Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_18 | Pages 3 - 3
1 Dec 2014
Somasundaram K Huber C Babu V Zadeh H
Full Access

Optimal surgical management of proximal humeral fractures remains controversial. We report our experience and the study on our surgical technique for proximal humeral fractures and fracture-dislocations using locking plates in conjunction with calcium sulphate augmentation and tuberosity repair using high strength sutures. We used the extended deltoid-splitting approach for fracture patterns involving displacement of both lesser and greater tuberosities and for fracture-dislocations.

We retrospectively analysed 22 proximal humeral fractures in 21 patients. 10 were male and 11 female with an average age of 64.6 years (Range 37 to 77). Average follow-up was 24 months. Fractures were classified according to Neer and Hertel systems. Pre-operative radiographs and CT scans in three and four-part fractures were done to assess the displacement and medial calcar length for predicting the humeral head vascularity. According to the Neer classification, there were 5 two-part, 6 three-part, 5 four-part fractures and 6 fracture-dislocations (2 anterior and 4 posterior). Results were assessed clinically with DASH scores, modified Constant & Murley scores and serial post-operative radiographs.

The mean DASH score was 16.18 and modified Constant & Murley score was 64.04 at the last follow-up. 18 out of 22 cases achieved good clinical outcome. All the fractures united with no evidence of infection, failure of fixation, malunion, tuberosity failure, avascular necrosis or adverse reaction to calcium sulphate bone substitute. There was no evidence of axillary nerve injury. The CaSO4 bone substitute was replaced by normal appearing trabecular bone texture at an average of 6 months in all patients.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 366 - 366
1 May 2009
Ahmed A Ahamed AZ Zadeh H Nathan S
Full Access

Introduction: Ankle fractures are one of the most common injuries treated by the orthopaedic surgeon. The general recommendation is if surgical treatment is not carried out within the first 24 hours from injury, then it should be delayed for about 5–7 days to reduce the risk of wound complications associated with limb swelling. The aim of our study was to see whether timing of surgery affects the relative risk of skin complications following internal fixation of ankle fractures.

Method: We analysed medical records of 102 patients with closed ankle fractures admitted to the orthopaedic department at our hospital between May 2003 and May 2005. The fractures were classified according to the Weber-AO classification. Open reduction and internal fixation was performed according to the techniques of the AO Group.

Results: The mean age of patients was 43 years(range 13–87). According to the AO classification, 3 were type A(A1–3), 77 were type B(B1-16, B2-42, B3-16), 17 were type C(C1-2, C2-11, C3-4), 4 were isolated medial malleolus and 1 was Salter-Harris type 2 fractures. The mean delay before surgery was 3(0–18) days. The mean length of hospital stay was 6(1–44) days. Out of 102 patients, 53 of the patients were operated within 24 hours, 22 were operated from 24–72 hours, 15 within 4 to 7 days and the rest were operated within 7–18 days. The main reasons for delay were either failed initial conservative management or late presentation.

There was one case of superficial wound infection, deep vein thrombosis, neuroma and delayed union of medial malleolus each.

Conclusion: We conclude that for ankle fractures that are not operated on within the initial 24 hours from the injury, delayed treatment could be instituted as soon as patient and limb factors permit and rigid adherence to waiting times of 5–7 days is not necessary.