Whiplash vertigo syndrome is often seen in victims of rear-end vehicle collisions. These patients commonly complain of headache, vertigo, tinnitus, poor concentration, irritability, and sensitivity to noise and light.

Sixteen patients (medium age, 39,5 years) that they refered in orthopaedic examination because of long-lasting subjective complaints after cervical spine injury underwent clinical, laboratorial and psychometric examinations. The mean posttraumatic interval was 43 months. Ten patients were injured in road accidents, 5 during sports and one at work, all with mechanism trial of whip. Each patient was evaluated with otorhinolaryngologic examination, audiometry tests, CT: petrus – internal auditory meatus and cerebellopontine corner. Also each patient was evaluated with neurologic examination, psychological well-being scale (sf-36), and personality profile scale.

None of the patients had neurologic symptoms, and no lesions of the cervical spine were identified. All the patients had negative clinical, radiological and standard laboratorial control, but may be is a critical point that the eleven of these patients had pathologic OGTT (Oral Glucose Tolerance Test). Also did not exist differentiations from the mean values in psychological well-being scale (SF-36), and personality profile scale of healthy population. Test results were unrelated to the length of the post-traumatic interval. However, 2 distinct syndromes were identified. Ten patients had cervicoencephalic whiplash type syndrome (CES), characterized by headache, vertigo, tinnitus poor concentration, and disturbed adaptation to light intensity. Six patients had the lower cervical spine whiplash type syndrome (LCSS), characterized by vertigo, tinnitus cervical and cervicobrachial pain.

The verification of Whiplash Vertigo syndrome require more objective clinical means. This article proposes that exists an organic base for the syndrome, but does not promote that whiplash injury certainly cause it

Aim of our study was the investigation and the cross-correlation of various neurologic scales to estimate, comparatively with the functional results of patients after damage of spinal cord injuries.

Between 1989 – 2005, 115 patients were submitted in stabilization of Lower Cervical Spine that was judged unstable.

The neurologic situation was certified with the scales: Frankel, ASIA motor score, NASCIS motor score, FIM scale, and MBI scale.

In the protocol took part the 94 patients for that existed in neurologic details and long follow-up for at least two years.

From the study of course of scores of all scales was not found statistically important difference between ASIA, NASCIS and other motor scales. However 12 patients with important improvement of mobility at ASIA motor score and NASCIS motor score they have not difference in Frankel scale, despite the make that the MRP (Motor Percentage Recovery) was improved: 21.5%

Also 8 patients with relatively big improvement in their total scores did not have corresponding functional improvement (FIM scale, and [MBI] scale)

A lot of neurologic methods – scales were used and are used today. However for the essential and modern follow-up of patients with spinal cord injuries, it needs certification with a scale of classic team of (measurement of mobility) and a scale of functional faculties of the patient