Background. Anatomical reduction of unstable Lisfranc injuries is crucial. Evidence as to the best methods of surgical stabilization remains sparse, with small patient numbers a particular issue. Dorsal bridge plating offers rigid stability and joint preservation. The primary aim of this study was to assess the medium-term functional outcomes for patients treated with this technique at our centre. Additionally, we review for risk factors that influence outcomes. Methods. 85 patients who underwent open reduction and dorsal bridge plate fixation of unstable Lisfranc injuries between January 2014 and January 2019 were identified. Metalwork was not routinely removed. A retrospective review of case notes was conducted. The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire summary index (MOXFQ-Index) was the primary outcome measure, collected at final follow-up, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot scale, complications, and all-cause re-operation rates were secondary outcome measures. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors associated with poorer outcomes. Results. Mean follow-up 40.8 months (24–72). Mean MOXFQ-Index 27.0 (SD 7.1). Mean AOFAS score 72.6 (SD 11.6). 48/85 patients had injury patterns that included an intra-articular fracture and this was associated with poorer outcomes, with worse MOXFQ and AOFAS scores (both p < 0.001). 18 patients (21%) required the removal of metalwork for either prominence or stiffness. Female patients were more likely to require metalwork removal (OR 3.89, 95% CI 1.27 to 12.0, p = 0.02). Eight patients (9%) required secondary arthrodesis. Conclusions. This is the largest series of Lisfranc injuries treated with dorsal bridge plate fixation reported to date and the only to routinely retain metalwork. The technique is safe and effective. The presence of an intraarticular fracture is a poor prognostic indicator. Metalwork removal is more likely to be needed in female patients but routine removal may not be essential

Background. Research on midfoot injuries have primarily concentrated on the central column and the Lisfranc ligament without amassing evidence on lateral column injuries. Lateral column injuries have historically been treated with Kirschner wire fixation when encountered. Objective. Our aim in this study was to analyse lateral column injuries to the midfoot, their method of treatment and the radiological lateral column outcomes. Our nul hypothesis being that fixation is required to obtain and maintain lateral column alignment. Methods. Data was retrospectively collected from four centres on surgically treated midfoot fracture dislocations between 2011 and 2021. Radiographs were analysed using departmental PACS. All statistics was performed using SPSS 26. Results. A total of 235 cases were diagnosed as having a lateral column injury out of the 409 cases included. On cross tabulation, there was a significant association with having a central column injury (234/235, p<.001) and 70% of cases (166/235) also had an additional medial column injury. Of the 235 lateral column injuries, data was available regarding fixation radiographic alignment on 222 cases. There were 44 cases which underwent Kirschner wire fixation, 23 plate fixations and 3 screw fixations. Lateral column alignment loss was seen in 2.84% (4/141) of those which didn't undergo fixation, 13.64% (6/44) which underwent K wires, and 0 % in those fixed by screws or K wires. Conclusion. Lateral column injury occurs in over half of midfoot fractures in this study. It rarely occurs alone and is most commonly related to three column injuries. Nevertheless, following stabilisation of the central column, additional fixation of injuries to the lateral column do not appear beneficial. The use of a bridge plate to fix the central column appears protective and purely ligamentous injury was a higher risk than an injury that included the bone

Aims. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of bridge plating, screw fixation, and a combination of both methods for the treatment of Lisfranc fracture dislocations. Patients and Methods. A total of 108 patients were treated for a Lisfranc fracture dislocation over a period of nine years. Of these, 38 underwent transarticular screw fixation, 45 dorsal bridge plating, and 25 a combination technique. Injuries were assessed preoperatively according to the Myerson classification system. The outcome measures included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, the validated Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) functional tool, and the radiological Wilppula classification of anatomical reduction. Results. Significantly better functional outcomes were seen in the bridge plate group. These patients had a mean AOFAS score of 82.5 points, compared with 71.0 for the screw group and 63.3 for the combination group (p < 0.001). Similarly, the mean Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire score was 25.6 points in the bridge plate group, 38.1 in the screw group, and 45.5 in the combination group (p < 0.001). Functional outcome was dependent on the quality of reduction (p < 0.001). A trend was noted which indicated that plate fixation is associated with a better anatomical reduction (p = 0.06). Myerson types A and C2 significantly predicted a poorer functional outcome, suggesting that total incongruity in either a homolateral or divergent pattern leads to worse outcomes. The greater the number of columns fixed the worse the outcome (p < 0.001). Conclusion. Patients treated with dorsal bridge plating have better functional and radiological outcomes than those treated with transarticular screws or a combination technique. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:468–74

In developed nations Charcot arthropathy is most commonly caused by diabetes mellitus. Worldwide, leprosy remains the primary cause. All evidence points to a relationship between neurologic loss, continued loading activities and the development of unrecognized bone fragmentation. In type 2 diabetes, dysregulation of leptin biology causes bone loss and may be an important factor in precipitating Charcot events. Bone density studies show massive loss of bone in patients with ankle and hindfoot Charcot problems, but not midfoot problems. This suggests a different mechanism for collapse. Stable collapse with ulcer development in the midfoot can be treated with exostectomy. Realignment and fusion remain the mainstays of treatment for diabetic Charcot neuropathy, especially in the ankle and hindfoot. Bone mineralization deficiencies require special consideration of fixation techniques. Thin wire external fixation – either as primary fixation or to reinforce/neutralize other methods can be very helpful. Large bridging screws and carefully selected bridging plates are frequently also valuable to consider. Excessive immobilization periods (often double the normal amount of time) are generally required. The goal may be limited to a braceable, plantigrade foot

Aims

Surgical reconstruction of deformed Charcot feet carries a high risk of nonunion, metalwork failure, and deformity recurrence. The primary aim of this study was to identify the factors contributing to these complications following hindfoot Charcot reconstructions.

The management of unstable ankle fractures is challenging due the difficulty in differentiating between stable and unstable fracture patterns. The aim of our study was to examine our practice and to determine if the operative management of unstable ankle fractures resulted in significantly improved radiographic parameters. Between June 2008 and December 2008, we identified all skeletally mature patients who were diagnosed with an ankle fracture after having radiographs in the radiology department at our institution. We analysed the case notes and radiographs of these patients retrospectively. The fractures were classified according to the Weber and Lauge-Hansen classification. Radiographs were evaluated for shortening of the fibula, widening of the joint space, or malrotation of the fibula. Three measurements were used to ascertain whether the correct fibular length has been restored – the circle sign, the talocrural angle, and the tibiofibular (or Shenton) line. Of 1064 patients who had radiographs, 123 patients sustained a fracture of the ankle. There were 61 females and 62 males, with a median age of 47 years. There were 20 Weber A, 80 Weber B and 12 Weber C ankle fractures. Eleven fractures could not be classified according to the Weber classification. According to the Lauge-Hansen classification there were 44 Supination-External rotation (SER) stage II fractures, 35 Supination-External rotation (SER) stage IV fractures, and 7 Pronation-External rotation (PER) stage III fractures. In the unstable SER stage IV fractures, 30 of the 35 patients had operative treatment and there was no statistically significant difference in the average Talocrural angles in the operative (78.9°) and nonoperative groups (83.4°). None of the patients with an SER stage IV fracture managed nonoperatively had an adequate circle sign compared to 14 of the 30 patients in the operative group who had an adequate circle sign. In the PER stage III fractures 4 of the 7 patients had operative treatment. The average Talocrural angle in the operative group was 79.1° versus 75.3° in the nonoperative group, with all patients in the operative group having an adequate circle sign compared to none in the nonoperative group. The patient numbers in the PER stage III group however were too small to show a statistically significant difference. In 4 patients with unstable fracture patterns, the use of a third tubular plate to bridge a fibula fracture without an inter-fragmentary lag screw led to inadequate restoration of fibular length in all cases. It is important to recognise unstable ankle fracture patterns and, in patients treated operatively, to restore fibular length and rotation. Operative management of unstable SER stage IV and PER stage III ankle fractures can restore normal radiographic parameters. We highlight certain technical pitfalls in restoring fibular length such as the inappropriate use of the semi-tubular plate as a bridging plate

We present a series of 16 patients treated between 1993 and 2006 who had a failed total ankle replacement converted to an arthrodesis using bone grafting with internal fixation. We used tricortical autograft from the iliac crest to preserve the height of the ankle, the malleoli and the subtalar joint. A successful arthrodesis was achieved at a mean of three months (1.5 to 4.5) in all patients except one, with rheumatoid arthritis and severe bone loss, who developed a nonunion and required further fixation with an intramedullary nail at one year after surgery, before obtaining satisfactory fusion. The post-operative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score improved to a mean of 70 (41 to 87) with good patient satisfaction. From this series and an extensive review of the literature we have found that rates of fusion after failed total ankle replacement in patients with degenerative arthritis are high. We recommend our method of arthrodesis in this group of patients. A higher rate of nonunion is associated with rheumatoid arthritis which should be treated differently.