Abstract. Objectives. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty with short segmented cement augmented pedicle screws fixation for severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) with posterior/anterior wall fractured patients. Methods. A retrospective study of 24 patients of DGOU type-4 (vertebra plana) OVCF with posterior/anterior wall fracture, were treated by vertebroplasty and short segment PMMA cement augmented pedicle screws fixation. Radiological parameters (kyphosis angle and compression ratio) and clinical parameters Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were analysed. Results. A significant improvement was noted in VAS (preoperative, 7.90 ± 0.60; final follow-up 2.90 ± 0.54) and ODI (77.10 ± 6.96 to 21.30 ± 6.70), (P < 0.05). Neurological improvement was noted in all patients. Kyphosis corrected significantly from preoperative 23.20 ± 5.90 to 5.30 ± 1.40 postoperative with 5% (3.30 ± 2.95) loss of correction at final follow-up. Anterior vertebral height restored significantly from 55.80 ± 11.9% to 87.6 ± 13.1% postoperative with 4.5 ± 4.0% loss at final follow-up. One case had cement leakage was found, but the patient is asymptomatic. No implant-related complication was seen. No iatrogenic dural or nerve injury. Conclusions. Treatment with vertebroplasty with cement augmented screw fixation and direct decompression is a great option in treating such a complex situation in fragile age with fragile bones because. Vertebroplasty is viable option for restoring vertebral anterior column in patients who are considered as contraindications for vertebroplasty, like DGOU-4. It provides anterior support avoiding corpectomy, minimise blood loss and also duration of surgery. Addition of short segment fixation gives adequate support with less stress risers at the junctional area

Summary. Metastatic spinal disease is a common entity of much debate in terms of ideal surgical treatment. The introduction of MIS can be a game-changer in the treatment of MSD due to less peri-operative morbidity and allowing earlier radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Introduction. Less invasive techniques have always been welcome for management of patients with ‘Metastatic Spinal Disorders’. This is because these patients can be poor candidates for extensive / major invasive surgery even though radiologically, there may be an indication for one. The aim of the treatment with Minimal Invasive Fixation (MIS) systems is mainly for ‘pain relief’ than to radically decrease tumour burden or to achieve near total spinal cord decompression, which could be major presentations in these patients. These procedures address the ‘spinal instability’ very well and they can address pain associated with compression fractures resulting from metastatic disease from a solid organ as well as multiple myeloma with minimal complications. These procedures can be combined with radiology and chemotherapy without much concern for wound problems in the way of infection or dehiscence. They also have a great advantage of timing of adjunct therapy closer to the index procedure. The disadvantage, however, are they do not allow thorough decompression of the spinal cord. There could also be problem in addressing patients who have severe vertebral height loss or loss of integrity of the anterior column where anterior column reconstruction may be required. There is a risk of inadequate fixation or implant loosening or failure. We aim to examine the results of MIS surgery in our department and support the rationale for its use. Patients and Methods. We prospectively collected data of patients who underwent MIS posterior instrumentation for MSD. Between June 2011 and December 2012, 10 patients presented with acute motor deficit, instability and/or threatening radiological features. Effectiveness of MIS was assessed in terms of operative parameters and clinical outcomes. Results. No patient suffered intra-operative complications. The median surgical time was 198 minutes (range: 149 – 403), median blood loss was 100 ml (range: 60 – 400). All patients maintained full neurological function and reported effective pain reduction. All patients were discharged with a median hospital stay was 13 days (range: 4 – 45) post-surgery. 9 patients started oncological treatment as planned. The median time in 7 patients who had radiotherapy post-surgery was 23 days (range: 20 – 40). Chemotherapy was initiated in 4 patients at a median of 9 days post-surgery (range: 6 – 23). No patient as yet has required open procedure due to progression of the disease. Discussion/Conclusion. We have shown that satisfactory outcomes are achievable with MIS in a selected group of patients with MSD. While our results are limited by small study size, we have been able to improve patient quality of living through minimally invasive intervention. By reducing surgical morbidity and enabling early implementation of oncological treatment, MIS has the potential to re-evaluate multi-disciplinary decision making for early surgery in MSD

Acetabular fractures in the elderly are associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality. Conservative management is reserved for those unfit for extensive reconstruction, or those who achieve ‘secondary congruence' of a complex fracture. We present demographic data and the results of conservative management in patients over 65 years of age. The Fracture Outcome Research Database (FORD) at our unit was interrogated for all patients over 65 years, who had sustained an acetabular fracture between June 2008 and June 2016. 410 patients were identified. Following exclusions, thirty-two patients were included for analysis. They had a mean age of 80 (66–91), and a mean ASA equivalent score of 3.1 (2–4). Mean follow up was five (1–9) years. Twenty-five patients lived in their own home and seven in a nursing home. Thirty had low energy injures, two high energy. Twenty-four (75%) had anterior column posterior hemitransverse fractures, seven (22%) had associated both column and one (3%) had a T-type fracture. The mean length of inpatient stay was 43 days (4–140). Maximum post-operative mobility was limited to a hoist in eight (25%), a frame with or without assistance in 15 (47%), a stick in five (16%) and independence in four (13%). Thirty-day mortality was 6%- and one-year mortality 22%. The data demonstrates that conservative treatment in this cohort leads to long inpatient stays, poor mobility and significant levels of mortality. Complex reconstruction remains demanding on both surgeon and patient. Innovative ways of managing these patients are needed to improve outcomes