Introduction and Objective. Despite pure
Mechanical failure in total hip arthroplasty is usually due to aseptic loosening related to wear particles as seen with polyethylene bearing.
Introduction: Ceramic/ceramic articulation has a long history and is accepted as a low wear couple for total hip joint application. Due to the requirements for strength of the ball-head it may be necessary to combine products from different
Aims: To compare acetabular surface treatments in
In order to avoid the consequences of polyethylene wear in a high-risk population, 128 alumina-alumina total hip arthroplasty were implanted in 116 consecutive patients of 40 years old or less. Osteonecrosis and sequellae of congenital hip dislocation were the main etiologies representing 71% of the hips. The same titanium alloy cemented stem was implanted in all hips. Four
On a theorethical basis a larger head diameter permit ewider range of motion and enhance the stability of the implant, reducing the risk of dislocation but increasing the level of friction and the production of debris. The need for a small head diameter (22 or 28 mm) was thus storically connected to the behaviour of the metal-polyethilene interface and the problem of PE debris. After the introduction of ceramics the production of debris diminished but the technology didn’t permit diameter-wider than 28 – 32 mm. The development of new ceramics with improved mechanical properties permit now to obtain thinner acetabular inserts and thus a larger head diameter, without increases the production of debris. From september 2003 to jenuary 2004 we have implanted 20 uncemented
The study was designed to compare the clinical performance of an
Introduction and purpose: Different bearing surfaces have been used to prevent osteolysis, such as alumina-alumina. We present here an analysis of the results of a prospective multi-center study of complications related to the use of alumina-alumina bearings. Materials and methods: In 4 hospitals 319 cups with hydroxyapatite stems and alumina-alumina bearing surfaces were implanted with a mean follow-up of 5.6 years (range: 3–8). The mean age of the patients was 52.7 (range: 14–70).
The use of a total hip arthroplasty with
Purpose. Primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been a very successful surgical intervention for the management of end-stage arthritis in geriatric patients (> age 65). The mid- to long-term results have been less satisfactory however, in younger patients primarily due to the wear of the acetabular liner and loosening of the femoral component. The primary study purpose was to compare pain, function and stiffness over the first five years in a population less than 60 years of age who received either an
Expecting the low wear property and the longevity, since October 1998, we have been using the
A modular layered acetabular component (metal-polyethylene-ceramic) was developed in Japan for use in
Aims. Our aim in this study was to describe a continuing review of
11 total hip arthroplasties using 22.225 mm
Biomaterials improve the quality of life for an ever increasing number of people each year. The range of applications is vast and includes such things as joint and limb replacements, artificial arteries and skin, contact lenses and dentures. Ceramic biomaterials can be divided roughly into three main types governed by their in vivo behaviour and tissue response. In broad terms, there are the bioresorbable ceramics (b-tricalciumphosphate), bioreactive (hydroxyapatite, fluorapatite and bioglass) and bioinert (alumina, zirconia and pyrolytic carbon). The resorbable ones are incorporated into the surrounding tissue, or may even dissolve completely over a period of time. The bioreactive ones, like hydroxyapatite (used for coatings on metallic pins), encourage bonding to surrounding tissue with, for example, new bone growth being stimulated. The bionert ceramics are mostly used for structural components.
The choice to use
It has been suggested that the wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in total hip replacement is substantially reduced when the femoral head is ceramic rather than metal. However, studies of
Introduction. Third body wear caused by contaminated bearing environment with debris that may have been generated by a worn or fractured revised bearing coupling, but also originated by generation of metal/cement particles during the primary or revision surgery, may be a relevant issue for the implant life. Objectives. To evaluate the wear behavior of a last generation
Aims. To determine the effect of a change in design of a cementless
ceramic acetabular component in fixation and clinical outcome after
total hip arthroplasty. Patients and Methods. We compared 342 hips (302 patients) operated between 1999 and
2005 with a relatively smooth hydroxyapatite coated acetabular component
(group 1), and 337 hips (310 patients) operated between 2006 and
2011 using a similar acetabular component with a macrotexture on
the entire outer surface of the component (group 2). The mean age of
the patients was 53.5 (14 to 70) in group 1 and 53.0 (15 to 70)
in group 2. The mean follow-up was 12.7 years (10 to 17) for group
1 and 7.2 years (4 to 10) for group 2. Results. No hips were revised due to complications related to bearing
fracture or to stem loosening. A total of 15 acetabular components
were revised for aseptic loosening in group 1 and two in group 2.
The survival rate for acetabular component aseptic loosening at
eight years was 96.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94.8 to 98.7)
for group 1 and 99.2% (95% CI 98.0 to 100) for group 2. The risk
for aseptic loosening of the acetabular component was higher in group
1 (p = 0.04, Hazard Ratio (HR) 4.99), dysplastic acetabula (p =
0.01, HR 4.12), components outside Lewinnek´s zone (p <
0.001,
HR 6.13) and in those with a hip rotation centre distance greater
than 5 mm (p = 0.005, HR 4.09). . Conclusion.
The choice to use