Objective. Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common spinal disorder mostly caused by the arthritic process. In cases with refractory complaints or significant neurologic deficit, decompressive surgery with or without instrumented fusion may be indicated. We aimed to investigate the surgical outcome of multi-level LSS in the patient with stable spine treated by simple decompression versus decompression and instrumented fusion. Methods: We retrospectively studied 51 patients (25 male, 26 female) with stable multi-level (>2 levels) LSS who were treated by decompressive surgery alone (group A, 31 cases) and decompression and instrumented fusion (group B, 20 cases) and followed them for more than two years. The patients’ disability and pain were assessed with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), respectively. At the last follow-up visit, patient satisfaction with surgery was also scored. Results: The two groups were homogeneous in terms of age, sex, severity of disability and pain. Surgery could significantly improve pain and disability in both groups. Preoperative ODI in group A and B were 51.0±23.7 and 54.5±22.9, respectively, however at the last follow-up visit these parameters improved to 23.1±21.1 and 36.6±21.4 showing a statistical significance. Mean patient satisfaction with surgical intervention was also higher in the simple decompression group, but this difference was not significant. Conclusion: In surgical treatment of the patients with multi-level but stable LSS, simple decompression versus decompression and instrumented fusion could achieve more disability improvement for more than two years of follow-up

Introduction. Ulnar nerve entrapment is the second most common nerve entrapment syndrome of the upper extremity. Despite this, only a few studies have assessed the outcome of ulnar nerve decompression. The objectives of the study were to review the pre-operative symptoms, nerve conduction studies, the co-morbidities, operative procedures undertaken and the post-operative outcomes; and investigate and ascertain prognostic factors particularly in cases of persistence of symptoms after the surgery. Methods. We reviewed the case notes of ulnar nerve decompressions surgery performed over a period of six year period. A structured proforma was created to document the demographics, patient complaints, method of decompression, per-operative findings and symptom status at the last follow up. Outcome grading was recorded as completely relieved, improved, unchanged or worse. Analysis of data was carried out using the SPSS software (Version 16.0; Illinois). The significance level was set at 5%. Results. 136 ulnar nerve decompressions formed the study group. Minimum follow-up was three months. Numbness and paresthesia in ulnar distribution were the two most common presenting symptoms (96%). The cause of compression was identified as idiopathic in 58.2%; flexor carpi ulnaris aponeurosis in 36.7% and Arcade of Stuthers in 5.1% extremities. The outcome was satisfactory in 85.2% of patients. No obvious association was demonstrated between the outcome of surgery and duration of symptoms, presence of co-morbidities or the type of surgery performed. Interestingly out of 12 patients who got worse or had no improvement, nine (75%) had either normal nerve conduction studies or none done pre-operatively. Conclusion. This is the largest review of outcomes after ulnar nerve decompressions at elbow. The study showed that good results (85.2%) of ulnar nerve decompression at elbow in majority of patients regardless of level of surgeon's experience or procedure undertaken

Introduction. Cubital Tunnel syndrome is common affecting 1 in 4000 people. The cubital tunnel serves as major constraint for the ulna nerve. Cubital tunnel decompression is a relatively simple operation to resolve the patients' symptoms. There has been published data on return to work and normal activity after carpal tunnel decompression but not cubital tunnel. Method. All patients who underwent cubital tunnel decompression in Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust between September 2006 and September 2010 were identified and sent a questionnaire; enquiring about age, type of job & if it involved heavy lifting, time off work, range of movement at elbow and hand and if their symptoms resolved or if they had any other complications. Results. 106 cubital tunnels were decompressed in the 4 year period. 66 patients returned the questionnaire (62% response). The average age at operation was 59 years (32–86years). The average time to return to work after surgery was 10 days (0–300days). Complications included painful scar, return of symptoms and chronic region pain syndrome, which lead the patient to change jobs (300days). Only one patient was self-employed, they had no time off work. In 24 patients (36%) their symptoms either never resolved or returned, only worsening in 2 patientsstopping them returning to work their heavy manual jobs. The DASH score (work modules) post operatively was 38.3 over all working groups; this was lower in patients who didn't have a manual job. Conclusion. Our patients, returned to work at around 10 days after surgery. People with jobs which involved no heavy lifting returned at 5 days compared to that of 40 days, in patients with manual jobs. Now we can give our patients more accurate information about how long it will take them to return to work, depending on their job type

Introduction. MRI imaging is carried out to identify levels of degenerative disc disease, and in some cases to identify a definite surgical target at which decompression should take place. We wanted to see if repeat MRI scans due to a prolonged time between the initial diagnostic MRI scan of the lumbar sacral spine, and the MRI scan immediately pre-operatively, due for the desire for a ‘fresh’ MRI scan pre-operatively, altered the level or type of procedure that they would have. Methods. This was a retrospective observational cohort study. Inclusion criteria- all patients with more than one MRI scan before their surgical procedure on the lumbar sacral spine, these were limited to patients that had either, discectomy, microdiscectomy, laminotomy decompression, laminectomy decompression and fusion, and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Exclusion criteria- all patients with anterior approaches, all patients without decompression and all non lumbar sacral patients. Outcome measures were if there was a change between the pre-operative MRI scans, which would have changed the operative level of decompression, added other levels of decompression or type of surgery than primarily decided. Results. 84 patients were identified with our inclusion criteria with two or more pre-operative MRI scans. The repeat MRI did not change the surgical target for all 84 patients. Conclusion. Repeat MRI scanning does not alter the surgical target level, and therefore does not change management. It can delay the initial primary procedure which can lead to progressive neurology, which may be irreversible and should be avoided unless the distribution of neurology has changed

Introduction. Chronic Achilles tendinopathy is a common overuse injury. There are several modalities of treatment, reflecting difficulties in its management. In particular, due to the well-recognised morbidity associated with surgical decompression, treatment has steered towards a less invasive route. Dry needling has been efficacious in managing other tendinopathies. This study therefore assessed dry needling and percutaneous hydrostatic decompression of the Achilles tendon as a novel treatment for this condition. Methods. Twenty-two patients with 27 sonographically-confirmed chronic Achilles tendinopathy were prospectively enrolled. All were symptomatic for >6 months and have failed alternative conservative treatments. Ultrasound-guided dry needling of neovascular areas and paratenon hydrostatic decompression was performed by a dedicated musculoskeletal radiologist on a 6-weekly basis until symptomatic resolution or no improvement was evident. Sonographic assessment of the tendon's thickness and neovascularity was undertaken. Following treatment, a standardized physiotherapy regime was adopted. At baseline and 6 weeks post-final procedure, visual analogue scores (VAS) at rest and during activity were obtained. Telephonic interviews were carried out 12 and 24 months post-treatment. Results. 24 tendons (in 19 patients) were successfully treated - 1 patient had spontaneous symptomatic resolution and 2 progressed to surgical intervention. The mean number of treatment sessions was 2. There was no significant change in neovascularity or tendon thickness after treatment. Therapeutic intervention led to a significant improvement in VAS at rest (42 v 18.4, p=0.0005) and during activity (74 v 33.7, p< 0.0001). At 12 months, 77% of patients were >80% satisfied with their outcome of the procedure, with 85% of patients able to return to their sporting interests. At 24 months, 90% of patients were >80% satisfied with their outcome, with nearly half having complete symptomatic resolution. Conclusion. Dry needling and percutaneous paratenon decompression under ultrasound guidance shows promise as an alternative treatment for this chronic condition

We obtained approval from the local research and ethics committee and prospectively evaluated the incidence of Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in arthroscopic shoulder sub acromial decompression in 72 patients. All patients were assessed clinically for DVT risks as per the established guidelines. Patients with previous history of DVT, those on anticoagulants and those positive for DVT on pre op scans were excluded from the study. All patients had doppler scans on 4 limbs performed by a single consultant radiologist at an average of 4 weeks pre and post operative period. All operations were performed by a single surgeon under GA in beach chair position with routine precautions for DVT, as a day case procedure. Arthroscopy and additional procedures were performed on standard lines. Postoperatively the shoulder was immobilised in a sling for comfort and physiotherapy was supervised by a qualified therapist. Demographic data, co-morbidities, patient position, ASA risk, nerve blocks, surgery duration, medications, intra operative findings, were documented. No patient received any DVT prophylaxis. All patients were available for followup and clinical and doppler findings were documented at an average 4 week period. 3 patients had bilateral procedures. There were 38 female and 34 male patients with an average age of 54.6 years. 47 were classified as ASA1, 15 as ASA2 and 10 ASA 3. Common co morbidities included hypertension, diabetes, acid peptic disease in 34 patients. 37 patients had additional interscalene nerve blocks for pain relief. The average operating time was 52 mins. Additional procedures included excision of lateral clavicle in 32, glenoid labral and rotator cuff debridement in 12 and 14 patients. There were no DVT's on all doppler scans. Shoulder arthroscopic sub acromial decompression procedures do not carry a risk of DVT and routine thromboprohylaxis is not required even in higher anaesthetic risk patients

Purpose of study. This RCT is to determine whether or not there is a clinical benefit from inserting a dynamic stabilising implant such as the Wallis ligament on the functional recovery of patients who have undergone lumbar decompression surgery. This Interspinous implant was developed as an anatomically conserving procedure without recourse to lumbar spinal fusion surgery. The biomechanical studies have shown that unloading the disc and facet joints reduces intradiscal pressures at same and adjacent levels. The aim of this study was to identify a patential Wallis affect. Methods. Ethicallly approved. Patients were randomized into 2 groups, decompression alone or decompression with wallis interspinous ligament stabilisation. Patients were assessed pre operatively and post operatively every 6 months by VAS pain score and Oswestry Disability Index. Summary of findings. A total of 60 patients were recriuted the study from October 2005. Equal number had been randomized into two groups. The mean age of 54 (24–85) and the average follow is 36 months (6–48). The results were significantly better in decompression plus Wallis group compared to decompression alone, showing a minimal clinical difference compared to the control group. Relationship between findings and existing knowledge: Our results deomonstrate that clincial outcomes are significantly better when a Wallis implant was used in lumbar deompression. Patients experienced less back pain. Overall significance of findings: The Wallis implant represents a successful non fusion stabilisation device in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease with canal stenosis. Minimal soft tissue dissection, quick rehabilitation, low morbidity. The Wallis ligament sucessfully treats spinal stenosis by reducing pain score, preserving mobility, and function

Background. Foraminal stenosis is often encountered in patients undergoing decompression for spinal stenosis. Given the increased resection of facets and the presence of the more sensitive dorsal root ganglion, it is hypothesized that patients with foraminal stenosis have poorer postoperative outcomes. Methods. Thirty-one patients undergoing decompression without fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis were evaluated. The degree of foraminal stenosis was determined by 2 independent reviewers for absence of fat around the nerve roots. ImageJ digital imaging software was also used to evaluate the foraminal area. Patients with foraminal stenosis were compared with those without using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and a numerical pain scale for back and leg pain at a minimum of 1 year follow-up. Results. Twenty patients in the foraminal stenosis group were compared with 11 without foraminal stenosis. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding age, sex, comorbidities, number of levels operated on, preoperative ODI, back pain or leg pain scores. The foraminal area was significantly smaller in the foraminal stenosis group. Patients without foraminal stenosis reported significant improvements in ODI (mean 26.0), back pain (mean 3.1) and leg pain scores (mean 5.5). Patients with foraminal stenosis reported significant improvements in ODI (mean 18.8) and leg pain (mean 2.5) but not in back pain (mean 0.3). Comparing the 2 groups, the patients with foraminal stenosis had significantly less improvement in back pain (p = 0.02) and leg pain (p = 0.02). Conclusion. The results of this study suggest that presence of foraminal stenosis is a negative predictor for successful outcome following decompression surgery. This may be related to the increased instability that occurs when a foraminotomy is required. Spinal fusion may reduce this effect, and further study is required. NO DISCLOSURES

Background. Several orthopaedic studies have found significant correlation between pre-operative psychological status and post-operative outcomes. The majority of research has focused on patients requiring lower limb and spine surgery. Few studies have investigated the effect of psychological status on the outcome of upper limb operations. We prospectively investigated the association between pre-operative psychological status and early postoperative shoulder pain and function in patients requiring arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASAD) for impingement syndrome. Methods. A consecutive series of patients in 2009/10 completed questionnaires 2 weeks pre-operatively and 3 and 6 weeks post-operatively that assessed psychological state, shoulder function and pain. The hospital anxiety and depression scale, the Oxford shoulder score and a pain visual analogue scale assessed psychological status, shoulder function and shoulder pain, respectively. Data was analysed using non-parametric statistical methods. Results. Thirty-one patients participated (21 women; 10 men; mean age 54.6 years; age range 21–89 years). Preoperative anxiety was significantly associated with pre-operative shoulder pain (P < 0.05). Pre-operative psychological status did not correlate with post-operative shoulder pain or function. Greater pre-operative anxiety and depression were significantly associated with post-operative psychological distress (P < 0.05). Overall shoulder pain, function and psychological state improved significantly during the study (P < 0.05) regardless of pre-operative psychological status. Conclusion. Despite pre-operative associations between anxiety and shoulder pain, there were no associations between pre-operative psychological status and post-operative outcomes. Our results from a total of 31 patients suggest there is no justification for routinely assessing psychological status in patients with ‘uncomplicated’ impingement syndromes that require ASAD. The majority of patients benefit from ASAD both physically and psychologically regardless of psychological state. Therefore abnormal pre-operative psychological status should not be a justifiable reason for delaying or denying this effective operation

Introduction

Health Economists in Denmark have recently reported low and delayed return to work for patients treated for Sub-Acromial Impingement syndrome (SAIS) by Arthroscopic Sub-Acromial Decompression (ASAD). Surgeons however are reporting that patients achieve good pain relief and a high standard of activities of daily living (ADL) after surgery.

Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis is a common entity and increasing in prevalence. Limited evidence is available regarding patient reported outcomes comparing primary vs revision surgery for those undergoing lumbar decompression, with or without fusion. Evidence available suggest a lower rate of improvement in the revision group. The aim of this study was to assess patient reported outcomes in patients undergoing revision decompression, with or without fusion, when compared to primary surgery. Patient data was collected from the Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN) database. Patients undergoing lumbar decompression without or without fusion were included. Patients under 18, undergoing discectomy, greater than two level decompressions, concomitant cervical or thoracic spine surgery were excluded. Demographic data, smoking status, narcotic use, number of comorbidities as well as individual comorbidities were included in our propensity scores. Patients undergoing primary vs revision decompression were matched in a four:one ratio according to their scores, whilst a separate matched cohort was created for those undergoing primary vs revision decompression and fusion. Continuous data was compared using a two-tailed t-test, whilst categorical variables were assessed using chi-square test. A total of 555 patients were included, with 444 primary patients matched to 111 revision surgery patients, of which 373 (67%) did not have fusion. Patients undergoing primary decompression with fusion compared to revision patients were more likely to answer yes to “feel better after surgery” (87.8% vs 73.8%, p=0.023), “undergo surgery again” (90.1% vs 76.2%, P=0.021) and “improvement in mental health” (47.7% vs 28.6%, p=0.03) at six months. There was no difference in either of these outcomes at 12 or 24 months. There was no difference between the groups ODI, EQ-5D, SF 12 scores at any time point. Patients undergoing primary vs revision decompression alone showed no difference in PROMs at any time point. In a matched cohort, there appears to be no difference in improvement in PROMS between patients undergoing primary vs revision decompression, with or without fusion, at two year follow-up. This would suggest similar outcomes can be obtained in revision cases

Abstract. Background. Elderly patients with degenerative lumbar disease are increasingly undergoing posterior lumbar decompression without instrumented stabilisation. There is a paucity of studies examining clinical outcomes, morbidity & mortality associated with this procedure in this population. Methods. A retrospective analysis of aged 80–100 years who underwent posterior lumbar decompression without instrumented stabilisation at University Hospitals of Derby &Burton between 2016–2020. Results. Total 167 eligible patients, 163 octogenarians & 4 nonagenarians. Mean age was 82.78 ± 3.07 years. Mean length of hospital stay 4.79 ± 10.92 days. 76% were pain free at 3months following decompression. The average Charleston co-morbidity index (CCI) was 4.87. No association found with CCI in predicting mortality (ODD ratio 0.916, CI95%). 17patients suffered complications; dural tear (0.017%), post-op paralysis (0.017%), SSI(0.01%), and 0.001% of hospital acquired pneumonia, delirium, TIA, urinary retention, ileus, anaemia. High BMI (35+) was associated with increased incidence of complication (CI 95%, p<0.002). There was significant social drift following discharge as 147 patients went home and 4 patients to rehabilitation facility (p<0.001FE test). The mean operative time was 91.408±41.17 mins and mean anaesthetic time was 36.8±16.06 mins. Prolonged operative time was not associated with increased mortality.2year revision decompression rate was 0.011%. Conclusion. Posterior lumbar decompression without instrumented stablisation in elderly is safe & associated with low mortality with 99.5%survival at 1 year. It significantly improves PROMs & has extremely low revision rate. Incidence of post-op complication is <0.05% and 54% of patients get discharged within 72hours of surgery. Careful selection & optimising patients with high BMI would reduced perioperative morbidity and mortality

We undertook this study to investigate the outcomes of surgical treatment for acute carpal tunnel syndrome following our protocol for concurrent nerve decompression and skeletal stabilization for bony wrist trauma to be undertaken within 48-hours. We identified all patients treated at our trauma centre following this protocol between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019. All patients were clinically reviewed at least 12 months following surgery and assessed using the Brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (bMHQ), the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) and sensory assessment with Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing. The study group was made up of 35 patients. Thirty-three patients were treated within 36-hours. Patients treated with our unit protocol for early surgery comprising nerve decompression and bony stabilization within 36-hours, report excellent outcomes at medium term follow up. We propose that nerve decompression and bony surgical stabilization should be undertaken as soon as practically possible once the diagnosis is made. This is emergent treatment to protect and preserve nerve function. In our experience, the vast majority of patients were treated within 24-hours

Introduction. Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is associated with progressive neurological deterioration. Surgical decompression can halt but not reverse this progression. The Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Assessment (MJOA) tool is recommended by international guidelines to grade disease severity into mild, moderate and severe, where moderate and severe are both recommended to undergo surgical intervention. During Covid-19 Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) NHS Trust, identified DCM patients as high risk for sustaining permanent neurological damage due to surgical delay. The Advanced Spinal Practitioner (ASP) team implemented a surveillance project to evaluate those at risk. Methods. A spreadsheet was compiled of all DCM patients known to the service. Patients were telephoned (Oct-Nov 2021) by an ASP. MJOA score was recorded and those describing progressive deterioration were reviewed by the ASP team on a spinal same day emergency assessment unit. Incident forms were completed for clinical deterioration and recorded as severe harm. Acute, progressive neurological deterioration was fast tracked for emergency surgical decompression. Results. 45 patients were telephoned, 18 (40%) had deteriorated. Of the 18, 9 underwent urgent surgical decompression, 6 still await surgery and 3 continue to be monitored. Those who had deteriorated were sent a formal apology and duty of candour letter. Conclusion. It appears that patients with a diagnosis of DCM deteriorate over time. Delays to timely surgical intervention can have a deleterious effect on patient's neurological function. Baseline assessment should be clearly documented and scoring system such as MJOA considered for effective monitoring. Safety netting for deterioration should be standard practice, and a clear pathway for emergency presentation identified. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained

Introduction and Objective. Osteoarthritis of the knee joint is common in old age population in every part of world. Pain is the major source of disability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Subchondral bone marrow is richly innervated with nociceptive pain fibers and may be a source of pain in patients with symptomatic degenerative joint disease. Current therapy for managing bone marrow oedema is core decompression (CD), combining core decompression and injection of hydroxyapatite cement or autologus chondrocyte supplementtion. But all of this work has been done in femoral head and authors documented good result with minimal complication. There are various studies in literature suggesting treatment to repair BME by restoring support and relieving abnormal stresses with accepted internal fixation and bone stimulating surgical techniques in relieving knee OA pain. In this study, we present efficacy of knee arthroscopy with adjunctive core decompression and supplementation with structural scaffold to improve self-rated visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, rate of conversion to arthroplasty, and patient satisfaction levels. Materials and Methods. The study included patients aged between 40 and 75 years old, with pain in the knee for at least six months, associated with high-signal MRI lesion on T2 sequences, on the tibia or femur. Trephine was used as the bone decompression instrument. Trephine has a diameter of 8–10 mm and operation with trephine requires that a cortical incision window be made prior to decompression treatment, thus necessitating strict disinfection. This procedure was done under spinal anesthesia. After diagnostic arthroscopy, decompression was done under C –ARM in desired area on MRI. After decompression, defect was filled with Poly ester urea's scaffold impregnated with BMAC. Results. Patients were assessed using the visual analog pain scale and the KOOS score, one week before surgery and one, three, six, 12, and 24 weeks after the procedure. MRI images were analyzed Lesions were mapped and measured in the axial, coronal, and sagittal views to plan the injection site and the trajectory of the cannula used for the procedure. Radiographs using anteroposterior, profile, and Rosenberg views of the knee and lower limb were performed to classify the lesion according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification and to assess lower limb alignment. Evaluation using the KOOS showed a mean total score in the preoperative period of 38.44 points and of 60.7, 59.08, 56.92, 64.40, and 71.36 points at one, three, six, 12, and 24 weeks after surgery, respectively. In the VAS assessment, mean was 7.8 points preoperatively and 2.8, 2.6, 2.5, 1.3, and 0.5 points in the same periods. Conclusions. Hence it can be Concluded that this new innovative technique has provided significant improvements in the parameters of pain and functional capacity in the short-term assessment

Sacral fractures are often underdiagnosed, but are frequent in the setting of pelvic ring injuries. They are mostly caused by high velocity injuries or they can be pathological in aetiology. We sought to assess the clinical outcomes of the surgically treated unstable sacral fractures, with or without neurological deficits. unstable sacral fractures were included in the study. Single centre, prospectively collected data, retrospective review of patients who sustained vertically unstable fractures of the sacrum who underwent surgical fixation. out of a total of 432 patients with pelvis and acetabulum injuries. fifty six patients met the inclusion criteria. 18 patients had sustained zone one injuries. 14 patients had zone 2 injuries and 10 patients had zone 3 injurie. Operative fixation was performed percutaneously using cannulated screws in 18 patients.. Open fixation of the sacrum using the anterior approach in 6 patients. Posterior approach was indicates in all 10 of the zone 3 injuries of the sacrum. While in 4 patients, combined approaches were used. 3 patients had decompression and spinopelvic fixation. Neurological deficits were present in 16% of the patients. 2 patients presented with neurgenic bladder. Of the 4 patients who had neurological fall out, 3 resolved with posterior decompression and posterior fixation. All 4 neurological deficits were due to taction or compression of the nerve roots. No hardware failures or non unions observed. The rate of neurological deficit was related more to the degree of pelvic ring instability than to a particular fracture pattern. Low rates of complications and successful surgical treatment of sacral fractures is achiavable. Timeous accurate diagnosis mandatory

Abstract. Introduction. There is paucity of evidence in predicting outcomes following cervical decompression in patients in octogenerians with cervical myelopathy. Our aim is to analyse the predictive value of Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) on clinical outcomes in this group. Methods. All patients age >80 years who underwent cervical decompression+/−stabilisation between January 2006-December 2021 at University Hospitals of Derby & Burton were included. Logistic regression analysis was performed using JASP. Results. Total 72 patients (n=32 male, n=28 female). Mean age 83.44 ± 3.21 years. 67 patients underwent posterior decompression+ stabilisation & 5 patients had posterior decompression alone. Mean CCI was 5; graded moderate in 32 (44%, CCI=<4) and severe in 40 (55.5%, CCI>4). Mean age and preoperative Nurick grade was similar between moderate and severe groups. Postoperative Nurick grade improved equally in both groups by 0.67 and 0.68 respectively (p=0.403). Mean LOS 16±16.12 days. 5 complications in the moderate group (21.8%) and 8 complications in severe group (21.6%); wound infection (n=7), other infection (n=2), electrolyte derangement (n=2), AKI (n=1), blood transfusion (n=1) and early death (n=3) (p=0.752). 1 early postoperative death <30 days occurred in the moderate group (4.3%) whereas 2 occurred in the severe group (5.3%) (p=0.984). No patients with moderate CCI required nursing home discharge whereas 7.9% of severe patients required this. Conclusion. Both groups benefitted from neurological improvement postoperatively, low 1 year mortality. No difference in hospital stay, complication rate and early mortality between both groups. More patients with severe CCI require nursing care after discharge than those with moderate CCI

Aims. To compare the efficacy of decompression alone (DA) with i) decompression and fusion (DF) and ii) interspinous process device (IPD) in the treatment of lumbar stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Outcomes of interest were both patient-reported measures of postoperative pain and function, as well as the perioperative measures of blood loss, operation duration, hospital stay, and reoperation. Methods. Data were obtained from electronic searches of five online databases. Included studies were limited to randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) which compared DA with DF or IPD using patient-reported outcomes such as the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), or perioperative data. Patient-reported data were reported as part of the systematic review, while meta-analyses were conducted for perioperative outcomes in MATLAB using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Forest plots were generated for visual interpretation, while heterogeneity was assessed using the I. 2. -statistic. Results. A total of 13 articles met the eligibility criteria. Of these, eight compared DA with DF and six studies compared DA with IPD. Patient-rated outcomes reported included the ODI and ZCQ, with mixed results for both types of comparisons. Overall, there were few statistically significant and no clinically significant differences in patient-rated outcomes. Study quality varied greatly across the included articles. Meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes revealed DF to result in greater blood loss than DA (MD = 406.74 ml); longer operation duration (MD = 108.91 min); and longer postoperative stay in hospital (MD = 2.84 days). Use of IPD in comparison to DA led to slightly reduced operation times (MD = –25.18 min), but a greater risk of reoperation compared to DA (RR = 2.70). Conclusion. Currently there is no evidence for the use of DF or IPD over DA in both patient-rated and perioperative outcomes. Indeed, both procedures can potentially lead to greater cost and risk of complications, and therefore, a stronger evidence base for their use should be established before they are promoted as routine options in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis

The pelvic girdle and spine vertebral column work as a long chain influenced by pelvic tilt. Spinal deformities or other musculoskeletal conditions may cause patients to compensate with excessive pelvic tilt, producing alterations in the degree of lumbar lordosis and subsequently causing pain. The objective of this study is to assess the effect of open and closed chain anterior or posterior pelvic tilt on lumbar spine kinematics using an in vitro cadaveric spine model. Three human cadaveric spines with intact pelvis were suspended with the skull fixed in a metal frame. Optotrak 3D motion system tracked real-time coordinates of pin markers on the lumbar spine. A force-torque digital gage applied consistent force to standardize the acetabular or sacral axis’ anterior and posterior pelvic tilt during simulated open and closed chain movements, respectively. In closed chain PPT, significant differences in relative intervertebral compression existed between L1/L2 [-2.54 mm] and L5/S1 [-11.84 mm], and between L3/L4 [-2.78 mm] and L5/S1 [-11.84 mm] [p <.05]. In closed chain APT, significant differences in relative intervertebral decompression existed between spinal levels L1/L2 [2.87mm] and L5/S1[24.48 mm] and between L3/L4 [2.94 mm] and L5/S1 [24.48 mm] [p <.05]. In open chain APT, significant differences in relative intervertebral decompression existed between spinal levels L4/L5 [1.53mm] and L5/S1 [25.14 mm] and between L2/L3 [1.68 mm] and L5/S1 [25.14 mm] [p<.05 for both]. Displacement during closed chain PPT was significantly greater than during open chain PPT, whereas APT showed no significant differences. In PPT, open chain pelvic tilts did not produce as much lumbar intervertebral displacement compared to closed chain. In contrast, APT saw no significant differences between open and closed chain. Additionally, results illustrate the increase in lumbar lordosis during APT and the loss of lordosis during PPT

The purpose of this study is the evaluate the net promotor score of arthroscopic subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair. The Friends and Family Test, a variant of the Net Promoter Score, was adapted for the National Health Service to evaluate overall patient satisfaction and how likely patients are to recommend an intervention. It ranges from −100 to 100. Positive scores indicate good performance. This study quantifies the scores in 71 patients at 1 year following arthroscopic sub acromial decompression and rotator cuff repair. All of the procedures were performed by 1 consultant shoulder specialist. The patient filled out a shoulder questionnaire pre-operatively, at 6 months and 1 year. The score was 72 for subacromial decompression (n = 32) and 85 for rotator cuff repair +/− decompression (n = 39). Oxford shoulder score was also taken and had a rise of 4.3 and 6.9 respectively. Our study indicates that these procedures are highly valued and are recommended by patients according to the Friends and Family Test. The results of the Friends and Family Test correlated well with postoperative functional improvement and satisfaction. We conclude from this study that a compound score based on the Friends and Family Test is a useful addition to traditional measures of patient satisfaction