INTRODUCTION. The introduction of hard-on-hard bearings and the consequences of increased wear due to edge-loading have renewed interest in the importance of acetabular component orientation for implant survival and functional outcome following hip arthroplasty. Some studies have shown increased dislocation risk when the cup is mal-oriented which has led to the identification of a safe-zone1. The aims of this prospective, multi-centered study of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) were to: 1. Identify factors that influence cup orientation and 2. Describe the effect of cup orientation on clinical outcome. METHODS. In a prospective study involving seven UK centers, patients undergoing primary THA between January 1999 and January 2002 were recruited. All patients underwent detailed assessment pre-operatively as well as post-op. Assessment included data on patient demographics, clinical outcome, complications and further surgery/revision. 681 primary THAs had adequate radiographs for inclusion. 590 hips received cemented cups. The primary functional outcome measure of the study was the change between pre-operative and at latest follow up OHS (OHS). Secondary outcome measures included dislocation rate and revision surgery. EBRA was used to determine acetabular inclination and version. The influence of patient's gender, BMI, surgeon's grade and approach on cup orientation was examined. Four different zones tested as possibly ± (Lewinnek Zone, Callanan's described zone and zones ± 5 and ±10 about the study's mean inclination and anteversion) for a reduced dislocation risk and an optimal functional outcome. RESULTS. There were 21 dislocations (3.1%) and 8 (1.2%) patients required revision at a mean follow up of 7 years. Experienced surgeons (2=0.047) and those operating with the patient in the lateral decubitus position (p=0.04) were more likely to achieve a cup orientation within any of the tested zones. Surgical approach (2=0.14) and patient's BMI (2=0.93) had no influence on whether a cup was within or outside any zone. There was no difference in dislocation rate between the posterior and anterio-lateral approaches (2=0.88). None of the zones tested had a significantly reduced dislocation risk (2=0.13), nor revision risk (2=0.55). OHS was not different for patients with cups within or outside any of the zones tested (p=0.523). DISCUSSION. There was a wide variation in cup orientation. Despite the wide scatter in cup orientation, no safe zone could be identified that would reduce dislocation and revision rate, nor improve patient reported outcome (OHS). Hence, these data suggest that acetabular component orientation should not be considered predictive of patients' early/mid-term complication/revision rate and outcome following THA

INTRODUCTION. Studies have suggested that there is a reduction in head-neck-ratio (HNR) associated with MoMHRA. A reduction in HNR at operation would decrease range of movement and increase impingement risk. Impingement could lead to 20 edge loading, increasing wear. Serum ion levels of Chromium (Cr) and Cobalt (Co) are surrogate markers of wear. Although acetabular component orientation has been shown to contribute to wear and PT development, the role of a decrease in HNR has only been highlighted in PT development. This study aimed to measure changes in HNR that occur at resurfacing and determine any gender- and component size-specific differences. In addition it aimed to determine whether changes in HNR could be associated with increased wear. METHODS. 84 patients (56M: 28F) with unilateral MoMHRA were included. The mean age at surgery was 57 years. The mean femoral component was 49mm. Components were considered small if <45mm, average if between 45–50mm and large if >50mm. Three designs were implanted; BHR, C+ and Recap. The average follow up was 4 years. All patients had Cr/Co levels measured at follow up. Patients were considered to have high ions if Cr and Co levels were 5.1ppb and 4.4ppb respectively. Pre-operative HNR (HNRpre) and the post-operative HNR (HNRpost) were made from the respective pelvic radiographs. Assuming a 2mm thick cartilage layer, the HNR based on the diameter of the articular cartilage pre-operatively (HNRart) was calculated. The immediate changes in HNR as a result of the operation were expressed relative to articular HNR pre-op:. HNRartpost=HNRpost–HNRart. RESULTS. The changes in HNR at operation were significantly negatively correlated with HNRpre, (p<0.001), (rho=−0.77). Females had greater ion levels (p=0.013) and smaller components (p<0.001). Females had bigger pre-operative HNRart and were downsized more (p<0.001). Similarly, patients with small components had higher ions (p=0.032). They had greater HNRart and were downsized more (p<0.001) Twelve patients comprised the high ion group. These patients had smaller components (p=0.004), greater HNRart and were down-sized significantly more at resurfacing (p<0.001). DISCUSSION. This study highlights HNR changes that occur in resurfaced hips. Females, patients with small components and patients in the high ion group had higher pre-operative HNR and were downsized more at operation. Femoral downsize, would probably increase impingement risk, lead to secondary edge loading and contribute to greater incidence of wear related problems