The Zenith^TM total ankle replacement (Corin, Cirencester) is a mobile-bearing implant based on the Buechal Pappas design. Key features are the simple fully-jigged instrumentation aiming to improve accuracy and reproducibility of implant positioning, cementless calcium phosphate coated surfaces for improved early osseointegration, and titanium nitride-coated bearing surfaces to resist wear. We present early to mid-term survival data for 155 total ankle replacements implanted by three surgeons in our institute.

Case records of all patients undergoing Zenith^TM Total Ankle Replacement by three senior surgeons, including a member of the design team, between 2007 and 2014 were examined. Patients were examined clinically and radiographically annually after the early postoperative period. The primary outcome measure was implant survival. Secondary outcome measures included complication rates, parameters of radiographic alignment, and radiographic evidence of cysts and loosening.

One hundred and fifty-five cases were performed for a mixture of primary pathologies, predominantly primary or posttraumatic arthrosis. Mean follow-up was 50 months. Implant survival was 99.0% at 3 years (n=103), 94.0% at 5 years (n=50), and 93.8% at 7 years (n=16). One patient was revised to arthrodesis for aseptic loosening, one arthrodesis was performed for periprosthetic infection with loosening, and one below-knee amputation was performed for chronic pain. Three cases underwent further surgery to address cysts, and 7 malleolar fractures were reported. Medial gutter pain was experienced by 9% of patients.

Overall, our data show excellent early and mid-term survivorship for the Zenith^TM Total Ankle Replacement. Simple fully-jigged instrumentation allows accurate and reproducible implant alignment.

Traditional open approaches for subtalar arthrodesis have reported nonunion rates of 5–16% and significant incidence of infection and nerve injury. The rationale for arthroscopic arthrodesis is to limit dissection of the soft tissues in order to preserve blood supply for successful fusion, whilst minimising the risk of soft tissue complications. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of sinus tarsi portal subtalar arthrodesis.

Case records of all patients undergoing isolated arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis by two senior surgeons between 2004 and 2014 were examined. All patients were followed up until successful union or revision surgery. The primary outcome measure was successful clinical and radiographic union. Secondary outcome measures included occurrence of infection and nerve injury.

Seventy-seven procedures were performed in 74 patients, with successful fusion in 75 (97.4%). One (1.3%) superficial wound infection and one (1.3%) transient sural nerve paraesthesia occurred. Fixation with a single screw provided sufficient stability for successful arthrodesis.

To our knowledge this is the largest reported series of isolated arthroscopic subtalar arthrodeses to date, and the first series reporting results of the two portal sinus tarsi approach. This approach allows access for decortication of all three articular facets, and obviates the need for a posterolateral portal, features which may explain the high union rate and low incidence of sural nerve injury in our series.

Lisfranc fracture dislocations of the midfoot are uncommon but serious injuries, associated with posttraumatic arthrosis, progressive deformity, and persistent pain. Management of the acute injury aims to restore anatomic tarsometatarsal alignment in order to minimise these complications. Reduction and stabilisation can be performed using image-guided percutaneous reduction and screw stabilisation (aiming to minimise the risk of wound infection) or through open plating techniques (in order to visualise anatomic reduction, and to avoid chondral damage from transarticular screws). This retrospective study compares percutaneous and open treatment in terms of radiographic reduction and incidence of early complications.

Case records and postoperative radiographs of all patients undergoing reduction and stabilisation of unstable tarsometatarsal joint injuries between 2011 and 2014 in our institution were reviewed. Dorsoplantar, oblique and lateral radiographs were assessed for accuracy of reduction, with malreduction being defined as greater than 2mm tarsometatarsal malalignment in any view. The primary outcome measure was postoperative radiographic alignment. Secondary outcome measures included the incidence of infection and other intra- or early postoperative complications.

During the study period, 32 unstable midfoot injuries were treated, of which 19 underwent percutaneous reduction and screw stabilisation and 13 underwent open reduction and internal fixation. Of the percutaneous group, no wound infections were reported, and there were four (21.1%) malreduced injuries. Of the open group, two infections (15.4%) were observed, and no cases of malreduction.

In conclusion, our study shows a strong trend towards increased risk of malreduction when percutaneous techniques are used to treat midfoot injuries, and an increased risk of infection when open surgery is used. Whilst conclusions are limited by the retrospective data collection, this study demonstrates the relative risks to consider when selecting a surgical approach.

Proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis for lesser toe deformity is commonly stabilised using a Kirschner wire passed through the tip of the toe. Recently, a number of all-inside intramedullary fusion devices have been developed, with the aim of decreasing infection risk through avoiding exposed metalwork. We report our early experience with Stayfuse™ (Nexa Orthopaedics).

Case records of patients undergoing Stayfuse™ proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis between July 2009 and November 2011 were examined. Twenty-eight Stayfuse™ proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis procedures in 14 patients were performed. Overall, 8 (29%) procedures required revision within 6 months. Of these, 3 (11%) intraoperative failures occurred, requiring immediate revision (Kirschner wire stabilisation or excision arthroplasty). All involved bending failure of the implant clip mechanism. A further 5 (18%) toes required revision procedures within 6 months of the index procedure, 3 (11%) for dissociation of the implant clip mechanism and 2 (7%) for periprosthetic fracture.

For patients perceived to be at higher risk of infective complications, all-inside stabilisation systems are an attractive concept. However, with 29% of patients undergoing revision procedures within 6 months, we question the safety of choosing Stayfuse™ implants over Kirschner wire stabilisation.

Background

During cephalomedullary nail stabilisation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures, damage to the distal anterior femoral cortex by the nail is a recognised cause of periprosthetic fracture. Currently available cephalomedullary devices vary widely in anteroposterior curvature, though all are less curved than the mean anatomic human femur. This study tests the hypothesis that a cephalomedullary device with greater anteroposterior curvature will achieve a more favourable position in the distal femur, with greater distance of the nail tip from the anterior cortex, and therefore lower risk of cortical damage.

Summary: A large number of review appointments in elective clinics are to discuss results. In well-informed patients, investigations and treatment plans can be discussed by telephone, avoiding the need for a face-to-face consultation. This saves resources, assists in achieving treatment pathway targets, and is financially viable and acceptable to patients.

Background: An audit of the Plymouth foot & ankle service highlighted a long patient wait to discuss the outcome of investigations and plan treatment. Not only is this unacceptable for patients, it adversely affects the flow of the RTT pathways.

Derriford Hospital has a wide catchment area and the foot & ankle service has a military catchment area from Cornwall to Buckinghamshire.

Method: During the initial outpatient consultation, if the clinician feels that the patient is suitable, an arrangement is made to discuss the results of investigations and subsequent treatment plan by telephone. The treatment options are re-iterated in a summary letter of the consultation to the patient.

Conclusion: The preliminary 3 month results are presented and as a concept the clinic has been successful, being acceptable to all patients involved and reducing the requirement to provide additional clinics.