To determine the cost-effectiveness of Lumbar Total Disc Replacement (LTDR) with circumferential spinal fusion surgery.

Cost utility analysis.

We prospectively reviewed a cohort of 32 consecutive patients who underwent LTDR between 2004 and 2008 with a mean follow-up for 3.75 years. Identical data was compared to a similar group of patients (n=37) who underwent fusion in our institution.

Oswestry Disability Index, visual analogue scale, quality of life (SF-36) and NHS resource use. Cost-effectiveness was measured by the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. QALY gains were estimated from SF-36 data using standard algorithms.

There was no significant intergroup difference in the ODI, VAS and SF-36 pre and post-op. Both treatments produced statistically significant and equivalent improvements in mean health state utility at the 24-month follow-up (0.078 for LTDR, 0.087 for fusion). Costs were significantly lower with LTDR than with fusion due to a shorter mean procedure time (193.6 vs 377.4 minutes) and shorter length of stay (5.8 vs 7 days). The mean cost difference was £2,878 per patient. At 2 years, the cost per QALY gain of the lower-cost option (LTDR) was £48,892 although the cost effectiveness ratio would fall to below £30,000 if it is assumed that the patient benefits of LTDR last for at least 4 years.

Both treatments led to significant improvements in patient outcomes which were sustained for at least 24 months. Costs were lower with LTDR which is effective and a more cost-effective alternative.

Literature review about the current management strategies for U-shape sacral fractures

A thorough literature search was carried out to find out the current concepts in the management of U-shaped sacral fractures.

Meta-analysis of 30 cases of U-Shaped sacral fractures

Radiological assessment for bone healing, and clinical examination for neurological recovery.

7 papers were published in the English literature between 2001 and 2009 about the management of U-shaped sacral fractures. In total 30 cases were included. The most common mechanism of injury was fall or jump from height (63%), followed by road traffic accidents and industrial injuries. Pre-operative neurological deficit was noted in 73% of patients. The average follow up time ranged from 2-12 months.

18 (60%) of patients were treated with sacroiliac screws. In this group pre-operative neurological deficit was found in 12(66%) patients. All of these patients had satisfactory radiological healing at follow up but 5(27%) patients had residual neurological deficit. No immediate complication was reported in this group. Incomplete sacroiliac screw disengagement was reported in one patient without fixation failure. Other procedures performed were lumbopelvic fixation, triangular osteosynthesis and transsacral plating.

The most common cause of U-shaped sacral fractures is a fall or jump from height. There is a high association of neurological damage with U-shaped sacral fractures. From the current available evidence sacroiliac screw fixation is the most commonly performed procedure, it is however not possible to deduce which procedure is better in terms of neurological recovery.

To review the accuracy of our systematic process in preventing wrong level lumbar microdiscectomy.

X-ray is used to identify the correct level for the skin incision to be made, x-ray is again used if the surgeon is in doubt prior performing the flavotomy. Following a lumbar microdiscectomy a Watson Chane is inserted into the empty disc space and an intra-operative x-ray is taken to confirm the level the discectomy has occurred. Observers A and B independently reviewed intra-operative x-ray in patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomies and correlated the accuracy of the x-ray in determining correct level surgery against the pre-operative MRI scan and the preposed level of surgery.

123 patients, 66 males and 57 females underwent 127 lumbar microdiscectomy procedures between 2007 and 2009. The levels where surgery occurred are;- L2/3 -1 patient, L3/4–8 patients, L4/5–53 patients and L5/S1-65 patients.

Kappa coefficient was used to determine inter-observer and Pearson Correlation coefficient was used to determine the X-ray and MRI relationship

Percentage of patients who required a pre-flavotomy x-ray level check are:- L2/3–100%, L3/4-63%, L4/5–45%, and L5/S1–40%. Pearson's correlation in confirming the level lumbar microdiscectomy was performed using final x-ray and the pre-operative MRI scan was 1. Kappa coefficient between observer A and B was 1.

This process of using intra-operative x-ray in determining the exact level where lumbar microdiscectomy was performed is 100% accurate. This is our standard process in preventing wrong level surgery for lumbar microdiscectomy.

To determine if there is a safe osseous corridor for trans-sacroiliac screw fixation of U-type sacral fractures using fluoroscopic landmarks.

We reviewed the sacral anatomy of patients who underwent Computed Tomography (CT) investigations between October and December 2009. Agfa-IPMAX Version 5.2 software was used to determine if there was a trans-sacroiliac osseous corridor in the S1 and S2 vertebrae from one ilium to the other.

76 patients were in the study, 38 male and 38 female. Exclusion criteria were patients under 18 years old; patients with degenerate lumbar spine and lumbo-sacral junction; CT imaging slices greater than 2.5mm.

We measured various parameters including the dimensions of the S1 and S2 mid-sagittal vertebral body; cross-sectional areas of the S1 and S2 corridor; location of the centre of the S1 and S2 corridor.

The mean cross-sectional area for S1 and S2 corridors in males and females are 21mm² and 15mm² respectively. The mean cross-sectional area for the S2 corridor in males and females were 15mm² and 11mm² respectively. The centre of the S1 and S2 corridor is located in the centre of both S1 and S2 vertebrae.

Two-thirds of males and females have a complete osseous corridor to pass a trans-sacroiliac S1 screw. The S2 corridor was present in all males but only in 87% of females. Before placement of trans-sacroiliac screws, the surgeon should review the CT sacral anatomy to determine if the trans-sacroiliac osseous corridor is present.

Ethics Approval: None – Audit Interest Statement: None

Introduction: Radiation dose exposure to patients in a main X-ray department in a hospital is well documented and controlled. Few studies report the radiation exposure to patients undergoing spinal surgery received from an image intensifier. There are no recommended doses published when using the image intensifier

Methods: We reviewed the radiation doses and exposure times from computer and radiation log records of all the patients who underwent trauma & orthopaedic surgery which required an image intensifier between January and September 2005. The Dose-Area-Product (Gray/cm2) and screening time was recorded.

Results: More than 600 patients underwent trauma & orthopaedic surgery that required an image intensifier at the time of surgery. The mean screening Dose Area Product of the patients undergoing spinal surgery and other common procedures are shown (Gray/cm2):- Lumbar fusion – 23. Disc replacement – 10. Discogram – 4.9. Foraminal injection – 4.4. DHS – 1.86. IMHS – 1.33. ORIF Ankle – 0.89. MUA k-wire wrist – 0.04. The four surgical procedures which required the most radiation were spinal procedures. The maximum radiation is given to patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.

Conclusion: Patients undergoing spinal surgery can receive as much radiation exposure as those undergoing procedures such as barium swallow or standard lumbar spine films. Efforts should be made to reduce radiation exposure to orthopaedic patients, and operating surgeons especially those undergoing spinal surgery. By publishing our radiation exposure doses, we can begin to establish guidelines for recommended patient doses.

Introduction: Clinical outcome studies have shown excellent results following unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A wide Pub Med search failed to find any literature on the outcome of results following bilateral staged TKA.

Aim: To determine the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing bilateral staged TKA.

Material & Methods: Patients who underwent bilateral staged TKA between 1994 – 2002 were assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scoring systems. They were also asked regarding which TKA they considered ‘better’ and why.

Results: We clinically reviewed 110 patients who underwent bilateral staged TKA. The mean clinical follow-up time was 5.13 years. The mean pre-operative KSS was 95.8 for the right knee and 95.5 for the left knee. The mean post-operative KSS was 154.1 for the right knee and 155.9 for the left knee. Patients mean postoperative WOMAC scores for the right knee were; Pain – 1.67, Stiffness – 1.17 and Function – 10.78. Patients mean post-operative WOMAC scores for the left knee were, Pain – 1.77, Stiffness – 1.14 and Function – 10.69. Objectively there was no statistical significance between right and left KSS pre-operatively. There was no statistical significance between right and left KSS and WOMAC scores post-operatively. Subjectively, 44 patients reported their first TKA was ‘better’ than their second. 48 patients reported both TKA’s were as good as each other. 18 patients reported their second TKA was ‘better’ than their first. The 2 main reasons why one TKA was better than the other were pain and range of movement.

Conclusion: Objectively, staged bilateral TKA results in equally good outcome. Subjectively, the first TKA is ‘better’ or equal to the second TKA in 84% of cases. We feel that this information is important during counseling of patients undergoing bilateral staged TKA.

Methods and materials: Between August 2000 and August 2002, 28 patients, average age of 78 years (range 62 to 94 years), with distal femoral fractures (33A1 – 17, 33A2 – 1, 33C1 – 6, 33C2 – 4) were treated with DFN. All the patients had sustained the injury following a simple fall. Periprosthetic fractures were excluded from this study. Two fractures required additional procedures in the form of circleage wires. Nailing was performed through a midline mini arthrotomy. Post operative protocol was to mobilise the patient weight bearing as tolerated.

Results: All fractures healed without the need for secondary procedures. Average period of follow up was 8.5 months. Average hospital stay was 18 days (range 10 to 34). Post operative mobility returned to pre operative state in 15 patients. Three patients died within 3 months due to unrelated medical causes. There was no incidence of extension lag or malunion. Knee range of movement was on average 95°. Patients with pre existing knee arthritis had slight worsening of the pain. Hospital for Special Surgery knee scores were on average 78.3. 23 patients were rated as excellent, 4 good and 1 poor. In one patient the distal screws broke without significant functional impairment.

Conclusion: We recommend the use of DFN in supracondylar femoral fractures in the elderly as it produced satisfactory results with low operative and post operative morbidity. It can be performed with minimal soft tissue damage with good purchase in the osteoporotic bone which allows early mobilisation.

Introduction: Darrach’s procedure is indicated for conditions were the distal radio-ulnar joint movement is painful or restricted. The procedure may be indicated at the time of wrist arthrodesis. Darrach’s procedure is not without complications and revision surgery may be indicated.

Aims: To determine the success rate following wrist arthrodesis and whether Darrach’s procedure correlates to revision surgery.

Methods: A retrospective case note review was performed of a consecutive series of patients who underwent wrist arthrodesis between 1991 and 2002 at our institution; performed by a single surgeon.

Results: 73 patients underwent wrist arthrodesis. 39 were female and 34 male. The indications for wrist arthrodesis were rheumatoid disease, osteoarthritis, carpal instability and failed wrist arthroplasty. Successful arthrodesis was achieved in 82% (60/73) of patients, where revision arthrodesis was defined as the end point. 25% (18/73) patients underwent Darrach’s procedure at the time of their primary arthrodesis. 25% (15/60) of the patients whose primary arthrodesis was successful underwent concomitant Darrach’s procedure. 23% (3/13) of patients who underwent revision arthrodesis had undergone concomitant Darrach’s procedure during their primary arthrodesis. 77% (10/13) patients who underwent revision arthrodesis did not undergo Darrach’s procedure at the time of their primary arthrodesis. Of these 10 patients, 3 (30%) of them underwent concomitant Darrach’s procedure during revision arthrodesis.

Conclusion: Wrist arthrodesis in our institution is comparable with that of published literature. The incidence of Darrach’s procedure at the time of primary wrist arthrodesis is 25%. There is a small increase to 30% in the number of patients who require Darrach’s procedure at the time of revision arthrodesis, which is not statistically significant.

Introduction: Clinical outcome studies have shown excellent results following unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We are unable to find in the medical literature the outcome of results following bilateral staged TKA.

Aim: To determine the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing bilateral staged TKA.

Material & Methods: Patients who underwent bilateral staged TKA between 1994 – 2002 were clinically assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scoring systems. They were also asked regarding which TKA they considered ‘better’ and why.

Results: We clinically reviewed 110 patients who underwent bilateral staged TKA. The mean clinical follow-up time was 5.13 years. The mean pre-operative KSS was 95.8 for the right knee and 95.5 for the left knee. The mean post-operative KSS was 154.1 for the right knee and 155.9 for the left knee. Patients mean post-operative WOMAC scores for the right knee were; Pain – 1.67, Stiffness – 1.17 and Function – 10.78. Patients mean post-operative WOMAC scores for the left knee were, Pain – 1.77, Stiffness – 1.14 and Function – 10.69. Objectively there was no statistical significance between right and left KSS pre-operatively. There was no statistical significance between right and left KSS and WOMAC scores post-operatively. Subjectively, 44 patients reported their 1st TKA was ‘better’ than their 2nd. 48 patients reported both TKA’s were as good as each other. 18 patients reported their 2nd TKA was ‘better’ than their 1st. The 2 main reasons why one TKA was better than the other were pain and range of movement.

Conclusion: Objectively, staged bilateral TKA results in equal good outcome. Subjectively, the 1st TKA is ‘better’ or equal to the 2nd TKA in 84% of cases. We feel that this information is important during counseling of patients undergoing bilateral staged TKA.

Aims: To determine the kneeling ability in 3 groups of patients who have undergone either Unicondylar, Primary, or Revision knee arthroplasty.

Methods: A questionnaire was designed to determine the kneeling ability of patients who have undergone knee arthroplasty surgery. The ‘Kneeling’ questionnaire along with a Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire was sent to 191 patients of whom, 27 have had Unicondylar, 105 had Primary and 59 Revision knee arthroplasty.

Results: The mean follow-up time for assessment for each of the 3 groups of patients were; Unicondylar = 3.32 years, Primary = 5.30 years and Revision = 5.06 years. The mean total WOMAC scores for the 3 groups were; Unicondylar = 13.96, Primary = 22.10, and Revision = 38.67. The percentage of patients who underwent knee arthroplasty that found it impossible to kneel were; Unicondylar = 18%, Primary = 36% and Revision = 66%. The commonest reasons why patients found kneeling difficult were; pain and stiffness around the knee prosthesis, fear of harming the prosthesis and sensory deficit around the knee. Visual Analogue Pain scores for kneeling in the 3 patient groups were, Unicondylar = 5.6, Primary = 7.12, Revision = 9.18. A minimum of 30% of patients in each of the 3 groups reported their daily lives were moderately-severely affected due to their difficulty in kneeling following knee arthroplasty. At least 60% of the patients in each group reported they would like to have better kneeling ability.

Conclusion: Unicondylar knee arthroplasty patients have better WOMAC scores and find kneeling easier than patients who have undergone Primary knee arthroplasty (p< 0.01). The Primary group have better WOMAC scores and find kneeling easier than the Revision group (p< 0.001). Kneeling is considered important in patients who have undergone knee arthroplasty. Poor kneeling ability in patients may restrict their daily activities.

Hallux valgus deformity may cause overriding of the second toe. Hallux valgus correction surgery in the elderly can be debilitating and patients may suffer a long period of morbidity. We show the outcomes of amputation of over-riding second toe caused by gross hallux valgus in the elderly. Eight patients underwent amputation of their overriding second toe, one of these patients underwent bilateral second toe amputations. All surgery was performed as a day case. Six patients had surgery under a local anaesthetic, two patients had surgery under a general anaesthetic. Patients selected had asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic hallux valgus with an overriding second toe and did not want hallux valgus correction surgery. A disease specific questionnaire using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was implemented measuring pain, discomfort, deformity and walking distance. Patients were followed up for a minimum nine of months.

Eight patients (nine feet) underwent amputation of their second toe. There were seven females and one male. The age range was 63–90 years (median 83 years). All patients had a painful second toe on wearing footwear. Skin ulceration occurred on the dorsum of second toe in two patients. The mean VAS for pain, deformity, discomfort and walking distance before and after surgery are:- (before/after); pain = (7.00/0.94), deformity = (7.44/2.78), discomfort = (7.78/1.22) and walking distance = (6.89/6.44). There were no cases of post-operative infection, wound dehiscence, bleeding or deep vein thrombosis. One patient complained of a painful neuroma after one year.

Amputation of the second toe significantly reduces pain, discomfort and the appearance of deformity (p< 0.01), there was no difference in the patient’s walking distance after surgery. We recommend this type of surgery as an alternative to hallux valgus correction surgery in the elderly if the first ray is not causing significant symptoms.