Introduction

Management of deformity involving limb length discrepancy (LLD) using intramedullary devices offers significant benefits to both patients and clinicians over traditional external fixation. Following the withdrawal of the PRECICE nail, the Fitbone became the primary implant available for intramedullary lengthening and deformity correction within our service. This consecutive series illustrates the advantages and complications associated with the use of this device, and describes a novel technique modification for antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails.

Introduction

Circular external fixators are fundamental to lower limb reconstruction, primarily in situations with a high risk of infection such as open fractures. During the Covid-19 pandemic, use of circular frames in our unit decreased, following departmental approval, due to resource management and in keeping with BOA guidelines as we opted to “consider alternative techniques for patients who require soft tissue reconstruction to avoid multiple operations”. These alternatives included the use of internal fixation (plate osteosynthesis and intramedullary nailing) as a measure to reduce the number of hospital attendances for patients and to conserve resources. This change in practice has continued in part following the pandemic with the increased use of internal fixation in cases previously deemed unsuitable for such techniques. We present our experience of this treatment strategy in the management of complex lower limb injuries, focusing on outcomes and consider the lessons learnt.

Autogenous bone grafting limitations have motivated the development of Tissue-Engineered (TE) biomaterials that offer an alternative as bone void fillers. However, the lack of a blood supply within implanted constructs may result in avascular necrosis and construct failure¹. The aim of this project was to investigate the potential of novel TE constructs to promote vascularisation and bone defect repair using two distinct approaches. In Study 1, we investigated the potential of a mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) and endothelial cell (EC) co-culture to stimulate pre-vascularisation of biomaterials prior to in vivo implantation². In Study 2, we investigated the potential of TE hypertrophic cartilage to promote the release of angiogenic factors such as VEGF, vascular invasion and subsequent endochondral bone formation in an in vivo model.

Collagen-only (Coll), collagen-glycosaminoglycan (CG) and collagen-hydroxyapatite (CHA) scaffolds were fabricated by freeze-drying³, seeded with cells and implanted into critical-sized calvarial and femoral defects in immunocompetent rats. In Study 1, Coll and CG scaffolds were initially seeded with ECs, allowed to form capillary-like networks before the delayed addition of MSCs and continued culture prior to calvarial implantation. In Study 2, CG and CHA scaffolds were seeded with MSCs and cultured under chondrogenic and subsequent hypertrophic conditions to form a cartilage pre-cursor prior to calvarial and femoral implantation in vivo.

MicroCT and histomorphometry quantification demonstrated the ability of both systems to support increased bone formation compared to controls. Moreover, the greatest levels of bone formation were observed in the CG groups, notably in those containing cartilage tissue (Study 2). Assessment of the immune response suggests the addition of MSCs promotes the polarisation of macrophages away from inflammation (M1) towards a pro-remodelling phenotype (M2).

We have developed distinct collagen-based systems that promote vascularisation and ultimately enhance bone formation, confirming their potential as advanced strategies for bone repair applications.