A retrospective follow-up study was done, assessing regional practices in acute cervical reduction in hospitals in the Western Cape. The constitutional court ruled on the urgency in managing cervical dislocations, and our task is to ensure that medical treatment is optimized to comply with best medical practice and the apex court. A questionnaire was distributed and completed by emergency departments at each hospital, the results retrieved, analysed, and compared to a similar survey done in 2016. Protocols for managing cervical spine dislocations had improved from 80% having no protocols to only over half of facilities (52,6%) not having protocols in place. Inadequate equipment availability remained a problem with only 50% of facilities having adequate equipment available in 2016 to 43,6% in 2023. 10,3% of participants did not know if there was equipment available. In terms of knowledge, there remained poor formal training with a drop from 93% participants identifying that the main indication to attempt emergency cervical reduction was acute cervical dislocation with worsening neurology, to only 46,2%. However, there was an increase in the number of participants who thought reduction was safe. The same percentage of participants from 2016 to 2023 would attempt emergency cervical reduction if given adequate training. Previously we found that most Western Cape hospitals had inadequate protocols, training, and equipment for cervical reductions. In 2023, more hospitals in the Province have protocols in place for cervical reductions and the same percentage of doctors would attempt emergency cervical reduction with adequate training. However, equipment and training for management of acute cervical dislocations has not improved. We conclude that most Western Cape Hospitals are unprepared to adequately manage acute cervical dislocations

Cervical bifacet dislocations are devastating injuries and require early reduction and surgical stabilization. Closed reduction is safe and neurological deterioration is rare. Pre-reduction MRI can cause clinical uncertainty as to the safety of closed reduction when a significant sequestrated disc is found. This study explores the direct cord pressures in a bifacet dislocation model with the use of fresh frozen cadaver cervical spines and a Tekscan Pressure Measurement System. Method. Surgical dislocations were created and pressure monitors inserted into the canal. Pressures on the cord from the posterior-superior edge of the caudal body as well as that from the cranial body were assessed at the level of the dislocation. The effects of the presence of a disc and its size, reduction angles and level of dislocation before and during closed reduction were evaluated. Results. The average dislocated spinal cord pressures were measured at 3.81 kPa and increased to 20.22 kPa under traction. This decreased to 1.295 kPa after cervical spine reduction. Average cord pressures as well as peak loading pressures were shown to increase with the increasing size of the prolapsed disc and diminished once the spine was reduced. Conclusion. This model provides additional insight into cervical spine dislocation and the contribution of disc prolapse to cord injury. NO DISCLOSURES