Aims

To analyse the influence of upper extremity trauma on the long-term outcome of polytraumatised patients.

We report the functional and socioeconomic long-term outcome of patients with pelvic ring injuries.

We identified 109 patients treated at a Level I trauma centre between 1973 and 1990 with multiple blunt orthopaedic injuries including an injury to the pelvic ring, with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of ≥ 16. These patients were invited for clinical review at a minimum of ten years after the initial injury, at which point functional results, general health scores and socioeconomic factors were assessed.

In all 33 isolated anterior (group A), 33 isolated posterior (group P) and 43 combined anterior/posterior pelvic ring injuries (group A/P) were included. The mean age of the patients at injury was 28.8 years (5 to 55) and the mean ISS was 22.7 (16 to 44).

At review the mean Short-Form 12 physical component score for the A/P group was 38.71 (22.12 to 56.56) and the mean Hannover Score for Polytrauma Outcome subjective score was 67.27 (12.48 to 147.42), being significantly worse compared with the other two groups (p = 0.004 and p = 0.024, respectively). A total of 42 patients (39%) had a limp and 12 (11%) required crutches. Car or public transport usage was restricted in 16 patients (15%). Overall patients in groups P and A/P had a worse outcome. The long-term outcome of patients with posterior or combined anterior/posterior pelvic ring injuries is poorer than of those with an isolated anterior injury.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:548–53.

Introduction: Various variants of the extensor indicis (EI) have be described in the literature. We wanted to detect whether there exist any variants of the EI that may cause restricted mobility of the thumb following EI transposition to the extensor pollicis longus (EPL).

Patients & method: Intraoperatively the function of the extensor tendons of 168 hands (98 right / 70 left) of 159 patients (96 female / 63 male) were examined. The function of the muscles was simulated using a tendon-hook. For ethical reasons the approach was not extended for the study.

Results: In 34 of 168 hands 39 accessory tendons were found: 8 were localized between EPL and EI (1 from the EPL to the index; 3 extensor pollicis et indicis; 1 from the EI-muscle to the thumb; 3 to the radial extensor hood of the index). 31 accessory tendon were found ulnar to the EI (2 to the ulnar extensor hood of the index; 25 to the middle finger; 3 to the ring finger; 1 to the little finger). The EI was missing in only one hand, were a strong extensor anularis-tendon was found, which would have been suitable for EPL-reconstruction. 8 of these variants would hinder the thumb from isolated extension following EPL-reconstruction with the EI-tendon.

Conclusion: The extensor tendons should be inspected carefully through EI-transposition for reconstruction of EPL to ensure a free function of the thumb postoperatively. Small accessory tendons that may cause trouble should be cut, strong tendons should be transposed together with the EI-tendon.

For femoral shaft fracture, damage control orthopaedics entails primary external fixation and subsequent conversion to an intramedullary device (IMN). Sub-clinical contamination of external fixator pin sites is common and it is argued that such an approach risks subsequent local infective complications. We aimed to determine the rate of wound infection following DCO procedures and primary IMN for femoral fracture stabilisation.

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively assembled adult patient database was carried out. Inclusion criteria were femoral #, New Injury Severity Score (NISS) above 20 and survival more than 2 weeks. Two groups, damage control (DCO) and early total care (ETC) (Primary Nail), were formed. Contamination was positive culture from the wound or fixator pin-sites without clinical infection. Superficial infection was a combination of positive bacterial swabs and local or systemic signs of infection. Deep infection was any case requiring surgical intervention with a sub-group requiring removal of femoral metal work (ROMW) also defined.

173 patients met the criteria for inclusion, with 192 fractures (19 bilateral). The mean follow up was 19 months. Patients in the damage control group were more severely injured than those undergoing primary intramedullary nailing (NISS 36 vs 25, p 0.001). There were also more severe (Grade 3 A,B or C) local soft tissue injuries in this group (p 0.05). 98 of the 111 DCO patients underwent subsequent IMN. Others either died without conversion being appropriate, or it was elected to complete treatment with external fixation. The mean time of exchange an ex/fix to a nail was 14.1 days.

Though contamination rates were higher in the DCO group (12.6% vs 3.7%, p 0.05), there was no excess of infective complications (11.1% vs 10.8%). Contamination increased significantly in patients who underwent conversion to IMN after 14 days. Grade 3 open injury was significantly associated with infection irrespective of treatment.

This study demonstrates that infection rates following DCO for femoral fractures are not significantly different to those observed following primary intramedullary nailing. Whilst the overall risk of deep infection in the DCO group did not show any correlation with the timing of converting the external fixator to a nail, the risk of contamination was higher in patients where the exchange nailing was performed after a period of 2 weeks.

Background /Methods: Abbreviated Injury Scale based systems; the ISS, NISS, and AISmax, are used to assess trauma patients. The merits of each in predicting outcome are controversial. A large prospective database was used to assess their predictive capacity using receiver operator characteristic curves.

Results: 13,301 adult patients met the inclusion criteria. All systems were significant outcome predictors for sepsis, multiple organ failure (MOF), length of hospital stay, length of ICU admission and mortality (p 0.0001). NISS was a significantly better predictor than the ISS for mortality (p 0.0001). NISS was equivalent to the AISmax for mortality prediction and superior in patients with orthopaedic injuries. NISS was significantly better for sepsis, MOF, ICU stay and total hospital stay (p 0.0001). Analysis of the ROC curves revealed that the traditional ISS cut-offs for severity of 16, 25 and 50 should be increased to 20, 30 and 55 to provide patients with equivalent outcome.

Conclusions: NISS is superior or equivalent to the ISS and AISmax for prediction of all investigated outcomes in a population of blunt trauma patients. As NISS is easier to calculate, its use is recommended to stratify patients for clinical and research purposes.