There is strong evidence to support the use of bisphosphonates in the prevention of osteoporotic fractures. There has, however, been growing concern that prolonged use of bisphosphonates can lead to the development of atypical femoral fractures and can protract healing time. We conducted a retrospective study looking at all femoral fractures between 2011–2013. Of 109 patients, 12 were diagnosed with atypical femoral fractures. The mean age of presentation was 69 (52–92). Five patients held no history of falls and presented with hip pain. The remaining seven sustained minor falls. Seven patients were on bisphosphonates on presentation. Bisphosphonates were discontinued in five cases and continued in two. Bisphosphonates commenced in one patient who subsequently developed second fracture. All fractures were managed with intramedullary nailing. Healing time was prolonged in all cases (mean healing time 7.3 months). Three patients needed further surgeries to achieve union. Overall, we observed that patients with prolonged bisphosphonate intake were more susceptible to atypical fractures with a delayed recovery time. Increasing awareness amongst medical professionals may aid timely diagnoses and subsequent referrals to orthopaedics. Recognition of these fractures may also permit early discontinuation of bisphosphonates, which may prevent future fractures and reduced healing times

Introduction. Bisphosphonates are among the most commonly prescribed drugs in Osteoporotic Patients. Their mode of action is anti-resorptive. Since remodeling is a key step in fracture healing, there has been concern regarding the effect of bisphosphonates on fracture healing. Objectives. To assess the effect of alendronate on fracture healing in the rabbit ulna osteotomy model. Materials and methods. 16 New Zealand white rabbits were divided into 2 equal groups. Bilateral ulnar osteotomies were performed in the first week. Group 1 was the control group and group 2 was gavaged with alendronate solution (human equivalent dose). 2 rabbits were euthanised at 3 and 6 weeks and the remaining 4 rabbits were euthanised at 8 weeks. Fracture healing was assessed radiologically, with mechanical testing using the Instron 4302 materials testing machine and histologically, in that order. Results. The fractures healed satisfactorily in all the control group animals. However, in the alendronate treated group, there was an abundance of woven bone and little lamellar bone in the callus. However there was no significant difference in mechanical testing. In addition we did not find any evidence of Osteonecrosis in the Bisphosphonate treated group. Conclusion. Bone remodelling in the alendronate treated group is slower but a larger amount of bone callus is formed around the fracture, thus giving the fracture callus a higher ultimate load to failure at an earlier stage

The aim was to analyze the efficacy of zoledronic acid (ZA) versus denosumab in the prevention of pathological fractures in patients with bone metastases from advanced cancers by evaluating all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on this subject.

A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed and MEDLINE) was performed to identify all published RCTs comparing zoledronic acid with denosumab in prevention of pathological fractures in bone metastases. Risk of bias of the studies was assessed. The primary outcomes evaluated were pathological fractures.

Four RCTs (7320 patients) were included. Denosumab was superior to ZA in reducing the likelihood of pathological fractures, when all tumour types were combined (OR 0.86, 95% CI [0.74, 0.99], p = 0.04). Denosumab was not significantly favoured over ZA in endodermal origin (breast and prostate) (OR 0.85, 95% CI [0.68, 1.05], p = 0.13) and mesodermal origin tumours (solid tumours and MM) (OR 0.87, 95% CI [0.71, 1.06], p = 0.16).

Denosumab significantly reduces the likelihood of pathological fractures in comparison to ZA in patients with bone metastases. When pathological fractures were grouped by tumour origin (endodermal or mesodermal), there was no significant difference between denosumab and ZA. Further long-term studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of these treatment regimens.

Although there is strong evidence that bisphosphonates prevent certain types of osteoporotic fractures, there are concerns that they may be associated with rare atypical femoral fractures.

1480 patients of proximal femur and shaft fractures over a period of 2 years from Jan 2014 to Jan 2016 were retrospectively reviewed in Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS trust. Hospital trauma database was used.195 patients had fractures in subtrochancteric and femoral shaft area.

11 patients had atypical femur fractures as defined by American society for bone and mineral research (ASBMR) task force 2013, revised criteria. Ten were female, one was male. Patients were aged from 68 to 97. In 6 patients, fractures were in the shaft, 5 in subtrochancteric area and 4 patients out of these had bilateral fractures. 10 out of 11 patients were on bisphosphonates. 4 patients had delayed diagnosis. 5 out of 11 patients did not have contralateral femoral x-rays. Treatment, 9 patients had intramedullary nail, one blade plate, and one treated conservatively. One patient in the IM group, had bilateral nailing. Average follow up was 7.6 months (range 1 to 16 months). At the end of the study, only 4 had united, 6 had not united and one not followed up. 4 out of 7 had low Vitamin D levels, 3 out of 7 had their bisphosphonate treatment stopped and 2 had histology which showed necrotic bone with trabeculae surrounded by fibrosis.

Increasing number of patients are on bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. Atypical femur fractures from bisphosphonates are often occult, often bilateral, with delayed healing. Patients on bisphosphonatetreatment should be advised to report any thigh or groin pain. Painful incomplete fractures need treatment with cephalomedullary nailing. Bone biology needs correcting by stopping bisphosphonatesand administering calcium & vitamin D supplements.

Implications: We need to raise awareness amongst treating clinicians and have national guidelines.

Bone metastases are the most common cause of cancer-related pain and often lead to other complications such as pathological fractures and spinal cord compression. Bisphosphonates (BP) are a class of potent anti-resorptive agents commonly prescribed to retard osteoporosis progression. Interestingly, BP may have indirect anti-tumour properties through negative effects on macrophages, osteoclasts, endothelial cells and their ability to suppress matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity. Currently, the use of bisphosphonates for cancer therapy is generally restricted to high dose systemic delivery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of direct local delivery of Zoledronate at the metastatic site in a mouse model of breast cancer metastasis to bone. Seven days following intra-tibial inoculation with MDA-MB-231 (N = 1× 105) breast cancer cells in athymic mice, the experimental group (N = 11) was treated by direct infusion of 2µg of Zoledronate into the tibial lesion (three times/week for three weeks) and compared to vehicle-treated mice (N = 5). The formation of bone metastases and growth of the lesions were followed up by weekly bioluminescence imaging. In a subsequent experiment, a comparison of the effects of local versus systemic delivery of Zoledronate on the formation of osteolytic bone metastases was carried in athymic mice (N = 15). Seven days following intra-tibial inoculation with MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, the systemic group (N = 5) was treated with Zoledronate (0.025mg/kg) once per week for four weeks and compared to systemic delivery of vehicle (N = 4). Following treatment, the mice were sacrificed, and micro-CT images of the right tibia were obtained. Bone volume to tissue volume ratio (BV/TV%) was determined using µ-CT biomarkers. The first experiment showed a statistically significant increase in mean bone volume/tissue volume ratio% (BV/TV%) in the treated group (7.0±1.54%) as compared to the control group (3.8±0.48%) (P <0.001, 95%CI=1.9–4.3). This corresponded to a net increase of 84.21% in response to Zoledronate treatment. Comparison between the local and systemic effects of Zoledronate also revealed a significant increase in the BV/TV% in the locally treated group (6.69±0.62%) when compared to the cohort administered systemic bisphosphonate treatment (4.03±0.44%) (P<0.001, 95%CI=1.24–3.20), corresponding to a net increase of 66.0%. These preliminary results suggest that high dose sustained release of Zoledronate can lead to a significant inhibition of tumor-induced osteolysis. Moreover, comparison between local and systemic delivery revealed that the effect of local bisphosphonate administration exceeds the benefits of systemic delivery in terms of osteolysis inhibition. Lastly, the noted effects of Zoledronate local delivery triggers the need for further assessment of its anti-tumour activity

Introduction. Bisphosphonates (BP) are the first-line therapy for preventing osteoporotic fragility fractures. However, concern regarding their efficacy is growing because bisphosphonate use is associated with over-suppression of remodeling. Animal studies have reported that BP therapy is associated with accumulation of micro-cracks (Fig. 1) and a reduction in bone mechanical properties, but the effect on humans has not been investigated. Therefore, our aim was to quantify the mechanical strength of bone treated with BP, and correlate this with the microarchitecture and density of micro-damage in comparison with untreated osteoporotic hip-fractured and non-fractured elderly controls. Methods. Trabecular bone cores from patients treated with BP were compared with patients who had not received any treatment for bone osteoporotic disease. Non-fractured cadaveric femora from individuals with no history of bone metabolic disease were also used as controls. Cores were imaged in high resolution (∼1.3µm) using Synchrotron X-ray tomography (Diamond Light Source Ltd.) The scans were used for structural and material analysis, then the cores were mechanically tested in compression. A novel classification system was devised to characterise features of micro-damage in the Synchrotron images: micro-cracks, diffuse damage and perforations. Synchrotron micro-CT stacks were visualised and analysed using ImageJ, Avizo and VGStudio MAX. Results. Our findings demonstrated that patients treated with BP (17.2 MPa) had significantly lower tissue strength than untreated fracture (24.0 MPa) and non-fracture controls (28.0 MPa). Yet treated and untreated hip-fracture patient's exhibited comparable bone microarchitecture, volume fraction, apparent and material density. The data also revealed that the BP group had the highest micro-damage density across all groups. The BP group (7.7/mm. 3. ) also exhibited significantly greater micro-crack density than the fracture (4.3/mm. 3. ) and non-fracture (4.1/mm. 3. ) controls. Furthermore, the BP group (1.9/mm. 3. ) demonstrated increased diffuse damage when compared to the fracture (0.3/mm. 3. ) and non-fracture (0.8/mm. 3. ) controls. In contrast, the BP group (1.9. mm. 3. ) had fewer perforations than fracture (3.0/mm. 3. ) and non-fracture controls (3.9/mm. 3. ). Discussion. Despite having comparable microarchitecture apparent and material density, patients taking BP exhibited weaker tissue strength compared to the controls. This weakness is likely to be the the result of the increased accumulation of micro-damage found in BP treated bone. BP inhibits bone remodelling, thereby reducing the number of perforated trabeculae, meanwhile over-suppression leads to the accumulation of micro-cracks and diffuse damage which reduce strength. Conclusion. In our subgroup of hip-fracture patients, BP therapy appeared to offer no mechanical advantage in resisting femoral fractures. BP accumulated micro-damage may have weakened the trabecular bone in the femoral head and neck thereby, therefore increasing the risk of a fracture during a trip or fall

Drug therapy forms an integral part of the management of many orthopaedic conditions. However, many medicines can produce serious adverse reactions if prescribed inappropriately, either alone or in combination with other drugs. Often these hazards are not appreciated. In response to this, the European Union recently issued legislation regarding safety measures which member states must adopt to minimise the risk of errors of medication.

In March 2014 the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and NHS England released a Patient Safety Alert initiative focussed on errors of medication. There have been similar initiatives in the United States under the auspices of The National Coordinating Council for Medication Error and The Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. These initiatives have highlighted the importance of informing and educating clinicians.

Here, we discuss common drug interactions and contra-indications in orthopaedic practice. This is germane to safe and effective clinical care.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:434–41.