Recurrent anterior shoulder instability (RASI) is related to progressive bone loss on the glenoid and on the humeral head. Bone deficit magnitude is a well-recognized predictor of recurrence of instability after an arthroscopic Bankart surgery, but the best way to measure it is unknown. In this study, we want to determine which measurement method is the best predictor of recurrence of instability and function.

For 10 years now, all patients undergoing surgery for RASI in 4 centers are included in a prospective study: the LUXE cohort. Patients with a pre-operative CT-scan and a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. ISIS score was used to stratify patients. WOSI and Quick-Dash questionnaires were used to characterise function. Bone defects were assessed using the Clock method, the Glenoid Ratio, the Humeral Ratio, the Glenoid Track method and the angle of engagement in the axial plane.

A total of 262 patients are now included in the LUXE study. One hundred and three patients met the inclusion criteria for analysis with a majority of male (79%) and a mean age is 28 years old. The median number of dislocations prior to surgery was 6. Seventy patients had an arthroscopic Bankart repair and 33 patients underwent an open Latarjet procedure. The ISIS score for these groups were of 2.7 and 4.8 respectively (p<0.001). The mean bone defect on the glenoid was of 1h51 with the Clock method (range: 0h-4h48; SD=1h46) and of 9% for the glenoid ratio (0–37%, 10%). On the humeral side, the bone defect was of 1h59 (0h-4h08; 0h49) for the Humeral clock method, 15% (0–36%; 6%) with the ratio method and 71 degrees of external rotation (SD=30 degrees) with the angle of engagement measurement. On the combined evaluations, 53 patients presented an off-track lesion, with mean combined hours of 3h53 (SD= 2h13). The greatest correlation obtained was between the glenoid ratio and the glenoid clock method (r=0.919, p<0.001). Eighteen patients had a recurrence of shoulder dislocation after the initial surgery, leading to a recurrence rate of 23% in arthroscopic surgery versus six percent after a Latarjet (OR= 4.6, p=0.034). No bone defect was correlated to Latarjet failure. For the arthroscopic group, the risk of recurrence was related to a smaller angle of engagement of the Hill-Sachs (p=0.05), a smaller Humeral clock measurement (p=0.034) and a longer follow-up (p=0.006). No glenoid or combined measurements were correlated with arthroscopic procedure failure. Recurrence of dislocation was associated to worst function according to the WOSI (1036 vs 573, p=0.002) and DASH (32 vs 15, p=0.03).

Even with lower ISIS score, arthroscopic procedures are still leading to high risk of recurrence in this “all comer” consecutive cohort study AND it is related to humeral side parameters. Recurrence is also affecting daily function and creating higher anxiety related to the shoulder.

Acute pain is one of the most common symptoms shared among patients who have suffered from an orthopedic trauma such as an isolated upper limb fracture (IULF). Development of interventions with limited side effects aiming to prevent the installation of chronic pain is critical as persistent pain is associated with an increased risk of opioid dependence, medical complications, staggering financial burdens and diminished quality of life. Theta burst stimulation (TBS), a non-invasive magnetic brain stimulation technique with minimal side effects, has shown promising results in patients experiencing various types of chronic pain conditions as it precisely targets brain regions involved in pain processing. Surprisingly, its impact on acute pain has never been investigated. This study aims to assess longitudinal effects of a 10-day continuous TBS (cTBS) protocol applied in the acute phase of an IULF on key functional outcomes.

Patients with an IULF aged between 18 to 60 years old were recruited within 7 days post-accident at a Level I Trauma Center. Exclusion criteria included a history of brain injury, neurological disorders, musculoskeletal complications, and open fractures. In order to assess longitudinal changes, questionnaires measuring intensity and characteristics of pain (Numerical Rating Scale, NRS; McGill Pain Questionnaire, MPQ) as well as functional disability (DASH) were completed by all patients at three time points, namely prior to the start of the TBS program as well as 72 hours and 3 months post-intervention. Patients were randomly attributed to the active TBS protocol (active group) or to the placebo protocol (sham group). The stimulation site for each participant corresponded to the contralateral motor cortex of the injured arm.

Fifty patients were recruited (female: 24; age: 40.38 years old), of which 25 were in the active group and 25 were in the sham group. Both groups were equivalent based on age, sex, type of injury, and surgical procedures (p>0.05). The intervention protocol was introduced on average 6.18 days post-accident. In comparison to the sham group, the active group showed a significant decrease in pain intensity (NRS) at 72h (F=6.02; p=0.02) and 3-month (F=6.37; p=0.02) post-intervention. No group difference was found early-on (72h post) in regard to pain characteristics (MPQ; F=3.90; p=0.06) and functional disabilities (DASH; F=0.48; p= 0.49). At three-month post-intervention, the active group showed statistically significant improvement on the MPQ (F=5.02; p=0.04) and the DASH (F=5.88; p=0.02) compared to the placebo group. No complications related to the treatment were reported.

Results from this study show that patients who underwent active cTBS reported less pain and better functional states shortly after the end of the TBS protocol compared to sham patients and treatment effects were maintained at three months post-intervention. Given that acute pain intensity is an excellent predictor of chronic pain development, this safe technique available in numerous centers in Canada may help prevent chronic pain development when administered during the acute post-injury phase. Future studies should continue to investigate mechanisms involved to optimize this technique among the orthopedic trauma population and to reduce opioid consumption.

Radial head fractures are relatively common, representing approximately one-third of all elbow fractures. Outcomes are generally inversely proportional to the amount of force involved in the mechanism of injury, with simple fractures doing better than more comminuted ones. However, the prognosis for these fractures may also be influenced by associated injuries and patient-related factors (age, body index mass, gender, tobacco habit, etc.) The purpose of this study is to evaluate which factors will affect range of motion and function in partial radial head fractures. The hypothesis is that conservative treatment yields better outcomes.

This retrospective comparative cohort study included 43 adult volunteers with partial radial head fracture, a minimum one-year follow up, separated into a surgical and non-surgical group. Risk factors were: associated injury, heterotopic ossification, worker's compensation, and proximal radio-ulnar joint implication. Outcomes included radiographic range of motion measurement, demographic data, and quality of life questionnaires (PREE, Q-DASH, MEPS).

Mean follow up was 3.5 years (1–7 years). Thirty patients (70%) had associated injuries with decreased elbow extension (−11°, p=0.004) and total range of motion (−14°, p=0.002) compared to the other group. Heterotopic ossification was associated with decreased elbow flexion (−9°, p=0.001) and fractures involved the proximal radio-ulnar joint in 88% of patients. Only worker's compensation was associated with worse scores. There was no difference in terms of function and outcome between patients treated nonsurgically or surgically.

We found that associated injuries, worker's compensation and the presence of heterotopic ossification were the only factors correlated with a worse prognosis in this cohort of patients. Given these results, the authors reiterate the importance of being vigilant to associated injuries.

Purpose

The measurement of radial head translation about the capitellum (in percent): the radio-capitellum ratio (RCR) has proven to have excellent inter- and intra-observer reliabilities when measuring the RCR on a lateral radiological view of elbows at 90° of flexion and in the neutral position of the forearm. However, in the clinical setting, radiographs may be taken with the elbow in different positions. However, the purpose was to validate the RCR measurement method on elbows in different positions in flexion-extension and in different positions of the forearm in pronation-supination.

Purpose: The literature contains little information on an objective method of measuring radiocapitellar joint translations, as would be seen with joint instability. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a measurement method that was simple and that could be easily reproducible in a clinical setting or intra-operatively to assess radiocapitellar joint translations.

Method: We performed a radiological study on a synthetic elbow specimen in order to quantify radial head translations as related to the capitellum: the Radio-capitellum ratio (RCR). Thirty (30) lateral elbow x-rays were taken in different magnitude of subluxation of the radial head. The subluxation was created randomly by manipulation. X-rays where taken by fluoroscopy to obtain a perfect lateral view of the distal humerus. First, the evaluators determined the long axis of the radius and the center of the capitellum. The displacement of the radial head (in mm) was obtained by measuring the distance of the line perpendicular to the long axis of the radius passing through the center of the capitellum. Then, in order to adjust for variation of magnification, a ratio of the displacement of the radial head about the diameter of the capitellum was done. The RC ratio would be of zero because the long axis of the radius always crosses the center of the capitellum in a perfectly aligned joint. A five mm translation of the radial head and a capitellum diameter of twenty (20) mm would give a RCR of 25% and would be positive if anterior and negative if posterior. The measurements were done two times at one week intervals by three independent evaluators to test inter-observer agreement and intra-observer consistency. The radiological incidences were randomly ordered to minimize observer recall bias. Intra/inter-observer reliability was calculated using Intra-Class Correlation (ICC) and paired T-tests.

Results: The mean translation in the trial group was of 6,06% (SD 70.7%) from – 167% to 125%. A result over 100% means that it is a complete dislocation ie – the axis of the radius is outside of the capitellum. Negative values signify posterior translation and positive values an anterior translation. Intra-observer reliability was excellent for the Radio-capitellum ratio (ICC 0.988 and 0.995) and inter-observer reliability was excellent (ICC 0.984 in average). Paired T-test results confirm a high intra-observer repeatability (p=0.97 and p=0.99) as well as a large inter-observer reproducibility (p=0.98 in average).

Conclusion: The proposed measurement of radial head translation about the capitellum (in percent): radio-capitellum ratio (RCR) has excellent inter – and intra-observer reliability when using our measurement method.