The most widely used classification system for
acetabular fractures was developed by Judet, Judet and Letournel over
50 years ago primarily to aid surgical planning. As population demographics
and injury mechanisms have altered over time, the fracture patterns
also appear to be changing. We conducted a retrospective review
of the imaging of 100 patients with a mean age of 54.9 years (19
to 94) and a male to female ratio of 69:31 seen between 2010 and
2013 with acetabular fractures in order to determine whether the
current spectrum of injury patterns can be reliably classified using
the original system. Three consultant pelvic and acetabular surgeons and one senior
fellow analysed anonymous imaging. Inter-observer agreement for
the classification of fractures that fitted into defined categories
was substantial, (κ = 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to
0.76) with improvement to near perfect on inclusion of CT imaging
(κ = 0.80, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.91). However, a high proportion of injuries
(46%) were felt to be unclassifiable by more than one surgeon; there
was moderate agreement on which these were (κ = 0.42 95% CI 0.31
to 0.54). Further review of the unclassifiable fractures in this cohort
of 100 patients showed that they tended to occur in an older population
(mean age 59.1 years; 22 to 94 Cite this article:
