The trabecular metal Monoblock TKR is comprised of a porous tantalum base plate with the polyethylene liner embedded directly in the porous metal. An alternative design, the trabecular metal Modular TKR, allows polyethylene liner insertion into the locking base plate after base plate implantation, but removes the low modulus of elasticity that was inherent in the Monoblock design. The purpose of this study was to compare the fixation of the Monoblock and Modular trabeucular metal base plates in a randomised controlled trial. Fifty subjects (30 female) were randomly assigned to receive the uncemented trabecular metal Monoblock or uncemented trabecular metal Modular knee replacement. A standard procedure of tantalum marker insertion in the proximal tibial and polyethylene liner was followed with uniplanar radiostereometric analysis (RSA) examinations immediately post-operatively and at 6 week, 3 month, 6 month, and 12 month follow-ups. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board and all subjects signed an Informed Consent Form. Twenty-one subjects received Monoblock components and 20 received Modular components. An intra-operative decision to use cemented implants occurred in 5 cases and 4 subjects did not proceed to surgery after enrollment. The clinical precision of implant migration measured as maximum total point motion (MTPM) was 0.13 mm (upper limit of 95% confidence interval of double exams). Implant migration at 12 months was 0.88 ± 0.64 mm (mean and standard deviation; range 0.21 – 2.84 mm) for the Monoblock group and 1.60 ± 1.51 mm (mean and standard deviation; range 0.27 – 6.23 mm) for the Modular group. Group differences in 12 month migration approached clinical significance (p = 0.052, Mann Whitney U-test). High early implant migration is associated with an increased risk for late aseptic loosening. Although not statistically significant, the mean migration for the Modular component group was nearly twice that of the Monoblock, which places it at the 1.6 mm threshold for “unacceptable” early migration (Pijls et al 2012). This finding is concerning in light of the recent recall of a similar trabecular metal modular knee replacement and adds validity to the use of RSA in the introduction of new or modified implant designs. Reference: Pijls, B.G., et al., Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,000 knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthop, 2012. 83(6): p. 614–24.
The purpose of this study was two-fold:
to examine perioperative prospective changes in pain, disability and psychosocial variables in ACL reconstructed recreational athletes over the pre-op to eight week post-op period. to see what variables will predict greatest disability at eight weeks post-op. All participants were recreational athletes at the time of their injuries who had patella-autograft procedure at the the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre. Fifty-four patients (twenty-nine males; mean age = 25.4 years, SD = 8.08). Mean education was fourteen years (SD = 2.08), 32%(17) were married, 67%(36) single, and 1% was divorced. 94%(51) of the sample was Caucasian, 3%(2) Black, and 1% Asian. One quarter reported their ACL injury was due to sport-based contact, with non-contact sporting activity reported at 76%(41). All participants completed measures of pain, depression, pain catastrophizing, state anxiety pre-op, on days one and two following surgery and again at eight weeks post-op. Disability was assessed pre-op and eight weeks post-op. Pain was varied across comparisons with preoperative pain increased twenty-four and forty-eight-hour post-op. Pain at forty-eight-hours postoperative was significantly higher than pain reported at eight-weeks post-op. Catastrophizing did not differ from the pre-op to twenty-four-hour post-op but did drop from twenty-four to forty-eight-hours and forty-eight-hours to eight-weeks post-op. Pre-op depression increased twenty-four-hour post-op, but not from twenty-four to forty-eight-hours and declined at eight-weeks. Anxiety increase pre-op to twenty-four-hours but not from twenty-four to forty-eight-hours but did drop from forty-eight-hours to eight-weeks.Disability did not change over time. Regression showed age or gender did not predict disability but forty-eight hour pain and catastrophizing did. These data indicate that pain and psychological variables change over time of ACL recovery. Results suggest that pain and distress peek during acute post-op period. As well, post-op catastrophizing predicts disability at eight weeks post-op which may indicate that catastrophizing may be related to behaviours related to slower recovery following ACL reconstructive surgery.
The demand for knee arthroplasty (TKR) is increasing yet there are no established criteria for prioritizing patients. We investigated surgeon inter-observer reliability and factors that influenced their prioritization of patients by having three surgeons each independently consult on twelve randomly selected patients waiting for TKR. Surgeons had high reliability and were most influence by the patient’s pain and gait pattern when assigning priority. Surgeon assigned priority also correlated with common subjective outcome metrics. Formalized gait assessment may allow for more objective prioritization of patients waiting for TKR. The purpose of this study was to investigate the inter-observer reliability of surgeons assessing the priority of patients waiting for elective total knee arthroplasty (TKR) surgery, and to assess the discriminative methodology surgeons employ when assessing patients. Surgeon’s can reliably assign a priority to their patients waiting for TKR. Surgeons generally consider the patients pain and gait pattern when assigning priority. Wait lists for elective TKR are increasing and the demand will continue to grow. Objective criteria for prioritizing patients would allow for rational delivery of limited surgical resources. Surgeons have high inter-observer reliability when assigning patient priority (ICC = 0.86). Pain and gait pattern have a significant impact on the surgeon’s assessment of priority (p=0.25 and p<
0.001, respectively). The oxford twelve most closely correlated to the surgeon’s prioritization (r=0.80). Twelve patients waiting for TKR were randomly selected from three surgeons wait lists. Each surgeon independently examined all twelve patients and recorded their assessment of the patient’s acuity (priority) on a visual analogue scale. The impact of various aspects of the patient’s presentation on the surgeon’s assessment, such as pain control, function, gait, joint contracture and radiographic appearance, were recorded. All patients completed the SF-36, Oxford twelve and WOMAC questionnaires. Linear regression and Intra-Class Correlation Coefficients were used to assess the data. Through the complex patient-surgeon interaction during a standard consultation, surgeons are able to prioritize their patient’s with high reliability. Improved objective metrics for prioritizing patient’s may be possible by more formalized methods of gait assessment.