Aims. Studies of infant hip development to date have been limited by considering only the changes in appearance of a single ultrasound slice (Graf’s standard plane). We used 3D ultrasound (3DUS) to establish maturation curves of normal infant hip development, quantifying variation by age, sex, side, and anteroposterior location in the hip. Methods. We analyzed 3DUS scans of 519 infants (mean age 64 days (6 to 111 days)) presenting at a tertiary children’s hospital for suspicion of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Hips that did not require ultrasound follow-up or treatment were classified as ‘typically developing’. We calculated traditional DDH indices like α angle (α. SP. ), femoral head coverage (FHC. SP. ), and several novel indices from 3DUS like the acetabular contact angle (ACA) and osculating circle radius (OCR) using custom software. Results. α angle, FHC, and ACA indices increased and OCR decreased significantly by age in the first four months, mean α. SP. rose from 62.2° (SD 5.7°) to 67.3° (SD 5.2°) (p < 0.001) in one- to eight- and nine- to 16-week-old infants, respectively. Mean α. SP. and mean FHC. SP. were significantly, but only slightly, lower in females than in males. There was no statistically significant difference in DDH indices observed between left and right hip. All 3DUS indices varied significantly between anterior and posterior section of the hip. Mean 3D indices of α angle and FHC were significantly lower anteriorly than posteriorly: α. Ant. = 58.2° (SD 6.1°), α. Post. = 63.8° (SD 6.3°) (p < 0.001), FHC. Ant. = 43.0 (SD 7.4), and FHC. Post. = 55.4° (SD 11.2°) (p < 0.001). Acetabular rounding measured byOCR indices was significantly greater in the anterior section of the hip (p < 0.001). Conclusion. We used 3DUS to show that hip shape and normal growth pattern vary significantly between anterior and posterior regions, by magnitudes similar to age-related changes. This highlights the need for careful selection of the Graf plane during 2D ultrasound examination. Whole-joint evaluation by obtaining either 3DUS or manual ‘sweep’ video images provides more comprehensive DDH assessment. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(11):913–923

Aims. The primary aims of this study were to determine the time to sonographic correction of decentred hips during treatment with Pavlik harness for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and investigate potential risk factors for a delayed response to treatment. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study of infants with decentred hips who underwent a comprehensive management protocol with Pavlik harness between 2012 and 2016. Ultrasound assessments were performed at standardized intervals and time to correction from centring of the femoral head was quantified. Hips with < 40% femoral head coverage (FHC) were considered decentred, and hips with > 50% FHC and α angles > 60° were considered corrected. Survival analyses using log-rank tests and Cox regression were performed to investigate potential risk factors for delayed time to correction. Results. A total of 108 infants (158 hips) successfully completed the bracing protocol and were included in the study. Mean age at treatment initiation was 6.9 weeks (SD 3.8). All included hips centred within two weeks of treatment initiation. At two, five, eight, and 12 weeks following centring of the femoral head, 13% (95% CI 8 to 19), 67% (95% CI 60 to 74), 98% (95% CI 95 to 99), and 99% (95% CI 98 to 100) of hips had cumulatively achieved sonographic correction, respectively. Low α angles at presentation were found to be a risk factor for delayed time to correction (hazard ratio per 1° decrease in α angle 1.04 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.06); p = 0.006). Conclusion. The majority of decentred hips undergoing Pavlik treatment achieved sonographic correction within eight weeks of centring and radiological severity at presentation was a predictor for slower recovery. These findings provide valuable insights into hip development during Pavlik treatment and will inform the design of future prospective studies investigating the optimal time required in harness. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(1):118–123