Background. With an ageing population, the incidence of traumatic injuries in those aged over 65 years is increasing. As a result, strategies for dealing with these patients must be developed. At present the standard management of open tibial fractures is described by the BOAST4 guidelines. We describe our experience of managing elderly patients presenting with open tibial fractures to our Major Trauma Centre. Methods. Patients were identified via prospectively collected national and departmental databases. Data collated included patient demographics, injury details, orthopaedic and plastic surgery operative details, and long term outcomes. Results. Between April 2013 and January 2016, 97 patients aged over 65 were admitted with open fractures, 38 of these were open tibial fractures. 10 patients required soft tissue reconstruction for Gustillo and Anderson IIIB tibial fractures (age range 67–95). In this group there were 4 midshaft (AO 42), 1 proximal (AO 41) and 5 distal (AO 43) fractures. Five patients were treated with internal fixation and 5 with circular frames. The median length of hospital stay was 33 days (range 16–113 days), 50% longer than comparable patients under 65. Four patients received pedicled local flaps and six underwent free tissue transfer. Of the 6 patients treated with free tissue transfer, one required pre-operative femoral angioplasty. There were no flap losses. Two patients had fasciocutaneous flaps, one an EDB flap and one gastrocnemius flap. All patients went on to unite and return to their pre-morbid weight-bearing status (2 using frames, 3 using sticks, 5 independent). Discussion. Although the literature suggests a significantly higher complication rate in elderly patients with open fractures, we have demonstrated comparable rates of flap survival and bony union to those observed in younger patients.
The Peri-Implant and PeriProsthetic Survival AnalysiS (PIPPAS) study aimed to investigate the risk factors for one-year mortality of femoral peri-implant fractures (FPIFs). This prospective, multicentre, observational study involved 440 FPIF patients with a minimum one-year follow-up. Data on demographics, clinical features, fracture characteristics, management, and mortality rates were collected and analyzed using both univariate and multivariate analyses. FPIF patients were elderly (median age 87 years (IQR 81 to 92)), mostly female (82.5%, n = 363), and frail: median clinical frailty scale 6 (IQR 4 to 7), median Pfeiffer 4 (1 to 7), median age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) 6 (IQR 5 to 7), and 58.9% (n = 250) were American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III.Aims
Methods
To explore staff experiences of a multicentre pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing intramedullary nails and circular frame external fixation for segmental tibial fractures. A purposeful sample of 19 staff (nine surgeons) involved in the study participated in an interview. Interviews explored participants’ experience and views of the study and the treatments. The interviews drew on phenomenology, were face-to-face or by telephone, and were analyzed using thematic analysis.Aims
Methods
