UK personnel have been deployed in Afghanistan since 2001 and over this time a wealth of experience in contemporary war surgery has been developed. Of particular note in the latter Herrick operations the injury pattern suffered by personnel is largely blast wounds, primarily from improvised explosive devices. With the development of improved body armour, previously unsurvivable blasts now result in a large number of traumatic amputations, predominantly affecting the lower limb. Faced with this, deployed medical personnel in the Role 3 facility, Camp Bastion, have developed, by a process of evolution, a standard process for timely management of these injuries. We present a documented schema and photographic record of the ‘Bastion’ process of management of traumatic amputation through the resuscitation department, radiology, theatres and post-operatively. In resuscitation the priority is control of catastrophic haemorrhage with exchange of CAT tourniquets to Pneumatic tourniquets. While undergoing a CT, time can be used to complete documentation. In theatre a process of social debridement & wash then sterile prep followed by formal debridement allows rapid management of the amputated limbs. This work provides a record of current best practice that generates maximum efficiency of personnel and time developed over a large number of procedures. This allows reflection both now in relation to continuing Herrick operations and when military medical services are faced with a future conflict and an inevitable change in injury patterns

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) occur in 10% of combat casualties. In the immediate field-hospital setting, an insensate limb can affect the surgeon's assessment of limb viability and in the long-term PNI remain a source of considerable morbidity. Therefore the aims of this study are to document the recovery of combat PNI, as well as report on the effect of current medical management in improving functional outcome. In this study, we present the largest series of combat related PNI in Coalition troops since World War II. From May 2007 – May 2010, 100 consecutive patients (261 nerve injuries) were prospectively reviewed in a specialist PNI clinic. The functional recovery of each PNI was determined using the MRC grading classification (good, fair and poor). In addition, the incidence of neuropathic pain, the results of nerve grafting procedures, the return of plantar sensation, and the patients' current military occupational grading was recorded. At mean follow up 26.7 months, 175(65%) of nerve injuries had a good recovery, 57(21%) had a fair recovery and 39(14%) had a poor functional recovery. Neuropathic pain was noted in 33 patients, with Causalgia present in 5 cases. In 27(83%) patients, pain was resolved by medication, neurolysis or nerve grafting. In 35 cases, nerve repair was attempted at median 6 days from injury. Of these 62%(22) gained a good or fair recovery with 37%(13) having a poor functional result. Forty-two patients (47 limbs) initially presented with an insensate foot. At final follow up (mean 25.4 months), 89%(42 limbs) had a return of protective plantar sensation. Overall, 9 patients were able to return to full military duty (P2), with 45 deemed unfit for military service (P0 or P8). This study demonstrates that the majority of combat PNI will show some functional recovery. Adherence to the principles of war surgery to ensure that the wound is clear of infection and associated vascular and skeletal injuries are promptly treated will provide the optimal environment for nerve recovery. Although neuropathic pain affects a significant proportion of casualties, pharmacological and surgical intervention can alleviate the majority of symptoms. Finally, the presence of an insensate limb at initial surgery, should not be used as a marker of limb viability. The key to recovery of the PNI patient lies in a multi-disciplinary approach. Essential to this is regular surgical review to assess progress and to initiate prompt surgical intervention when needed. This approach allows early determination of prognosis, which is of huge value to the rehabilitating patient psychologically, and to the whole rehabilitation team

The types of explosive devices used in warfare and the pattern of war wounds have changed in recent years. There has, for instance, been a considerable increase in high amputation of the lower limb and unsalvageable leg injuries combined with pelvic trauma.

The conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan prompted the Department of Military Surgery and Trauma in the United Kingdom to establish working groups to promote the development of best practice and act as a focus for research.

In this review, we present lessons learnt in the initial care of military personnel sustaining major orthopaedic trauma in the Middle East.

Ballistic fractures are devastating injuries often necessitating reconstructive surgery or amputation. Complications following surgery are common, particularly in the austere environment of war. Workload from the recent conflict was documented in order to guide future medical need. All data on ballistic fractures was collected prospectively. Fractures were scored using the Red Cross Fracture Classification. During the first two weeks of the conflict, 202 Field Hospital was the sole British hospital in the region. Thereafter, until the end of the conflict, it became the tertiary referral hospital for cases requiring orthopaedic and plastic surgery opinions. Thirty-nine patients, with 50 ballistic fractures were treated by British military surgeons. Patients were predominantly Iraqi (20 enemy prisoners of war and 15 civilians); 4 children sustained five fractures. Fifty percent were caused by bullets. Seventeen upper limb fractures and 33 lower limb fractures were sustained. A total of 30 per cent of wounds became infected, 12 per cent were deep infection necessitating surgical drainage. Thirteen limbs were amputated; seven were traumatic amputations. Ballistic fractures remain a challenge for surgeons in times of war. There is a continued need to relearn the principles of war surgery in order to minimise complications and restore function. Military medical skills training and available resources must reflect these fundamental changes in order to properly prepare for future conflicts

Introduction: Within the period from 1992. to 1996. (War in Bosnia) we performed 528 amputations. At the Chopart level in 45 (8.5%) patients and at the Syme level by 7 (1.3%) patients.

Etiology: In more than 90 % patients the injury was caused by mine.

Method: Open method, primary suture or primary delayed suture. We had 6 reamput actions and 15 corrections.

Result: The Chopart stump inclines to deformation (we can often use only a part of calcaneus and talus). Achille’s tendon pulls the heel in increased supination and this is disturbing when leaning onto it and when placing the prosthesis. We achieved good results with the Baumgartner procedure: lengthening of Achille’s tendon, transfer of tendon m. tibialis anterior and tibio=tal=calcaneal arthrodesis. In cases with infection or if there remains only half of the calcaneus and talus, we prefer Syme level.

Conclusion: The patient with CH stump was properly followed and kept under control. We prefer Baumgartner procedure as prevention of deformation. In some cases the better result are achieved with the Syme level (it remains only part of calcaneus and talus)

During the second Gulf War in 2003, the Primary Casualty Receiving facility onboard R.F.A. Argus treated thirty six patients with injuries sustained in the conflict, including thirty Iraqi enemy prisoners of war and displaced persons. Their injuries and operative management are reported. Eighteen casualties sustained fragmentation injuries, six casualties sustained gunshot wounds and seven casualties suffered a combination of both. In addition to penetrating missile injuries five casualties from road traffic accidents were treated. All wounds were managed following the established principles of war surgery. The extremities were involved in twenty eight patients (78%) including nine open, multifragmented long bone fractures which were managed with external skeletal fixators. Two laparotomies and one thoracotomy were performed. The average duration of surgery was one hundred and thirty two minutes with the longest procedure lasting for six hours and ten minutes. This was the first time that the Primary Casualty Receiving Facility had been used to surgically manage war casualties and it fulfilled this role to good effect