Cementless stem fixation is a widely used method of stem revision in North America and elsewhere in the world. There is abundant literature in its support. Most of the reports from 1985 to 2005 related to proximally or extensively porocoated designs, the former falling into disfavor with time because of unpredictable outcomes. With few exceptions (eg S-ROM) the modularity of these designs was limited to the head/neck junction. But this generation of designs was associated with some issues such as insertional fractures, limited control of anteversion (and risk of dislocation), limited applicability in the setting of severe bone loss (Paprosky Type 4 osteolysis or Vancouver Type B3 periprosthetic fracture), as well as ongoing concern relating to severe proximal stress shielding. In the past decade we have seen the mounting use of a new design concept: tapered fluted titanium stems (TFTS), which incorporate the advantages of titanium (for less flexural rigidity), conical taper (for vertical taper-lock stability), longitudinal ribs and flutes (for rotational stability), and surface preparation which attracts bone on growth for long term fixation. Four consecutive reports from our center have documented the superiority of the TFTS in our hands, with encouraging outcomes even when dealing with severe bone loss or periprosthetic fractures. There is an increasing body of other literature which reports a similar experience. Furthermore, with increasing experience and confidence in this design, we now use a monoblock or non-modular design in greater than 95% of cases in which a TFTS is indicated at our center. This circumvents the potential drawbacks of stem modularity, including taper corrosion and taper junction fracture.
In 2012 we reviewed a consecutive series of 92
uncemented THRs performed between 1986 and 1991 at our institution
using the CLS Spotorno stem, in order to assess clinical outcome
and radiographic data at a minimum of 21 years. The series comprised
92 patients with a mean age at surgery of 59.6 years (39 to 77)
(M:F 43;49). At the time of this review, seven (7.6%) patients had died and
two (2.2%) were lost to follow-up. The 23-year Kaplan–Meier survival
rates were 91.5% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 85.4% to 97.6%;
55 hips at risk) and 80.3% (95% CI, 71.8% to 88.7%; 48 hips at risk)
respectively, with revision of the femoral stem or of any component
as endpoints. At the time of this review, 76 patients without stem
revision were assessed clinically and radiologically (mean follow-up
24.0 years (21.5 to 26.5)). For the 76 unrevised hips the mean Harris
hip score was 87.1 (65 to 97). Femoral osteolysis was detected in
five hips (6.6%) only in Gruen zone 7. Undersized stems were at
higher risk of revision owing to aseptic loosening (p = 0.0003).
Patients implanted with the stem in a varus position were at higher risk
of femoral cortical hypertrophy and thigh pain (p = 0.0006 and p
= 0.0007, respectively). In our study, survival, clinical outcome and radiographic data
remained excellent in the third decade after implantation. Nonetheless,
undersized stems were at higher risk of revision owing to aseptic
loosening. Cite this article:
Severe bone loss creates a challenge for fixation in femoral revision. The goal of the study was to assess reproducibility of fixation and clinical outcomes of femoral revision with bone loss using a modular, fluted, tapered distally fixing stem. 92 consecutive patients (96 hips) underwent hip revision surgery using the same design of a modular, fluted, tapered titanium stem between 1998 and 2005. Fourteen patients with 16 hips died before a 2-year follow-up. Eighty hips were followed for an average of 11.3 years (range of 8 to 13.5 years). Bone loss was classified as per Paprosky's classification, osseointegration assessed according to a modified system of Engh et al, and Harris Hip Score was used to document pain and function. Serial radiographs were reviewed by an independent observer to assess subsidence, osseointegration and bony reconstitution.Introduction:
Methods:
Studies have documented encouraging results with the use of fluted, tapered, modular, titanium stems in revision hip arthroplasty with bone loss. However, radiographic signs of osseointegration and patterns of reconstitution have not been previously categorized. 64 consecutive hips with index femoral revision using a particular stem of this design formed the study cohort. Serial radiographs were retrospectively reviewed by an independent observer. Bone loss was determined by Paprosky's classification. Osseointegration was assessed by a slight modification of the criteria of Engh et al. Femoral restoration was classified according to Kolstad et al. Pain and function was documented using Harris Hip Score (HHS).Introduction
Materials and Methods
To review the results of revision THR performed with a modular titanium tapered uncemented stem in two cohorts of patients to assess whether subsidence of this type of stem is avoidable through improved surgical technique. The first 70 patients undergoing revision THR with this type of stem were compared with 38 patients who had their revision in the last 24 months and had a minium follow up of 12 months., with particular reference to stem subsidence. All patients were also assessed with the Oxford Hip Score. All radiographs were reviewed to measure subsidence. Identical post-operative management was used in both groups. The mean subsidence in the first group was 11.7 mm and in the most recent group 4mm. The Oxford Hip Score in both groups was similar (20.9) which compares very favourably with the OHS score from the National joint Register for revision arthroplasty (24.3). This comparison shows that changes in surgical technique can limit the subsidence seen with tapered stems used in revision total hip replacement. No bone grafts were used in either series, only small changes in bone preparation, and prosthesis selection were used .The outcome as determined by the OHS was similar in both groups.
