Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 62 - 62
1 Jul 2020
Nowak L MacNevin M Sanders D Lawendy A McKee MD Schemitsch E Walker R DiGiovanni R
Full Access

This study was designed to compare atypical hip fractures with a matched cohort of standard hip fractures to evaluate the difference in outcomes. Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's (NSQIP) targeted hip fracture data file (containing a more comprehensive set of variables collected on 9,390 specially targeted hip fracture patients, including the differentiation of atypical from standard hip fractures) were merged with the standard 2016 NSQIP data file. Atypical hip fracture patients aged 18 years and older in 2016 were identified via the targeted hip fracture data file and matched to two standard hip fracture controls by age, sex, and fracture location. Patient demographics, length of hospital stay, 30-day mortality, major and minor complications, and other hip-specific variables were identified from the database. Binary outcomes were compared using the McNemar's test for paired groups, and continuous outcomes were compared using a paired t-test. Ninety-five atypical hip fractures were identified, and compared to 190 age, sex, and fracture location matched standard hip fracture controls. There was no statistical difference in body mass index (BMI), race, ASA score, smoking status, timing of fixation, or functional status between the two groups (P>0.05). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in the atypical hip fracture group (atypical 7.36%, standard 2.11% p. This is the first study, to our knowledge, that demonstrates an increase in the rate of mortality in atypical hip fractures. Comparing atypical hip fractures with a matched cohort of standard hip fractures revealed a significantly greater 30-day mortality rate with an odds ratio of 3.62 in atypical hip fractures (95% CI 1.03–12.68). Prospective, clinical studies are recommended to further investigate these findings


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 4 - 4
1 May 2015
Shah S Divekar M
Full Access

There is strong evidence to support the use of bisphosphonates in the prevention of osteoporotic fractures. There has, however, been growing concern that prolonged use of bisphosphonates can lead to the development of atypical femoral fractures and can protract healing time. We conducted a retrospective study looking at all femoral fractures between 2011–2013. Of 109 patients, 12 were diagnosed with atypical femoral fractures. The mean age of presentation was 69 (52–92). Five patients held no history of falls and presented with hip pain. The remaining seven sustained minor falls. Seven patients were on bisphosphonates on presentation. Bisphosphonates were discontinued in five cases and continued in two. Bisphosphonates commenced in one patient who subsequently developed second fracture. All fractures were managed with intramedullary nailing. Healing time was prolonged in all cases (mean healing time 7.3 months). Three patients needed further surgeries to achieve union. Overall, we observed that patients with prolonged bisphosphonate intake were more susceptible to atypical fractures with a delayed recovery time. Increasing awareness amongst medical professionals may aid timely diagnoses and subsequent referrals to orthopaedics. Recognition of these fractures may also permit early discontinuation of bisphosphonates, which may prevent future fractures and reduced healing times