Aims

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the evidence for the use of intraoperative cell salvage in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty, and specifically to analyze the available data in order to quantify any associated reduction in the use of allogenic blood transfusion, and the volume which is used.

Perioperative blood conservation remains an important topic today in order to reduce complications, improve function, and facilitate recovery after a total knee replacement (TKR). Studies have shown that the degree of postoperative anemia is related to an increase in complications. A greater blood loss and need for transfusion is associated with a higher risk of infection, a slower recovery process, increased morbidity to patients, as well as an increased cost to the health care system. Typical blood loss estimates range from 800cc to over 1700cc, when accounting not only for intraoperative but postoperative blood loss. Several strategies have been developed to help mitigate the risk of perioperative blood loss and need for subsequent transfusion. Firstly, preoperative measures such as vitamin and mineral supplementation can ensure the starting hemoglobin and red cell count are maximised. Additionally, erythropoietin can be helpful in refractory cases of preoperative anemia. Preoperative autologous blood donation was used extensively in the past, but has fallen out of favor due to its inefficiency and cost. Intraoperatively, measures such as the use of a tourniquet, meticulous technique, and expeditious surgery can help reduce blood loss. The most effective method, however, has been the use of tranexamic acid (TXA). TXA, an antifibrinolytic compound, has been extremely effective at reducing perioperative blood loss without increasing the risk of thromboembolic events. TXA can be used topically or intravenously. Other methods that can reduce intraoperative blood loss include the use of fibrin sealants, applied to the soft tissues and bony surfaces around the knee. Postoperatively, the avoidance of wound drains is associated with a higher blood count and reduced transfusion risk. Alternatively, drainage reinfusion systems can be used to raise the postoperative blood count, particularly in cases of bilateral TKR

Perioperative blood conservation remains an important topic today in order to reduce complications, improve function, and facilitate recovery after a total knee replacement (TKR). Studies have shown that the degree of postoperative anemia is related to an increase in complications. A greater blood loss and need for transfusion is associated with a higher risk of infection, a slower recovery process, increased morbidity to patients, as well as an increased cost to the healthcare system. Typical blood loss estimates range from 800cc to over 1700cc, when accounting not only for intraoperative but postoperative blood loss. Several strategies have been developed to help mitigate the risk of perioperative blood loss and need for subsequent transfusion. Firstly, preoperative measures such as vitamin and mineral supplementation can ensure the starting hemoglobin and red cell count are maximised. Additionally, erythropoietin can be helpful in refractory cases of preoperative anemia. Preoperative autologous blood donation was used extensively in the past, but has fallen out of favor due to its inefficiency and cost. Intraoperatively, measures such as the use of a tourniquet, meticulous technique, and expeditious surgery can help reduce blood loss. The most effective method, however, has been the use of tranexamic acid (TXA). TXA, an antifibrinolytic compound, has been extremely effective at reducing perioperative blood loss without increasing the risk of thromboembolic events. TXA can be used topically or intravenously. Other methods that can reduce intraoperative blood loss include the use of fibrin sealants, applied to the soft tissues and bony surfaces around the knee. Postoperatively, the avoidance of wound drains is associated with a higher blood count and reduced transfusion risk. Alternatively, drainage reinfusion systems can be used to raise the postoperative blood count, particularly in cases of bilateral TKR

Summary. There is emerging evidence of successful application of IOCS and leucocyte depletion filter in removing tumour cells from blood salvaged during various oncological surgeries. Research on the use of IOCS-LDF in MSTS is urgently needed. Introduction. Intra-operative cell salvage (IOCS) can reduce allogeneic blood transfusion requirements in non-tumour related spinal surgery. However, IOCS is deemed contraindicated in metastatic spine tumor surgery (MSTS) due to risk of tumour dissemination. Evidence is emerging from different surgical specialties describing the use of IOCS in cancer surgery. We wanted to investigate if IOCS is really contraindicated in MSTS. We hereby present a systematic literature review to answer the following questions: 1. Has IOCS ever been used in MSTS? 2. Is there any evidence to support the use of IOCS in other oncologic surgeries?. Methods. A systematic review of the English literature was conducted using computer searching of databases: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for articles published between 1 January 1986 and 31 Dec 2012. Results. Question 1: A comprehensive literature search did not provide any publication describing the use of IOCS in MSTS. The application of IOCS in MSTS has never been described before. Question 2: Our systematic review shows that the use of IOCS has been extensively investigated in patients undergoing surgery for gynaecological, lung, urological, gastrointestinal, and hepatobiliary cancers. The literature review considered 281 abstracts from the initial search. After consideration by consensus, 30 articles were included in the final analysis. We included in our review -prospective, retrospective studies and in vitro studies. The selected articles were then classified according to the surgical specialty: gynaecological, lung, urological, gastrointestinal, and hepatobiliary cancers and type of studies: reinfusion studies, non-reinfusion studies and in vitro studies. 23 Reinfusion studies: Studies where salvaged blood was actually re-infused into patients and analyzed on the basis of clinical outcomes like survival, recurrence, metastasis rates, and transfusion requirements, etc. IOCS has been extensively investigated in several large cohort studies and large case series with considerable follow-up duration across urological, gynaecological, hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal cancers. Patients receiving salvaged blood have been shown to perform as well or better across a variety of clinical outcome measures as mentioned above. 2 in vitro studies and 5 non-reinfusion studies: Studies where salvaged blood was not re-infused into patients but was analyzed for the presence or viability of tumour cells in the processed blood. They consistently demonstrated the utility of LDF in either greatly reducing the number of tumour cells or even completely eradicating tumour cells from blood-tumour admixtures or salvaged blood. This provides the “proof-of-concept” that LDF is able and is effective in removing tumour cells from blood. Discussion/Conclusion. There is strong evidence that LDF can safely remove tumour cells from salvaged blood. IOCS in patients undergoing cancer surgery is not associated with any adverse clinical outcomes. The reluctance of spine surgeons to use IOCS in MSTS appears to be unsupported. There is ample evidence supporting the use of IOCS in oncological surgeries. Research is needed to evaluate the application of IOCS in MSTS

We hypothesised there was no clinical value in using an autologous blood transfusion (ABT) drain in either primary total hip (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) in terms of limiting allogeneic blood transfusions when a modern restrictive blood management regime was followed. A total of 575 patients (65.2% men), with a mean age of 68.9 years (36 to 94) were randomised in this three-arm study to no drainage (group A), or to wound drainage with an ABT drain for either six hours (group B) or 24 hours (group C). The primary outcome was the number of patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusion. Secondary outcomes were post-operative haemoglobin (Hb) levels, length of hospital stay and adverse events.

This study identified only 41 transfused patients, with no significant difference in distribution between the three groups (p = 0.857). The mean pre-operative haemoglobin (Hb) value in the transfused group was 12.8 g/dL (9.8 to 15.5) versus 14.3 g/dL (10.6 to 18.0) in the non-transfused group (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval: 1.08 to 1.86). Post-operatively, the median of re-transfused shed blood in patients with a THR was 280 mL (Interquartile range (IQR) 150 to 400) and in TKR patients 500 mL (IQR 350 to 650) (p <  0.001). ABT drains had no effect on the proportion of transfused patients in primary THR and TKR. The secondary outcomes were also comparable between groups.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:765–71.

Traditional use of tourniquets and reinfusion drains in total knee replacement (TKR) has recently been challenged. Many studies have challenged the benefits of their use. Our aim was to compare the outcomes of three different blood management techniques in primary TKR. We conducted a prospective randomised study of 87 patients with a mean age of 71 years. All patients were randomised into three groups: Group A (29 patients without tourniquet and drain), Group B (27 patients without tourniquet or drain but cell salvage system) and Group C (31 patients with the use of tourniquet and drain). The results showed no difference between the postoperative haemoglobin drop and blood transfusion rate between the groups. At day two, range of knee movements (Group A: 80.2 degree; Group B: 79.6 degree; Group C: 77.9 degree) showed no significant difference. Two Group C patients (6.4%) had postoperative thromboembolic events (one DVT, one TIA). Knee stiffness leading to readmission (Group A: 6.8%; Group B: 7.4%; Group C: 3.2%) and superficial wound problems did not reveal any significant difference. The average operative time and hospital stay were the same in all groups and there was no wound haematoma or deep infection in any groups. There was no statistical difference between the groups for any outcome measure assessed thus the use of tourniquets and drains in total knee arthroplasty are controversial and questionable. We can conclude that all techniques are safe and it is the surgeon's choice as to which they apply routinely in their clinical practice

Background. One-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) is twice as invasive as unilateral THA. Therefore, increases in bleeding, postoperative anemia, and complications are a concern. The purpose of this study was to investigate hemoglobin values and the use of autologous and allogenic blood transfusion after one-stage bilateral THA. Methods. Twenty-nine patients (7 men and 22 women; 58 hips) were treated with one-stage bilateral THA. The mean age of subjects at the time of surgery was 60.6 years. The average body mass index for patients was 21.7 kg/m. 2. The diagnoses were secondary osteoarthritis due to developmental dysplasia of the hip (n=25) and avascular necrosis (n=4). All patients had donated 800 ml of autologous blood in 2 stages preoperatively (1 to 4 weeks apart). All patients took iron supplements starting from 5 weeks preoperatively. For all patients, the procedure was performed under general anesthesia in the lateral decubitus position via a posterolateral approach. Intra-operative blood salvage was not used. Suction drains were inserted subfascially. As a general rule, pre-donated autologous blood was transfused back to the patients intra- or post-operatively. Allogenic blood transfusion was performed when clinical symptoms of anemia occurred (hypotension, low urinary output, tachycardia, etc.) rather than using a preset blood threshold (hemoglobin level <8 g/dl). To determine changes in blood pressure following surgery until the next morning, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured at 3-hr intervals. Results. The mean duration of surgery was 67.4 min for the procedure on the side that was operated on first, 32.7 min to change to the other side, and 68.4 min for the procedure on the other side. The mean blood loss was 576.1 ml. Hemoglobin values at baseline, at the time of autologous blood donation, and on the first day after surgery were 13.2, 12.7, and 8.7 g/dl respectively. Hemoglobin values were significantly different between the 2 weeks before surgery and the first day after surgery. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were the lowest 3–6 hrs postoperatively (mean, 86/55). Blood reinfusion using autologous blood was performed for all patients. The allogenic blood transfusion rate was 25.0% (range, 2–8 units). In terms of complications, one patient developed an arrhythmia on postoperative day 5. This was the patient for whom autologous blood donation could not be performed due to pre-existing anemia. This patient also had right-sided sciatic nerve palsy. Discussion. With respect to one-stage bilateral THA, Gie showed that allogenic blood transfusion rate with or without autologous blood donation was 42% and 87% respectively. The allogenic blood transfusion rate was 25.0% in our study. Establishing a procedure to perform surgery in a shorter time period may further reduce the rate of allogenic blood transfusion. Although not used herein, intraoperative blood salvage may also be considered. Conclusions. In one-stage bilateral THA, autologous blood donation is effective in managing perioperative anemia and reducing the rate of allogenic blood transfusion. Perioperative blood management based on individual patients' situations are important for the safe performance of one-stage bilateral THA

In this paper, we consider wound healing after total knee arthroplasty.

Purpose. To evaluate the long term results of the use of a postoperative autologous blood reinfusion system in total knee arthroplasty. Material and method. In a prospective study, 176 patients who underwent unilateral total knee replacement, during the period 2004–2008, were evaluated (study group or group A). In all these patients a reinfusion system of unwashed blood salvaged was applied, while supplementary homologous blood transfusion was performed when required. The admission of banked blood transfusion determined by haemoglobin value (<9mg/dL) and/or clinical signs (blood pressure, pulses, etc). The value of haemoglobin, haematocrite and platelets recorded preoperatively and the 1st, 5th and 15th day after operation. Results were compared with the material of our previous prospective randomized controlled study (control groups B and C), where in 60 patients, between the years 2002–2004, the effectiveness of postoperative autologous blood reinfusion had been proved. Results. 19 patients of group A required postoperatively 23 units of homologous blood (total study group requirements23 blood units or 0.13 units per patient) while in group B required 1.5 units/patient and in group C 0.3 units/patient. In the study group the total homologous blood requirements reduced by 91% compared with group B (patients without autotransfusion system applied) and by 47% compared with group C (patients with autotransfusion system applied). There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative values of Hb and Ht between the groups. None of the patients developed any adverse reactions after reinfusion. The cost of blood management was reduced in study group by 76%. Conclusions. The use of an autotransfusion system postoperatively minimizes practically the demands for homologous banked blood transfusion in total knee arthroplasty

The reinfusion of perioperative cell salvage is one method employed to reduce exposure to donor blood. Data on the safety of this process, however, are scant. Notably, the effect of intraoperative, washed cell salvage reinfusion on prothrombotic markers has not been demonstrated. The risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism following major orthopaedic operations is not insignificant. The study objective was to assess the effect of cell salvage reinfusion on coagulation and platelet activation. Twenty-one patients undergoing elective primary hip operations were recruited. Nine patients received washed cell salvage intraoperatively, and were compared with 12 patients undergoing similar surgery that did not. Two patients in the cell salvage group also received postoperative, unwashed cell salvage. Blood samples were collected pre-operatively, immediately post-operatively, and one day post-operatively for assays of platelet activation markers, P-selectin expression and fibrinogen binding by flow cytometry in diluted whole blood; coagulation activation marker, thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT); D-dimer by ELISA, thrombin generation by chromogenic assay, and full blood count. Samples of cell salvage material were also analysed for prothrombotic markers. There were no significant differences between the groups preoperatively. Postoperatively haemoglobin levels did not differ significantly between the cell salvage group and controls. Postoperative TAT and D-dimer were significantly higher in the cell salvage group compared with controls (p<0.05). One day postoperatively, there were significantly higher platelet P-selectin expression (p=0.006) and platelet fibrinogen binding (p=0.004) in the cell salvage group compared with controls. The white cell count (WCC) was also significantly higher (p=0.04). In the intraoperative washed cell salvage material, and in postoperative cell salvage, the platelet count was low, but significant proportions of platelets were activated, and levels of D-dimer were elevated compared with venous blood. The postoperative salvage material also contained high levels of TAT. The results from this pilot study show the induction of a prothrombotic state following reinfusion of intraoperative, washed cell salvage in recipients undergoing primary elective hip operations. An inflammatory response to reinfusion is also indicated by the raised WCC. Further investigation into the safety of cell salvage is indicated

Purpose. The traditional use of pneumatic tourniquets and reinfusion drains in total knee replacement (TKR) has recently been challenged and the aim of our study was to compare the outcomes of three different blood management techniques in primary TKR. Methods. We prospectively conducted a study of 87 patients with mean age of 71 (44-91) years old. They were randomised into three groups: Group A: 29 patients without the use of tourniquet and reinfusion drain, Group B: 27 patients without the use of tourniquet and reinfusion drain but application of intraoperative cell salvage system and Group C: 31 patients with the use of tourniquet and reinfusion drain. All groups were well matched and all patients were reassessed at the 2. nd. postoperative day. Results. There was no difference between the postoperative haemoglobin drop (Group A: 3.6 g/dl; Group B: 3.3 g/dl; Group C: 3.2 g/dl) and allogenic blood transfusion rate (Group A: 6.8%; Group B: 7.4%; Group C: 6.4%). In Group B an average of 525 ml of blood was collected and an average of 148 ml of concentrated blood was reinfused. In Group C an average of 432 ml of blood was collected by the drain and an average of 324 ml of blood was reinfused. The 2. nd. postoperative day range of knee movements showed no significant difference. Only 2 Group C patients (6.4%) had postoperative thrombembolic events (one DVT, one TIA). Readmission rate due to knee stiffness and superficial wound problems did not revealed any significant difference. The average operative time (83 minutes) and hospital stay (5.3 days) were the same in all groups and there was no wound haematoma or deep infection in any groups. Conclusion. There was no statistical difference between the groups for any outcome measure

Blood loss during the perioperative period of total joint arthroplasty has been well described in the literature. Despite numerous advances, allogeneic transfusion rates are still reported as high as 50%. Often the literature focuses on one area or mechanism of blood loss prevention but this article focuses on a multimodal approach to blood loss prevention including preoperative optimization, intraoperative technique, and postoperative management. Hemoglobin drop and transfusion rates were retrospectively reviewed for 134 control patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in three groups. Group 1 included low risk patients (Hb >14 g/dl), Group 2 included intermediate risk patients (Hb 13-14 g/dl) utilizing reinfusion drain and preoperative autologous blood donation, and Group 3 included high risk (Hgb <13) patients treated with preoperative erythropoietin (EPO). These controls were then compared to two groups of patients undergoing minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA). Group 4 included 20 consecutive patients undergoing MIS TKA with intraoperative injection of lidocaine and epinephrine along the arthrotomy site. Group 5 included 22 consecutive patients treated with similar technique plus the additional intraoperative use of a bipolar sealer device. The combined utilization of MIS TKA, epinephrine, and bipolar sealer minimized hemoglobin drop (2.74 (Std Dev 0.77) vs 3.29 (SD 1.05) g/dl, p= 0.01) and total blood transfusions (0.05 (SD 0.21) vs 0.86 (SD 0.63) units, p< 0.01) compared with the traditional TKA approach for high risk patients using reinfusion drain and preoperative autologous donation (Group 2). This series demonstrates how a busy knee practice minimizes hemoglobin drop and transfusion requirements with preoperative optimization of high risk patients utilizing EPO, minimally invasive technique, intraoperative hemostasis obtained with epinephering injection, use of a bipolar sealer, and postoperative management with a reinfusion drain

Background: During total hip or knee replacement there is blood loss, wich often requires allogenic blood transfusions. The risks associated with this practice are well documented in the literature, and numerous strategies have been employed to conserve blood following total joint arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of an autologous retransfusion drain system to reduce the postoperative allogenic blood transfusion rate and the lack of adverse effects when using it. Method: We did a retrospective study of patients operated on hip and knee primary replacements during the first six months of 2008, which had a postoperative blood salvage and retransfusion (Bellovac ABT autotransfusion system-Astra Tech, Mölndal, Swedenn-), Group A, n=220 patients, and a control group, Group B, with patients operated on hip or knee replacements during the first six months of the year before, which had standard drainage system, n=177. In first group the drain was opened inmediatly after tourniquet release and the shed blood was returned to the patient after collecting up to 500 ml and no later than six hours after surgery. The pre-operative data for cardiopathy, angiopathy, preoperative anemia or anticoagulant treatment showed no significant differences for group A and B. We standardised the transfusion criteria in order to allow an accurate comparison between the two groups. Evaluation was done with the medical history and the pre-/postoperative hemoglobin values, postoperative blood loss and postoperative need of allogenic blood transfusion. Results: The two groups showed no significant differences relating to the demographic data or the medical history. 17 patients (7.7 %) of the retransfusion group needed allogenic blood transfusion compared with 16 patients (9 %) of the control group B (p > 0.05). The hemoglobin values of group A versus the control group showed after the donation of the salvaged blood a significant difference (p = 0,0007) but only in the subgroup of total knee replacement. Only three adverse events were observed when using the recuperator, which were not a risk for patients life and were solved with the cessation of postoperative reinfusion. Conclusions: The use of the autotransfusion system seems to reduce the postoperative allogenic blood transfusion rate but not statistical significant. Our study therefore confirms the safety of retransfusion drains

Primary hip and knee replacements can be associated with significant blood loss. Tranexamic acid is a fibrinolytic inhibitor that has been shown to significantly reduce blood loss and transfusion requirement in hip and knee replacement, however the cost-benefit has not been widely investigated. Our study involved 100 patients, comprising a prospective cohort of 50 consecutive primary hip and knee replacements (treatment group) and a control group of the preceding 50 patients undergoing the same surgery. All knee replacements were computer navigated. The prospective cohort all had tranexamic acid 1g intravenously at the time of surgery, repeated at 8 and 16 hours. All patients had 28 days thromboprophylaxis with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight-heparin. The control group comprised 24 hip replacements and 26 knees versus 17 hips and 33 knees in the treatment group. Autologous transfusion drains were used in the control group knee replacements and the mean volume reinfused was 458ml. These drains were only used in the first 15 knee replacements in the treatment group as only one patient drained enough for reinfusion (100ml; p< 0.001). The mean fall in haemoglobin in the control group post surgery was 3.4g/dl versus 2.3g/dl in the treatment group (p< 0.001). Seven patients were transfused in the control group (14 units of red cells) versus two in the treatment group (5 units). The potential cost saving per patient averaged across all joints in the treatment group is £102.51. This is a function of savings in transfusion, cessation of drains for re-infusion in knee replacement and the cost of tranexamic acid. The only thromboembolic event was 1 deep vein thrombosis in the treatment group. Our data shows the cost savings associated with the use of tranexamic acid in primary hip and knee surgery are considerable and supports its use to significantly reduce blood loss and transfusion requirement

Introduction: A prospective analysis of the total blood losses (TBL) and the rate of blood transfusions was conducted for the unilateral primary TKA performed at our clinic from January 2008 to March 2009. A transfusion-sparing strategy was used, based on the use of the tourniquet, the intraoperative injection of tranexamic acid and the preoperative administration of erythropoietin for patients with hemoglobin baseline level less than 13 gr/dl. The formula of Gross and the values of Gilcher were utilized to calculate TBL and to estimate the blood volume of the patient. No autologous blood transfusion systems were employed. The postoperative program consisted of pain control and anticoagulants. Results were compared with a historical cohort of patients operated on with the aid of cell salvage. Materials and Methods: One hundred – five patients (mean age, 73 years) were admitted to the study group and compared to an historic group including 44 patients (mean age, 70 years). No significant differences were found between the study arms regarding BMI (31 kg/m2), ASA score and operating time (65 minutes). Results: Mean TBL was 1560 ml versus 1821 ml in the historic group throughout the entire 8-day period. In the study group, TBL was significantly reduced in the patients who received tranexamic acid. In both groups, one patient received homologous blood transfusion. In the historic group, 41 of the 44 patients received autologous blood transfusion from reinfusion drains (mean volume 314 ml). Finally, the mean Hb at postoperative day 8 (POD 8) was 10,95 g/dl in the study group versus 10,35 gr/dl in the historic group (p< 0.01). Costs were superior in the study group in relation to the use of erythropoietin. No complications were related to the use of the blood –sparing pharmacologic agents. Discussion: This study confirms that recent improvements in surgical and anesthetic procedure allow for performing routine unilateral TKA with a marginal rate of blood transfusion when the procedure is achieved by an experienced team using a blood-conserving strategy. The strengths of this study include the calculation of blood loss and the homogeneity between the study arms. However the reduction of TBL related to the use of tranexamic acid was not evaluated within the setting of a randomized clinical trial. Furthermore, the results were obtained in patients having a high BMI. Conclusion: The blood transfusion sparing plan improved quality of care by reducing the risks of transfusion and maintaining a satisfactory Hb level at POD 8

Introduction: Elective joint replacement patients routinely require transfusion following surgery. Haemoglobin must remain within red blood cells in order to be functional. The process of surgery and collection in the reinfusion drain may disrupt cell membranes resulting in non functional haemoglobin. The filtration and collection process does not eliminate free haemoglobin. This results in intracellular and free haemoglobin being transfused into patients giving false functional haemoglobin levels. Aim: To determine the proportion of intracellular haemoglobin in autologous blood transfusion drain following joint replacement. Research Methodology: Research ethical approval was obtained prior to conducting this study. 20 consecutive patients undergoing elective total hip replacement (THR) and 20 consecutive patients undergoing elective knee replacement (TKR) from April 08–July 08 were consented to participate in this study. A standard full blood count sample of 3 mls was taken from the rein-fused blood. Each sample had the total haemoglobin (THb) concentration determined (i.e. free and intra-cellular) from the blood in the specimen tube. The sample was then centrifuged, and the THb of the supernatant was determined. This determined the concentation of ‘free’ haemoglobin. From these two respective values, the proportion of haemolysed haemoglobin was determined from each sample. Results: There were a total of 35 participants of which 20 were TKR and 15 were THR. The average THb concentration for the THR and TKR were 7.7g/dl and 10.3g/dl respectively. The proportion of haemolysed Hb was 1.46% and 0% respectively. The THb and proportion of haemolysed Hb for all 35 patients were 8.76g/dl and 0.63%. Conclusion: Autologous blood transfusion is not only safe and economical but remains an effective procedure with a negligible proportion of haemolysis

Introduction: Primary total hip replacement remains one of the commonest orthopaedic procedures performed. It is yet to be clearly demonstrated whether use of a postoperative drain is of benefit in these procedures. Methods: We carried out a prospective randomised study comparing the use of autologous reinfusion drains, closed suction drains or no drain to determine their influence on allogenic blood transfusion requirements, length of hospital stay and infection rates. Stratification was carried out for confounding factors. Results: 153 patients were recruited into the study and randomised to one of the three closely matched groups. There was no significant difference between the mean intra-operative blood loss or post-operative haemaglo-bin levels between the 3 groups. 42% of the suction drain group required post-operative transfusion as compared to 17% of the reinfusion drain group and 12% of the group with no drains. This difference was highly significant (P=0.02) Mean time for the wound to become dry was 3 days, 3.9 days and 4 days in the no drain, re-transfusion drain and suction drain groups respectively. This difference was statistically significant (P=0.03). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean length of inpatient stay. Discussion: This study demonstrates a significantly higher transfusion rate with closed suction drains compared to reinfusion drains or no drains. With the drive to reduce hospital stay our study supports the considered use of no drain or a reinfusion drain

Introduction: Reinfusion drains are used to minimise the need for allogenic blood transfusion, and its potential complications. Tranexamic acid {TA} is an antifibrinolytic agent that is used to decrease blood loss in total knee arthroplasty surgery. The effect of TA on reinfusion volume of drained blood has received little attention. The aim of our study is to measure the effect of TA on reinfusion volumes in primary total knee replacement {TKR}. Methods: A cohort of consecutive patients undergoing primary total knee replacement between November 2006 and January 2008 were studied. Each patient was operated upon by the same surgeon, and had the same pros-thesis inserted. Patients operated upon before June 2007 did not receive TA but had reinfusion drains, while those who underwent surgery after June 2007 received TA along with the reinfusion drain. We measured pre and post operative haemoglobin {Hb}, drainage volume and reinfusion volume. The need for allogenic blood transfusion was recorded. TA and non TA groups were compared. Results: Seventy patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference between the TA and non TA groups in pre operative Hb {13.2, 13.1g/dl} or post operative Hb {10.95, 10.9}. There was a significantly lower drainage volume {250 v 600ml} and subsequent reinfusion volume {100 v 465ml} in the TA group versus non TA groups respectively. There were no cases of thromboembolism or allogenic blood transfusion in either group. Conclusion: Tranexamic acid significantly decreased post operative blood loss and subsequent reinfusion volumes in TKR. TA and reinfusion drains greatly decrease the demand for allogenic blood transfusion. Drainage volume is so low when TA is used in routine primary TKR, that the need for reinfusion drains is questionable. TA is cost-effective compared to reinfusion drains in TKR

Primary total knee arthroplasty is associated with considerable blood loss, and allergenic blood transfusions are frequently necessary. Because of the cost and risks of allogenic blood transfusions, the autologous drainage blood reinfusion technique has been developed as an alternative. A number of studies have compared reinfusion techniques with standard suction drainage, but few reports compared with no drain use. We analyzed early results after primary total knee arthroplasty using autologous drainage blood reinfusion and no drain. We selected 30 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty using no drain between November 2005 and March 2006 and matched for age and gender with 30 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty using autologous drainage blood reinfusion technique between January 2003 and October 2005. All operations were done under pneumatic tourniquet and meticulous hemostasis was performed after deflation of the tourniquet. We have retrospectively reviewed the preoperative data (age, gender, body mass index, diagnosis, history of the knee surgery, infection and anticoagulant therapy, and medical cormorbidities) and the postoperative data (hemoglobin, hematocrit and platelet during hospitalization, the amount of allogenic blood transfusion and narcotics, complications, rehabilitation process, and clinical scores). All preoperative and postoperative variables except the postoperative second and seventh days hemoglobin and 2nd day hematocrit showed no significant differences between two groups. The hemoglobin and hematocrit also showed no significant differences at the postoperative fourteenth day. The autologous drainage blood reinfusion method in primary total knee arthroplasty does not have significant clinical benefit over no-drain method with regards to allogenic blood transfusions, narcotics uses, the incidence of complications and rehabilitation processes

Although mechanical stabilisation has been a hallmark of orthopaedic surgical management, orthobiologics are now playing an increasing role. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a volume of plasma fraction of autologous blood having platelet concentrations above baseline. The platelet α granules are rich in growth factors that play an essential role in tissue healing, such as transforming growth factor-β, vascular endothelial growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor. PRP is used in various surgical fields to enhance bone and soft-tissue healing by placing supraphysiological concentrations of autologous platelets at the site of tissue damage. The easily obtainable PRP and its possible beneficial outcome hold promise for new regenerative treatment approaches.

The aim of this literature review was to describe the bioactivities of PRP, to elucidate the different techniques for PRP preparation, to review animal and human studies, to evaluate the evidence regarding the use of PRP in trauma and orthopaedic surgery, to clarify risks, and to provide guidance for future research.