INTRODUCTION:. Acetabular retroversion has been implicated as a risk factor for the development of early hip osteoarthritis. In clinical practice standard osseous signs such as the cross-over sign (COS) and the posterior wall sign (PWS) are widely used to establish the diagnosis of acetabular retroversion on plain radiographs. Despite standardized radiological evaluation protocols, an increased pelvic tilt can lead to a misdiagnosis of acetabular retroversion in AP radiographs and 2D MR or CT scans. Previous studies have shown that the elimination of observer bias using a standardized methodology based on 3D-CT models and the anterior pelvic plane (APP) for the assessment of
Purpose. Diagnosis of acetabular retroversion is essential in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), but its assessment from radiographs is complicated by pelvic tilt and the two-dimensional nature of plain films. We performed a study to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the crossover sign (COS) and the posterior wall sign (PWS) in identifying acetabular retroversion. Method.
It has been suggested that metal ion levels are indicative of in vivo bearing performance of metal-on-metal hip replacements. A cobalt or Chromium level of 7μg/L or higher is proposed to be indicative of a bearing malfunction and the need for clinical intervention. Component design, size, acetabular orientation, patient gender and activity level have been suggested as factors leading to accelerated wear and elevated metal ions. The contact patch to rim (CPR) distance is a calculation that describes the distance from the point where a theoretical joint reaction force intersects the cup to the acetabular rim for a patient in standing position, dependent on the coverage, size, and orientation of the acetabular component. It has been suggested that CPR distance determines the hip joint susceptibility to edge loading, and the risk for increased wear and high ion levels (Langton et al JBJS Br 91: 2009). This study examined the effects of patient activity, gender, and CPR distance on serum metal ion concentrations in a series of patients treated with one type of metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MMHRA) performed by one surgeon. 182 patients (73 females and 109 males)with a unilateral Conserve Plus (WMT, TN USA) MMHRA and had who had provided blood for metal ion analysis data from December 2000 to June 2011 were retrospectively studied. Only measurements made more than 12 months after surgery were included in order to exclude hips that had yet to reach steady-state wear. For patients with multiple draws, the most recent qualifying draw was used. Activity level was assessed by the UCLA activity score. The mean age was 51.5 years (20.0 to 77.5 years). The mean follow-up time for the last blood draw was 70 months (range, 12 to 165). Serum cobalt (CoS) and chromium (CrS) levels were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry in a specialized trace element lab. Using acetabular abduction and anteversion measured by EBRA, component size, and reported coverage angle of the acetabular component, the CPR distance was calculated as previously described. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify significant relationships between high metal ion levels (7 μg/L or greater) and gender, activity and CPR distance. The median
Bone demonstrates good healing capacity, with a variety of strategies being utilized to enhance this healing. One potential strategy that has been suggested is the use of stem cells to accelerate healing. The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, WHO-ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, as well as reference checking of included studies. The inclusion criteria for the study were: population (any adults who have sustained a fracture, not including those with pre-existing bone defects); intervention (use of stem cells from any source in the fracture site by any mechanism); and control (fracture healing without the use of stem cells). Studies without a comparator were also included. The outcome was any reported outcomes. The study design was randomized controlled trials, non-randomized or observational studies, and case series.Aims
Methods