Posterior slope of the tibial component is an important factor in overall alignment of Total Knee Arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of tibial bone cuts utilizing traditional extramedullary 0 degree and angled 5 degree cutting blocks, and computer aided navigation, in primary total knee arthroplasty.

We identified 3 groups of patients. Group one were primary total knees performed using an extramedullary 0 degree cutting block for posterior slope, group 2 were performed using an extramedullary 5 degree cutting block and the third group were performed with computer navigation. Patients in all 3 groups were age and sex matched. All operations were performed by residents or clinical fellows, under the supervision of the senior authors. Lateral digital radiographs were reviewed and posterior slope was determined in a standardized fashion. Two independent blinded researchers assessed the posterior slope using Siemens Magicweb software version VA42C_0206.

The average difference from the ideal posterior slope in navigated knees was lower than with non-navigated knees, however this was not significant (p=0.086). The average difference from the ideal posterior slope in computer navigated knees was 1.77 degrees (95% CI=1.28 to 2.26) compared to 2.37 degrees (95% CI=1.56 to 3.17) with the 5 degree cutting block and 2.70 degrees (95% CI=1.73 to 3.66) with the 0 degree block. No absolute significant difference was highlighted between the 3 groups using ANOVA testing (p=0.22).

All three techniques used to obtain ideal tibial slope were accurate. Accuracy was not increased by the use of computer navigation; however navigation resulted in less variation in outcome. The two jig based methods produced similar outcomes and either technique can be used successfully.