Aim. Our aim was to evaluate cementless one-stage revision in chronic periprosthetic hip joint infection. Method and patients. The study was performed as a multicentre, proof-of-concept, observational study with prospective data collection. Inclusion of patients with a chronic periprosthetic hip joint infection (PJI) were followed by protocolled surgical treatment (cementless one-stage revision - the CORIHA protocol) at one of 8 participating departments of orthopaedic surgery between 2009 – 2014, and the patients enrolled in a 2-year follow-up program. A PJI were diagnosed based on adopted criteria from McPherson and Zimmerli. At the time of initiation of the study in 2009, the collaborating departments performed approximately one-fourth of all nationwide primary HJR and more than one-third of all revisions. In total 56 PJI patients with a median age of 72 years and a median pre-operative ASA score of 2 met the established eligibility criteria and accepted to participate; 31 (55%) were males. The cohort had a mean follow-up time of 4.0 years, with all patients followed for minimum 2 years. The primary outcome were relapse described as re-revision due to infection (regardless of considered as a relapse or new infection). This was evaluated by competing risk analysis (competing risks: aseptic revisions and death). Secondary, all-cause mortality was evaluated by survival analysis. The study was approved by the local Committees on Biomedical Research Ethics. Results. Five patients were revised due to relapse of infection. The cumulative incidence of re-revision due to infection was 8.9% (95% Confidence Interval 3.2–18.1). Seven patients had died in the follow-up period. None of these were believed to have been re-infected. The 1 and 5 year survival incidence was 96 (95% Confidence Interval 86–99) and 89 (95% Confidence Interval 75–95). Several complications were registered in the follow-up period: Three patients sustained periprosthetic fractures. Five patients had closed reduction due to dislocation - none have been open revised. Five patients sustained
Hip fractures are among the most common orthopaedic injuries and represent a growing burden on healthcare as our population ages. Despite improvements in preoperative optimisation, surgical technique and postoperative care, complication rates remain high. Time to surgery is one of the few variables that may be influenced by the medical team. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of time to surgery on mortality and major complications following surgical fixation of hip fractures. Utilising the American College of Surgeons' National Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, we analysed all hip fractures (femoral neck, inter-trochanteric, and sub-trochanteric) treated from 2011 to 2013 inclusively. We divided patients into three groups based on time to surgery: less than one day (<24h), one to two days (24–48h), and two to five days (48–120h). Baseline characteristics were compared between groups and a multivariate analysis performed to compare 30-day mortality and major complications (return to surgery, deep wound infection, pneumonia, pulmonary embolus,
It is the prime responsibility of the treating surgeon to identify and treat the vascular injury along with the skeletal trauma. Limbs with combined Orthopaedic and Vascular injuries are traditionally admitted as an Orthopaedic emergency. In a 17 year period we treated 67 cases of vascular injuries (including 16 pseudo aneurysms) associated with fractures and dislocations or soft tissue injuries of the limbs. Three cases have been followed up for over 20 years. All patients were operated by Orthopaedic residents on duty with limited resources, without the help of vascular surgeons. We relied on clinical diagnosis and immediate exploration of the blood vessels rather than time consuming procedure of arteriography. Skeletal stabilisation was achieved by internal or external fixation. Vascular reconstruction involved end to end repair or vein grafting. Fasciotomy was performed in selected cases where the injury-revascularisation time was more than 6 hours. Post-operative care involved limb placement at body level, Sympathetic blockade for 48 hours, vasodilators, Lomodex, Mannitol, Aspirin and antibiotic therapy. Urine was monitored for smoky color indicating myoglobinuria. Though only 17 were repaired within six hours, limb viability with good function was obtained in 51 cases. Complications included 7 deaths, 6 amputations, 2
This study aimed to investigate the risk of postoperative complications in COVID-19-positive patients undergoing common orthopaedic procedures. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Programme (NSQIP) database, patients who underwent common orthopaedic surgery procedures from 1 January to 31 December 2021 were extracted. Patient preoperative COVID-19 status, demographics, comorbidities, type of surgery, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Propensity score matching was conducted between COVID-19-positive and -negative patients. Multivariable regression was then performed to identify both patient and provider risk factors independently associated with the occurrence of 30-day postoperative adverse events.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the severity of anaemia on postoperative complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. All patients who underwent primary TKA or THA between January 2012 and December 2017 were identified and stratified based upon hematocrit level. In this analysis, we defined anaemia as packed cell volume (Hct) < 36% for women and < 39% for men, and further stratified anaemia as mild anaemia (Hct 33% to 36% for women, Hct 33% to 39% for men), and moderate to severe (Hct < 33% for both men and women). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the incidence of multiple adverse events within 30 days of arthroplasty.Aims
Methods
Little information is available about several
important aspects of the treatment of melioidosis osteomyelitis
and septic arthritis. We undertook a retrospective review of 50 patients with these
conditions in an attempt to determine the effect of location of
the disease, type of surgical intervention and duration of antibiotic
treatment on outcome, particularly complications and relapse. We found that there was a 27.5% risk of osteomyelitis of the
adjacent bone in patients with septic arthritis in the lower limb.
Patients with septic arthritis and osteomyelitis of an adjacent
bone were in hospital significantly longer (p = 0.001), needed more
operations (p = 0.031) and had a significantly higher rate of complications
and re-presentation (p = 0.048). More than half the patients (61%), most particularly those with
multifocal bone and joint involvement, and those with septic arthritis
and osteomyelitis of an adjacent bone who were treated operatively,
needed more visits to theatre. Cite this article: