Introduction: Acral sarcomas present as small tumours to specialised orthopaedic services. There is a high incidence of inadequate resection compromising clinical and functional outcome.

It is advised that lumps which are greater than 5cm should be referred to a sarcoma centre for management and that small lesions cause less harm with unplanned excision.

Method: Data from the Oxford Registry was collated of all those patients with acral sarcomas who underwent surgery in a period from 1997 – 2008 at The Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre including site, size, histological subtype, of tumours, history of previous surgical excisions, staging, and functional scores.

Results: 27 patients were treated (17 foot and ankle cases, 10 hand tumours). The commonest acral lesions were synovial sarcomas (30%).

Of the hand patients 7 of the 10 patients had wide excision of the lesion with 3 an amputation. 5 of the cases were for inadequate previous excision (50%).

7 of the 17 in the foot and ankle group underwent amputation (41%) the rest wide excision. 29% of cases were for second time surgery due to inadequate previous excision.

Discussion: Our study shows that up to 50% of patients with acral tumours are undergoing further surgery due to previous inadequate excision. The belief that 5cm should be a benchmark for specialist referral should not be applied to such lesions.