Background: It is well established that unstable fractures of the distal part of the radius may require operative treatment to restore alignment and that failure to restore alignment often leads to wrist and forearm dysfunction. There is ongoing debate in the literature whether or not there is a strict relationship between the quality of anatomical reconstruction and functional outcome. We hypothesize that there is no difference in objective- and subjective functional outcome between patients with AO type B versus more complex AO type C fractures. Methods: Ninety-four patients with an average age of 42 years (range, 20 to 78 years) at the time of injury were evaluated an average of 20 years (range, 8 to 32 years) after treatment of an intra-articular distal radius fracture. At long-term follow-up patients were evaluated using a physician-based evaluation instruments (modified Mayo wrist score; MMWS and an upper extremity-specific health status questionnaire (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; DASH) questionnaire. Objective and subjective functional outcome of patients with AO Type B and AO Type C fractures were compared. Results: An average of 20 years after injury (average age 62 years, range 35 to 90), all fractures healed without significant loss of alignment. There was no difference in physician based outcome measure according to the Mayo score between 17 patients with 18 AO type B fractures (average, 80,3 points; range 45 to 100) and 27 patients with 31 AO type C fractures (average, 75.9 points; range 10 to 95, p=0.42). Differences in subjective DASH scores were not statistically significant either (p = 0.47); average 13 points for Type B patients (range, 0 to 58 points) and an average of 16 points for Type C patients (range, 0 to 71 points). Groups were statistically comparable. No statistical differences were found in flexion extension arc (average 103 degrees, range 10 to 145 degrees), pronation supination arc (average 150 degrees, range 0 to 180 degrees) or radial ulnar deviation (average 52 degrees, range 0 to 85 degrees), as well as grip strength and osteoarthritis (all p> 0.05). Conclusions: Twenty years after injury 67% of patients have a satisfactory outcome according to physician-based MMWS categorical ratings. There is no difference in functional long term outcome between patient with more extensive intra-articular comminution (type C fractures) and AO type B fractures. This is consistent with previous long term outcome studies with similar methodology; when more complex injuries are not correlated with decreased long term functional outcome, other (subjective) factors are more important determinants of disability

Aims. Despite limited clinical scientific backing, an additional trochanteric stabilizing plate (TSP) has been advocated when treating unstable trochanteric fractures with a sliding hip screw (SHS). We aimed to explore whether the TSP would result in less post operative fracture motion, compared to SHS alone. Methods. Overall, 31 patients with AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures were randomized to either a SHS alone or a SHS with an additional TSP. To compare postoperative fracture motion, radiostereometric analysis (RSA) was performed before and after weightbearing, and then at four, eight, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. With the “after weightbearing” images as baseline, we calculated translations and rotations, including shortening and medialization of the femoral shaft. Results. Similar migration profiles were observed in all directions during the course of healing. At one year, eight patients in the SHS group and 12 patients in the TSP group were available for analysis, finding a clinically non-relevant, and statistically non-significant, difference in total translation of 1 mm (95% confidence interval -4.7 to 2.9) in favour of the TSP group. In line with the migration data, no significant differences in clinical outcomes were found. Conclusion. The TSP did not influence the course of healing or postoperative fracture motion compared to SHS alone. Based on our results, routine use of the TSP in AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures cannot be recommended. The TSP has been shown, in biomechanical studies, to increase stability in sliding hip screw constructs in both unstable and intermediate stable trochanteric fractures, but the clinical evidence is limited. This study showed no advantage of the TSP in unstable (AO 31-A2) fractures in elderly patients when fracture movement was evaluated with radiostereometric analysis. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(1):37–45

Ideberg-Goss type VI/AO F2(4) glenoid fossa fractures are a rare and complex injury. Although some advocate non-operative management, grossly displaced glenoid fossa fractures in the young patient may warrant fixation. Current approaches still describe difficulty with access of the entirety of the glenoid, particularly the postero-superior quadrant. We present 2 cases of Ideberg-Goss type VI/AO F2(4) glenoid fossa fractures treated with fixation through a novel “Deltoid Takedown” approach, which allows safe access to the whole glenoid with satisfactory clinical results at 5 and 7 years respectively

In absence of available quantitative measures, the assessment of fracture healing based on clinical examination and X-rays remains a subjective matter. Lacking reliable information on the state of healing, rehabilitation is hardly individualized and mostly follows non evidence-based protocols building on common guidelines and personal experience. Measurement of fracture stiffness has been demonstrated as a valid outcome measure for the maturity of the repair tissue but so far has not found its way to clinical application outside the research space. However, with the recent technological advancements and trends towards digital health care, this seems about to change with new generations of instrumented implants – often unfortunately termed “smart implants” – being developed as medical devices. The AO Fracture Monitor is a novel, active, implantable sensor system designed to provide an objective measure for the assessment of fracture healing progression (1). It consists of an implantable sensor that is attached to conventional locking plates and continuously measures implant load during physiological weight bearing. Data is recorded and processed in real-time on the implant, from where it is wirelessly transmitted to a cloud application via the patient's smartphone. Thus, the system allows for timely, remote and X-ray free provision of feedback upon the mechanical competence of the repair tissue to support therapeutic decision making and individualized aftercare. The device has been developed according to medical device standards and underwent extensive verification and validation, including an in-vivo study in an ovine tibial osteotomy model, that confirmed the device's capability to depict the course of fracture healing as well as its long-term technical performance. Currently a multi-center clinical investigation is underway to demonstrate clinical safety of the novel implant system. Rendering the progression of bone fracture healing assessable, the AO Fracture Monitor carries potential to enhance today's postoperative care of fracture patients

Aims. This study aimed to compare mortality in trochanteric AO/OTA A1 and A2 fractures treated with an intramedullary nail (IMN) or sliding hip screw (SHS). The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality, with secondary endpoints at 0 to 1, 2 to 7, 8 to 30, 90, and 365 days. Methods. We analyzed data from 26,393 patients with trochanteric AO/OTA A1 and A2 fractures treated with IMNs (n = 9,095) or SHSs (n = 17,298) in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register (January 2008 to December 2020). Exclusions were made for patients aged < 60 years, pathological fractures, pre-2008 operations, contralateral hip fractures, fractures other than trochanteric A1/A2, and treatments other than IMNs or SHSs. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses adjusted for type of fracture, age, sex, cognitive impairment, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and time period were conducted, along with calculations for number needed to harm (NNH). Results. In unadjusted analyses, there was no significant difference between IMN and SHS patient survival at 30 days (91.8% vs 91.1%; p = 0.083) or 90 days (85.4% vs 84.5%; p = 0.065), but higher one-year survival for IMNs (74.5% vs 73.3%; p = 0.031) compared with SHSs. After adjustments, no significant difference in 30-day mortality was found (hazard rate ratio (HRR) 0.94 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.02(; p = 0.146). IMNs exhibited higher mortality at 0 to 1 days (HRR 1.63 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.34); p = 0.009) compared with SHSs, with a NNH of 556, but lower mortality at 8 to 30 days (HRR 0.89 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.00); p = 0.043). No differences were observed in mortality at 2 to 7 days (HRR 0.94 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.11); p = 0.434), 90 days (HRR 0.95 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.02); p = 0.177), or 365 days (HRR 0.97 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.02); p = 0.192). Conclusion. This study found no difference in 30-day mortality between IMNs and SHSs. However, IMNs were associated with a higher mortality at 0 to 1 days and a marginally lower mortality at 8 to 30 days compared with SHSs. The observed differences in mortality were small and should probably not guide choice of treatment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(6):603–612

Introduction. To develop an international guideline (AOGO) about use of osteobiologics in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for treating degenerative spine conditions. Method. The guideline development process was guided by AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative (KF Degen) and followed the Guideline International Network McMaster Guideline Development Checklist. The process involved 73 participants with expertise in degenerative spine diseases and surgery from 22 countries. Fifteen systematic reviews were conducted addressing respective key topics and evidence were collected. The methodologist compiled the evidence into GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks. Guideline panel members judged the outcomes and other criteria and made the final recommendations through consensus. Result. Five conditional recommendations were created. A conditional recommendation is about the use of allograft, autograft or a cage with an osteobiologic in primary ACDF surgery. Other conditional recommendations are about use of osteobiologic for single or multi-level ACDF, and for hybrid construct surgery. It is suggested that surgeons use other osteobiologics rather than human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in common clinical situations. Surgeons are recommended to choose one graft over another or one osteobiologic over another primarily based on clinical situation, and the costs and availability of the materials. Conclusion. This AOGO guideline is the first to provide recommendations for the use of osteobiologics in ACDF. Despite the comprehensive searches for evidence, there were few studies completed with small sample sizes and primarily as case series with inherent risks of bias. Therefore high quality clinical evidence is demanded to improve the guideline

INTRODUCTION. Intramedullary nail fixation has been used for successful treatment of long bone fracture such as humerus, tibia and femur. We look at the experience of our trauma unit in treating long bone fracture using the AO approved Expert femoral/tibial nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). We look at the union and complication rates in patients treated with AO approved nailing system for pertrochanteric, femoral and tibial shaft fracture. METHODS. We carried out retrospective case notes review of patients that underwent femoral and tibial nailing during the period of study- October 2007 to August 2009. All patients were treated using the AO approved nailing system. We identified all trauma patients that underwent femoral and tibial nailing through the trauma register. Further information was then obtained by going through medical notes and reviewing all followed-up X-rays stored within the online radiology system. RESULTS. 149 patients, 85 male and 64 female were included into the study. 150 procedures were carried out during period of study as 1 patient underwent conversion of lateral entry femoral nail to PFNA due to refracture. Patients' age ranged from 14-96 with mean of 55. 140 patients had isolated long bone fracture (either femur or tibia) compared to 9 patients with multiple bone fractures. Our unit performed 64 Expert tibial nail, 36 PFNA, 31 Expert lateral entry femoral nail and 19 Expert retrograde femoral nail during period of study. 13 patients treated with intramedullary nail sustained open fracture, 9 of them were compound tibial fracture compared to 4 compound femoral fractures. All patients were followed-up between 2 to 24 months or until death. 9 out of 17 patients that died in this study had diagnosis of tumour. Complication rates were 17% for Expert tibial nail (1 patient with valgus deformity, peroneal nerve palsy and delayed union, 3 with delayed union, 4 with broken locking screw, 2 with wound infection and 1 with abscess over wound site), 4% for lateral/retrograde femoral nail (1 each for pulmonary embolism and broken locking screw) and 4% for PFNA (1 each for delayed union and deep vein thrombosis). The overall complication rates were 10% from this study. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS. We conclude that the AO approved nailing system used for treating pertrochanteric, femoral and tibial fractures were effective with high union rate. The overall complication rates were 10% from this study. Complication rates for tibial nail were as high as 17% compared to 4% for femoral nail or PFNA. The complication rates for PFNA in our study were lower compared to 29% in PFN that was reported in one literature

We sought to quantify agreement by different assessors of the AO classification for distal fractures of the radius. Thirty radiographs of acute distal radial fractures were evaluated by 36 assessors of varying clinical experience. Our findings suggest that AO ‘type’ and the presence or absence of articular displacement are measured with high consistency when classification of distal radial fractures is undertaken by experienced observers. Assessors at all experience levels had difficulty agreeing on AO ‘group’ and especially AO ‘subgroup’. To categorise distal radial fractures according to joint displacement and AO type is simple and reproducible. Our study examined only whether distal radial fractures could be consistently classified according to the AO system. Validation of the classification as a predictor of outcome will require a prospective clinical study

AO Spine Guideline for Using Osteobiologics in Spine Degeneration project is an international collaborative initiative to identify and evaluate evidence on existing use of osteobiologics in spine degenerative diseases. It aims to formulate clinically relevant and internationally applicable guidelines ensuring evidence-based, safe and effective use of osteobiologics. The current focus is the use of osteobiologics in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgeries. The guideline development is planned in three phases. Phase 1- Evidence synthesis and Recommendation; Phase 2- Guideline with osteobiologics grading and Validation; Phase 3- Guideline dissemination and Development of a clinical decision support tool. The key questions formulating the guidelines for the use of osteobiologics will be addressed in a series of systematic reviews in Phase 1. The evidence synthesized by the systematic reviews will be assessed by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology, including expert panel discussions to formulate a recommendation. In Phase 2, osteobiologics will be graded based on evidence and the grading will be integrated with the recommendation from Phase 1, and thus formulate a guideline. The guideline will be further validated by prospective clinical studies. In the third phase, dissemination of the proposed guideline and development of a decision support tool is planned. AO-GO aims to bridge an important gap between quality of evidence and use of osteobiologics in spine fusion surgeries. With a holistic approach the guideline aims to facilitate evidence-based, patient-oriented decision-making process in clinical practice, thus stimulating further evidence-based studies regarding osteobiologics usage in spine surgeries

The AO Foundation advocates the use of partially threaded lag screws in the fixation of fractures of the medial malleolus. However, their threads often bypass the radiodense physeal scar of the distal tibia, possibly failing to obtain more secure purchase and better compression of the fracture. We therefore hypothesised that the partially threaded screws commonly used to fix a medial malleolar fracture often provide suboptimal compression as a result of bypassing the physeal scar, and proposed that better compression of the fracture may be achieved with shorter partially threaded screws or fully threaded screws whose threads engage the physeal scar. We analysed compression at the fracture site in human cadaver medial malleoli treated with either 30 mm or 45 mm long partially threaded screws or 45 mm fully threaded screws. The median compression at the fracture site achieved with 30 mm partially threaded screws (0.95 kg/cm. 2. (interquartile range (IQR) 0.8 to 1.2) and 45 mm fully threaded screws (1.0 kg/cm. 2 . (IQR 0.7 to 2.8)) was significantly higher than that achieved with 45 mm partially threaded screws (0.6 kg/cm. 2. (IQR 0.2 to 0.9)) (p = 0.04 and p < 0.001, respectively). The fully threaded screws and the 30mm partially threaded screws were seen to engage the physeal scar under an image intensifier in each case. The results support the use of 30 mm partially threaded or 45 mm fully threaded screws that engage the physeal scar rather than longer partially threaded screws that do not. A 45 mm fully threaded screw may in practice offer additional benefit over 30 mm partially threaded screws in increasing the thread count in the denser paraphyseal region. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1662–6

We conducted an observational radiographic study to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the AO classification of fractures of the distal radius. Plain posteroanterior and lateral radiographs of 456 patients with an acute fracture of the distal radius were classified by a consultant orthopaedic hand specialist and two specialist trainees, and the k coefficient for the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the type, group and subgroup classification was calculated. . Only the type of fracture (A, B or C) was found to provide substantial intra-observer reliability (k . type. 0.65). The inclusion of ‘group’ and ‘subgroup’ into the classification reduced the inter-observer reliability to fair (k. group. 0.29, k. subgroup . = 0.28) and the intra-observer reliability to moderate (k. group. 0.53, k. subgroup. 0.49). Disagreement was found to arise between specific subgroups, which may be amenable to clarification. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:818–23

Introduction: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the AO Universal Spine System (AO USS) with Harrington-Luque instrumentation for the treatment of King type II idiopathic scoliosis. Methods/Results: A retrospective analysis was performed on two groups of patients with King II adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The first group consisted of 40 consecutive patients treated with Harrington-Luque instrumentation between 1990 and 1993. The second group consisted of 25 consecutive patients treated with AO USS instrumentation between 1994 and 1996. The groups were well matched with respect to age, sex and curve severity. Inclusion criteria were patients over the age of 12 years with a King II curve pattern and a Cobb angle of greater than 40°. Half of the patients in each group underwent anterior release prior to posterior fusion. All patients were followed up six monthly for 18 months. The thoracic curve, lumbar curve, kyphosis and lordosis were measured using the Cobb method. The mean pre-operative thoracic and lumbar curves were 62° and 43.9° respectively in the Harrington group and 57.5° and 35.9° in the AO USS group. On average 11.4 levels were fused in the Harrington group compared to 10.9 levels in the AO USS group. The mean post-operative correction of the thoracic curve in the AO USS group of 64% was significantly greater than the 51% achieved in the Harrington group (p< 0.005). At 18 months there was a 7% loss of correction in the Harrington group and 9% in the AO USS group. The correction of lumbar curve of 41% in the Harrington group and 46% in the AO USS group at 18 months was not significantly different. In the sagittal plane the AO USS group had significantly better preservation of the lumbar lordosis but there was no difference in kyphosis correction. Blood loss was similar in both groups. Mean operative time of 132 minutes in the AO USS group was shorter than the mean time of 153 minutes in the Harrington group (p< 0.05). Two hooks in the Harrington group became dislodged and two in the AO group. There were no neurological complications in either group. All the patients in both groups achieved a solid fusion. Conclusion: AO USS is a safe and effective instrumentation system for the treatment of King type II adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Correction of the thoracic curve is superior to that achieved with Harrington-Luque instrumentation and operative time is shorter. AO USS enables better preservation of the lumbar lordosis than Harrington-Luque. There is no difference in blood loss, complication rate and fusion rates between the two techniques. It has become our instrumentation system of choice for this group of patients

Aim: To assess the functional and radiological outcome of AO wrist Arthrodesis using the AO wrist fusion plate. Method: An 8 year, independent, retrospective, radiological and functional review was performed using The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) and the Buck-Gramcko/Lohmann outcome scores. Results: Twenty-eight patients were reviewed. The two scoring systems correlated consistently in regards to the functional outcome. However, patients with systemic disease experienced problems completing the DASH questionnaire. Mono-articular arthritis was associated with an excellent/good outcome in 95% of cases. Results for patients with systemic disease were markedly worse. There was one case of plate breakage associated with a delayed union of the second MCP joint. There was a 100% union rate, no significant post-operative infections and no tendon ruptures. Conclusion: The short to mid term clinical outcomes for the AO wrist fusion plate are encouraging and its use can be recommended in a variety of wrist pathologies

Background. Current literature of definition, classification and outcomes of fractures of talar body remains controversial. Our primary purpose is to present an unusual combination of fractures of talar body with pantalar involvement / dislocation / extension as a basis for modification of Müller AO / OTA Classification. Methods. We include four consecutive patients, who sustained talar body fractures with pantalar subluxation/dislocation /extension. These unusual injury patterns lead us to reconsider Müller AO / OTA Classification in the light of another widely used talar fracture classification, Hawkins Classification of fractures of neck of talus and subsequent modification by Canale and Kelly. Results. Müller AO / OTA Classification comprises CI – Ankle joint involvement, C2 – Subtalar joint involvement, C3 – Ankle and subtalar joint involvement. We propose Modification of Müller AO / OTA. Classification. C1 – Absolutely undisplaced fracture; C2 – Ankle and Subtalar joint involvement: subluxation; C3 – Ankle and subtalar joint involvement: subluxation with comminution; C4 – Ankle, subtalar and talonavicular joint involvement. Conclusions. Our modification redefines Müller AO / OTA Classification, extends and fills the void in the classification by inclusion of C4, draws attention to stability of talonavicular joint and reflects increasing severity of injury in fractures of talar body

For any fracture classification, a high level of intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability is desirable. We compare the consistency of the AO and Frykman classifications for distal radius fractures using digitised radiographs of 100 fractures by 15 orthopaedic surgeons and 5 radiologists using a Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS). The process was repeated 1 month later. Reproducibility moderate for both the AO and Frykman systems, reliability only fair for both the AO and Frykman systems. In each case reproducibilty using the Frykman system was slightly greater. The assessor’s level of experience and specialty was not seen to influence accuracy. The ability to electronically manipulate images does not appear to improve reliability compared to the use of traditional hard copies, and their sole use in describing these injuries is not recommended. These fractures are common, approximately one sixth of all fractures and the most commonly occurring fractures in adults. Their multitude of eponyms hint at the difficulty in formulating a comprehensive and useable system. The Frykman classification is most popular, but limited- does not quantify displacement, shortening or the extent of comminution. The more comprehensive AO system is limited in its complexity with 27 possible subdivisions. Computerised tomography shown to give only marginal improvement in consistency of classification. Radiographs of 100 fractures selected. Anteroposterior and lateral view for each. 15 orthopaedic surgeons and 5 radiologists recruited as assessors, including 5 specialist registrars. Each given a printed description of Frykman and AO classifications. Radiographs could be manipulated digitally. Intra and inter-observer reproducibility analysed. A comparison made comparing reproducibility between radiologists and surgeons, consultant orthopaedic surgeons and trainees. Statistical methods; analysis involves adjustment of observed proportion of agreement between observers by correction for the proportion of agreement that could have occurred by chance. Kappa coefficients compared using the Student t test incorporating standard errors of kappa for these groups. Median interobserver reliability was fair for both the AO (kappa = 0.31, range 0.2 to 0.38) and Frykman (kappa = 0.36, range 0.30 to 0.43) systems. Median intraobserver reproducibility was moderate for both the AO (kappa = 0.45, range 0.42 to 0.48) and Frykman (kappa = 0.55, range 0.51 to 0.57) systems. In each case the Frykman system was statistically (p< 0.01) more accurate. Level of experience, or specialty was not seen to influence accuracy (p< 0.01). Our results demonstrate that using them in isolation in determining treatment and comparing results following treatment cannot be recommended

Background: Over many years our understanding of fracture patterns and management has evolved. One of the biggest steps was the adoption of the principles of fracture fixation as described by the Arbitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen (AO). The application of this philosophy has allowed us to optimise fracture management and improve outcome. In our unit we noted a number of complications resulting from suboptimal fracture fixations of ankles some of which required revision. It was decided to review fracture fixation of ankles in the unit to see whether the basic principles of fixation was being followed in our DGH. Aim: To evaluate whether the AO principles of fixation for ankle fractures are being followed in our local unit. Patients and Methods: 52 consecutive patients over a period of 1 year from August 2005 to August 2006 with bi malleolar and isolated medial malleolar ankle fractures, requiring surgery, had their case notes and pre operative x rays reviewed retrospectively looking at fracture patterns according to the AO and Weber classification. Post operative x rays where reviewed to see if the principles of facture fixation had been appropriately followed. Results: Of the 52 patients evaluated 26 were Weber type B fractures, 20 were type C and 6 were isolated medial malleolar fracture. Nine of the type B and three of type C (23% of the total number) underwent fixation not in accordance with AO principles. In every case the fibula fixation did not include a cortical lag screw. Discussion/Conclusions: Although none of the 12 described had to undergo revision, their management was far from optimum. By ensuring that operating surgeons have the appropriate training and experience in basic fracture fixation before being allowed to undertake such procedures, our unit hopes to show an improvement on these figures by the time this audit is repeated

Trochanteric femur fractures can be classified using the Jensen modification of the Evans’ classification or the AO/ASIF classification. This study compares the reproducibility of both classifications. Furthermore we evaluated the agreement on fracture stability, choice of osteosynthesis, fracture reduction and the accuracy of implant positioning. We used pre- and postoperative lateral and AP radiographs of 50 trochanteric femur fractures. The fractures were classified using both classifications with a three-month interval by five trauma surgeons and five residents. Inter-, and intra-observer variability was analysed using the multi-rater Fleiss’ kappa and the Cohen’ kappa tests. The AO/ASIF classification showed a kappa coefficient for the intra-observer agreement of 0.40 (SE 0.01). After leaving out classification-subgroups, AO/ASIF classification showed a coefficient of 0.68 (SE 0.02) and the Jensen classification a coefficient of 0.48 (SE 0.02). The kappa values of the intra-observer reliability of the AO/ASIF classification with and without subgroups were: 0.43 (SE 0.08) and 0.71 (SE 0.08) respectively. For the Jensen classification the kappa value was 0.56 (SE 0.09). Preoperative agreement on fracture stability and type of implant to be chosen showed kappa values of 0.39 (SE 0.05) and 0.65 (SE 0.04). Postoperative disagreement on the choice of implant was 15% (kappa 0.17, SE 0.08). Kappa values for postoperative fracture reduction and position of the implant were 0.29 (SE 0.09) and 0.22 (SE 0.05), respectively. Both the Jensen classification and the AO/ASIF classification showed poor reproducibility. However, without subgroups the AO/ASIF classification seemed more reliable. This study suggests that the definition of stability of trochanteric fractures remains controversial, which possibly complicates the choice of osteosynthesis. Refinement of the classifications or renewed definition of trochanteric fractures seems to be required

For any fracture classification, a high level of intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability is desirable. We compare the consistency of the AO and Neer classifications for proximal humerus fractures with an assessment of the digitised radiographs of 100 fractures by 10 orthopaedic surgeons and 5 radiologists using the General Electric Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS), allowing manipulation of the image. This process repeated 1 month later. Reproducibility and reliability moderate for both the AO and Neer systems. Reproducibility using the AO/ ASIF system was slightly greater. The assessor’s level of experience and specialty did affect accuracy. The ability to electronically manipulate images does not improve reliability and their sole use in describing these injuries and comparing similarly classified fractures from different centres is not recommended. Fractures of the proximal humerus are common. Most undisplaced or minimally displaced, and treated conservatively. Up to one fifth may benefit from surgery. As decisions regarding treatment are based on the fracture type, a radiological classification should be easy to use and have a high degree of reliability and reproducibility to serve as a useful discriminator, creating standards by which treatment can be recommended and outcomes compared. Radiographs of 100 fractures of the proximal humerus selected. A true anteroposterior, scapular lateral, and axillary radiograph taken for each fracture. 10 orthopaedic surgeons and 5 radiologists recruited as assessors, including 5 specialist registrars. Each given a printed description of both Neer and AO classifications, a goniometer and ruler. The assessment preceeded by short lecture. Radiographs could be manipulated digitally for size, contrast, brightness, orientation and the negative image displayed. We did not require assessors to determine subgroups for reasons of simplicity. Reproducibility and reliability analysed using Kappa statistical methods. Coefficients for agreement compared using the Student t test incorporating the standard errors of kappa for these groups. A comparison made between radiologists and surgeons, and then consultant orthopaedic surgeons and trainees. In each case the AO/ASIF system was statistically (p< 0.01) more accurate. Agreement was greater for less complex (one and two part, and type A) fractures. Level of experience produced a statistically (p< 0.01) significant difference in accuracy. Specialty did not. Our analysis comparing the Neer and AO systems uses the largest group of assessors reviewing the largest number of radiographs reported in the literature. We concur with others in concluding that using these systems in isolation in determining treatment and comparing results following treatment cannot be recommended

Introduction. To achieve tibiotalocalcaneal arthodesis, implants described range from external fixator, compression screws and anterior plate and the more recent retrograde calcaneal locked intramedullary nail. Our aim is to assess the outcome of the AO cannulated blade plate for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Patients and methods. Four tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodeses were performed in three patients. The operative technique involves lateral approach to the distal fibula that was osteotomised and used as bone graft. The articular cartilage of ankle and subtalar joint was removed using an osteotome and congruent surfaces achieved. AO cannulated blade plate was applied on the lateral aspect to achieve compression. The postoperative protocol included a plaster cast for three months, followed by mobilization out of plaster. Results and discussion. At the mean follow up of 10 months (range five to fourteen months) all patients were pain free on full weight bearing. The union was achieved at three months which was confirmed clinically and radiologically. There was no infection, wound breakdown, or loss of position at the ankle or subtalar joints. Mean preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle/hindfoot score was 21 and postoperative score 83. We conclude that the cannulated blade plate is an alternate technique for tibiotalocalcaneal arthodesis, with no moulding of the implant required to attain satisfactory alignment

Purpose: To evaluate the intra and inter-observer variation of the Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications in assessing tibial plateau fractures, using plain radiographs. Summary: Fifty tibial plateau fractures were classified independently by 6 observers as per the Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications, using antero-posterior and lateral plain radiographs. Assessment was done on two occasions 8 weeks apart. We found that both the Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications have a high intra-observer (kappa=0.57 and 0.53 respectively), and inter-observer (kappa=0.41 and 0.43 respectively) variation. Classification of tibial plateau fractures into unicondylar vs. bicondylar and pure splits vs. articular depression +/− split conferred improved inter and intra-observer variation. Conclusions: The high inter-observer variation found for the Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications must be taken into consideration when these are used as a guidance of treatment and when used in evaluating patients’ outcome. Simply classifying tibial plateau fractures into unicondylar vs. bicondylar and pure splits vs. articular depression +/− split may be more reliable