle floor resulting in severe injuries to calcaneus. Anecdotally referred to as a ‘deck-slap’ injury, there have been no studies evaluating the pattern of injury or the effect of these potentially devastating injuries since World War II. Therefore the aim of this study is to determine the pattern of injury, medical management and functional outcome of UK Service Personnel sustaining calcaneal injuries from under-vehicle explosions.

From Jan 2006 – Dec 2008, utilising a prospectively collected trauma registry (Joint Theatre Trauma Registry, JTTR), the records of all UK Service Personnel sustaining a fractured calcaneus from a vehicle explosion were identified for in depth review. For each patient, demographic data, New Injury Severity Score (NISS), and associated injuries were recorded. In addition, the pattern of calcaneal fracture, the method of stabilisation, local complications and need for amputation was noted. Functional recovery was related to the ability of the casualty to return to military duties.

Forty calcaneal fractures (30 patients) were identified in this study. Mean follow-up was 33.2 months. The median NISS was 17, with the lower extremity the most severely injured body region in 90% of cases. Nine (30%) had an associated spinal injury. The overall amputation rate was 45% (18/40); 11 limbs (28%) were amputated primarily, with a further 3 amputated on return to the UK. Four (10%) casualties required a delayed amputation for chronic pain (mean 19.5 months). Of the 29 calcaneal fractures salvaged at the field hospital, wound infection developed in 11 (38%). At final follow-up, only 2 (6%) were able to return to full military duty with 23 (76%) only fit for sedentary work or unfit any military duty.

Calcaneal injuries following under-vehicle explosions are commonly associated with significant polytrauma, of which the lower limb injury is the most severe. Spinal injuries were frequently associated with this injury pattern and it is recommended that radiological evaluation of the spine be performed on all patients presenting with calcaneal injuries from this injury mechanism. The severity of the hindfoot injury witnessed is reflected by the high infection rate and amputation rate seen in this cohort of patients. Given the high physical demands of a young, active military population, only a small proportion of casualties were able to return to pre-injury duties. We believe that the key to the reduction in the injury burden to the soldier lies in the primary prevention of this injury. Work is currently on going to develop experimental and numerical models of this injury in order to drive future mitigation strategies.

Introduction

Civilian fractures have been extensively studied with in an attempt to develop classification systems, which guide optimal fracture management, predict outcome or facilitate communication. More recently, biomechanical analyses have been applied in order to suggest mechanism of injury after the traumatic insult, and predict injuries as a result of a mechanism of injury, with particular application to the field so forensics. However, little work has been carried out on military fractures, and the application of civilian fracture classification systems are fraught with error. Explosive injuries have been sub-divided into primary, secondary and tertiary effects. The aim of this study was to 1. determine which effects of the explosion are responsible for combat casualty extremity bone injury in 2 distinct environments; a) in the open and b) enclosed space (either in vehicle or in cover) 2. determine whether patterns of combat casualty bone injury differed between environments Invariably, this has implications for injury classification and the development of appropriate mitigation strategies.

The biomechanics of civilian fractures have been extensively studied with a view to defining the forces responsible e.g. bending, torsion, compression and crushing. Little equivalent work has been carried out on military fractures, although fractures from gunshot can be divided into direct and indirect. Given that the effects of blast can be sub-divided into primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary, the aim of this study was to try to determine which effects of the blast are responsible for the bony injury. This may have implications for management and prognosis as well as prevention.

We reviewed emergency department records, case notes, and all radiographs of patients admitted to the British military hospital in Afghanistan over a 6 month period (Apr 08–Sept 08) to identify any fracture caused by an explosive mechanism. In addition we reviewed all relevant radiographs from the same period at the Royal Hospital Haslar, who report all radiographs taken, and keep a copy of the images. Early in the study it became clear that due to the complexity of some of the injuries it was inappropriate to consider bones separately and we used the term ‘fracture zone’ to identify separate areas of injury, which could involve from 1 – 28 bones. It also became clear that the pattern of injury differed considerably between patients in open ground, and those in houses or vehicles. These 2 groups were considered separately and compared.

We identified 86 patients with fractures. The 86 patients had 153 separate fracture zones (range 1–6). 56 casualties in the open sustained 87 fracture zones (mean 1.55 fracture zones per casualty). 30 casualties in a vehicle or other cover sustained 66 fracture zones (2.2 per casualty). Of the casualties in the open, 17 fracture zones were due the primary effects of blast, 10 a combination of primary and secondary effects, 30 due to secondary effects and 30 from the tertiary effects of blast. Of the casualties in vehicles we could not identify anyone with a fracture due to either the primary or secondary effects of blast, all 66 fracture zones appeared to be due to the tertiary effects.

In both groups there appeared to be a significant number of fractures, often with no break in the skin, caused by severe axial loading of the limb. This was possibly due to the casualty impacting against the ground, building or the inside of a vehicle, and this is a group of injuries we are now studying in greater detail.

UK military forces have been deployed in Afghanistan since 2006 as part of the International Stabilisation Assistance Force. The Operation is supported by a 50-bedded hospital. In 2007 the Defence Medical Services introduced a massive haemorrhage policy. In asymmetric warfare gunshot wounds (GSW), improvised explosive devices (IED) and mine injuries are prevalent and we hypothesized that they would require significant blood products.

We prospectively collected data from consecutive trauma resuscitations over 3 months (January to March 2008). Pre-hospital time points, mechanism of injury, injury distribution, injury severity score (ISS), new injury severity score (NISS), surgical procedures, blood product utilisation and outcome were recorded.

115 trauma resuscitations were performed over the study period. Median pre-hospital time was 95 minutes (range 30–325), with median 64 minutes to the arrival of the Medical Emergency Response Team helicopter. The cause of injury was landmine (20), IED (31) and GSW (40); mean number of involved body systems was 1.4, 1.8 and 1.5 respectively and injured structures 2.8, 3.5 and 2.3 respectively (IED> GSW p< 0.05). Mean ISS was 16, 16.8, 14.9 and NISS 18.7, 20.9, and 17.9 respectively. Blood transfusion was required in 3 mine, 14 IED and 17 GSW casualties (mine< IED & GSW, p< 0.05) with 10.6, 11.4, and 13.9 units of blood transfused per casualty.

Injury severity for casualties is high with multiple injuries to body systems irrespective of mechanism. Anti-personnel mine injuries were significantly less likely to require transfusion. Large quantities of blood products were still required when necessary in all mechanisms of trauma. It is therefore recommended that during the pre-hospital time the major transfusion protocol should be placed on stand-by.

Current ATLS protocols dictate that spinal precautions should be in place when a casualty has sustained trauma from a significant mechanism of injury likely to damage the cervical spine. In hostile environments, the application of these precautions can place pre-hospital medical teams at considerable personal risk. It may also prevent or delay the identification of airway problems. In today’s global threat from terrorism, this hostile environment is no longer restricted to conflict zones. The aim of this study was to ascertain the incidence of cervical spine injury following penetrating ballistic neck trauma in order to evaluate the need for pre-hospital cervical immobilisation in these casualties.

We retrospectively reviewed hospital charts and autopsy reports of British military casualties of combat, from Iraq and Afghanistan presenting with a penetrating neck injury during the last 5.5 years. For each patient, the mechanism of injury, neurological state on admission, medical and surgical intervention and cause of death was recorded.

During the study period, 90 casualties sustained a penetrating neck injury. The mechanism of injury was by explosion in 66 (73%) and from gunshot wounds in 24 (27%). Cervical spine injuries (either cervical spine fracture or cervical spinal cord injury) were present in 20 of the 90 (22%) casualties, but only 6 (7%) actually survived to reach hospital. Four subsequently died from injuries within 72 hours. Only 1 (1.8%) of the 56 survivors to reach a surgical facility sustained an unstable cervical spine injury that required surgical stabilisation, however this patient died as result of a co-existing head injury.

Penetrating ballistic trauma to the neck is associated with a high mortality rate. Our data suggests that it is very unlikely that penetrating ballistic trauma to the neck will result in an unstable cervical spine in survivors. In a hazardous environment (e.g. shooting incidents or terrorist bombings), the risk/benefit ratio of mandatory spinal immobilisation is unfavourable and may place medical teams at prolonged risk. In addition cervical collars may hide potential life threatening conditions.

Over 75% of combat casualties from Iraq and Afghanistan sustain injuries to the extremities, with 70% resulting from the effects of explosions. Damage to peripheral nerves may influence the surgical decision on limb viability in the short-term, as well as result in significant long-term disability. To date, there have been no reports of the incidence and severity of nerve injury in the current conflicts.

A prospective assessment of United Kingdom (UK) Service Personnel attending a specialist nerve injury clinic was performed. For each patient the mechanism, level and severity of injury to the nerve was assessed and associated injuries were recorded.

Fifty-six patients with 117 nerve injuries (median 2, range 1–5) were eligible for inclusion. This represents 12.9% of casualties sustaining an extremity injury. The most commonly injured nerves were the tibial (19%), common peroneal (16%) and ulnar nerves (16%). 25% (29) of nerve injuries were conduction block, 41% (48) axonotmesis and 34% (40) neurotmesis. The mechanism of injury did not affect the severity of injury sustained (explosion vs gunshot wound (GSW), p=0.53). An associated fracture was found in only 48% of nerve injuries and a vascular injury in 35%. The presence of an associated vascular injury resulted in more severe injuries (conduction vs axonotmesis and neurotmesis, p< 0.05). Nerves injured in association with a fracture, were more likely to develop axonotmesis (p< 0.05).

The incidence of peripheral nerve injury from combat wounds is higher than previously reported. This may be related to increasing numbers of casualties surviving with complex extremity wounds. In a polytrauma situation, it may be difficult to assess a discrete peripheral neurological lesion. As only 35% of nerves injured are likely to have anatomical disruption, the presence of an intact nerve at initial surgery should not preclude the possibility of an injury. Therefore, serial examinations combined with appropriate neurophysiologic examination in the post-injury period are necessary to aid diagnosis and to allow timely surgical intervention. In addition, conduction block nerve injuries can be expected to make a full recovery. As this accounts for 25% of all nerve injuries, we recommend that the presence of an insensate extremity should not be used as an indicator for assessing limb viability.