Now that we are in the deceleration phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, the focus has shifted to how to safely reinstate elective operating. Regional and speciality specific data is important to guide this decision-making process. This study aimed to review 30-day mortality for all patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery during the peak of the pandemic within our region. This multicentre study reviewed data on all patients undergoing trauma and orthopaedic surgery in a region from 18 March 2020 to 27 April 2020. Information was collated from regional databases. Patients were COVID-19-positive if they had positive laboratory testing and/or imaging consistent with the infection. 30-day mortality was assessed for all patients. Secondly, 30-day mortality in fracture neck of femur patients was compared to the same time period in 2019.Aims
Methods
We performed a longitudinal outcome study involving the operative management of ankle fractures at two university teaching hospitals. This was a retrospective review of the quality of reduction and a prospective study into the functional outcome. All patients undergoing open reduction internal fixation of the ankle between November 2006 and November 2007 at one centre, and January to December 2009 at the other were included. Adequacy of reduction was assessed on the initial post-operative radiographs using Pettrone's criterion. The post-operative functional outcome was recorded using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), completed by postal or telephone follow-up at 64 months post injury (60–74 months).Introduction
Methods
Osseous first ray surgery is a common day case procedure. Patients are often given regional blocks. We sought to find if there is a difference between ankle block and metatarsal block in this group of patients. After ethical approval was granted and power analysis performed, 25 patients were recruited into each arm of the study. These patients were having either an osteotomy or arthrodesis. All patients had standardised general anaesthesia and received 20mls of 0.5% chirocaine for the blockade. The cohort having the ankle block had infiltration under ultrasound guidance in the anaesthetic room; and the cohort receiving the metatarsal block had infiltration at the end of the procedure. The timings of both the anaesthesia and the operation were recorded for each patient. Patients scored their pain level at 2, 6 and 24 hours. The amount of post-operative analgesia used in the first 24 hours was also recorded by the research nurse. All patients were discharged home with a standardised prescription of analgesia. Analysis of the pain scores showed that there was no difference between the two blocks at any measured time period. Nor was there a difference in the analgesic requirement in the first 24 hours. There was, however, a difference in the time taken for the whole procedure: with the ankle block taking an average of ten minutes more. We conclude that metatarsal blocks are as effective as ankle blocks in providing pain relief after osseous first ray surgery, and may be a more efficient use of time.
Treatment of the rheumatoid forefoot involves resection arthroplasty of the MTP joints of the lesser toes. This can either involve resection of the metatarsal heads or, as described by Stainsby: resection of the proximal phalanx. The Stainsby procedure is a well accepted technique, however despite this there is very little information on the outcome of this procedure. 40 rheumatoid patients were treated with the Stainsby procedure, over a five year period. Preoperatively patients completed a Foot Function Index (FFI) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS). The minimum follow-up was 12 months, range of follow-up 12–60 months. At follow-up review patients also completed the FFI and AOFAS. Therefore comparison of preoperative and postoperative scores was assessed. There was a great improvement in both FFI and AOFAS after the Stainsby procedure, especially in patients who also underwent arthrodesis of the first MTPJ. Statistical analysis of the results is presently being completed and the full results will be discussed at the meeting.Materials and Methods
Results
NICE published the guidelines ‘Selection of prostheses for primary hip replacement’ in 2000. Essentially these guidelines made two recommendations: firstly to use prostheses which had attained the ‘10 year benchmark’ of a revision rate of 10% or less at 10 years, or had a minimum of three years revision rate experience that was on target to reach this benchmark; and secondly to use cemented hip prostheses to the exclusion of uncemented and hybrid prostheses. The information from the Trent Regional Arthroplasty Study (TRAS) has been used to retrospectively examine the types of hip prostheses used from 1990 – 2005, and assess the impact that the NICE guidelines have had on orthopaedic practice. This study revealed that the percentage of prostheses used which attained the ‘ten year benchmark’ has increased since the guidelines were published. In 2001, of the ten cups, which constituted 80% of the acetabular components used, only three attained this NICE benchmark, but by 2005 this number had risen to eight. Similarly in 2001, of the eight stems, which constituted almost 80% of the femoral components used, only five attained this NICE benchmark. In 2005 seven out of these eight stems had attained the minimum standard. However contrary to the recommendation made by NICE in 2000, to use cemented prostheses, the results indicate the use of uncemented prostheses has trebled (from 6.7% to 19.2%, n= 137 and 632 respectively), and the use of hybrid prostheses has more than doubled (from 8.8% to 22% of all prostheses, n= 181 and 722 respectively) since the guidelines were published. Therefore the recommendations made by NICE are not being followed, which calls the value of NICE guidelines into question.
We measured patellar height, VMO length on the axial views of the scans. The VMO insertion was calculated from the data and we divided the patients into proximal and distal groups in relation to the VMO termination on the patella. The proximal group included patients with VMO termination proximal to the mid-point of the patella and distal group included patients with VMO termination at or distal to the mid-point of the patella.
The introduction of the laminar flow theatre was responsible for a decrease in wound infection four and a half fold. Further research has found that total body exhaust suits were also responsible for a reduction in infection rate. These exhaust suits include a toga hood, also supplied sterile and attached to the gown. There is no information from the manufacturers regarding microbial penetration of these hoods. Therefore we have performed an experiment to examine the potential for microbial penetration of these toga hoods, both when wet and dry.
Both wet and dry toga circles were applied to the previously prepared lawns of Staphylococcus epidermidis NCTC 11047, with the internal surface in contact with the lawn. Swabbings were taken from the external surface of both wet and dry toga circles at regular intervals. The timing of the swabbings were: 1 min, 5 mins, 20 mins, and 60 mins. The swabs were then used to inoculate blood agar plates, which were incubated overnight at 37°C, after which they were examined for growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis.
To calculate the patellar height the apex of the patella was considered as ‘Reference Slice 1’. The consecutive slices were followed distally to the last slice in which the patella was visible. From ‘Reference Slice 1’ VMO muscle was followed distally to the slice in which the muscle was last visible. We calculated the patella height and VMO muscle length as the product of the number of MRI slices and MRI slice thickness.
A statistically significant inverse relationship was noted between the level of insertion of VMO and the age of the patient.
In this study we have traced all the patients, who had a primary total knee replacement between 1990 and 1992. We issued a validated, self administered questionnaire to all surviving patients, at a mean of fifteen years post arthroplasty. This questionnaire examines the patient’s level of expectation and satisfaction with their TKR, and also measures their quality of life (using EQ-5D and visual analogue score). Using a similar register, containing information of all revision TKR in the region, we have measured the survivorship of these primary TKR at 10 and 15 years.
Survivorship analysis revealed that 94.7% (+/−0.4%) of implants survive to 10 years, and 92.7% (+/−0.5%) to 15 years. Survivorship was significantly affected by gender of the patient, age at time of primary, and type of prosthesis used. Infection rate at 15 years was 0.9%.