Source of the study: University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is effective for patients with isolated compartment osteoarthritis, however the procedure has higher revision rates. Long-term survivorship and accurate characterisation of revision reasons are limited by a lack of long-term data and standardised revision definitions. We aimed to identify survivorship, risk factors and revision reasons in a large UKA cohort with up to 20 years follow-up. Patient, implant and revision details were recorded through clinical and radiological review for 2,137 consecutive patients undergoing primary medial UKA across Auckland, Canterbury, Counties Manukau and Waitematā DHB between 2000 and 2017. Revision reasons were determined from review of clinical, laboratory, and radiological records for each patient using a standardised protocol. To ensure complete follow-up data was cross-referenced with the New Zealand Joint Registry to identify patients undergoing subsequent revision outside the hospitals. Implant survival, revision risk and revision reasons were analysed using Cox proportional-hazards and competing risk analyses. Implant survivorship at 15 years was comparable for cemented fixed-bearing (cemFB; 91%) and uncemented mobile-bearing (uncemMB; 91%), but lower for cemented mobile-bearing (cemMB; 80%) implants. There was higher incidence of aseptic loosening with cemented implants (3–4% vs. 0.4% uncemented, p<0.01), osteoarthritis (OA) progression with cemMB implants (9% vs. 3% cemFB/uncemMB; p<0.05) and bearing dislocations with uncemMB implants (3% vs. 2% cemMB, p=0.02). Compared with the oldest patients (≥75 years), there was a nearly two-fold increase in risk for those aged 55–64 (hazard ratio 1.9; confidence interval 1.1-3.3, p=0.03). No association was found with gender, BMI or ASA. Cemented mobile-bearing implants and younger age were linked to lower implant survivorship. These were associated with disease progression and bearing dislocations. The use of cemented fixed-bearing and uncemented mobile-bearing designs have superior comparable long-term survivorship

Cementless fixation is an alternative to cemented unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR), with several advantages over cementation. This study reports on the 15-year survival and 10-year clinical outcomes of the cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (OUKR). This prospective study describes the clinical outcomes and survival of first 693 consecutive cementless medial OUKRs implanted in New Zealand. The sixteen-year survival was 89.2%, with forty-six knees being revised. The commonest reason for revision was progression of arthritis, which occurred in twenty-three knees, followed by primary dislocation of the bearing, which occurred in nine knees. There were two bearing dislocations secondary to trauma and a ruptured ACL, and two tibial plateau fractures. There were four revisions for polyethylene wear. There were four revisions for aseptic tibial loosening, and one revision for impingement secondary to overhang of the tibial component. There was only one revision for deep infection and one revision where the indication was not stated. The mean OKS improved from 23.3 (7.4 SD) to 40.59 (SD 6.8) at a mean follow-up of sixteen years. In conclusion, the cementless OUKR is a safe and reproducible procedure with excellent sixteen-year survival and clinical outcomes

Source of the study: University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand and University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are predictors of knee arthroplasty revision. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is effective for patients with the correct indications, however has higher revision rates than total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Different revision thresholds for the procedures have been postulated. Our aims were to investigate: 1) if PROMs could predict knee arthroplasty revision within two years of the score at six months, five years and ten years follow-up, and 2) if revision ‘thresholds’ differed between TKA and UKA. All TKAs and UKAs captured by the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1999 and 2019 with at least one OKS response at six months (TKA n=27,708, UKA n=8,415), five years (TKA n=11,519, UKA n=3,365) or ten years (TKA n=6,311, UKA n=1,744) were included. were propensity-score matched 2:1 with UKAs for comparison of revision thresholds. Logistic regression indicated that for every one-unit decrease in OKS, the odds of TKA and UKA revision decreased by 10% and 11% at six months, 10% and 12% at five years and 9% and 5% at ten years. Fewer TKA patients with ‘poor’ outcomes (≤25) subsequently underwent revision compared with UKA at six months (5.1% vs. 19.6%, p<0.001), five years (4.3% vs. 12.5%, p<0.001) and ten years (6.4%vs. 15.0%, p=0.02). Compared with TKA, UKA patients were 2.5 times more likely to undergo revision for ‘unknown’ reasons, bearing dislocations and disease progression. The OKS is a strong predictor of subsequent knee arthroplasty revision within two years of the score from early to late term. A lower revision threshold was found with UKA when compared with a matched TKA cohort. Higher revision rates of UKA are associated with both lower clinical thresholds for revision and additional modes of UKA failure

Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (OMUKR) is a well-established treatment option for isolated medial compartment arthritis, with good patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). We present our results of the Oxford Domed Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (ODLUKR) to establish if patients benefit as much as with OMUKR. Retrospective review of prospectively collected data of a single surgeon series of consecutive UKR from 2007 to 2014 were collated with a minimum 2 years follow-up. PROMs data were collected using pre- and post-operative Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) (best score of 48). One hundred and twenty-eight OMUKR and 27 ODLUKR were performed in the study period. There was no significant difference in the age at time of surgery, but there were significantly more women in the ODLUKR group (74% vs 53%). There was no significant difference in pre-op OKS between the groups (OMUKR = 16/48; ODLUKR = 20/48), or the improvement in OKS post-op (OMUKR = 19 points; ODLUKR = 17 points). One ODLUKR was revised to Total Knee Replacement (TKR) for pain. There were three (11.1%) bearing dislocations, which were treated with thicker bearing exchange, with no subsequent problems. There were no bearing dislocations in the OMUKR. Four OMUKR were revised to TKR due to pain. The overall implant survivorship was 96.3% for ODLUKR and 96.9% for OMUKR. ODLUKR is a good treatment option for isolated lateral compartment arthritis and gives results equivalent to OMUKR. There is, however, an increased risk of bearing dislocation so should be performed by a high volume UKR surgeon

Background. To evaluate the causes and modes of complications after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and to identify its prevention and treatment method by analyzing the complications after UKA. Materials and Methods. A total of 1,576 UKAs were performed between January 2002 and December 2014 at a single-institution. Postoperative complications occurred in 89 knees (83 patients, 5.6%), and 86 of them were found in females and 3 in males. Their mean age was 61 years (range, 46 to 81 years) at the time of initial UKA and 66 years (range, 46 to 82 years) at the time of revision surgery. We analyzed the complications after UKA retrospectively andinvestigated the proper methods of treatment (Table 1). Results. A total of 89 complications (5.6%) occurred afterUKA. Regarding the type of complications after UKA, there were bearing dislocation (n=42), component loosening (n=23), 11 cases of femoral component loosening, 8 cases of tibial component loosening, and 4 cases of both femoral and tibial component loosening, periprosthetic fracture (n=6), polyethylene wear/ destruction (n=3), progression of arthritis to the other compartment (n=3), medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury (n=2), impingement (n=2), infection (n=5), ankylosis (n=1), and unexplained pain (n=2) (Table 2). The most common complication after UKA was mobile bearing dislocation in mobile-bearing type and loosening of prosthesis in fixed-bearing type, but polyethylene wear and progression of arthritis were relatively rare. The mean interval from UKA to the occurrence of complications was 4 years and 6 months (range, 0 [during operation] to 12 years). Of those complications following UKA, 58 knees were treated with conversion TKA, 1 with revision UKA, and 21 with simple bearing change. Complications in the remaining knees were treated with arthroscopic management (n=2), open reduction and internal fixation (n=3), closed reduction and internal fixation (n=1), manipulation (n=1), and MCL repair (n=2) (Table 3). Discussion. In this single-center study, we reviewed the causes and types of complications (n=89) that occurred following UKA (n=1,576) and investigated optimal treatment methods. The incidence and type of complications were also compared among patients classified according to gender, medial/lateral UKA, and implant design and type. The strengths of this study include that all the patients were enrolled from the same institution and the sample size (UKA cases and complication cases) was relatively large compared to that in previous publications. The most common complication following UKA was bearing dislocation in the mobile-bearing knees and component loosening in the fixed-bearing knees. The incidence of polyethylene wear and progression of arthritis to the other compartment was relatively low. The results of our study are in some discrepancy with those of studies involving Western patients. This can be attributed to the differences in patient characteristics such as lifestyle and in the type and design of implant used. Conclusion. Thorough understanding of UKA, proper patient selection, appropriate implant choice are essential to reduce complications following UKA and obtain satisfactory outcomes. We suggest that complications following UKA should be treated differently according to the type and cause of complication and conversion TKA can be the most effective treatment when revision operation is determined necessary

Purpose. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) has been indicated for inactive elderly patients over 60, but for young and active patients less than 60 years old, it has been regarded as a contraindication. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of UKA performed on young Asian patients under 60 years of age by analyzing clinical outcomes, complications and survival rate. Materials and Methods. The subjects were 82 cases, which were followed up for at least 5 years (from 5 to 12 years). Only Oxford phase III® (Biomet Orthopedics, Inc, Warsaw, USA) prosthesis was used for all cases. The clinical evaluation was done by the range of motion, Knee society score (KSS), WOMAC score. The radiographic evaluation was performed on weight bearing long-leg radiographs, AP and lateral view of the knee and skyline view of the patella. The survival rate was estimated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results. Three bearing dislocations, one medial tibial collapse and one lateral osteoarthritis occurred, so the complication rate was 6.1% (5/82). Among the 3 cases of bearing dislocation, 2 cases were resolved by replacing with a thicker bearing and 1 case was converted to TKA due to repeated dislocation. One case of medial tibia collapse and one lateral osteoarthritis were converted to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). All clinical outcomes measured by KSS scores and WOMAC score showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). The 10 year cumulative survival rate using Kaplan-Meier survival method was 94.7% (95% CI: 88.7%–100%). Conclusion. The clinical outcomes and the survival rate of young asian patients less than 60 years of age who underwent Oxford medial UKA showed good clinical results and a good survival rate in the mid-term results. However, long-term follow-up is needed for more reliable clinical results

The Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) was introduced in 1976 with good results. Mobile bearings in the lateral compartment have been associated with unacceptably high bearing dislocation rates, due to greater movement between the lateral femoral condyle and tibia, and the lateral collateral ligament's laxity in flexion. The new domed implant is designed to counter this with a convex tibial prosthesis and a fully-congruent, bi-concave mobile bearing allowing a full range-of-movement (ROM), minimising dislocation risk and bearing wear. We present complication rates and clinical outcomes for a consecutive series of our first 20 patients undergoing Oxford domed lateral UKR, between June 2006 and August 2009, with minimum 6-month follow-up. There was one unrelated death (31 months post-UKR) and one postop MI. We had no bearing dislocations, infections or loosening nor other complications. All patients had post-op Oxford Knee Scores; eleven had pre-op scores and demonstrated a significant improvement – mean pre-op 22.75 to post-op 35.45 (p=0.01). All achieved full extension with average ROM 116°, mean change in ROM was –2.6°(p=0.6). This study adds to previous work in confirming a low level of complications with this new procedure (including the early learning curve), particularly bearing dislocation and demonstrates excellent functional outcomes

Background. A commonly held belief amongst surgeons and patients is that progression of disease (arthritis) to other compartments is a major cause of early failure of UKRs. Methods. We analysed the NJR database records of 17,643 primary UKRs performed between April 2003 and April 2009. Where these had been revised the reason for revision was noted. Results. Of the 17,643 primary UKRs, 308 had died and were excluded from the analysis. Of the living, 505 had been revised (3%) at a mean 3.45 years (range 2-6 years) following the primary procedure. Reason for revision was recorded in 472 cases (93%). Aseptic loosening was the commonest cause for revision in 154 cases (33%), followed by non specific pain in 129 cases (27%), bearing dislocation in 58 cases (12%), Instability in 33 cases (7%), Infection 28 cases (6%), progression of disease 23 cases (5%), periprosthetic fracture 19 cases (4%) and malalignment 15 cases (3%). 35% failed within 1 year, 38% within 2 years and 16% within 3 years of the index operation. Conclusion. Similar findings has been reported on the New Zealand Registry 10 year report where the overall revision rate was 284/4,826 (5.9%), and revision due to disease progression 7.7%. Progression of disease is not a major cause of early failure of UKRs. 73% of the failures occurred within two years of surgery. Other causes such as aseptic loosening, bearing dislocation and instability are more common and could be possibly ameliorated by improved surgical technique, better patient selection and component choice

INTRODUCTION. Wear and polyethylene damage have been implicated in up to 22% of revision surgeries after unicompartmental knee replacement. Two major design rationales to reduce this rate involve either geometry and/or material strategies. Geometric options involve highly congruent mobile bearings with large contact areas; or moderately conforming fixed bearings to prevent bearing dislocation and reduce back-side wear, while material changes involve use of highly crosslinked polyethylene. This study was designed to determine if a highly crosslinked fixed-bearing design would increase wear resistance. METHODS. Gravimetric wear rates were measured for two unicompartmental implant designs: Oxford unicompartmental (Biomet) and Triathlon X3 PKR (Stryker) on a knee wear simulator (AMTI) using the ISO-recommended standard. The Oxford design had a highly conforming mobile bearing of compression molded Polyethylene (Arcom). The Triathlon PKR had a moderately conforming fixed bearing of sequentially crosslinked Polyethylene (X3). A finite element model of the AMTI wear simulation was constructed to replicate experimental conditions and to compute wear. This approach was validated using experimental results from previous studies. The wear coefficient obtained previously for radiation-sterilized low crosslinked polyethylene was used to predict wear in Oxford components. The wear coefficient obtained for highly crosslinked polyethylene was used to predict wear in Triathlon X3 PKR components. To study the effect design and polyethylene crosslinking, wear rates were computed for each design using both wear coefficients. RESULTS. Wear rates were significantly lower (69%) for the Triathlon fixed-bearing design compared to the Oxford mobile-bearing design (Fig 1, p<0.01). The FEA model predicted 46% of wear occurring at the back side of the mobile bearing (Fig 2). When wear was computed for the Triathlon PKR design using the wear coefficients used for the low crosslinked polyethylene, wear rates increased to 13.9 mg/million cycles. DISCUSSION. We used a combined experimental and computational approach to quantify factors contributing to polyethylene wear after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. To isolate the effect of crosslinking level and mobile-bearing design, we computed wear rates for both designs using the same wear coefficient obtained for low crosslinked polyethylene. Wear rates in the low crosslinked Triathlon PKR insert increased by more than 160% relative to those in the highly crosslinked Triathlon X3 PKR. The finite element method facilitates computation of relative back-side to front-side wear, which is challenging to obtain experimentally. The back-side wear Oxford mobile bearing was 46% of total wear. Major factors contributing to the difference in wear were back-side wear (46%) and increased crosslinking (63%) with the combined effect having an additive effect. Our FEA-predicted wear penetration rates (0.024 mm/million cycles) also compare well to in vivo studies, which reported penetration rates of 0.022 mm/year for Oxford bearings. A validated computer model is extremely valuable for efficient evaluation of wear performance and design development. In summary, increasing conformity to increase contact area and reduce contact stress may not be the sole predictor of wear performance. A highly crosslinked polyethylene insert in a fixed-bearing design may provide the high wear performance of a mobile-bearing design without the increased risk for bearing dislocation

Background. The purpose of this study is to report the outcome of navigation-assisted cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using one type of cemented, second-generation, floating-platform (FP), mobile-bearing system. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 42 patients (51 knees) who underwent cruciate retaining TKAs using e.motion-FP prostheses under navigational guidance. The preoperative diagnosis was osteoarthritis in all knees except one rheumatoid arthritis. There were 2 men (2 knees) and 40 women (49 knees) with a mean age of 64.0 ± 4.7 years (range, 51 – 76 years) at the time of index surgery. The mean follow-up was 120.0 months (range, 106 – 126 months). Clinical and radiographic results as well as mechanical survival rate of this type prosthesis were investigated at a mean follow-up of 10 years. Results. The mean mechanical femorotibial angle was improved from 11.7° ± 3.3° (range, 5.0° to 19.7°) preoperatively to 1.4° ± 1.7° (range, −2.9° to 6.4°) at the latest follow-up. No prosthesis-related complications such as bearing dislocation or breakage occurred and no knees showed aseptic loosening or progressive osteolysis. Kaplan-Meier survivorship at 10.5 years was 100% with an endpoint of revision for any prosthesis-associated reason. Conclusions. The emotion-floating platform mobile-bearing design yielded satisfactory mid-term durability and implant performance under navigational guidance

The dual mobility (DM) bearing concept was introduced to reduce the risk of dislocation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our aim was to evaluate the early outcomes following the utilisation of DM in primary and revision THA in our unit. Prospectively collected data on all patients undergoing a DM bearing at was reviewed between July 2012and December 2015. The primary outcome assessed was dislocation, with a secondary outcome revision for any reasons. All data was gathered from patient clinical records and the digital picture archiving and communication system (PACS). 30 primary THA were undertaken and 54 revision THAin the time period described. 11 of the procedures involved a proximal femoral endoprosthesis. The mean age in the primary setting was 65 and 73 in the revision population. The main indications for using DM bearing in the primary setting were; trauma (40%), residual dysplasia (40%) and malignancy (17%). There were no dislocations in the primary THA category. Indications in the revision THA cohort included 33% for aseptic loosening, 11% for instability, 18% for ALVAL reactions, 20% for infection, 18% for fracture. 1 out of the 54 revision THA had one large bearing dislocation requiring closed reduction. Subsequent analysis confirmed that implant alignment was satisfactory and this was a patient compliance issue due to mental health concerns. To date no patient in either cohort required revision surgery. Overall dislocation rate was 1.2%. Our early experience with DM bearings has been positive with no evidence of early failure or loosening. The dislocation rate overall has been low and matches the current large series in the literature

It is very important for implanting tibial component to prevent bearing dislocation in Oxford UKA. One of the keys is accurate rotational position of tibia. But the problem remains what is accurate rotation of tibia in UKA. Oxford Signature decided the rotation of tibia component from MRI images. We measured the component rotation of tibia using CT after operation. Patients and Methods. 14 patients were operated by Oxford Signature and 11 patients were operated by Microplasty method. Patients were examined by CT 2 or 3 weeks later after operation. We compared component axis of tibia and A-P axis by best fit circle, Akagi's line. Results. In Oxford Signature group, component angle were 7.1 degree external rotation compared with A-P axis by best fit circle and were 3.6 degree external rotation compared with Akagi's line. In Microplasty group, component angle were 8.1 degree external rotation compared with A-P axis by best fit circle and were 3.8 degree external rotation compared with Akagi's line. Discussion. It is difficult to decide accurate position of tibial component for UKA. The A-P axis by best fit circle and Akagi's line are reliable methods for tibial axis in TKA. We examined component axis of Signature Oxford and Microplasty, these were same tendency toward external rotation

Background. Wear and fatigue damage to polyethylene components remain major factors leading to complications after total knee and unicompartmental arthroplasty. A number of wear simulations have been reported using mechanical test equipment as well as computer models. Computational models of knee wear have generally not replicated experimental wear under diverse conditions. This is partly because of the complexity of quantifying the effect of cross-shear at the articular interface and partly because the results of pin-on-disk experiments cannot be extrapolated to total knee arthroplasty wear. Our premise is that diverse experimental knee wear simulation studies are needed to generate validated computational models. We combined five experimental wear simulation studies to develop and validate a finite-element model that accurately predicted polyethylene wear in high and low crosslinked polyethylene, mobile and fixed bearing, and unicompartmental (UKA) and tricompartmental knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. Low crosslinked polyethylene (PE). A finite element analysis (FEA) of two different experimental wear simulations involving TKA components of low crosslinked polyethylene inserts, with two different loading patterns and knee kinematics conducted in an AMTI knee wear simulator: a low intensity and a high intensity. Wear coefficients incorporating contact pressure, sliding distance, and cross-shear were generated by inverse FEA using the experimentally measured volume of wear loss as the target outcome measure. The FE models and wear coefficients were validated by predicting wear in a mobile bearing UKA design. Highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE). Two FEA models were constructed involving TKA and UKA XLPE inserts with different loading patterns and knee kinematics conducted in an AMTI knee wear simulator. Wear coefficients were generated by inverse FEA. Results. Predicted wear rates were within 5% of experimental wear rates during validation tests. Unicompartmental mobile bearing back-side wear accounted for 46% of the total wear in the mobile bearing. Wear during the swing phase was 38% to 44% of total wear. Discussion & Conclusions. Crosslinking polyethylene primarily decreased (by nearly 10-fold) the wear generated by cross-shear. This result can be explained by the reduced propensity of crosslinked polyethylene molecules to orient in the dominant direction of sliding. A highly crosslinked fixed-bearing polyethylene insert can provide high wear performance without the increased risk for mobile bearing dislocation. Finite element analysis can be a robust and efficient method for predicting experimental wear. The value of this model is in rapidly conducting screening studies for design development, assessing the effect of varying patient activity, and assessing newer biomaterials. This FEA model was experimentally validated but requires clinical validation

Background and Purpose of Study. The Valgus knee in total knee Arthroplasty, is considered a more demanding procedure, often with ligament balance a greater challenge than seen with neutral or Varus knees. It has also frequently been suggested that prostheses with higher levels of constraint be used to avoid late-onset instability. Various lateral release techniques have also been suggested in the literature. This study is aimed at assessing the outcomes of an unconstrained, rotating platform designed prosthesis, the LCS, using our technique, in the management of severe valgus deformity. Methods. 44 knees in 42 patients with a pre-operative valgus deformity of more than 10 degrees were included in our retrospective series. We analyzed the radiographs for the degree of correction, the angle of tibial tray implantation, and femoral implantation angle, tibial slope, as well as the presence (or degree) of lift off and any complications were noted. In this group, 7 had a Valgus deformity of greater than 25 degrees, with a mean Valgus deformity of 17,36 degrees. The mean age at operation was 65. Clinical and radiological analysis was done Pre-hospital discharge and again post-operatively 6 weeks. Results. The mean coronal alignment was corrected from 17,36 degrees to 5 degrees of Valgus post operatively. 2 knees were corrected past neutral to varus alignment. There was 1 case of bearing spin out experienced early on in the series. The mean tibial implant angle was 1,7 degrees from neutral. Lift off in the early post-operative X-rays was seen in 6 patients, however at 3 month follow up the knees appeared to be well balanced. There were no infections or revisions for wear, one re-operation for bearing dislocation, and no cases of loosening in our series. There were no cases of delayed instability. Patient satisfaction was 86 %. Conclusions. The rotating platform, mobile bearing prosthesis, using our technique, provided a reproducible correction of deformity in Valgus knees, a well-balanced knee, a low complication rate, and an excellent degree of patient satisfaction. NO DISCLOSURES

Purpose. We analyzed the frequency, causes and treatment of dislocation of polyethylene insertion among various causes of failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Materials and Methods. We studied 69 knee joints of 65 patients who underwent medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using from June 2005 to December 2010. Average age was 61.8 and average follow-up period was 20 months. Radiologic results evaluated preoperative and postopertative mechanical axis deviation, tibio-fibular angle and postoperative implant position in total 69 knees(A group), failed 15 cases(B group) and 10 cases(C group) of bearing dislocation. We demonstrated treatment on failure group and analyzed preoperative and postoperative HSS and Lysolm score. Results. Failures were observed in 15 cases(21.7%) on follow-up. dislocation of polyethylene insertion was observed in 10 cases at average 26.7 months (3–60). There were 2 cases of dislocation of insert without loosening of implant and 8 cases of dislocation of insert with loosening of implant. Tibio-femoral angle in A, B and C group were corrected form preoperative varus 8.1°, 7.3° and 6.3° to postoperative valgus 3.6°, 4.0° and 3.5°. Thickness of inserted polyethylene in A, B and C were 4.7 mm, 5.2 mm and 4.8 mm, but each groups didn't show statistical significance. HSS and Lysolm score improvement had statistical significance. Conclusion. Dislocation of polyethylene insert (66.1%) in cases of the failure was most common. Coronal correction angle and thickness of inserted polyethylene showed no difference between dislocation gourp and non-dislocation group, so we consider that polyethylene dislocation after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty seems to be due to structural problem of the implant

Mobile bearings in knee arthroplasty carry the theoretical advantage of lower wearing prostheses. However, dislocating mobile bearings can be a significant issue in mobile bearing knee replacement arthroplasty. Our aim is to report our design alterations to the insert to address bearing spinout. A total of 598 RBK mobile bearing total knee arthroplasties were performed by the senior author over a 10–year period. The standard bearing was subjected to three design changes to address spinout and increase flexion range. The first alteration involved a deeper dish with a higher anterior lip. Subsequently, a reduced footprint insert (RFI) was created. The final modification was a shaved off posterior rim to allow for greater flexion (high flex). An overall bearing dislocation rate of 1.0% (6 out of 595) was obtained. Of these 595 knees, 132 were of the initial insert design, 194 were deep-dished inserts, 71 inserts were RFI, and 198 were high flex. There were four (3%) dislocations with the initial insert design and two (1%) dislocations in the final implant version. In our series the dislocated bearings have in all but one required revision to higher constrained prostheses. The mechanism of dislocation is speculated to be instability in flexion, leading to posterior loading of the insert and spinning out of the bearing. Most of the bearing subluxations have been medial but one was observed intra operatively to be a lateral extrusion. With respect to the two dislocations in the final implant design, one dislocation was attributed to a technical error of under sizing the insert. At revision surgery he was also found to have a disrupted MCL, which was repaired. He has had no further issues after the insert was upsized. The cause of spin out in the second patient was speculated to be obesity and a diminished pre- operative range of movement. She required a revision to a higher constrained prosthesis. Insert spinout has a multifactorial aetiology. The occurrence of spinout can be minimised by a combination of good surgical technique, such as balanced flexion and extension gaps and design modifications to the insert as we have instituted

Purpose. To identify the causes of failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and to evaluate considerations for surgical procedures and the results of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed after failure of UKA. Materials and Methods. Eight hundreds and fifty-two cases of UKA were performed from January 2002 to June 2011. Forty-seven cases of failures after UKA were analyzed for the cause of the failures, and thirty-five cases of revision TKA after failure were analyzed for the operative findings and surgical technique. The clinical results were measured for thirty cases which were followed-up on at least two years after TKA. The mean duration of follow-up was four years and one month after revision TKA and the mean patient age at the time of surgery was sixty-five years. Results. For the cause of failures after UKA, there were twenty-two cases of early loosening of prosthesis, seventeen cases of simple mobile bearing dislocation, five cases of infection, one case of fracture of medial tibial condyle and two cases of unknown origin pain. In operative findings of thirty-five cases of TKA after failed UKA, there were twenty-five cases of bone defect requiring treatment and the mean thickness of the defect was 10.6 mm. For the treatment of bone defect, there were five cases of autogenous bone graft, twenty-one cases of metal blocks, and one case of autogenous bone graft with metal block. The stem was used in tibial implants for nineteen cases, and one case of use in tibial and femoral implants. For thirty cases where follow ups were possible at least two years after operation, the mean knee score was improved from 68.2 to 85.2 and the mean knee function score was improved from 67.7 to 78.0 at the last follow-up, respectively. The mean range of knee motion was 107.2° pre-operatively, which was recovered to 120.7° after the operation. The mean tibiofemoral angle was changed from 1.7° of valgus to 5.2° of valgus. Conclusion. As shown in this study, the tibial bone defect was the most important problem in revision TKA after failure of UKA. Therefore, proper indication and accurate surgical technique using autogenous bone graft, metal block and stemmed implants would be able to achieve satisfactory results in revision TKA after failure of UKA

Purpose. To identify the incidence and reasons for revision of the Oxford prosthesis (OXF) in New Zealand. Methods. Review and compare UKA and TKA data including patient-generated Oxford scores after operation. Results. 105 surgeons performed 3,624 OXF (66.5% of all UKA). UKA made up 12.8% of all knee arthroplasties. There were 216 OXF revisions and revision rate (RR) of 1.39 per 100 component-years (p100cy); for UKA this was 1.42 p100cy, and for TKA 0.54 p100cy (OXF vs TKA p< 0.0001). The indications for OXF revisions were unexplained pain (38.0%); aseptic loosening (38.0%); bearing dislocation (9.3%) and deep sepsis (4.2%). For TKA, unexplained pain (28%) was significantly lower than from OXF (p=0.005). Revision for deep sepsis was significantly lower for OXF compared with TKA (4.2% vs 13.1%, p < 0.001). The Oxford scores 6 months post-op were excellent or good in 79% of OXF vs 72% TKA patients (p< 0.0001); at 5 years after operation these were 88% for OXF and 81% for TKA (p=0.001). Twenty high-use OXF surgeons (10 or more operations/year) performed 44% of the operations (RR of 1.3 p100cy), 62 medium-use surgeons (2-9/year) performed 54% (RR of 1.3 p100cy). 23 low-use surgeons (2 or less/year) performed 2% (RR of 3.9p100cy). The differences in RR high vs low users (p< 0.001) and medium vs low groups (p< 0.001) were significant. RR for OXF high or medium users was significantly higher than the overall rate for TKA (p< 0.001). Conclusion. RR for the OXF was 2.5 times greater than that for TKA. Deep infection rate was lower, and 6-month and 5-year function scores were significantly higher OXF vs TKA

Introduction. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a successful procedure for medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA). Recent studies using the same implant report a revision rate of 2.9%. Other centers have reported revision rates as high as 10.3%. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review the clinical results of Oxford Phase 3 UKA's performed in the setting of isolated medial compartment OA and to compare our results to the previous mid-term studies. Our secondary goal was to determine reasons for revision and evaluate selected independent predictors of failure. Methods. A retrospective review of 465 Oxford Phase 3 medial UKA's performed on 386 patients (222 female; 164 male) with isolated medial compartment OA. The average age at surgery was 69.5 years (40–88). Outcome measures included: Knee Society Scores(KSS), Oxford Knee Scores(OKS), SF-12, WOMAC, revision rates, and patient satisfaction. We evaluated independently predictors of failure including: gender, body mass index(BMI), number of previous surgeries, implant sizes, cement technique (simultaneous vs staged), cement type. Revision rates based upon the polyethylene thickness (defined as thin 3–4 mm; medium 5–6 mm; thick 7–9 mm). The need for stems and augments and the degree of constraint required at revision to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were evaluated. Results. At a mean follow-up of 60.7 months (11–114) OKS improved from 21 to 37 points (p<.05). Latest SF-12 score was 43.8 points (16.8–64.7 points; SD, 10.5) and WOMAC was 80 points (23–100 points; SD, 18). The overall revision rate was 6.9% (32/465 knees). Mean time to revision in 25 knees was 34.5 months (7–96), and revision was most commonly performed for lateral compartment OA (10). Eight knees were revised for tibial loosening, femoral loosening (6), and PCL failure (1). Revision implants included posterior stabilized in 13 knees (52%), cruciate retaining in 9 knees (36%), and cruciate substituting/dished in 3 knees (12%). Five revisions (20%) required tibial augments and 2(8%) had cemented tibial stems. The mean revision polyethylene thickness was 12 mm (range, 9–19 mm) and one knee required a constrained polyethylene. Three knees are pending revision to TKA. Four knees underwent poly exchange for bearing dislocation and 3 knees had further arthroscopic procedures. Eighty-four percent of the patella were resurfaced at revision. Three quarters (76%) of the patients were extremely or very satisfied with their surgery. Over 90% would have had their surgeries again. Gender, BMI, number of previous surgeries, femoral or tibial sizing, poly thickness, cementing technique or type did not predict revision, the need for constraint, or the need for stems or augments. Conclusion. Our revision rate of 6.9% was comparable to other midterm studies from independent centers but not as low as recently reported results from Oxford. Progression to lateral compartment OA was the most common reason for revision. We could not find any independent predictors of failures in this group of 465 knees

Introduction. Despite the theoretical advantages of mobile bearings for lateral unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR), the failure rate in the initial published series of the lateral Oxford UKR's was unacceptably high. The main cause of failure was early dislocation. In contrast, dislocations of bearings in medial UKR's are rare. The lateral compartment present a higher laxity in flexion than the medial. An adaptation of the lateral design by introducing a convex tibial component and biconcave bearing should tackle this difference in kinematics. The risk of dislocation increased substantially if the lateral tibial joint line was elevated, quantified by the proximal tibial varus angle. This angle had a significant relationship to dislocation. A recent kinematic study identified roughly 3 times as much posterior translation of the tibia during deep knee bend activities after lateral UKR compared to the normal knee, possibly also resulting in a higher incidence of bearing dislocation. With the exception of dislocation, the overall early complication ratio in the initial published series of lateral Oxford UKR was also rather high compared to the last published series. Is there a learning curve?. Materials and Methods. Between January 2009 and April 2010, 16 domed lateral Oxford unicompartmental knee replacements were implanted by the senior author. The valgus deformity was in 2 cases not completely correctable. All femoral components were positioned anatomically. In no case the popliteus tendon was divided. A partial iliotibial band (ITB) release was done in 2 cases. The most common tracking deviation of the bearing peroperatively was a small lift off in deep flexion, seen in 6 cases. Results. Dislocation: no. Clinical outcome. Twelve of our patients (75%) have already good or excellent results with no pain in rest, no or mild pain with activity and good restoration of function. One patient feels some pain in deep flexion during work as a carpenter. In only one patient there is still a flexion of less than 100°. Small extension deficits are seen in 4 patients. Radiographic outcome. The full-leg radiographs showed a valgus axis of 1,2° (-1° to 7°) compared to preoperative 5,8° (0° to 14°). The assessment of the proximal tibial varus angle resulted in an angle of 3,8° (1 to 7°). The measurements on deep flexion radiographs are not yet available. Discussion and Conclusion. Until now we had no dislocation of the bearing in our series, but further follow-up is needed. The preliminary clinical results are already promising and display no early complications needing further operations. By anatomical placement of the femoral component the height of the lateral joint line seems to be respected, confirmed by a nearly correct proximal tibial varus angle in all cases. An increased proximal tibial varus angle can also be avoided by minimizing damage to the lateral soft tissues during surgery and so not over-tighten the knee. Therefore the popliteus tendon should stay intact. The elevated posterior translation, as seen in the recent kinematic studies of the lateral Oxford UKP can perhaps also be reduced by respecting those soft tissues