Twenty-three patients with thirty hips of slipped capital femoral epiphysis were treated in our department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore between 1997 and 2005. Except one patient lost of follow-up, twenty-four SCFEs with more than 2 years (25 to 73 months, average 38.5 months) follow-up were reviewed. This study is to evaluate the effectiveness and outcome of our protocol: Russell traction followed by gentle manipulative reduction with a single screw fixation & spica cast immobilization (for acute-on-chronic cases with unstable and reducible SCFE). In this series, there were 13 boys & 5 girls, mean age 12 year old ranging from 10 to 14 years. Among them 7 were Chinese, 6 Malays & 5 Indians. There were 12 unilateral cases (8 on the left & 4 right, 67%) & 6 bilateral cases (33%), including 2 patients found contralateral SCFE subsequently 1 year postoperatively. Acute-on-chronic SCFE were 16 & chronic SCFE 8. 16 were Grate I & 8 Grate II. Russell traction was on preoperatively with an average of 6 days. Gentle manipulative reduction under general anesthesia was performed in 20 SCFEs (12 GI & 8 GII) and 17 of them were successful. Fixation with a single screw was used for all cases except one hip with 2 screws. Average follow-up was 38.5 months. Good results achieved. All patient were symptom free with good function. No complications of AVN, chondrolysis, screw loosening and reslipping of the affective hips. Our protocol of management for SCFE has been largely successful in term of manipulative reduction and fixation

This study is to evaluate the effectiveness and outcome of our protocol: Russell traction followed by gentle manipulative reduction with a single screw fixation & spica cast immobilization. Twenty-three patients with thirty hips of slipped capital femoral epiphysis were treated in our department, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore between 1997 and 2005. Except one patient lost of follow-up, twenty-four SCFEs with more than 2 years follow-up were reviewed. In this series, there were 13 boys & 5 girls, mean age 12 year old ranging from 10 to 14 years. Among them 7 were Chinese, 6 Malays & 5 Indians. There were 12 unilateral cases (8 on the left & 4 right, 67%) & 6 bilateral cases (33%), including 2 patients found contralateral SCFE subsequently 1 year postoperatively. Acute-on-chronic SCFE were 16 & chronic SCFE 8. 16 were Grate I & 8 Grate II. Russell traction was on preoperatively with an average of 6 days. Gentle manipulative reduction under general anesthesia was performed in 20 SCFEs (12 GI & 8 GII) and 17 of them were successful. Fixation with a single screw was used for all cases except one hip with 2 screws. Average follow-up was 38.5 months. Good results achieved. All patient were symptom free with good function. No complications of AVN, chondrolysis, screw loosening and reslipping of the affective hips. Our protocol of management for SCFE has been largely successful in term of manipulative reduction and fixation. This is a safe, simple and effective management

Proximal humerus fractures are the third most common fragility fractures with treatment remaining challenging. Mechanical fixation failure rates of locked plating range up to 35%, with 80% of them being related to the screws perforating the glenohumeral joint. Secondary screw perforation is a complex and not yet fully understood process. Biomechanical testing and finite element (FE) analysis are expected to help understand the importance of various risk factors. Validated FE simulations could be used to predict perforation risk. This study aimed to (1) develop an experimental model for single screw perforation in the humeral head and (2) evaluate and compare the ability of bone density measures and FE simulations to predict the experimental findings. Screw perforation was investigated experimentally via quasi-static ramped compression testing of 20 cuboidal bone specimens at 1 mm/min. They were harvested from four fresh-frozen human cadaveric proximal humeri of elderly donors (aged 85 ± 5 years, f/m: 2/2), surrounded with cylindrical embedding and implanted with a single 3.5 mm locking screw (DePuy Synthes, Switzerland) centrally. Specimen-specific linear µFE (ParOSol, ETH Zurich) and nonlinear explicit µFE (Abaqus, SIMULIA, USA) models were generated at 38 µm and 76 µm voxel sizes, respectively, from pre- and post-implantation micro-Computed Tomography (µCT) images (vivaCT40, Scanco Medical, Switzerland). Bone volume (BV) around the screw and in front of the screw tip, and tip-to-joint distance (TJD) were evaluated on the µCT images. The µFE models and BV were used to predict the experimental force at the initial screw loosening and the maximum force until perforation. Initial screw loosening, indicated by the first peak of the load-displacement curve, occurred at a load of 64.7 ± 69.8 N (range: 10.2 – 298.8 N) and was best predicted by the linear µFE (R. 2. = 0.90), followed by BV around the screw (R. 2. = 0.87). Maximum load was 207.6 ± 107.7 N (range: 90.1 – 507.6 N) and the nonlinear µFE provided the best prediction (R. 2. = 0.93), followed by BV in front of the screw tip (R. 2. = 0.89). Further, the nonlinear µFE could better predict screw displacement at maximum force (R. 2. = 0.77) than TJD (R. 2. = 0.70). The predictions of non-linear µFE were quantitatively correct. Our results indicate that while density-based measures strongly correlate with screw perforation force, the predictions by the nonlinear explicit µFE models were even better and, most importantly, quantitatively correct. These models have high potential to be utilized for simulation of more realistic fixations involving multiple screws under various loading cases. Towards clinical applications, future studies should investigate if explicit FE models based on clinically available CT images could provide similar prediction accuracies

Subtrochanteric femoral fractures are a subset of hip fractures generally treated with cephalomedullary nail fixation\[1\]. Single lag screw devices are most commonly-used, but integrated dual screw constructs have become increasingly popular\[2,3\]. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures using a single lag screw (Gamma3 nail, GN) with a dual screw device (InterTAN nail, IN). The primary outcome was mechanical failure, defined as lag screw cut-out, back-out, nail breakage or peri-implant fracture. Consecutive adult patients (18yrs) with subtrochanteric femoral fracture treated in a single centre were retrospectively identified using electronic records. Patients that underwent surgical fixation using either a long GN (2010–2017) or IN (2017–2022) were included. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to identify complications of fixation. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the risk of mechanical failure and secondary outcomes by implant design. Multivariable regression models were used to identify predictors of mechanical failure. The study included 622 patients, 354 in the GN group (median age 82yrs, 72% female) and 268 in the IN group (median age 82yrs, 69% female). The risk of any mechanical failure was increased two-fold in the GN group (HR 2.44 \[95%CI 1.13 to 5.26\]; _p=0.024_). Mechanical failure comprising screw cut-out (_p=0.032_), back-out (_p=0.032_) and nail breakage (_p=0.26_) was only observed in the GN group. Technical predictors of failure included varus >5° for cut-out (OR 19.98 \[2.06 to 193.88\]; _p=0.01_), TAD;25mm for back-out (8.96 \[1.36 to 58.86\]; p=0.022) and shortening 1cm for peri-implant fracture (7.81 \[2.92 to 20.91\]; _p=<0.001_). Our results demonstrate that an intercalated screw construct is associated with a lower risk of mechanical failure compared with the a single lag screw device. Intercalated screw designs may reduce the risk of mechanical complications for patients with subtrochanteric femoral fractures

This study compares outcomes of fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures using a single lag screw (Gamma3 nail, GN) with a dual lag screw device (InterTAN nail, IN). The primary outcome was mechanical failure, defined as lag screw cut-out, back-out, nail breakage or peri-implant fracture. Technical factors associated with mechanical failure were also identified. All adult patients (>18yrs) with a subtrochanteric femoral fracture treated in a single centre were retrospectively identified using electronic records. Included patients underwent surgical fixation using either a long GN (2010–2017) or IN (2017–2022). Cox regression analysis was used to determine the risk of mechanical failure and technical predictors of failure. The study included 587 patients, 336 in the GN group (median age 82yrs, 73% female) and 251 in the IN group (median age 82yrs, 71% female). The IN group exhibited a higher prevalence of osteoporosis (p=0.002) and CKD□3 (p=0.007). There were no other baseline differences between groups. The risk of any mechanical failure was increased two-fold in the GN group (HR 2.51, p=0.020). Mechanical failure comprising screw cut-out (p=0.040), back-out (p=0.040) and nail breakage (p=0.51) was only observed in the GN group. The risk of peri-implant fracture was similar between the groups (HR 1.10, p=0.84). Technical predictors of mechanical included varus >5° for cut-out (HR 15.61, p=0.016), TAD>25mm for back-out (HR 9.41, p=0.020) and shortening >1cm for peri-implant fracture (HR 6.50, p=<0.001). Dual lag screw designs may reduce the risk of mechanical complications for patients with subtrochanteric femoral fractures

Single screw fixation for the management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) was introduced in 1984 and has been reported to have less chondrolysis and avascular necrosis (AVN) than previous methods using multiple pin fixation or osteotomy (Ward 1992). Two groups of patients were investigated. The first group of 55 hips (44 patients) were treated over a 27 year period (1963–1989). Forty four hips were treated with multiple pins and 11 hips with primary intra- or extracapsular osteotomy. These patients were followed up for an average of 8 years (3–27yrs). The second group of 88 hips (69 patients) were treated over a 6 year period (1999–2004). All were treated with single screw fixation and followed up for at least one year. The duration and severity of slip were found to be similar for both groups. In the second group 16 hips (20%) were unstable (unable to walk even with crutches). Instability had not been coined as a term in the first group. All serial radiographs were retrospectively reviewed for AVN and chondrolysis and correlated with clinical findings. In the first group AVN occurred in 8 hips (14.5%). Five (9%) were due to osteotomies, two (3.5%) due to manipulation and one (2%) due to pinning in the superior quadrant. Chondrolysis occurred in 14 hips (25%); eight (14%) at presentation and six (11%) due to persistent pin penetration. In the second group AVN occurred in two hips (2%). Both were unstable. Two of 16 unstable hips (12.5%) developed AVN. Chondrolysis occurred in 6 hips (7%); four (4.5%) at presentation and 2 (2.5%) due to persistent pin penetration. The authors conclude that single screw fixation is a safer technique than multiple pin fixation or osteotomy. AVN only occurred in unstable slips. Chondrolysis due to pin penetration is significantly reduced

Purpose of Study:. In situ fixation with cannulated screws, is the most common surgical management of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis. Surgeons are wary of the consequences to the epiphysis with any manipulation of the hip. The purpose of this study, was to evaluate the use of a single cannulated screw, inserted with imaging done in the standard AP position, and gentle positioning for a frog lateral X-ray, and the risk of slip progression. Description:. A retrospective radiological review was done on 18 patients between the ages of 9–14 treated for unstable slips from 2006–2014. All patients were treated with a single partially threaded, cannulated screw inserted from the anterior aspect of the neck perpendicular to the epiphysis. Intraoperative imaging included an AP image, and thereafter the hip was gently abducted and externally rotated for a frog lateral view. Radiological comparison of the preoperative, postoperative and subsequent follow up X-rays was done. Follow up ranged from 6 months to 8 years. Results:. Radiographs showed no significant slip progression post op. Conclusion:. Gentle positioning for a frog lateral image during screw placement, and a single screw technique appears to be a safe in the management of unstable slips in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

Tip-apex distance (TAD) has long been discussed as a metric for determining risk of failure in fixation of peritrochanteric hip fractures. This study seeks to investigate risk factors including TAD for hospital readmission one year after hip fixation surgery. A retrospective review of proximal hip fractures treated with single screw intramedullary devices between 2016 and 2020 was performed at a 327 bed regional medical center. Patients included had a postoperative follow-up of at least twelve months or surgery-related complications developing within that time. 44 of the 67 patients in this study met the inclusion criteria with adequate follow-up post-surgery. The average TAD in our study population was 19.57mm and the average one year readmission rate was 15.9%. 3 out of 6 patients (50%) with a TAD > 25mm were readmitted within one year due to surgery-related complications. In contrast, 3 out of 38 patients (7.9%) with a TAD < 25mm were readmitted within one year due to surgery-related complications (p=0.0254). Individual TAD measurements, averaging 22.05mm in patients readmitted within one year of surgery and 19.18mm in patients not readmitted within one year of surgery were not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.2113). Our data indicate a significant improvement in hospital readmission rates up to one year after hip fixation surgery in patients with a TAD < 25mm with a decrease in readmissions of over 40% (50% vs 7.9%). This result builds upon past investigations by extending the follow-up time to one year after surgery and utilizing hospital readmissions as a metric for surgical success. With the well-documented physical and financial costs of hospital readmission after hip surgery, our study highlights a reduction of TAD < 25mm as an effective method of improving patient outcomes and reducing financial costs to patients and medical institutions

Olecranon Osteotomy is a common approach used in the management of intraarticular distal humerus fractures. Significant complication rates have been associated with this procedure, including non-union rates of 0–13% and implant removal rates between 12–86%. This study is a multicentre retrospective study involving the largest cohort of olecranon osteotomies in the literature, examining implant fixation types, removal rates and associated complications. Patients were identified between 2007 and 2017 (minimum one year follow-up) via Canadian Classification of Health Interventions (CCI) coding and ICD9/10 codes by our health region's data information service. CCI intervention codes were used to identify patients who underwent surgery for their fracture with an olecranon osteotomy. Reasons for implant removal were identified from a chart review. Our primary outcome was implant removal rates. Categorical data was assessed using Chi square test and Fischer's Exact test. Ninety-nine patients were identified to have undergone an olecranon osteotomy for treatment of a distal humerus fracture. Twenty patients had their osteotomy fixed with a plate and screws and 67 patients were fixed with a tension band wire. Eleven patients underwent “screw fixation”, consisting of a single screw with or without the addition of a wire. One patient had placement of a cable-pin system. Of patients who underwent olecranon osteotomy fixation, 34.3% required implant removal. Removal rates were: 28/67 for TBW (41.8%), 6/20 plates (30%), 0/1 cable-pin and 0/11 for osteotomies fixed with screw fixation. Screw fixation was removed less frequently than TBW p<.006. TBW were more commonly removed than all other fixation types p<.043. Screws were less commonly removed than all other fixation types p<.015. TBW were more likely to be removed for implant irritation than plates, p<.007, and all other implants p<.007. The average time to removal was 361 days (80–1503 days). A second surgeon was the surgeon responsible for the removal in 10/34 cases (29%). TBWs requiring removal were further off the olecranon tip than those not removed p=.006. TBWs were associated with an OR of 3.29 (CI 1.10–9.84) for implant removal if implanted further than 1mm off bone. Nonunion of the osteotomy occurred in three out of 99 patients (3%). K-wires through the anterior ulnar cortex did not result in decreased need for TBW removal. There was no relation between plate prominence and the need for implant removal. There was no association between age and implant removal. The implant removal rate was 34% overall. Single screw fixation was the best option for osteotomy fixation, as 0/11 required hardware removal, which was statistically less frequent than TBW at 28/67. Screw fixation was removed less frequently than TBW and screw fixation was less commonly removed than all other fixation types. Only 6/20 (30%) plates required removal, which is lower than previously published rates. Overall, TBW were more commonly removed than all other fixation types and this was also the case if hardware irritation was used as the indication for removal. Nonunion rates of olecranon osteotomy were 3%

Cannulated screw is commonly used in the fixation of proximal femoral neck fractures. In the literature, several configurations had been proposed for best mechanical support with clinical experiences or biomechanical tests. Although screws in triangle configuration contribute certain fixation stability, but sometimes the surgeons made their own choices have to conduct another fixation pattern for some factors such as fracture type, economic issues, and so on. Therefore the aim of this study is to analyze the mechanical responses of a fractured femur fixed with screws in different configurations, screw materials and screw diameters with finite element method, trying to find the most stable construct. A solid femur model was built from the CT images of a standard saw bone. Three fracture types of the femoral neck were created according to Pauwel's classification (30?, 50?, 70?) by CAD software. The models of implanted screws were built according to a commercial cannulated screw (Stryker Osteosynthesis, Schoenkirchen/Kiel, Germany) with diameter 6.5mm and 4.5mm by CAD software, too. Three fixation configurations were analyzed in this study, including triangle with superior single screw with titanium diameter 6.5mm, triangle with inferior single screw with diameter 6.5mm and diamond with four stainless screw diameter 4.5mm (fig.1). Totally there were nine models constructed in this study, and all of them were then imported into ANSYS WORKBENCH v14 (Swanson Analysis, Houston, PA, USA) to mesh and further analysis. 700N vertical downward force was applied on the femur head and the distal end of femur shaft was totally fixed. The triangle fixation with superior single screw resulted in a best stability, but the fracture fixed with screws in a diamond configuration has least fracture gap. The difference of the maximum displacement of the femur head with Pauwel's classification 70?between triangle fixation with superior single screw and diamond configuration is only 0.03mm (1.72–1.69 mm). In most unstable femoral neck fracture [Pauwel's classification 70], the maximum gap distance is 0.59mm under the diamond configuration, while it is 0.63mm as the fracture fixed with a triangle configuration. Therefore, this study suggests that four 4.5mm stainless screws in a diamond configuration is an alternative for proximal femur fracture once 6.5mm titanium screws are not available

Introduction and Objective. Trochanteric fractures are associated with increasing incidence and represent serious adverse effect of osteoporosis. Their cephalomedullary nailing in poor bone stock can be challenging and associated with insufficient implant fixation in the femoral head. Despite ongoing implant improvements, the rate of mechanical complications in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures is high. Recently, two novel concepts for nailing with use of a helical blade – with or without bone cement augmentation – or an interlocking screw have demonstrated advantages as compared with single screw systems regarding rotational stability and cut-out resistance. However, these two concepts have not been subjected to direct biomechanical comparison so far. The aims of this study were to investigate in a human cadaveric model with low bone density (1) the biomechanical competence of cephalomedullary nailing with use of a helical blade versus an interlocking screw, and (2) the effect of cement augmentation on the fixation strength of the helical blade. Materials and Methods. Twelve osteoporotic and osteopenic femoral pairs were assigned for pairwise implantation using either short TFN-ADVANCED Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA) with a helical blade head element, offering the option for cement augmentation, or short TRIGEN INTERTAN Intertrochanteric Antegrade Nail (InterTAN) with an interlocking screw. Six osteoporotic femora, implanted with TFNA, were augmented with 3 ml cement. Four study groups were created – group 1 (TFNA) paired with group 2 (InterTAN), and group 3 (TFNA augmented) paired with group 4 (InterTAN). An unstable pertrochanteric OTA/AO 31-A2.2 fracture was simulated. All specimens were biomechanically tested until failure under progressively increasing cyclic loading featuring physiologic loading trajectory, with monitoring via motion tracking. Results. T-score in groups 3 and 4 was significantly lower compared with groups 1 and 2, p=0.03. Stiffness (N/mm) in groups 1 to 4 was 335.7+/−65.3, 326.9+/−62.2, 371.5+/−63.8 and 301.6+/−85.9, being significantly different between groups 3 and 4, p=0.03. Varus (°) and femoral head rotation around neck axis (°) after 10,000 cycles were 1.9+/−0.9 and 0.3+/−0.2 in group 1, 2.2+/−0.7 and 0.7+/−0.4 in group 2, 1.5+/−1.3 and 0.3+/−0.2 in group 3, and 3.5+/−2.8 and 0.9+/−0.6 in group 4, both with significant difference between groups 3 and 4, p<=0.04. Cycles to failure and failure load (N) at 5° varus in groups 1 to 4 were 21428+/−6020 and 1571.4+/−301.0, 20611+/−7453 and 1530.6+/−372.7,21739+/−4248 and 1587.0+/−212.4, and 18622+/−6733 and 1431.1+/−336.7, both significantly different between groups 3 and 4, p=0.04. Conclusions. From a biomechanical perspective, cephalomedullary nailing of trochanteric fractures with use of helical blades is comparable to interlocking screw fixation in femoral head fragments with low bone density. Moreover, bone cement augmentation of helical blades considerably improves their fixation strength in poor bone quality

Dual plate constructs have become an increasingly common fixation technique for midshaft clavicle fractures and typically involve the use of mini-fragment plates. The goal of this technique is to reduce plate prominence and implant irritation, as these are common reasons for revision surgery. However, limited biomechanical data exist for these lower-profile constructs. The study aim was to compare dual mini-fragment orthogonal plating to traditional small-fragment clavicle plates for biomechanical non-inferiority and to determine if an optimal plate configuration could be identified, using a cadaveric model. Twenty-four cadaveric clavicles were randomized to one of six groups (n=4 per group), stratified by CT-based bone mineral content (BMC). The six different plating configurations compared were: pre-contoured superior or anterior fixation using a single 3.5-mm LC-DC plate, and four different dual-plating constructs utilizing 2.4-mm and 2.7-mm reconstruction or LC-DC plates. The clavicles were plated and then osteotomized to create an inferior butterfly fracture, which was then fixed with a single interfragmentary screw (OTA 15.2B). Axial, torsional, and bending (anterior and superior surface loading) stiffness were determined for each construct through non-destructive cyclic testing, using an MTS 858 Bionix materials testing system. This was followed by a load-to-failure test in three-point superior-surface bending. Kruskal-Wallace H and Mann-Whitney U were used to test for statistical significance. There were no significant differences in BMC (median 7.9 g, range 4.2-13.8 g) for the six groups (p=1.000). For axial stiffness, the two dual-plate constructs with a superior 2.4-mm and anterior 2.7-mm plate (either reconstruction or LC-DC) were significantly stiffer than the other four constructs (p=0.021). For both superior and anterior bending, the superior 2.4-mm and anterior 2.7-mm plate constructs were significantly stiffer when compared to the 3.5-mm superior plate (p=0.043). In addition, a 3.5-mm plate placed anterior was a stiffer construct than a superior 3.5-mm plate (p=0.043). No significant differences were found in torsional stiffness or load-to-failure between the different constructs. Dual plating using mini-fragment plates is biomechanically superior for fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures when compared to a single superior 3.5-mm plate and has similar biomechanical properties to a 3.5-mm plate placed anteriorly. With the exception of axial stiffness, no significant differences were found when different dual plating constructs were compared to each other. However, placing a 2.4-mm plate superiorly in combination with a 2.7-mm plate anteriorly might be the optimal construct, given the biomechanical superiority over the 3.5-mm plate placed superior

The ideal treatment of the unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) is not clearly defined in the literature. Unstable SUFE occurs with less frequency than the stable SUFE. The incidence of unstable SUFE is between 14–25% of all SUFE’s. The literature reports a variety of accepted methods of treatment of the unstable SUFE, consequently, in Auckland there are various methods of treatment. The unstable SUFE is at risk of development of avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. The reported incidence of AVN in unstable SUFE is between 15–50%. We expect that different treatment will influence the rate of AVN. Our aim was to determine current practice and outcomes in Auckland. We reviewed the records and radiographs of all SUFE’s treated in Auckland from 2000–2007. In this time period there were 463 patients across the Auckland region, 109 of which had bilateral SUFE’s which allowed 572 treated hips to be followed. Over this time period there were 34 unstable SUFE representing 6% of treated hips. There was a difference in average weight, with unstable SUFE on average 10kgs lighter (60.5 vs 70.3kgs). Average time to surgery was 43 hours (range: 4–360hrs). Cases operated within 24 hours have a reduced rate of AVN (20%) compared to those operated after 24 hours (AVN 50%). Of the 34 cases, 13 cases had radiological evidence of AVN (35%). Of these there were 11 cases of pin penetration requiring further surgery. There was no difference in rate of AVN when comparing single screw to double screw fixation (SS 44% v DS 38%). There were 11 cases of pin penetration, 8 with single screw and 3 with double screw fixation. Our review of unstable SUFE in Auckland has shown a difference in the weight of patients when compared to stable SUFE’s presenting from the same population. We have also found that cases operated on within 24 hours have a lower rate of AVN. Single screw fixation is more common than double screw fixation. There was no statistical difference in the rate of AVN but there was a higher rate of screw penetration when using a single screw fixation

In posterior fixation for deformity correction and spinal fusion, there is increasing discussion around auxiliary rods secured to the pedicle screws, sharing the loads, and reducing stresses in the primary rods. Dual-rod, multiaxial screws (DRMAS) provide two rod mounting points on a single screw shaft to allow unique constructs and load-sharing at specific vertebrae. These implants provide surgical flexibility to add auxiliary rods across a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) or over multiple vertebral levels where higher bending loads are anticipated in primary rods. Other options include fixed-angle devices as multiple rod connectors (MRC) and variable-angle dominoes (VAD) with a single-axis rotation in the connection. The objective in this simulation study was to assess rod bending in adult spinal instrumentation across an osteotomy using constructs with DRMAS, MRC, or VAD multi-rod connections. The study was performed using computer biomechanical models of two adult patients having undergone posterior instrumented spinal fusion for deformity. The models were patient-specific, incorporating the biomechanics of the spine, have been calibrated to assess deformity correction and intra- and postoperative loads across the instrumented spine. One traditional bilateral-rod construct was used as a control for six multi-rod configurations. Spinal fixation scenarios from T10 through S1 with the PSO at L4 were simulated on each patient-specific model. The multi-rod configurations were bilateral and unilateral DRMAS at L2 through S1 (B-DRMAS and U-DRMAS), bilateral DRMAS at L3 and L5 (Hybrid), bilateral MRC over L3-L5, bilateral and unilateral VAD over L3-L5 (B-VAD and U-VAD). Postoperative gravity plus 8-Nm flexion and extension loads were simulated and bending moments in the rods were computed and compared. In the simulated control for each case (#1 & #2), average rod bending moments (of the right and left rods) at the PSO level were 6.7Nm & 5.5Nm, respectively, in upright position, 8.8Nm & 7.3Nm in 8-Nm flexion, and 4.6Nm & 3.7Nm in 8-Nm extension. When the primary rods of the multi-rod constructs were normalized to this control, the bending moments in the primary rods of Case #1 & #2 were respectively 57% & 58% (B-DRMAS), 54% & 62% (B-VAD), 60% & 61% (MRC), 72% & 69% (Hybrid), 81% & 70% (U-DRMAS), and 81% & 73% (U-VAD). Overall, the reduction in primary rod bending moments ranged from 19–46% for standing loads. Under simulated 8-Nm functional moments, the primary rod moments were reduced by 18–46% in flexion and 17–48% in extension. More rods and stiffer connections produced the largest reductions for the primary rods, but auxiliary rods had bending moments that varied from 49% lower to 13% higher than the primary ones. Additional rods through DRMAS, MRC, and VAD connections noticeably reduced the bending loads in the primary rods compared with a standard bilateral-rod construct. Yet, bending loads in the auxiliary rods were higher or lower than those in the primary rods depending on the 3D spinal deformity and stiffness of the auxiliary rod connections. Additional studies and patient-specific analyses are needed to optimize instrumentation parameters that may improve load-sharing in these constructs

Minimally invasive placement of iliosacral screws (SI-screw) is becoming the standard surgical procedure for sacrum fractures. Computer navigation seems to increase screw accuracy and reduce intraoperative radiation compared to conventional radiographic placement. In 2012 an interdisciplinary hybrid operating theatre was installed at the University of Ulm. A floor-based robotic flat panel 3D c-arm (Artis zeego, Siemens, Germany) is linked to a navigation system (BrainLab Curve, BrainLab, Germany). With a single intraoperative 3D scan the whole pelvis can be visualised in CT-like quality. The aim of this study was to analyse the accuracy of SI-screws using this hybrid operating theater. 32 SI-screws (30 patients) were included in this study. Indications ranged from bone tumour resection with consecutive stabilisation to pelvic ring fractures. All screws were implanted using the hybrid operating theatre at the University of Ulm. We analysed the intraoperative 3D scan or postoperative computed tomography and classified the grade of perforation of the screws in the neural foramina and the grade of deviation of the screws to the cranial S1 endplate according to Smith et al. Grade 0 stands for no perforation and a deviation of less than 5 °. Grade 1 implies a perforation of less than 2 mm and a deviation of 5–10°, grade 2 a perforation of 2–4 mm and a deviation of 10–15° and grade 3 a perforation of more than 4 mm and a deviation of more than 15°. All patients were tested for intra- and postoperative neurologic complications and infections. The statistical analysis was executed using Microsoft Excel 2010. 32 SI-screws were implanted in the first 20 months after the hybrid operating theatre had been established in 2012. All 30 patients were included in this study (15 men, 15 women). The mean age was 59 years ±23 (13–95 years). 20 patients received a single screw in S1 (66.7%), 1 patient 2 unilateral screws in S1 and S2 (3.3%), one patient 2 bilateral screws in S1 (3.3%) and 8 patients a single screw stabilising both SI-joints (26.7%). 27 screws showed no perforation (84.4%), 1 screw a grade 1 perforation (3.1%) and 4 screws a grade 2 perforation (12.5%). There was no grade 3 perforation. Furthermore there was no perforation of the neural foramina or the ventral cortex in the axial plane of the SI-screws stabilising one SI-joint (24 screws). Only single SI-screws bridging both SI joints showed a perforation of the neural foramina (37% grade 0, 12.5% grade 1, 50% grade 2, 0% grade 3). In the frontal plane 23 screws (71.9%) showed a deviation of less than 5°. In 5 screws a grade 1 deviation (15.6%) and in 4 screws a grade 2 deviation (12.5%) could be found. There was no grade 3 deviation. There were no infections or neurological complications. The high image quality and large field of view in combination with an advanced navigation system is a great benefit for the surgeon. All SI-screws stabilising only one joint showed completely intraosseous placement. Single SI-screws bridging 2 SI-joints intentionally perforated the neural foramina ventrally in 5 cases because of dysmorphic sacral anatomy. This makes image-guided implantation of SI-screws in a hybrid operating theatre a very safe procedure

To assess the outcome and safety of transarticular C1-C2 screw fixation. The clinical and radiological outcomes of 15 patients treated with posterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation and posterior wiring was assessed at a minimum follow up of six months. Indications for fusion were rheumatoid arthritis in eight (instability in six and secondary degenerative changes in two), non union odontoid fracture four, symptomatic osodontoideum one, C1-C2 arthrosis one and irreducible odontoid fracture one. Fusion was assessed with plain x-rays including flexion – extension films. Twenty nine screws were placed under fluroscopic guidance. Bilateral screws were placed in 14 patients and a single screw in one patient. This patient had a single screw placed due to the erosion of the controlateral C2 pars by an anomolous vertebral artery. All patients had radiological union. Two screws (7%) were malpositioned, neither was associated with clinical sequelae. No neurological or vascular injuries were noted. Transarticular C1-C2 fusion yielded a 100% fusion rate. The risk of neurological or vascular injury can be minimised by thorough assessment of pre operative CT scans to assess position of the vertebral artery and use of intra operative lateral and AP fluroscopy

To assess the outcome and safety of transarticular C1–C2 screw fixation. The clinical and radiological outcomes of 15 patients treated with posterior atlanto-axial transarticular screw fixation and posterior wiring was assessed at a minimum follow up of 6 months. Indications for fusion were rheumatoid arthritis in 8 (instability in 6 and secondary degenerative changes in 2), non-union odontoid fracture 4, symptomatic os-odontoideum one, C1–C2 arthrosis one and irreducible odontoid fracture one. Fusion was assessed with plain x-rays including flexion extension films. Twenty nine screws were placed under fluoroscopic guidance. Bilateral screws were placed in 14 patients and a single screw in one patient. This patient had a single screw placed due to the erosion of the contralateral C2 pars by an anomalous vertebral artery. All patients had radiological union. Two screws (7%) were malpositioned; neither was associated with clinical sequelae. No neurological or vascular injuries were noted. Transarticular C1–C2 fusion yielded a 100% fusion rate. The risk of neurological or vascular injury can be minimised by thorough assessment of pre operative CT scans to assess position of the vertebral artery and use of intra operative lateral and AP fluoroscopy

We investigated the effect of the location and the number of distal screws in the efficiency of an intramedullary nail implementing the finite element method (FEM). The left proximal femur of a 93-year old man was scanned and two series of full 3D models were developed. The first series, consisting of five models, concerned the use of a single distal screw inserted in five different distal locations. The second series, consisting of four models, concerned the use of four different pairs of distal screws. Each model was analyzed with the (FEM) twice, first considering that the femur is fractured and then considering that the femur is healed. For nails with a single distal screw, stresses around the nail hole were reduced with proximal placement of the distal screw but the area around the nail hole where the lag screw is inserted is stressed more. Furthermore, for nails with a pair of distal screws, placing the pair of distal screws at a specific location is most beneficial for the mechanical behavior of the femur/nail assembly. The distal area of the nail generally gets less stressed when a pair of distal screws is introduced, while the presence of two distal screws far away from each other results in lower proximal femoral head displacements. The stress field at the area of fracture is not influenced significantly by the presence of a single distal screw or a pair of distal screws

Traditional open approaches for subtalar arthrodesis have reported nonunion rates of 5–16% and significant incidence of infection and nerve injury. The rationale for arthroscopic arthrodesis is to limit dissection of the soft tissues in order to preserve blood supply for successful fusion, whilst minimising the risk of soft tissue complications. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of sinus tarsi portal subtalar arthrodesis. Case records of all patients undergoing isolated arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis by two senior surgeons between 2004 and 2014 were examined. All patients were followed up until successful union or revision surgery. The primary outcome measure was successful clinical and radiographic union. Secondary outcome measures included occurrence of infection and nerve injury. Seventy-seven procedures were performed in 74 patients, with successful fusion in 75 (97.4%). One (1.3%) superficial wound infection and one (1.3%) transient sural nerve paraesthesia occurred. Fixation with a single screw provided sufficient stability for successful arthrodesis. To our knowledge this is the largest reported series of isolated arthroscopic subtalar arthrodeses to date, and the first series reporting results of the two portal sinus tarsi approach. This approach allows access for decortication of all three articular facets, and obviates the need for a posterolateral portal, features which may explain the high union rate and low incidence of sural nerve injury in our series

Introduction. Surgeons fixing scaphoid fractures need to be familiar with its morphological variations and their implications on safe screw placement during fixation of these fractures. Literature has limited data in this regard. The purpose of this CT-based study was to investigate scaphoid morphometry and to analyse the safe trajectories of screw placement in scaphoid. Methods. We measured the coronal and Sagittal widths of scaphoid in CT-scans of 60 patients using CT based data from 50 live subjects with intact scaphoid. Safe placements for screws with diameters of 1.7mm, 2.4mm, 3.5mm and 4mm were studied using trajectories with additional 2mm safety corridor. Results. The mean width of proximal segment in coronal and sagittal plane were 6.39mm (4.5–8.7) and 11.44mm (8.4–14.1) respectively. For the waist region, the mean coronal, sagittal width were 8.03mm (6.3–10.2mm) and 9.02mm (7–11.4mm) respectively. For distal segment, the mean coronal and sagittal width were 10.58mm (8.2–14.6mm) and the 9.59mm (7.3–11.9mm) respectively. The coronal and sagittal widths were significantly different from each other in all three zones. All scaphoid were capable of safely containing single 4mm screw and two parallel 1.7mm screws. Conclusion. Our study shows that there is considerable variation in scaphoid morphometry. Among the parameters, the waist region measurements show the least variation. The screw lengths do not always correlate to the overall longitudinal extent of scaphoid and can be planned preoperatively using CT-scans. Surgeons treating these fractures should opt for a CT-based analysis regarding the screw direction and length and need to be familiar with the variations in scaphoid morphometry