Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 229 - 229
1 Jul 2008
Costa M Kay D Donell S Robinson F
Full Access

One of the factors that influence the outcome after Achilles tendon rupture is gait abnormality. We prospectively assessed 14 patients with Achilles tendon rupture and 15 normal control subjects using an in-shoe plantar pressure measurement system. There was a significant reduction in peak mean forefoot pressure in the early period of rehabilitation (p < 0.001). There was a concomitant rise in heel pressure on the injured side (p=0.05). However, there was no difference in cadence, as determined by the duration of the terminal stance and pre-swing phases as a proportion of the total stance component of the gait cycle. The forefoot pressure deficit in the Achilles tendon rupture group was smaller when assessed six months after the injury but was still significant (p=0.029). Pedobarographic assessment of patients after Achilles tendon rupture confirms that there are marked abnormalities within the gait cycle. Rehabilitation programmes which address these abnormalities may improve outcome.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 229 - 229
1 Jul 2008
Costa M Robinson F Donell S Shepstone L Chester R
Full Access

We performed two independent randomised controlled trials to assess the potential benefits of immediate weight-bearing mobilisation for Achilles tendon ruptures. The first trial on surgically treated patients provides strong evidence of improved functional outcome for patients mobilised fully weight-bearing after operative repair of their Achilles tendon rupture. The two cases of re-rupture in the treatment group suggest that careful patient selection may be required as patients need to follow a structured rehabilitation regime.

The second trial performed upon non-operatively treated patients provides only weak evidence of a functional benefit from immediate weight-bearing mobilisation. However, the practical advantages of immediate weight-bearing did not predispose the patients to a higher complication rate. In particular there was no evidence of tendon lengthening or a higher re-rupture rate. We would therefore advocate the use of immediate weight-bearing mobilisation for the rehabilitation of all patients with rupture of the Achilles tendon.