Aims. The Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) tool designed to assess artificial prosthesis awareness during daily activities following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) is the minimum cut-off value that corresponds to a patient’s satisfactory state-of-health. Despite the validity and reliability of the FJS-12 having been previously demonstrated, the PASS has yet to be clearly defined. This study aims to define the PASS of the FJS-12 following primary THA. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent primary elective THA from 2019 to 2020, and answered both the FJS-12 and the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) questionnaires one-year postoperatively. HOOS, JR score was used as the anchor to estimate the PASS of FJS-12. Two statistical methods were employed: the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve point, which maximized the Youden index; and 75th percentile of the cumulative percentage curve of patients who had the HOOS, JR score difference larger than the cut-off value. Results. This study included 780 patients. The mean one-year FJS-12 score was 65.42 (SD 28.59). The mean one-year HOOS, JR score was 82.70 (SD 16.57). A high positive correlation between FJS-12 and HOOS, JR was found (r = 0.74; p<0.001), making the HOOS, JR a valid external anchor. The threshold score of the FJS-12 that maximized the sensitivity and specificity for detecting a PASS was 66.68 (area under the curve = 0.8). The cut-off score value computed with the 75th percentile approach was 92.20. Conclusion. The PASS threshold for the FJS-12 at one year following primary THA was 66.68 and 92.20 using the ROC curve and 75th percentile approaches, respectively. These values can be used to achieve consensus about meaningful postoperative improvement to maximize the utility of the FJS-12 to evaluate and counsel patients undergoing THA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(4):307–313

Aims. Treatment of end-stage anteromedial osteoarthritis (AMOA) of the knee is commonly approached using one of two surgical strategies: medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this study we aim to investigate if there is any difference in outcome for patients undergoing UKA or TKA, when treated by high-volume surgeons, in high-volume centres, using two different clinical guidelines. The two strategies are ‘UKA whenever possible’ vs TKA for all patients with AMOA. Methods. A total of 501 consecutive AMOA patients (301 UKA) operated on between 2013 to 2016 in two high-volume centres were included. Centre One employed clinical guidelines for the treatment of AMOA allowing either UKA or TKA, but encouraged UKA wherever possible. Centre Two used clinical guidelines that treated all patients with a TKA, regardless of wear pattern. TKA patients were included if they had isolated AMOA on preoperative radiographs. Data were collected from both centres’ local databases. The primary outcome measure was change in Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and the proportion of patients achieving the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) at one-year follow-up. The data were 1:1 propensity score matched before regression models were used to investigate potential differences. Results. The matched cohort included 400 patients (mean age 67 years (SD 9.55), 213 (53%) female, mean BMI 30.2 kg/m. 2. , 337 (84%) American Society of Anesthesiologists grade ≤ 2). We found a mean adjusted difference in change score of 3.02 points (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41 to 4.63; p < 0.001) and a significantly larger likeliness of achieving PASS (odds ratio 3.67 (95% CI 1.73 to 8.45); p = 0.001) both in favour of the UKA strategy. Conclusion. UKA and TKA are both good strategies for treating end-stage AMOA. However, when compared as a strategy, UKA achieved larger improvements in OKS, and were more likely to reach the PASS value at one-year follow-up. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(5):441–447

Aims. The effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with no or minimal radiological signs of osteoarthritis (OA) is unclear. In this study, we aimed to: 1) assess the outcome of such patients; 2) identify patient comorbidities and CT or MRI findings which predicted outcome; and 3) compare their outcome to the expected outcome of THA for hip OA. Methods. Adult patients undergoing THA for hip pain, with no or minimal radiological features of OA (Tönnis grading scale ≤ 1), were identified from a consecutive series of 1,925 THAs. Exclusion criteria were: inflammatory arthritis; osteonecrosis of the femoral head; prior trauma or infection; and patients without minimum one-year follow-up and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The primary outcome measure was the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Secondary outcome measures were EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), University of California and Los Angeles (UCLA) scale, and patient satisfaction on a validated three-point ‘better’, ‘same’, or ‘worse’ scale. Results. A total of 107 patients with a median age of 41 years (IQR 18 to 73) were included, with mean follow-up of 6.0 years (SD 3.1). All patients underwent a diagnostic hip injection as a decision aid. Median postoperative OHS was 34 (IQR 28 to 42), with 36 patients (33%) achieving a patient-acceptable symptom state (OHS ≥ 42), lower than THA patients in international registries (40 to 43 points). Secondary outcomes were UCLA of 6 (4 to 8) and EQ-VAS of 73 (51 to 80); 91/102 patients (89%) felt ‘better’ and would ‘undergo surgery again'. Patients with chronic pain syndrome or hypermobility had lower OHS than patients without comorbidities (-6 points, p < 0.006). Overall, 84 patients had a CT and 34 patients an MRI. Patients with subchondral cysts (OHS 42 (37 to 45) vs 35 (26 to 36); p = 0.014) or joint space narrowing on CT (OHS 42 (IQR 37 to 44) vs 35 (26 to 36); p = 0.022) had higher function. Conclusion. Despite high satisfaction levels, patients undergoing THA with minimal or no radiological OA had lower postoperative function than typical THA patients. We recommend obtaining low-dose CT imaging and a diagnostic hip injection to aid decision-making. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2025;6(3):328–335

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to determine the ten-year outcome following surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). We assessed whether the evolution of practice from open to arthroscopic techniques influenced outcomes and tested whether any patient, radiological, or surgical factors were associated with outcome.