Anterior knee pain is a frequent complaint of dissatisfied total knee arthroplasty patients. We hypothesize that the need to use the extensor mechanism to stabilise the knee during activity is a cause of anterior knee pain. Studies have shown that TKA patients often walk with a “quadriceps avoidance” gait, which may explain the phenomenon of anterior knee pain. Most TKA prostheses are designed to allow AP motion. This feature in knee implant design is to prevent the “kinematic conflict” that was predicted with the crossed four-bar-link model of knee motion, which holds that progressive posterior contact of the femur on the tibia (rollback) with flexion was obligatory for knee range of motion. It has been stated that preventing this motion overly “constrained” the knee and could lead to loosening and wear. Paradoxical motion has been seen with video fluoroscopy in knees after TKA. This motion is an anterior translation of the femur on the tibia early in knee flexion and is called paradoxical because it occurs opposite to the expected rollback. In fact, paradoxical motion is a consequence of the “unconstrained” articulation of the femoral component on the tibial component. During gait, just after heel strike as the foot is assuming a flat position on the floor, there is a significant vector of force from posterior to anterior. This vector has been calculated as 33% of body weight for walking at normal speed and could lead to a significant displacement of the femur forward on the tibia. It is countered by 1) the slope of the proximal tibia; 2) the articulation of the femur in the concavity of the tibial (with the firmly attached meniscus that deepens the concavity) on the medial side; and 3) the body mass vector combined with that of the contracting quadriceps. If a total knee prosthesis allows the femur to move forward, the posterior-to-anterior force just after heel strike acts to move the femur forward on the tibia (paradoxical motion). The patient, in an attempt to stabilise the knee, uses increased quadriceps contraction to prevent the forward motion of the femur. The forces required are significant and are not only found in the patella-femoral articulation but all through the retinaculum that covers the anterior part of the femur. As the extensor mechanism tires, patients begin using a quadriceps avoidance gait to adapt to the weakening extensor, and after a period of activity, the stress on the retinaculum leads to pain. AP stability can be improved through implant design by preventing AP motion through conformity of the femoral and tibial components. We have used a medially conforming ball-in-socket prosthesis as a revision component for patients with anterior knee pain, and have achieved resolution of the pain. Patients demonstrate a “posterior sag” at approximately 20 degrees of flexion (the degree of flexion that has the maximum posterior-to-anterior force during gait). When treated with a brace appropriate for stabilisation of the knee after PCL reconstruction, patients experienced a marked decrease in symptoms and this predicts a good result from revision surgery

Introduction. Special high-flexion prosthetic designs show a small increase in postoperative flexion compared to standard designs and some papers show increased anterior knee pain with these prosthesis. However, no randomised controlled trails have been published which investigate difference in postoperative complaints of anterior knee pain. To assess difference in passive and active postoperative flexion and anterior knee pain we performed a randomized clinical trial including the two extremes of knee arthroplasty designs, being a high flex posterior stabilized rotating platform prosthesis versus a traditional cruciate retaining fixed bearing prosthesis. We hypothesised that the HF-PS design would allow more flexion, due to increased femoral rollback with less anterior knee pain than the CR design. We specifically assessed the following hypotheses:. Patients have increased flexion after HF-PS TKA compared to CR TKA, both passive and active. Patients show an increased femoral rollback in the HF-PS TKA as compared to the CR TKA. Patients receiving a HF-PS TKA design report reduced anterior knee pain relative to those receiving the CR TKA. Methods. In total 47 patients were randomly allocated to a standard cruciate retaining fixed bearing design (CR) in 23 patients and to a high-flexion posterior stabilized mobile bearing design (HF-PS) in 24 patients. Preoperative and one year postoperative we investigated active and passive maximal flexion. Furthermore, we used the VAS pain score at rest and during exercise and the Feller score to investigate anterior knee pain. A lateral roentgen photograph was used to measure femoral rollback during maximal flexion. Results. The HF-PS did show a significantly higher passive postoperative flexion; 120.8° (SD 10.3°) vs. 112.0° (SD 9.5°) for the CR group (p=0.004). The active postoperative flexion, VAS-pain score and Feller score did not show significant differences between both groups. Sub analysis with the HF-PS group showed a higher VAS-pain for the patients achieving ≥130° of flexion; 30.5 (SD 32.2) vs. 12.2 (SD 12.5) (p=0.16). The rollback was significantly lower in the CR group compared to the HF-PS group; 4.4 (SD 3.0) vs. 8.4 (SD 2.1). Conclusion. The present study showed a significant higher passive flexion in the Posterior Stabilised-High Flexion mobile bearing compared to a Cruciate Retaining fixed bearing prosthesis. However, this difference disappeared when comparing active flexion. The difference in passive flexion was probably related to a significantly lower rollback causing impingement in the CR prosthesis. No difference in anterior knee pain was found between both groups. However, a suggestion is raised that achieving high-flexion might lead to more patellofemoral complaints/anterior knee pain

The prevalence of anterior knee pain in the general population is relatively high. Patellar height, and more specific patella alta, is one of the several factors that have been associated with anterior knee pain, but the precise mechanism by which patella alta leads to a less favourable situation in terms of patellofemoral contact force, contact area and contact pressure, is poorly understood. The recent availability of validated dynamic knee simulators and advances in the analysis of contact force and area, give us today the possibility to study the influence of patellar position and patellar height on patellofemoral biomechanical characterisitics. Simulating a knee squat in different configurations with variable predetermined patellar height, reveals a clear association of patella alta with the highest maximal patellofemoral contact force and contact pressure, probably as a consequence of the delay in tendofemoral contact. When averaged across all flexion angles, the normal height of the patella seems to be the most optimal position in terms of contact pressures. This may provide a biomechanical explanation for anterior knee pain in young patients with patella alta and in older patients following total knee prosthesis resulting in an altered patellar position in terms of height

We performed an advancement and medial transfer of the tibial tuberosity based on Fulkerson's principle to treat intractable anterior knee pain associated with patellofemoral maltracking diagnosed by dynamic MRI. Between January 1998 and July 2000 twenty-two patients had 28 knees operated for anterior knee pain. There were 4 men and 18 women with a mean age of 28 years (range 18-41). Indications for surgery were [a] failure to improve after six months of physiotherapy and [b] patellofemoral maltracking evident in dynamic MRI. Mean follow-up was for 37 months (23 – 42). Knee instability score modified by Fulkerson was employed for objective and subjective assessment. Objectively 22 (79%) knees achieved good to excellent results. Four knees (14%) had fair, and two (7%) had poor results. Excellent and very good results were seen in 20 knees. These patients were a younger age group (mean age 21 years) and had minimal degeneration (grade I-II) of the patellofemoral joints. Two patients achieved good results. One of them had moderate (grade III) and one minimal (II) arthritis. Three knees with fair results had advanced (grade IV or V) and one had moderate (grade III) arthritis. Out of two patients who had a poor result, one had advanced degeneration (grade V) that later required a patellofemoral joint resurfacing. The other was a 24 year old woman with grade II changes. She was treated by the pain therapy team. Anterior displacement of the tuberosity in the presented study was kept to 5 mm to avoid the possible complications of wound break down. The overall length and depth of the osteotomy was also reduced to minimise risk of fracture and commence early mobilisation. Based on our results there is a strong case of justification for Anteromedialisation of tibial tuberosity using a smaller length of osteotomy and lesser degree of anteriorisation in carefully selected patients with Patellofemoral arthralgia associated with maltracking patella

Introduction. A comprehensive met-analysis of anterior knee pain post intramedullary nailing of the tibia was performed by Katsoulis et al in 2006. The principle findings were that 47.4% of patients had anterior knee pain at 2 years post tibial nailing. Worse results were found following a patella tendon splitting approach when compared with a medial para-patellar tendon approach. These conclusions were drawn from 20 studies including 1460 patients. Currently both approaches to the proximal tibia for nailing are used at JCMH Blanchardstown. A retrospective study was performed to compare the results of tendon splitting and tendon sparing approaches to tibial nails and to compare the results of JCMH with those stated in literature. Method. Patients who underwent tibial nailing in 2007 and 2008 were identified using the hospital coding system. Those patients who were treated under the care of Mr Kenny had a medial para-tendinous approach and those treated the care of Mr O'Flanagan and Mr Keogh had a tendon splitting approach. Apart from the approach the nailing technique using the Trigen Knee Nail and the post operative physiotherapy protocol were identical. Follow up included questions regarding knee pain and return to previous function. Specifically: Knee pain that affects daily life, Knee pain on kneeling, Knee pain on ascending or descending stairs, Return to work and Return to sports or active hobbies. Results. 61 patients were treated with intra-medullary nailing between 2007 and 2008 43 were available for follow for the purposes of this study (70 %). 25 had nails inserted via a tendon splitting approach and 18 via a tendon sparing approach. Only 5% of patients had knee pain that affected daily life, 16 % had pain on kneeling, 90% of patients who were previously at work returned to work and 75% of patients who were previously engaged in sports were able to return to these activities. Discussion. These results are significantly better than the figures stated in literature in terms of knee pain, return to work and sports. There was no significant difference between the 2 approaches to the tibia again in contradiction of available literature

Introduction. Anterior knee pain (AKP) is a recognized cause of patient's dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. Potential implant/technique related contributors to AKP are patellofemoral maltracking, trochlear geometry, femoral malrotation, patellar tilt and overstuffing. The primary aim of this prospective, matched pair study was to assess the safety, efficacy and performance of an anatomic patella and its effect on AKP in in a matched pair analysis. Material and Methods. Between July 2012 and May 2013, 55 consecutive posterior stabilized cemented Attune TKAs (Depuy) were matched to the PFC Sigma group based on age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). All surgeries were performed via medial parapatellar approach with patellar resurfacing. Clinical and radiographic analysis was performed prospectively with minimum 6 month follow-up. Radiographic measurements included overall limb alignment, anterior offset, posterior offset, joint line, patellar thickness, patellar tilt and patellar displacement by two independent observers. Results. The mean functional outcomes were similar in both groups. AKP incidence between Attune and PFC was statistically insignificant (3.6% and 3.8%). Radiographic analysis revealed no mal-alignment, or osteolysis. No complications such as infection, patellar fracture, subluxation or dislocations were observed. Discussion. Attune knee design demonstrates excellent short-term safety and efficacy. At minimum 6-month follow-up, anatomical patella with shows less AKP than single radius patella design. Longer follow-up is required to assess functional outcome this design

Purpose. Anterior knee pain has been relieved by resection of the infrapatellar plica (IPP). The question is: How? The hypothesis is: the IPP acts as an intra-articular ligament, a mechanical link between the forces of knee motion, the fat pad (FP) and the distal femur, holding the FP captive through the arc of motion. Release of the IPP severs this link, allowing the highly innervated FP to move freely. This may allow any underlying pathologic process to heal. Method. Anatomic dissection: In 12 knees, the extensor apparatus was released from the femur and retracted distally allowing relationships to be examined. Cadaver studies: Lateral fluoroscopy was used as well as direct arthroscopic visualization to control implantation of tantalum beads or radiographic contrast material in the FP and IPP. The knee was taken through the arc of motion repeatedly. The femoral attachment of the IPP was then released and knee motion repeated. Traction on the extensor apparatus simulated active motion. In-Vivo Study: The IRB approved study of 12 volunteers undergoing planned knee arthroscopy under local anesthesia. Contrast was placed in the FP and IPP under lateral fluoroscopic control. Passive, then active motion then a quads-set manoeuvre was performed. The IPP was resected and knee motion again recorded. Results. Knees without IPP (4) demonstrated FPs that were lobular, with lateral bodies, and a central process. The fibrous synovial layer of the capsule bypassed the FP inserting on the superior aspect of the menisci. Knees with an IPP (8) showed a FP that was covered by fibrous synovium. The fibrous elements of the capsule coalesced on either side of the patellar in folds that merged with the alar folds. These fibrous elements ramified over and through the FP and were continuous with the upper portion of the IPP medially and laterally. Inferiorly the lower portion of the IPP merged with fibrous synovium that attached to the superior aspect of the menisci and the inter-meniscal ligament. The cadaver studies demonstrated that the IPP elongated with FP distortion as the knee approached full extension and flexion, and that the IPP was lax through mid arc. Release of the IPP at the femur eliminated almost all of the distortion through the full arc. The In-Vivo study replicated the cadaver observations for passive and active motion. The quads set manoeuvre caused further distortion of the FP with the patella moving one cm proximally. Release of the IPP eliminated FP distortion. Conclusion. The IPP seems to act as a true ligamentum mucosum. By virtue of its central femoral attachment if captures the FP against the end of the femur, loosely in mid arc, but with distortion of the FP and stretch of the IPP approaching full flexion and extension. This has been demonstrated in both cadavers and in in-vivo for the first time. Any pathologic process affecting the highly innervated FP will likely be improved by removal of the capture effect of the IPP

Introduction. The constitutional knee anatomy in the coronal plane includes the distal femoral joint line obliquity (DFJLO) which in most patients is in slight valgus positioning. Despite this native anatomy, the mechanical positioning of the femoral component during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often ignores the native DFJLO opting to place the femur in a set degree of valgus that varies upon the practitioner's practice and experience. Unfortunately, this technique is likely to generate high rate of distal lateral femoral overstuffing. This anatomical mismatch might be a cause of anterior knee pain and therefore partly explain the adverse functional outcomes of mechanically aligned (MA) TKA. Our study aims at assessing the relationship between constitutional knee anatomy and clinical outcomes of MA TKA. We hypothesized that a negative relationship would be found between the constitutional frontal knee deformity, the distal femoral joint line obliquity, and functional outcomes of MA TKA with a special emphasize on patellofemoral (PF) specific outcomes. Methods. One hundred and thirteen patients underwent MA TKA (posterior-stabilized design) for primary end-stage knee osteoarthritis. They were prospectively followed for one year using the New KSS 2011 and HSS Patella score. Residual anterior knee pain was also assessed. Knee phenotypes using anatomical parameters (such as HKA, HKS, DFJLO and LDFA (Lateral distal femoral angle)) were measured from preoperative and postoperative lower-limb EOS® images (Biospace, Paris, France). We assessed the relationship between the knee anatomical parameters and the functional outcome scores at 1 year postoperatively. Results. We investigated four groups according to the preoperative obliquity of the distal femur and HKA. The group with high DFJLO and varus knee deformity demonstrated lower HSS scores (drop>10%, p=0.03) and higher rate of anterior knee pain (p=0.03). Higher postoperative variation of LDFA was associated with lower HSS scores (r = −0.2367, p=0.03) and with higher preoperative DFJLO (p=0.0001) due to the MA technique. Knee phenotypes with LDFA<87° presented higher risk of variation of LDFA. No correlation was found using New KSS 2011 outcomes at one-year follow-up. Discussion/Conclusion. Disregard of the constitutional knee anatomy (LDFA and DFJLO) when performing a MA TKA may generate a non-physiologic knee kinematics that impact patellofemoral outcomes and resulting in residual anterior knee pain. While these results are restricted to modern posterior-stabilized TKA design, recent in silico and in vitro studies supported the negative effect of the lateral overstuffing of the femoral component in the coronal plane during knee flexion. This study provides further evidence that suggest patient-specific anatomical considerations are needed to optimize component position and subsequent outcomes following primary TKA. Additional studies are needed to integrate the rotational status of the femoral component in this analysis. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Background. Hoffa pad in Total knee replacement is a mystery. Very few studies have been carried out and no obvious results have been achieved. Aim. Our aim was to compare the clinical value of the Hoffa pad including blood loss, range of motion, anterior knee pain and swelling post total knee replacement. Method. this study has been designed as prospective randomized control trial, with involvement of 4 surgeons, with no exclusion criteria and no special preparation for the patients. Results. with 100 patients results, it has been found that by leaving the Hoffa pad well alone, there were increase of range of motion post TKR by 5 to 10 degrees, there were decrease of blood loss by 50%, no difference in swelling, and most patients with Hoffa pad had almost no anterior knee pain. Conclusion. the study is in a very early stage to draw a concrete conclusion, however early results showed that Hoffa pad can play a huge role in lubrication, anterior knee pain and finally in reducing blood loss

To determine in skeletally mature patients with a traumatic, first-time, patellar dislocation, the effect of early MPFL reconstruction versus rehabilitation on the rate of recurrent patellar dislocations and functional outcomes. Three online databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed were searched from database inception (1946, 1974, 1966 respectively), to August 20th, 2021, for literature addressing the management of patients sustaining acute first-time patellar dislocations. Data on redislocation rates, functional outcomes using the Kujala score, and complication rates were recorded. A meta-analysis was used to pool the mean postoperative kujala score as well as calculate the proportion of patients sustaining redislocation episodes using a random effects model. A risk of bias assessment was performed for all included studies using the MINORS and Detsky scores. Overall, there were a total of 22 studies and 1705 patients included in this review. The pooled mean redislocation rate in 18 studies comprising 1409 patients in the rehabilitation group was 31% (95% CI 25%-36%, I2 = 65%). Moreover, the pooled mean redislocation rate in five studies comprising 318 patients undergoing early MPFL reconstruction was 7% (95% CI 2%-17%, I2 = 70%). The pooled mean postoperative Kujala anterior knee pain score in three studies comprising 67 patients in the reconstructive group was 91 (95% CI 84-97, I2 = 86%), compared to a score of 81 (95% CI 78-85, I2 = 78%) in 7 studies comprising 332 patients in the rehabilitation group. The reoperation rate was 9.0% in 936 patients in the rehabilitation group and 2.2% in 322 patients in the reconstruction group. Management of acute first-time patellar dislocations with MPFL reconstruction resulted in a lower rate of redislocation and a higher Kujala score, as well as noninferiority with respect to complication rates compared to nonoperative treatment. The paucity of high-level evidence warrants further investigation in this topic in the form of well-designed and high-powered RCTs to determine the optimal management option in these patients

Introduction. Total knee replacement (TKR) is an established and effective surgical procedure in case of advanced osteoarthritis. However, the rate of satisfied patients amounts only to about 75 %. One common cause for unsatisfied patients is the anterior knee pain, which is partially caused by an increase in patellofemoral contact force and abnormal patellar kinematics. Since the malpositioning of the tibial and the femoral component affects the interplay in the patellofemoral joint and therefore contributes to anterior knee pain, we conducted a computational study on a cruciate-retaining (CR) TKR and analysed the effect of isolated femoral and tibial component malalignments on patellofemoral dynamics during a squat motion. Methods. To analyse different implant configurations, a musculoskeletal multibody model was implemented in the software Simpack V9.7 (Simpack AG, Gilching, Germany) from the SimTK data set (Fregly et al.). The musculoskeletal model comprised relevant ligaments with nonlinear force-strain relation according to Wismans and Hill-type muscles spanning the lower extremity. The experimental data were obtained from one male subject, who received an instrumented CR TKR. Muscle forces were calculated using a variant of the computed muscle control algorithm. To enable roll-glide kinematics, both tibio- and patellofemoral joint compartments were modelled with six degrees of freedom by implementing a polygon-contact-model representing the detailed implant surfaces. Tibiofemoral contact forces were predicted and validated using data from experimental squat trials (SimTK). The validated simulation model has been used as reference configuration corresponding to the optimal surgical technique. In the following, implant configurations, i.e. numerous combinations of relative femoral and tibial component alignment were analysed: malposition of the femoral/tibial component in mediolateral (±3 mm) and anterior-posterior (±3 mm) direction. Results. Mediolateral translation/malposition of the tibial component did not show high influence on the maximal patellofemoral contact force. Regarding the mediolateral translation of the femoral component, similar tendencies were observed. However, lateralisation of the femoral component (3 mm) clearly increased the lateral patella shift and medialisation of the tibial component (3 mm) led to a slightly increased lateral patella shift. Compared to the reference model, pronounced posterior translation of the tibial and femoral component resulted in a lower patellofemoral contact force, further increasing with higher anterior translation of the components. The translation of the tibial component showed smaller influence on the patellofemoral contact force than the translation of the femoral component. Discussion. In our present study, the mediolateral malposition of the femoral and tibial component showed no major impact on patellofemoral contact force and contribution to anterior knee pain in patients with CR TKR. However, the influence of implant component positioning in anterior-posterior direction on patellofemoral contact force is evident, especially for the femoral component. Our generated musculoskeletal model can contribute to computer-assisted preclinical testing of TKR and may support clinical decision-making in preoperative planning

Resurfacing the patella is performed the majority of the time in the United States and in many regions it is considered standard practice. In many countries, however, the patella is left un-resurfaced an equal amount of the time or even rarely ever resurfaced. Patella resurfacing is not a simple or benign procedure. There are numerous negative sequelae of resurfacing including loosening, fragmentation, avascular necrosis, lateral facet pain, stress fracture, acute fracture, late fracture, and restricted motion. In a study by Berend, Ritter, et al, failures of the patella component were reported 4.2% of the time at an average of only 2.6 years. A study was undertaken at Washington University in recent years to determine rather more clinical problems were observed following total knee replacement with or without patella resurfacing. Records were maintained on all problem total knees cases with well localised anterior knee pain. The referral area for this clinic is St. Louis which is among the largest American cities, with the highest percentage of total knees that are performed without patella resurfacing. During 4 years of referrals of total knee patients with anterior knee pain, 47 cases were identified of which 36 had a resurfaced patella and 11 had a non-resurfaced patella. Eight of 36 resurfaced patellae underwent surgery while only 2 of 11 non-resurfaced patellae underwent subsequent surgery. More than 3 times as many painful total knees that were referred for evaluation had already had their patella resurfaced. In spite of the fact that approximately equal number of total knees were performed in this area without patella resurfacing, far more patients presented to clinic with painful total knee in which the patella had been resurfaced. The numerous pathologies requiring a treatment following patella resurfacing included patella loosening, fragmentation of the patella, avascular necrosis patella, late stress fracture, lateral facet pain, oblique resurfacing, and too thick of a patellar composite. In a large multi-center randomised clinical trial at 5 years from the United Kingdom in over 1700 knees from 34 centers and 116 surgeons, there was no difference in the Oxford Score, SF-12, EQ-5D, or need for further surgery or complications. The authors concluded, “We see no difference in any score, if there is a difference, it is too small to be of any clinical significance”. In a prospective of randomised clinical trial performed at Tulane University over 20 years ago, no differences were observed in knee score, a functional patella questionnaire, or the incidence of anterior knee pain between resurfaced and un-resurfaced patellae at time intervals of 2–4 years, 5–7 years, or greater than 10 years. Beyond 10 years the knee scores of total knee patients with a resurfaced patella had declined significantly greater than those with a non-resurfaced patella. There are numerous advantages of not resurfacing the patella including less surgical time, less expense, a lower risk of “major” complications (especially late complications), and if symptoms develop in an un-resurfaced patella, it is an easier salvage situation with more options available. A small percentage of total knee patients will be symptomatic whether or not their patella is resurfaced. Not resurfacing the patella retains more options and has fewer complications. The major determinant of clinical result and the presence of anterior knee pain after knee replacement is surgical technique and component design not whether or not the patella is resurfaced. Patella resurfacing is occasionally necessary for patients with inflammatory arthritis, a deformed or maltracking patella, or symptoms and pathology that are virtually restricted to the patellofemoral joint. For the vast majority of patients, however, patella resurfacing is not necessary

Introduction. Snapping hip syndrome is a common condition affecting 10% of the population. It is due to the advance of the iliotibial band (ITB) over the greater trochanter during lower limb movements and often associated with hip overuse, such as in athletic activities. Management is commonly conservative with physiotherapy or can be surgical to release the ITB. Here we carry out a systematic review into published surgical management and present a case report on an overlooked cause of paediatric snapping hip syndrome. Materials & Methods. A systematic review looking at published surgical management of snapping hip was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for “((Snapping hip OR Iliotibial band syndrome OR ITB syndrome) AND (Management OR treatment))”. Adult and paediatric published studies were included as few results were found on paediatric snapping hip alone. Results. 1548 studies were screened by 2 independent reviewers. 8 studies were included with a total of 134 cases, with an age range of 14–71 years. Surgical management ranged from arthroscopic, open or ultrasound guided release of the ITB, as well as gluteal muscle releases. Common outcome measures showed statistically significant improvement pre- and post-operatively in visual analogue pain score (VAPS) and the Harris Hip Score (HHS). VAPS improved from an average of 6.77 to 0.3 (t-test p value <0.0001) and the HHS improved from an average of 62.6 to 89.4 (t-test p value <0.0001). Conclusions. Although good surgical outcomes have been reported, no study has reported on the effect of rotational profile of the lower limbs and snapping hip syndrome. We present the case of a 13-year-old female with snapping hip syndrome and trochanteric pain. Ultrasound confirmed external snapping hip with normal soft tissue morphology and radiographs confirmed no structural abnormalities. Following extensive physiotherapy and little improvement, she presented again aged 17 with concurrent anterior knee pain, patella mal-tracking and an asymmetrical out-toeing gait. CT rotational profile showed 2° of femoral neck retroversion and excessive external tibial torsion of 52°. Consequently, during her gait cycle, in order to correct her increased foot progression angle, the hip has to internally rotate approximately 35–40°, putting the greater trochanter in an anterolateral position in stance phase. This causes the ITB to snap over her abnormally positioned greater trochanter. Therefore, to correct rotational limb alignment, a proximal tibial de-rotation osteotomy was performed with 25° internal rotation correction. Post-operatively the patient recovered well, HHS score improved from 52.5 to 93.75 and her snapping hip has resolved. This study highlights the importance of relevant assessment and investigation of lower limb rotational profile when exploring causes of external snapping hip, especially where ultrasound and radiographs show no significant pathology

The decision to resurface the patella has been well studied. While regional differences exist, the overwhelming choice by most Surgeons in the United States is to resurface the patella. Data supports that this is the correct choice. Articular cartilage on metal has not been shown to be a good long term bearing surface. Cushner et al. has also shown that cartilage in the arthritic knee has significant pathologic abnormalities. Patella surfacing has excellent long-term results with a low complication rate. Anterior knee pain is a common complaint after knee replacement and is even more common in TKA with un-resurfaced patella. Pakos et al. had more reoperations and greater anterior knee pain when the patella was NOT resurfaced. Parvizi et al. also found less patient satisfaction with un-resurfaced patellas. Meta-analysis results indicate higher revision rates with un-resurfaced patellas. Bilateral knee studies also favor resurfaced patella. Higher revision rates were also confirmed in the Swedish Registry with a 140% higher revision rate in TKA with un-resurfaced patellas In addition, second operations to resurface the patella often are unsuccessful at alleviating pain. Surgeons who choose not to resurface the patella must accept that their patients will have the same or greater degree of anterior knee pain and a significantly greater risk for reoperation

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. We report the medium term results of patients who had Scorpio total knee replacement for osteoarthritis between January 2002 and September 2004. A retrospective review of 118 patients was undertaken. All patients during the first half of this time period had no resurfacing of the patella, and all patients in the later half of this period underwent resurfacing of the patella. The mean follow-up in the non-resurfaced group was 30 months and the mean follow-up in the resurfaced group was 17 months. The two groups were similar in age, gender and the grade of the surgeon. Knee society clinical rating score, patient satisfaction, anterior knee pain, patellofemoral questionnaires, patellofemoral revision rates and success in returning to normal daily activities were noted. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the patellar revision rates, anterior knee pain and Euroquol scores. The incidence of anterior knee pain in the patella non-resurfaced group was 23%, compared to 6% in the resurfaced group [p<0.05]. The rate of revision in the non-resurfaced group was 11% compared to 0% in the resurfaced group [p=0.03]. The mean Euroquol score in the resurfaced group was 86.44 compared to 80.35 [p=0.04]. Knee Society score, patient satisfaction, symptoms of patellar apprehension and knee instability, return to pre-op functional level, ability to kneel, use of a walking aid, presence of limp and satisfaction with operation as not statistically different between the two groups. In view of the statistically significant difference in the incidence of anterior knee pain and the rate of revision in the group of patients without patellar resurfacing, the authors suggest that retaining the patellar surface may not be a viable option. Although an appropriate design for the femoral prosthetic trochlea is an important factor, a good surgical technique with patellar resurfacing is more likely to result in predictable satisfactory results. We feel that high contact pressures between the non-resurfaced patellae and the prosthetic femoral trochlea can be generated after a total knee replacement when the patella is not resurfaced, and can thus result in patients having anterior knee pain

The decision to resurface the patella has been well studied. While regional differences exist, the overwhelming choice by most surgeons in the United States is to resurface the patella. Data supports that this is the correct choice. Articular cartilage on metal has not been shown to be a good long term bearing surface. Cushner et al has also shown that cartilage in the arthritic knee has significant pathologic abnormalities. Patella surfacing has excellent long-term results with a low complication rate. Anterior knee pain is a common complaint after knee replacement and is even more common in TKA with unresurfaced patella. Pakos et al had more reoperations and greater anterior knee pain when the patella was NOT resurfaced. Parvizi et al also found less patient satisfaction with unresurfaced patellas. Meta-analysis results indicate higher revision rates with unresurfaced patellas. Bilateral knee studies also favor resurfaced patella. Higher revision rates were also confirmed in the Swedish Registry with a 140% higher revision rate in TKA with unresurfaced patellas. In addition second operations to resurface the patella often are unsuccessful at alleviating pain. Surgeons who choose not to resurface the patella must accept that their patients will have the same or greater degree of anterior knee pain and a significantly greater risk for reoperation

Resurfacing the patella is performed the majority of the time in the US and in many regions it is considered standard practice. In many countries, however, the patella is left unresurfaced an equal amount of the time or even rarely ever resurfaced. Patella resurfacing is not a simple or benign procedure. There are numerous negative sequelae of resurfacing including loosening, fragmentation, avascular necrosis, lateral facet pain, stress fracture, acute fracture, late fracture, and restricted motion. In a study by Berend, Ritter, et al, failures of the patella component were reported 4.2% of the time at an average of only 2.6 years. A study was undertaken at Washington University in recent years to determine whether more clinical problems were observed following total knee replacement with or without patella resurfacing. Records were maintained on all problem total knees cases with well localised anterior knee pain. The referral area for this clinic is St. Louis which is among the largest American cities, with the highest percentage of total knees that are performed without patella resurfacing. During 4 years of referrals of total knee patients with anterior knee pain, 47 cases were identified of which 36 had a resurfaced patella and 11 had a non-resurfaced patella. Eight of 36 resurfaced patellae underwent surgery while only 2 of 11 non-resurfaced patellae underwent subsequent surgery. More than 3 times as many painful total knees that were referred for evaluation had already had their patella resurfaced. In spite of the fact that approximately equal number of total knees were performed in this area without patella resurfacing, far more patients presented to clinic with painful total knee in which the patella had been resurfaced. The numerous pathologies requiring a treatment following patella resurfacing included patella loosening, fragmentation of the patella, avascular necrosis patella, late stress fracture, lateral facet pain, oblique resurfacing, and too thick of a patellar composite. In a large multi-center randomised clinical trial at 5 years from the United Kingdom in over 1700 knees from 34 centers and 116 surgeons, there was no difference in the Oxford Score, SF-12, EQ-5D, or need for further surgery or complications. The authors concluded, “We see no difference in any score, if there is a difference, it is too small to be of any clinical significance”. In a prospective randomised clinical trial performed at Tulane University over 20 years ago, no differences were observed in knee score, a functional patella questionnaire, or the incidence of anterior knee pain between resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae at time intervals of 2–4 years, 5–7 years, or greater than 10 years. Beyond 10 years the knee scores of total knee patients with a resurfaced patella had declined significantly greater than those with a non-resurfaced patella. There are numerous advantages of not resurfacing the patella including less surgical time, less expense, a lower risk of “major” complications (especially late complications), and if symptoms develop in an unresurfaced patella, it is an easier salvage situation with more options available. A small percentage of total knee patients will be symptomatic whether or not their patella is resurfaced. Not resurfacing the patella retains more options and has fewer complications. The major determinant of clinical result and the presence of anterior knee pain after knee replacement is surgical technique and component design not whether or not the patella is resurfaced. Patella resurfacing is occasionally necessary for patients with inflammatory arthritis, a deformed or maltracking patella, or symptoms and pathology that are virtually restricted to the patellofemoral joint. For the vast majority of patients, however, patella resurfacing is not necessary

To resurface or not to resurface the patella… that is the question. It all comes down to where you practice. It is controversial in that there is a risk of possible complications from resurfacing versus the potential for simply having complaints of pain which may supposedly arise from the anterior knee stemming from the unresurfaced patella. The evolution of more favorable anatomic femoral component designs which are very friendly to the patellofemoral articulation have resulted in lower patella resurfacing complications. The insertion of appropriately externally rotated tibial and femoral components, if not reducing anterior knee pain, have certainly minimised the risk of resurfaced patella complications. Also, with current surgical techniques of component insertion, the lateral release rate is extremely low, thus avoiding the possibility of avascularity developing in the resurfaced patella. This complication will almost completely be eliminated if the patella thickness is kept greater than 13 mm after patella resection. In my experience, patella complications from the resurfaced patella are extremely rare. Many unicompartmental knees require re-operation because of the development of progressive patellofemoral arthritis. Re-operation from anterior knee pain from progressive arthritis from the unresurfaced patella has given inferior results. Overall, meta-analysis data demonstrates decreased satisfaction, increased anterior knee pain and higher early revision rates in the unresurfaced group. National joint registries, especially the Australian registry support routine resurfacing; complications are low and outcomes are improved. Even though there exists controversy as to whether the patella should be resurfaced or not, there is an overwhelming consensus in the U.S. that there is little downfall nowadays with respect to resurfacing the patella

Abstract. Background. Conventional TKR aims for neutral mechanical alignment which may result in a smaller lateral distal femoral condyle resection than the implant thickness. We aim to explore the mismatch between implant thickness and bone resection using 3D planning software used for Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) TKR. Methods. This is a retrospective anatomical study from pre-operative MRI 3D models for PSI TKR. Cartilage mapping allowed us to recreate the native anatomy, enabling us to quantify the mismatch between the distal lateral femoral condyle resection and the implant thickness. Results. We modelled 292 knees from PSI TKR performed between 2012 and 2015. There were 225 varus knees and 67 valgus knees, with mean supine hip-knee-angle of 5.6±3.1 degrees and 3.6±4.6 degrees, respectively. In varus knees, the mean cartilage loss from medial and lateral femoral condyle was 2.3±0.7mm and 1.1±0.8mm respectively; the mean overstuffing of the lateral condyle 1.9±2.2mm. In valgus knees, the mean cartilage loss from medial and lateral condyle was 1.4±0.8mm and 1.5±0.9mm respectively; the mean overstuffing of the lateral condyle was 4.1±1.9mm. Conclusions. Neutral alignment TKR often results in overstuffing of the lateral condyle. This may increase the patello-femoral pressure at the lateral facet in flexion. Anterior knee pain may be persistent even after patellar resurfacing due to tight lateral retinacular structures. An alternative method of alignment such as anatomic alignment may minimise this problem

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is recognised as an effective treatment for end-staged knee osteoarthritis. Up to 20% of these patients is unfortunately unsatisfied due to anterior knee pain from unknown origin (Bourne and al. 2010). The aim of this study is to compare knee 3D kinematics during gait of patients with anterior knee pain after TKA to an asymptomatic TKA group. Our hypothesis is that the painful TKA group would exhibit known kinematics characteristics during gait that increase patellofemoral (PF) stresses (i.e. dynamic flexion contracture, valgus alignment, valgus collapse or a quick internal tibial rotation movement) compared to the TKA asymptomatic group. Thirty-eight patients (45 knees) were recruited 12–24 months post-surgery done by one of three experienced orthopaedic surgeons (31 unilateral TKA and seven bilateral TKA, all using the same knee implant). Patients were divided according to their KOOS pain score (with a cut-off at 6/20 to be included in the painful group). The KOOS questionnaire was also used to assess activities of daily living, symptoms, sports and quality of life. A complete clinical and radiological work up was done on the painful group to exclude those with known explanation for pain (i.e. loosening, malrotation, infection and clinical instability). 3D knee kinematics during treadmill walking was captured and computed using the KneeKGTM system. For the painful and asymptomatic groups, demographic results show respectively: age of 64.4 ± 7.6 and 69.8 ± 8.3 years, BMI of 31.9 ± 5.0 and 28.1 ± 3.6 kg.m−2, speed of 1.8 ± 0.6 and 1.67 ± 0.5 miles/h., and 50% of women in each group. Only age and BMI showed to be statistically different between groups. The painful TKA group exhibited a valgus alignment when walking (at initial contact and during stance, p<0.001). No significant difference has been put forward for the flexion/extension and internal/external tibial rotation. Since a higher valgus alignment increases the Q angle, which lateralise the patella and increases PF stresses, results provide new insight on origin of symptoms. Conservative treatments for PF pain syndrome have shown to address the valgus alignment and improve symptoms, therefore the next step will be to assess the impact on pain level and alignment during gait of a personalised conservative management for the painful TKA group. Additionally, a study assessing the change in the radiological and dynamic alignment from pre to post surgery could bring valuable insight on the impact of surgical procedure on anterior knee pain