Study Aim. Femoral components used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are primarily designed on the basis of kinematics and ease of fixation. This study considers the stress-strain environment in the distal femur due to different implant internal geometry variations (based on current industry standards) using finite element (FE) analyses. Both two and three dimensional models are considered for a range of physiological loading scenarios – from full extension to deep flexion. Issues associated with micro-motion at the bone-implant interface are also considered. Materials and methods. Two (plane strain) and three dimensional finite element analyses were conducted to examine implant micro-motions and stability. The simple 2D models were used to examine the influence of anterior-posterior (AP) flange angle on implant stability. AP slopes of 3°, 7° and 11° were considered with contact between bone and implant interfaces being modeled using the standard coulomb friction model. The direction and region of loading was based on loading experienced at full extension, 90° flexion and 135° flexion. Three main model variations were created for the 3D analyses, the first model represented an intact distal femur, the second a primary implanted distal femur and the third a distal femur implanted with a posterior stabilising implant. Further each of the above 3D model sets were divided into two group, the first used a frictional interface between the bone and implant to characterise the behavior of uncemented implants post TKA and the second group assumed 100% osseointegration had already taken place and focused on examining the subsequent stress/strain environment in the femur with respect to different femoral component geometries relative the intact distal femur model. Results and Discussion. Analyses indicate a trend relating the slope of the anterior-posterior (AP) flange to implant loosening at high flexion angles for uncemented components. Once cemented, this becomes less important. Results from the 3D analyses show that the posterior stabilising implant causes stress concentrations which can lead to bicondylar fatigue fracture. All femoral components cause stress shielding in cancellous bone particularly when they are fully bonded. Investigations into implant micromotion show that revision implants with box sections provided more resistance to micromotion than the pegged primary implants. However for the gait cycle tested the maximum recorded micromotion of both implants was well within acceptable levels for osseointegration to occur

We have evaluated four different fixation techniques for the reconstruction of a standard Mason type-III fracture of the radial head in a sawbone model. The outcome measurements were the quality of the reduction, and stability.

A total of 96 fractures was created. Six surgeons were involved in the study and each reconstructed 16 fractures with 1.6 mm fine-threaded wires (Fragment Fixation System (FFS)), T-miniplates, 2 mm miniscrews and 2 mm Kirschner (K-) wires; four fractures being allocated to each method using a standard reconstruction procedure.

The quality of the reduction was measured after definitive fixation. Biomechanical testing was performed using a transverse plane shear load in two directions to the implants (parallel and perpendicular) with respect to ultimate failure load and displacement at 50 N.

A significantly better quality of reduction was achieved using the FFS wires (Tukey’s post hoc tests, p < 0.001) than with the other devices with a mean step in the articular surface and the radial neck of 1.04 mm (sd 0.96) for the FFS, 4.25 mm (sd 1.29) for the miniplates, 2.21 mm (sd 1.06) for the miniscrews and 2.54 mm (sd 0.98) for the K-wires. The quality of reduction was similar for K-wires and miniscrews, but poor for miniplates.

The ultimate failure load was similar for the FFS wires (parallel, 196.8 N (sd 46.8), perpendicular, 212.5 N (sd 25.6)), miniscrews (parallel, 211.8 N (sd 47.9), perpendicular, 208.0 N (sd 65.9)) and K-wires (parallel, 200.4 N (sd 54.5), perpendicular, 165.2 N (sd 37.9)), but significantly worse (Tukey’s post hoc tests, p < 0.001) for the miniplates (parallel, 101.6 N (sd 43.1), perpendicular, 122.7 N (sd 40.7)). There was a significant difference in the displacement at 50 N for the miniplate (parallel, 4.8 mm (sd 2.8), perpendicular, 4.8 mm (sd 1.7)) vs FFS (parallel, 2.1 mm (sd 0.8), perpendicular, 1.9 mm (sd 0.7)), miniscrews (parallel, 1.8 mm (sd 0.5), perpendicular, 2.3 mm (sd 0.8)) and K-wires (parallel, 2.2 mm (sd 1.8), perpendicular, 2.4 mm (sd 0.7; Tukey’s post hoc tests, p < 0.001)).

The fixation of a standard Mason type-III fracture in a sawbone model using the FFS system provides a better quality of reduction than that when using conventional techniques. There was a significantly better stability using FFS implants, miniscrews and K-wires than when using miniplates.

The treatment of bony defects of the tibia at the time of revision total knee replacement is controversial. The place of compacted morsellised bone graft is becoming established, particularly in contained defects. It has previously been shown that the initial stability of impaction-grafted trays in the contained defects is equivalent to that of an uncemented primary knee replacement. However, there is little biomechanical evidence on which to base a decision in the treatment of uncontained defects. We undertook a laboratory-based biomechanical study comparing three methods of graft containment in segmental medial tibial defects and compared them with the use of a modular metal augment to bypass the defect.

Using resin models of the proximal tibia with medial defects representing either 46% or 65% of the medial cortical rim, repair of the defect was accomplished using mesh, cement or a novel bag technique, after which impaction bone grafting was used to fill the contained defects and a tibial component was cemented in place. As a control, a cemented tibial component with modular metal augments was used in identical defects. All specimens were submitted to cyclical mechanical loading, during which cyclical and permanent tray displacement were determined.

The results showed satisfactory stability with all the techniques except the bone bag method. Using metal augments gave the highest initial stability, but obviously lacked any potential for bone restoration.